Monday of the 9th week after Pentecost

Mystically the rolling away of the stone implies the disclosure of the sacraments, which were formerly hidden and closed up by the letter of the law. The law was written on stone. Indeed in the case of each of us, when we acknowledge our faith in the Lord's passion and resurrection, his tomb, which had been closed, is opened up.

The Lord spoke that word to Moses, and Moses, having heard the word, ascended the mountain and received two tablets of stone and the Law and the commandments. In this it is signified that if we wish to arrive at an understanding of the commandments of God, we must ascend the mountain, that is, to the eminence of the mind, because according to the impression of the eternal light the law of nature has been given to us, and according to that light we have received the teachings of the divine law.

Being of itself first falls upon the soul. Now being is twofold, namely created and uncreated, and accordingly justice is twofold: one, by which we are ordered to uncreated being, and another, by which we are ordered to created being. And according to this twofold justice a twofold tablet was given to Moses, namely the first and the second. In the first tablet are contained the commandments by which we are ordered to uncreated being, that is, God. In the second tablet are contained the commandments by which we are ordered to created being, namely our neighbor.

Just as God completed the whole world in six days and rested on the seventh, so the lesser world may be led in most orderly fashion through six stages of successive illuminations to the repose of contemplation. As a figure of this, one ascended by six steps to the throne of Solomon; the Seraphim that Isaiah saw had six wings; after six days the Lord called Moses from the midst of the cloud, and Christ after six days, as is said in Matthew, led the disciples up the mountain and was transfigured before them.

If, then, any one desires to see this Image of God, he must love God, that he may be loved by God; and be no longer a servant but a friend, because he has kept the commandments of God, that he may enter into the cloud where God is.

Christ was such a Center in His ascension. It is written in Exodus: "Moses passed into the midst of the cloud, and there he stayed for forty days and forty nights." And this is what Christ was in His ascension.

Do you now recognize the harm caused by intemperance? Look in turn at the instances of good behavior due to fasting. The great Moses, after keeping his fast for forty days, was able to get the tables of the law. When he came down from the mountain and saw the people's sin, the tablets which he had been successful in obtaining through such intercession he threw down and smashed, thinking it was preposterous that an indulgent and sinful people should receive laws of the Lord's own making.

Moses himself was so purified and freed from his body by a fast of forty days that his whole self took on a glorious appearance of divinity. Still in the darkness of our body, he gleamed with the full radiance of divinity. The eyes of mortals could not gaze upon him who, long nourished by the substance of God, had forgotten all about the aids provided by mortals' food. From this he learned that the sustenance of life does not fail those who live in God's sight and with him.

And like this holy man the blessed Moses also was twice deemed worthy to go unto the thick darkness and to receive the law upon the tablets; and he was made pure by fasting like unto this, and then he was deemed worthy of the terrible sight.

You may know that Peter, James and John did not taste death and were worthy to see the glory of the resurrection. It says "about eight days after these words, he took those three alone and led them onto the mountain." Why is it that he says "eight days after these words"? He that hears the words of Christ and believes will see the glory of Christ at the time of the resurrection. The resurrection happened on the eighth day, and most of the psalms were written "For the eighth." It shows us that he said that he who because of the Word of God shall lose his own soul will save it, since he renews his promises at the resurrection. But Matthew and Mark say that they were taken after six days. We may say this means after six thousand years, because a thousand years in God's sight are as one day. We counted more than six thousand years. We prefer to understand six days as a symbol, because God created the works of the world in six days, so that we understand works through the time and the world through the works.

Only three, three chosen, were led to the mountain.… This perhaps means none can see the glory of the resurrection except he who has preserved the mystery of the Trinity intact with the undefiled purity of faith. Peter, who received the keys of the kingdom, John, to whom his mother was entrusted, and James, who was the first to mount a bishop's throne, ascended.

Or, Peter went up, who received the keys of the kingdom of heaven; John, to whom was committed our Lord's mother; James, who first suffered martyrdom. (Acts 12:1.)

Now in a mystical manner, after the words above said, is exhibited the transfiguration of Christ, since he who hears the words of Christ, and believes, shall see the glory of His resurrection. For, on the eighth day the resurrection took place. Hence also several Psalms are written, 'for the eighth,' (pro octava.) or perhaps it was that He might make manifest what He had said, that he who for the word of God shall lose his own life, shall save it, seeing that He will make good His promises at the resurrection.

But Matthew and Mark have related that He took them with Him after six days, of which we may say after 6000 years, (for a thousand years in the Lord's sight are as one day;) but more than 6000 years are reckoned. We had rather then take the six days symbolically, that in six days the works of the world were completed, that by the time we may understand the works, by the works the world. And so the times of the world being finished, the resurrection to come is declared; or because, He who has ascended above the world, and has passed beyond the moments of this life, is waiting, seated as it were on a high place, for the everlasting fruit of the resurrection.

I should think that in the three who are taken up into the mountain, was contained in a mystery the human race, because from the three sons of Noah sprung the whole race of man; I did not perceive that they were chosen out. Three then are chosen to ascend the mountain, because none can see the glory of the resurrection, but they who have preserved the mystery of the Trinity with inviolable purity of faith.

And it came to pass about eight days after these sayings, that he took Peter and James and John. On the eighth day, the Lord manifests to the disciples the glory of the promised future blessedness, so that, with the sweetness of heavenly life shown, he may refresh the hearts of all who can hear these things, and with the number of eight days, he may teach that the true joy of the resurrection is to come. For he himself rose from the dead on the eighth day, that is, after the sixth day of the Sabbath, on which he ascended the cross, and the seventh day of the Sabbath, on which he rested in the tomb. And we too, after the six ages of this world, in which we rejoice to suffer and labor for the Lord, and the seventh age of the rest of souls, which is meanwhile in another life, will rise again in a kind of eighth age. For that which Matthew and Mark say of the Lord being transfigured after six days does not result in the order of time, nor in the reason of the mystery. Because they only place the intermediate days, therefore they say absolutely that it happened after six days: he here includes both the first and the last, and thus more fittingly mentions about eight days. And this one signifies that the saints must rest from labor after six ages of the world, while the other one designates that we shall rise in the eighth time. Hence also fittingly the sixth psalm is inscribed For the eighth, whose beginning is, O Lord, rebuke me not in your anger. Because indeed after the six ages in which it is permitted to work, it is necessary to insist in prayers that in the eighth time of retribution we are not rebuked by an angry judge. Which indeed the Lord himself wanted to teach us in this place by the example of his prayer being shown, about which it follows:

And he went up into the mountain to pray. He indeed went up into the mountain to pray, and thus to be transfigured, to show that those who expect the fruit of the resurrection, who desire to see the king in his beauty, ought to dwell in mind in the heights and devote themselves to continuous prayers. He takes only three disciples with him, because many are called, but few are chosen (Matthew XX). And those who here keep the faith with which they are imbued, with an incorrupt mind of the Holy Trinity, deserve to rejoice there in its eternal vision.

For as He rose from the dead after the seventh day of the Sabbath, during which He lay in the tomb, we also after the six ages of this world, and the seventh of the rest of souls, which meanwhile is passed in another life, shall rise again as it were in the eighth age.

Hence He ascends the mountain to pray and be transfigured, to show that those who expect the fruit of the resurrection, and desire to see the King in His glory, ought to have the dwelling place of their hearts on high, and be ever on their knees in prayer.

Now it came to pass after these words. After the exhortation to the harshness of the way, the Evangelist subjoins the showing of the sweetness of glory. He proceeds in this order. For first he describes the revelation of the promised glory; second, the consideration of the revealed glory, at the passage: But Peter, and those who were with him; third, the confirmation of the revelation shown, at the passage: Now it came to pass on the following day, and this indeed he does through the admirable healing of the demoniac.

The revelation of future glory the Evangelist describes in two ways: first, as to the antecedents; second, as to the concomitants, at the passage: And it came to pass, while he was praying, etc. — Now it should be known that with regard to the Transfiguration of Christ there were three antecedents or disposing factors, namely the requirement of the appointed time, the selection of companions, and the eminence of place. Now these three are what God observes in communicating divine revelations.

First, therefore, as to the requirement of the appointed time, he says: Now it came to pass after these words, about eight days. For since the Lord had promised that he would show glory to his disciples, and "the Lord does not delay his promise," as is said in Second Peter three, therefore between the promise and its fulfillment only a small space of time ought to have intervened, namely one week. A figure of this preceded in the betrothal of Rachel, concerning which Laban said to Jacob: "Complete the week of days of this union, and I will give you this one also."

And he indicates this when he says, about eight days having passed, because he did this on the eighth day, the order of the week having come full circle, which are not eight complete days on account of the incompleteness of part of the first and last day; and in Matthew 17 and Mark 9 the first and last days are not counted, but only the complete intermediate ones. For there it is said: "It came to pass after six days," in which there is no contradiction, but one statement explains the other. Moreover, the Holy Spirit willed it to be expressed in both ways for the intimation of the mystery. For since God fashioned the world in six days and rested after the sixth day, therefore one must labor for six days and afterward devote oneself to contemplation. Therefore, to intimate this, Matthew says: "After six days." But since perfect and supreme rest and contemplation do not come before the eighth day, namely the resurrection, therefore he says here: eight days. And this is what is said in the Gloss by Bede and Ambrose: After these words, etc.

Second, as regards the choice of companions, it is said: And he took Peter, John, and James. He took these three as the more intimate and familiar, just as he took them above in chapter eight, at the raising of the girl. Therefore he takes three to commend the mystery of the Trinity and for the firmness of testimony, whence it is said in the Gloss: "So that the whole world might believe through three suitable witnesses." Moreover, he especially chose these three on account of the eminence which he discerned in them: because Peter was to be first in governing the Church, as Matthew 16 says: "You are Peter," etc. "I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven." And James was to be the first among the Apostles to be killed for the multiplication of the Church: in Acts 12 it is said of Herod that "he killed James, the brother of John, with the sword." John was preeminent in guarding the Mother: John 19: "Jesus, seeing his Mother and the disciple standing," etc. — Or he took these three for figural instruction. Through them the threefold state of those to be saved in the Church is designated, namely prelates in Peter, actives in James, contemplatives in John, just as in Noah, Daniel, and Job; or in Peter the married, in James the continent, in John the virgins, according to the threefold continence, to which is owed the thirtyfold, sixtyfold, and hundredfold fruit. For we read of the wife of Peter, of the virginity of John, but of James neither is said expressly.

Third, with regard to the eminence of the place, he adds: And he went up into the mountain to pray. For a mountain is an elevated place, extending from earthly things toward heavenly ones, and therefore suited to contemplation and prayer. Such was this mountain; hence it is said in Matthew 17 that "he led them up into a high mountain apart," so that they might be separated from the crowd and from earthly things. And such places are suited to divine revelations; hence in Exodus 3 it is said of Moses that "when he had driven the flock to the inner parts of the desert, he came to the mountain of God, Horeb," where the Lord appeared in the fire of the bush. Similarly in the receiving of the Law; Exodus 24: "The Lord said to Moses: Come up to me on the mountain and be there, and I will give you two tablets of stone." Similarly in the surveying of the promised land, according to Deuteronomy last chapter: "Moses went up from the plains of Moab to Mount Nebo, to the top of Pisgah, over against Jericho, and the Lord showed him all the land of Gilead as far as Dan." - From these things, therefore, it is gathered that a mountain is suited to divine apparitions, instructions, and contemplations. Hence Bede in the Gloss: "He ascended the mountain to pray, to indicate that those who await the resurrection ought to raise their minds to things on high and persist in continual prayers," and this on a mountain on account of its eminence, according to Deuteronomy 33: "The Lord came from Sinai and rose up from Seir upon us, he appeared from Mount Paran, and with him thousands of saints. In his right hand a fiery law." "And those who draw near to his feet shall receive of his doctrine"; and thus three things appear that dispose toward the divine Transfiguration, even according to the literal sense.

Spiritually, however, in these three things there is very great instruction for those wishing to attain to seeing the Lord's transfiguration through the ecstasy of contemplation. For in the number of days are given to be understood the grades of contemplations succeeding one another, just as day succeeds day. And according to Matthew, six days are numbered to indicate six grades of contemplation, which Richard sets forth in his book On the Ark, or On Contemplation, speaking thus in the first book, sixth chapter: "There are six kinds of contemplation entirely divided from one another and among themselves. The first is in imagination and according to imagination alone: the second is in imagination according to reason: the third is in reason according to imagination: the fourth is in reason according to reason: the fifth is above reason, but not beyond reason; the sixth is above reason and seems to be beyond reason. Two therefore are in imagination, two in reason, two in intelligence." — The first two concern corporeal things, the second two concern spiritual things, the third two concern everlasting and incomprehensible things. — These six kinds, moreover, are understood through the six days and through the six steps by which one ascended to Solomon's throne, according to that passage in 3 Kings 10, that "Solomon made for himself a great throne of ivory and overlaid it with exceedingly bright gold, which had six steps." And the number of perfection agrees with this: for six is the first perfect number.

But according to Luke, eight days are counted. For Luke treats of this apparition insofar as it expresses the glory after the resurrection: which is clear, because there he touches upon sleep and awakening; therefore he indicates eight grades, of which seven are on the way, and the eighth is reserved in the homeland. Concerning these seven, Augustine says in the book On the Magnitude of the Soul, at the end: "For those ascending upward," he says, "let the first step be called, for the sake of teaching, animation; the second, sense: the third, art: the fourth, virtue: the fifth, tranquility: the sixth, entry: the seventh, contemplation"; after which nothing remains but the beatific vision: and thus there are approximately eight days. And as he says, "the first is concerning the body, the second through the body, the third about the body, the fourth toward itself, the fifth in itself, the sixth toward God, the seventh with God." And these steps do not only denote steps of contemplation, but those by which one arrives at contemplation.

A certain one, however, simple in speech but not in knowledge, Brother Giles, who has been proven to be most frequently caught up in rapture, distinguishes the grades thus, saying: There are seven grades of contemplation: the first is fire: the second is unction: the third is ecstasy: the fourth, contemplation: the fifth, taste: the sixth, rest: the seventh, glory: after which nothing remains but everlasting happiness.

By these seven days, therefore, one arrives at the eighth day of glory: which the Holy Spirit willed to designate in the assignment of times.

By the three persons taken up, we are given to understand the three virtues necessary for contemplation, namely faith, hope, charity: faith, through Peter, whose name is interpreted as "the one who recognizes"; hope, through James the wrestler; through John, in whom is grace, charity. Without these wings, however, no one can ascend to the heights. Or by the three persons we understand the three dispositions necessary for the contemplative soul, namely diligence, discipline, and grace: the first in Peter, the second in James, the third in John. For it is necessary that the understanding be illuminated, the concupiscence be tamed, and the affection be inflamed, so that we may be carried upward with the Lord. If any of these is lacking, the work of contemplation perishes. — Or by these three persons are understood the three modes of ascending to the summit of contemplation. For in one mode one ascends by the way of splendor, and blessed Augustine teaches this mode of ascending, and this is designated through Peter. In another mode one ascends by the way of sorrow and groaning, and this is in James, and this mode is common to those who pray. In the third mode, by the way of love, and Dionysius teaches this; and this is designated through John: and this is the most excellent among all, in which grace moves most powerfully: in the first, however, diligence or knowledge avails much; the second mode, however, is as it were mixed between grace and natural and acquired diligence.

By the place, however, into which he ascended, the eminence of the contemplative life can rightly be understood. For a mountain is a place of teaching: whence it is said in Matthew 5 that "Jesus went up on the mountain, and when he had sat down," etc. And from this we are given to understand that the contemplative life abounds in knowledge, and therefore in the person of contemplatives Isaiah says, in chapter 2: "Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord and to the house of the God of Jacob, and he will teach us," etc.; whence also it is said of Moses in Exodus 24 that "he went up on the mountain and was there forty days and forty nights," and then he received the Law.

A mountain is also a place of sacrifice, according to that passage in Genesis 22: "Take your only-begotten son, whom you love, Isaac, and offer him to me upon one of the mountains which I shall show you"; and Exodus 3: "When you have led the people out of Egypt, you shall sacrifice to God upon this mountain." From which it is gathered that the contemplative life abounds in devotion: whence the contemplative soul in Song of Songs 4: "I will go to the mountain of myrrh and to the hill of frankincense," etc. A mountain is also a place of burning on account of the rays of the sun; whence Ecclesiasticus 43: "The sun burning the mountains in three ways and breathing out fiery rays"; and this on account of its great radiance, according to that passage in 1 Maccabees 6: "The sun shone upon the golden and bronze shields, and the mountains gleamed from them like lamps of fire." From which it is given to understand that the contemplative life abounds in charity: as a sign of which it is said in Exodus 19: "The whole of Mount Sinai was smoking, because the Lord God had descended upon it in fire."

A mountain is also a place of refuge; whence Genesis 19: "Save yourself on the mountain"; and in Matthew 24 it is said, when persecution is imminent: "Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains." From which it is understood that the contemplative life abounds in defense: whence in the person of the contemplative man it is said in the Psalm: "I have lifted up my eyes to the mountains, whence help shall come to me." A mountain is also a place of silence: whence it is said in 3 Kings 19 that Elijah came to the mountain of God, Horeb, "and" "he stayed in a cave"; and concerning Christ, in Matthew 14, that "he went up on the mountain alone to pray." From which it is understood that the contemplative life abounds in tranquility: whence concerning contemplatives it is said in the Psalm: "Let the mountains receive peace for the people, and the hills justice."

A mountain is also a place of pasture, according to that passage in Job 39: "He surveys the mountains of his pasture and every green thing"; Ezekiel 34: "In the richest pastures I shall feed them; on the high mountains of Israel shall be their pastures." From which it is understood that the contemplative life abounds in sweetness: whence Joel, in the last chapter, concerning contemplation: "In that day the mountains shall drip sweetness, and the hills shall flow with milk and honey."

Finally, a mountain is a place of eminence, according to that passage in Isaiah 2: "The mountain of the house of the Lord shall be prepared on the summit of the mountains"; and concerning Elijah it is said in 3 Kings 18 that "Elijah ascended to the summit of the mountain"; and it follows afterward that he saw a little cloud rising from the sea. From which we understand that the contemplative life superabounds in upward agility: as a sign of which the Lord ascended into heaven from the Mount of Olives; and concerning the holy soul it is said in the figure of Anna in Tobit 11 that "she sat on the brow of the mountain," because in the person of such souls it is said: "Our conversation is in heaven," Philippians 3.

From these things can be gathered the excellence of the contemplative life, and how greatly it is to be desired. For it is full of discretion, full of devotion, full of charity, full of security, full of tranquility, full of sweetness, full of agility.

The Transfiguration and the walking on the water are glimpses of the beauty and the effortless power over all matter which will belong to men when they are really waked by God.

"I say to you, there are some of those standing here who shall not taste of death until they have seen the kingdom of God." … By the "kingdom of God" he means the sight of the glory in which he will appear at his revelation to the inhabitants of earth. He will come in the glory of God the Father and not in a humble condition like ours. How did he make those who received the promise spectators of a thing so wonderful? He goes up into the mountain taking three chosen disciples with him. He is transformed to such a surpassing and godlike brightness that his garments even glittered with rays of fire and seemed to flash like lightning.

Not as though His body changed its human form, but a certain glistening glory overspread it.

Our Lord, when He made known to His disciples the great mystery of His second coming, that it might not seem that they were to believe in His words only, proceeds to works, manifesting to them, through the eyes of their faith, the image of His kingdom; as it follows, And it came to pass about an eight days after these sayings, he took Peter and John and James, and went up into a mountain to pray.

(Orat. de Trans fig. §. 8.) Matthew and Mark indeed say that the transfiguration took place on the sixth day after the promise made to the disciples, but Luke on the eighth. But there is no disagreement in these testimonies, but they who make the number six, taking off a day at each end, that is, the first and the last, the day on which He makes the promise, and that on which He fulfilled it, have reckoned only the intervening ones, but He who makes the number eight, has counted in each of the two days above mentioned. But why were not all called, but only some, to behold the sight? There was only one indeed who was unworthy to see the divinity, namely Judas, according to the word of Isaiah, Let the wicked be taken away, that he should not behold the glory of God. (Isai. 26:10 LXX.) If then he alone had been sent away, he might have, as it were from envy, been provoked to greater wickedness. Henceforward He takes away from the traitor every pretext for his treachery, seeing that He left below the rest of the company of the Apostles. But He took with Him three, that in the mouths of two or three witnesses every word should be established. He took Peter, indeed, because He wished to show him that the witness he had borne to Him was confirmed by the witness of the Father, and that he was as it were to preside over the whole Church. He took with Him James, who was to be the first of all the disciples to die for Christ; but He took John as the clearest singer of the sacred doctrine, that having seen the glory of the Son, which submits not to time, he might sound forth, In the beginning was the Word. (John 1:1.)

(ut sup. 10.) Servants however pray in one way; our Lord prayed in another. For the prayer of the servant is offered up by the lifting up of the mind to God, but the holy mind of Christ, (who was hypostatically [ὑπόστασιν] united to God,) prayed, that He might lead us by the hand to the ascent, whereby we mount up in prayer to God, and teach us that He is not opposed to God, but reverences the Father as His beginning; (ὡς ἀρχὴν ἑαυτὸν) nay, even tempting the tyrant, who sought from Him whether He were God, (which the power of His miracles declared,) He concealed as it were under the bait a hook; that he who had deceived man with the hope of divinity might fitly himself be caught with the clothing of humanity. Prayer is the revelation of Divine glory; as it follows, And as he prayed, the fashion of his countenance was altered.

You ought to be very much ashamed of yourself on this account too, for permitting him to appear on the retired mountain in the company of Moses and Elias, whom he had come to destroy. This, to be sure, was what he wished to be understood as the meaning of that voice from heaven: "This is my beloved Son, hear Him"—Him, that is, not Moses or Elias any longer. The voice alone, therefore, was enough, without the display of Moses and Elias; for, by expressly mentioning whom they were to hear, he must have forbidden all others from being heard.

He selects from His disciples three witnesses of the impending vision and voice. And this is just the way of the Creator. "In the mouth of three witnesses," says He, "shall every word be established." He withdraws to a mountain. In the nature of the place I see much meaning. For the Creator had originally formed His ancient people on a mountain both with visible glory and His voice. It was only right that the New Testament should be attested on such an elevated spot as that whereon the Old Testament had been composed; under a like covering of cloud also, which nobody will doubt, was condensed out of the Creator's air.

But further, if Christ reproves the scribes and Pharisees, sitting in the official chair of Moses, but not doing what they taught, what kind of (supposition) is it that He Himself withal should set upon His own official chair men who were mindful rather to enjoin—(but) not likewise to practise—sanctity of the flesh, which (sanctity) He had in all ways recommended to their teaching and practising?—first by His own example, then by all other arguments; while He tells (them) that "the kingdom of heavens" is "children's;" while He associates with these (children) others who, after marriage, remained (or became) virgins; while He calls (them) to (copy) the simplicity of the dove, a bird not merely innocuous, but modest too, and whereof one male knows one female; while He denies the Samaritan woman's (partner to be) a husband, that He may show that manifold husbandry is adultery; while, in the revelation of His own glory, He prefers, from among so many saints and prophets, to have with him Moses and Elias—the one a monogamist, the other a voluntary celibate (for Elias was nothing else than John, who came "in the power and spirit of Elias"); while that "man gluttonous and toping," the "frequenter of luncheons and suppers, in the company of publicans and sinners," sups once for all at a single marriage, though, of course, many were marrying (around Him); for He willed to attend (marriages) only so often as (He willed) them to be.

On the other hand, he whose "heart" was habitually found "lifted up" rather than fattened up, who in forty days and as many nights maintained a fast above the power of human nature, while spiritual faith subministered strength (to his body), both saw with his eyes God's glory, and heard with his ears God's voice, and understood with his heart God's law: while He taught him even then (by experience) that man liveth not upon bread alone, but upon every word of God; in that the People, though fatter than he, could not constantly contemplate even Moses himself, fed as he had been upon God, nor his leanness, sated as it had been with His glory! Deservedly, therefore, even while in the flesh, did the Lord show Himself to him, the colleague of His own fasts, no less than to Elijah. For Elijah withal had, by this fact primarily, that he had imprecated a famine, already sufficiently devoted himself to fasts: "The Lord liveth," he said, "before whom I am standing in His sight, if there shall be dew in these years, and rain-shower."

Or, He takes these with Him as men who were able to conceal this thing, and reveal it to no one else. But going up into a mountain to pray, He teaches us to pray solitary, and going up, into stooping to earthly things.

Or else, according to your capacity is the word either lessened or increased to you, and unless you ascend the summit of a higher wisdom, you behold not what glory there is in the word of God. Now the garments of the Word, are the discourses of the Scriptures, and certain clothings of the Divine mind; and as His raiment shone white, so in the eyes of your understanding, the sense of the divine words becomes clear. Hence after Moses, Elias; that is, the Law and the Prophets in the Word. For neither can the Law exist without the Word, nor the Prophet, unless he prophesied of the Son of God.

And it came to pass, while he was praying, the appearance of his face was altered, and his clothing became white and dazzling. The Savior transfigured did not lose the substance of true flesh, but showed the glory of future resurrection, either his or ours. Just as he appeared then to the apostles, so shall he appear to all the elect after judgment. For in the very time of judging both the good and the evil, he will be seen in the form of a servant, so that the impious who spurned him, the Jews who denied him, the soldiers who crucified him, Pilate and Herod who judged him, may recognize the judge. The clothing of the Lord, however, is taken to mean the chorus of his saints, whom the Apostle glorifying says: For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ (Galatians 3). This same attire, while the Lord remained on earth, appeared humble and similar to others, but as he sought the mountain, it shone with new whiteness, for now we are sons of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be. We know that when he appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is (1 John 3). Hence Mark, describing these clothes well, says: such as no launderer on earth can whiten (Mark 9). For the launderer to be understood here is the one whom the penitent Psalmist prays to: Wash me thoroughly from my iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin (Psalm 51), he cannot give his faithful on earth the brightness, which remains preserved for them in heaven.

Now the transfigured Saviour shows the glory of His own coming, or our resurrection; who as He then appeared to His Apostles shall in like manner appear to all the elect. But the raiment of the Lord is taken for the band of His Saints, which in truth when our Lord was upon earth seemed to be despised, but when He sought the mount, shines with a new whiteness; for now are we the sons of God; and it does not yet appear what we shall be. But we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him. (1 John 3:2.)

And it came to pass, as he prayed etc. After the antecedents to the transfiguration, the Evangelist here subjoins the concomitants. These were three, namely the splendor of appearance, the brilliance of clothing, the honor of accompaniment: so that Christ might thus appear glorious both within himself and around himself and beside himself, lest anything be lacking to his glory.

First, therefore, with regard to the splendor of appearance, it is said: And it came to pass, as he prayed, the appearance of his countenance was altered, altered indeed by the surpassing radiance of brightness; whence in Matthew 17 it is said that "he was transfigured before them, and his face shone like the sun." Nor is this surprising, because in this he showed the glory of the resurrection, concerning which Matthew 13 says: "Then the just shall shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father." And therefore in this display of brightness he showed the disciples the kingdom of God, because brightness is the chief endowment of those who rise, according to that passage of First Corinthians 15: "There is one glory of earthly things, another of heavenly; one brightness of the sun, another brightness of the moon, another of the stars; for star differs from star in brightness, so also the resurrection of the dead." Now Christ assumed this endowment of brightness for a time, just as is said of subtlety, which he assumed at his birth, when he came forth from the closed womb of his mother; agility, when he walked upon the waters; impassibility, when he gave his body to the disciples in the Sacrament. So also he assumed brightness here for a time, yet he did not lose his proper likeness, but there was in him his proper likeness and a consummated quality as a passible quality, while the brightness was as a passion. For just as a pale person blushes for a time out of shame, and there occurs in him an alteration for a time, so by a supreme and wondrous power his earthly body was made for a time radiant and heavenly. Whether, however, there was in him another endowment of brightness or not, nevertheless there was another brightness conformed to that supernal brightness, which by divine power did not harm the eyes of the disciples but rather strengthened them, so that they could say that word of Ecclesiastes 11: "Sweet is the light, and it is delightful for the eyes to see the sun."

Second, regarding the splendor of his clothing, it is added: And his clothing was white and shining, that is, it became so. For such was the whiteness that it shone with exceeding brilliance, according to what is said in Mark 9: "His garments became exceedingly splendid and white as snow, such as no fuller on earth can make white." Nor is this surprising, for this signified the splendor that will appear in the Saints, according to Revelation 3: "He who overcomes shall thus be clothed in white garments"; and chapter 7: "These who are clothed in white robes, who are they? and whence have they come?" etc.

According to the spiritual understanding, in prayer and contemplation the face of man is illuminated, because when the face of our mind is turned toward God, it is illuminated, improved, and perfected. This was prefigured in Exodus 34, where it is said that "when Moses descended from the mountain, his face appeared horned from the fellowship of the Lord's discourse"; whence also in Second Corinthians 3: "But we, with unveiled face beholding the glory of the Lord as in a mirror, are transformed into the same image from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord." - Not only this, but also his clothing becomes radiant, because one's manner of life becomes irreproachable, according to Philippians 2: "That you may be sincere, without reproach in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom you shine as lights in the world." Nor is this surprising, because such persons are conformed to the Lord Jesus Christ, according to Romans 13: "Let us put on the armor of light, let us walk honestly as in the day"; and shortly after: "Not in reveling and drunkenness, but put on the Lord Jesus Christ." Not only this, but also Moses and Elijah converse, because in prayer there is given to man understanding of the Scriptures and of the mysteries set forth, according to that passage in Daniel 2: "Daniel went into his house and informed his companions, that they might seek mercy from the God of heaven concerning this mystery. Then the mystery was revealed to Daniel by night"; and Wisdom 7: "I wished, and understanding was given to me: I called upon God, and the spirit of wisdom came upon me." Moreover, Moses and Elijah speak with the transfigured Lord for the certitude of the vision, because, as Richard says, "no revelation whatsoever is to be accepted unless it can be confirmed by the New or Old Testament."

(ut sup. 13.) Now the devil, seeing His face shining in prayer, recollected Moses, whose face was glorified. But Moses indeed was arrayed with a glory, which came from without; our Lord, with that which proceeded from the inherent brightness of Divine glory. (Exod. 34:29.) For since in the hypostatical union there is one and the same glory of the Word and the flesh, He is transfigured not as receiving what He was not, but manifesting to His disciples, what He was. Hence, according to Matthew, it is said, that He was transfigured before them, and that His face shone as the sun; (Mat. 17:2.) for what the sun is in things of sense, God is in spiritual things. And as the sun, which is the fountain of light, cannot be easily seen, but its light is perceived from that which reaches the earth; so the countenance of Christ shines more intensely, like the sun, but His raiment is white as snow; as it follows, And his raiment was white and glistering; that is, lighted up by its participation of the divine light.

For He nowhere has dissolved the law, as Simon pretends, but fulfilled it; for He says: "One iota, or one tittle, shall not pass from the law until all be fulfilled." For says He, "I come not to dissolve the law, but to fulfil it." For Moses himself, who was at once the lawgiver, and the high priest, and the prophet, and the king, and Elijah, the zealous follower of the prophets, were present at our Lord's transfiguration in the mountain, and witnesses of His incarnation and of His sufferings, as the intimate friends of Christ, but not as enemies and strangers. Whence it is demonstrated that the law is good and holy, as also the prophets.

And behold, two men were speaking with him. They were Moses and Elias, of whom we read that one died, and the other was taken up into heaven. Unless this signifies the future glory of all the saints with the Lord in majesty, who at the time of judgment will reign with him, either found alive in the flesh or resurrected from death tasted long ago. For as the Apostle testifies, "The dead who are in Christ will rise first, then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord" (1 Thess. IV). Alternatively, Moses and Elias, that is, the lawgiver and the greatest of the prophets, appear and speak with the Lord to show that he is the one whom all the writings of the law and the prophets foretold. They appear, however, not in the lowlands, but on the mountain with him, because only those who seek the divine heights with their minds will perceive the majesty of the holy Scripture fulfilled in the Lord. Consequently, even the Jews saw Moses, but they did not merit to follow him as he ascended to God on the mountain. They see him also when he returned, but not without a veil. They knew Elias, but only Elisha with the sons of the prophets beheld the triumph of his ascent, because many of us read the words of Scripture here and there, but very few understand how lofty it shines in the mysteries of Christ.

Luke writes more clearly of how they appeared and what they spoke about with him. Luke says that Moses and Elijah were seen in majesty, and they spoke of his passing away which he was about to fulfill in Jerusalem. Moses and Elijah, who talked with the Lord on the mountain and spoke about his passion and resurrection, represent the revelations of the law and prophets that were fulfilled in the Lord.…It is appropriate that the Evangelist reported Moses and Elijah were "seen in majesty." The mark of the favor with which they are to be crowned is shown by the preeminence of their majesty. It is also appropriately recorded that they spoke about his passing away, which was to be fulfilled in Jerusalem. To his faithful, the Redeemer's passion has become a unique subject for praise. The more they remember that they could not have been saved apart from his grace, the more they should always ponder the greater memory of this grace in a faithful heart, and bear faithful witness to it.

Third, regarding the honor of his retinue, he adds: And behold, two men were speaking with him. For it was not fitting that the Lord of glory should be seen alone, but that he should have an honorable retinue; therefore regarding this he adds: And they were Moses and Elijah, seen in majesty. These two were persons to be honored: Moses, I say, on account of his lawgiving, according to Numbers 12: "Not so my servant Moses, who is most faithful in all my house: for I speak to him mouth to mouth, and openly and not through riddles and figures does he see the Lord"; Elijah, however, on account of his excellence of prophecy together with his working of miracles. Whence Sirach 48, speaking to Elijah: "Who can glory like you? You who raised the dead from the netherworld, from the lot of death, by the word of the Lord God." Whence also, in order to show this excellence, the Lord appeared in a special manner to both of them in a figure on Mount Horeb: to Moses first, as is said in Exodus 3, and to Elijah afterward, as is said in 3 Kings 19, on the same Mount Horeb. Therefore, on account of their worthiness and preeminent dignity, he appeared in their company; or rather, because one of them was dead and the other living, one from heaven and the other from the netherworld, so that he might have testimony from every kind, and it might be shown that he is the one who will make both the living and the dead glorious. Whence in the Gloss it is said: "Therefore one living and one dead appear, to signify that Christ would die and live again, and that we might be alive to God and dead to the world." Or these two appear in order to show that the Law and the Prophets were in accord with the Lord Jesus Christ; whence in the Gloss of Bede: "Moses the lawgiver and Elijah, the foremost of the Prophets, appear with the Word, to show that he is the one who spoke in the Law and the Prophets, and whom the Law and the Prophets promised," so that thus that word of Matthew 21 might be verified: "Those who went before and those who followed cried out: Hosanna to the Son of David."

And since the Law and the Prophets attest not only to the glory of Christ, but also to his passion, which is the way into glory, therefore it is added: And they spoke of his departure, which he was about to accomplish in Jerusalem. Departure rightly names the passion, because in it there was an excess of humility, according to Philippians 2: "He emptied himself, taking the form of a servant"; and afterward: "He humbled himself," etc. There was also an excess of poverty, according to Lamentations 3: "Remember my poverty and my transgression, the wormwood and the gall." There was an excess of suffering, according to Lamentations 1: "O all you who pass by the way," etc. There was also an excess of love, according to Ephesians 2: "God, who is rich in mercy, on account of his exceedingly great love, when we were dead in sins," etc.; and Romans 8: "He who did not spare his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how has he not also given us all things together with him?"

That departure he accomplished in Jerusalem, where he was crucified, in which was the consummation of our redemption, according to Hebrews 2: "It was fitting for him, for whom are all things and through whom are all things, who had brought many sons into glory, to perfect the author of their salvation through suffering." Hence he himself also foretold to his disciples in Luke 18: "Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things shall be consummated," etc.

Besides, Moses and Elijah stood at Jesus' side and spoke with one another about his departure that he was about, it says, to accomplish at Jerusalem. This meant the mystery of the dispensation in the flesh and of his precious suffering upon the cross. It is also true that the law of Moses and the word of the holy prophets foreshadowed the mystery of Christ. The law of Moses foreshadowed it by types and shadows, painting it as in a picture. The holy prophets in different ways declared beforehand that in due time he would appear in our likeness and for the salvation and life of us all, agree to suffer death on the tree. Moses and Elijah standing before him and talking with one another was a sort of representation. It excellently displayed our Lord Jesus Christ as having the law and the prophets for his bodyguard. It displayed Christ as being the Lord of the Law and the Prophets, as foretold in them by those things that they proclaimed in mutual agreement beforehand. The words of the prophets are not different from the teachings of the law. I imagine this was what the most priestly Moses and the most distinguished of the prophets Elijah were talking about with one another.

The mystery, namely, of His incarnation, also the life-giving Passion accomplished on the sacred cross.

What strange thing do we announce when we say that God became man and when you say that Abraham received the Lord as a guest? What strange thing do we announce when Jacob says, "I have seen a heavenly being face to face, yet my life has been spared"? The same Lord who ate with Abraham also ate with us. What strange thing do we announce? We present two witnesses who stood before the Lord on Mount Sinai: Moses was "in the hollow of the rock," and Elijah was once in the hollow of the rock. Being present at his transfiguration on Mount Tabor, they spoke to his disciples "of his death that he was about to fulfill in Jerusalem."

Moses and Elijah appeared beside him so that they might know that he was Lord of the prophets. He transformed his face on the mountain before he died, so that they would not be in doubt concerning the transformation of his face after his death. He changed the garments which he was wearing so that they might know that it is also he who will raise to life the body with which he was clothed. He, who gave his body a glory that no one can reach, is able to raise it to life from the death that everyone tastes.

(ut sup. 13.) But while these things were so, that it might be shown there was but one Lord of the new and old covenant, and the mouths of heretics might be shut, and men might believe on the resurrection, and He also, who was transfigured, be believed to be the Lord of the living and the dead, Moses and Elias, as servants, stand by their Lord in His glory; hence it follows, And behold there talked with him two men. For it became men, seeing the glory and confidence of their fellow servants, to admire indeed the merciful condescension of the Lord, but to emulate those who had laboured before them, and looking to the pleasantness of future blessings, to be the more strengthened for conflicts. For he who has known the reward of his labours, will the more easily endure them.

After that, Pentecost is a most joyous space for conferring baptisms; wherein, too, the resurrection of the Lord was repeatedly proved among the disciples, and the hope of the advent of the Lord indirectly pointed to, in that, at that time, when He had been received back into the heavens, the angels told the apostles that "He would so come, as He had withal ascended into the heavens; " at Pentecost, of course.

And they spoke of his departure, which he was to accomplish in Jerusalem. And to this day, the law and the prophets teach in mutual voices the mystery of the Lord's dispensation to whomsoever they find on the summit of true faith.

Peter saw this grace, and so did those who were with him, although they were heavy with sleep. The incomprehensible magnificence of the Godhead overwhelms the perceptions of our body. If the sharpness of bodily vision cannot bear the ray of the sun directly into watching eyes, how may the corruption of human members endure the glory of God? The garment of the body, purer and finer after the removal of the materiality of vices, is made for the resurrection. Perhaps they were so heavy with sleep that they saw the radiance of the resurrection after their rest. Keeping vigil, they saw his majesty, because no one sees the glory of Christ unless he is vigilant.

Or else, according to your capacity is the word either lessened or increased to you, and unless you ascend the summit of a higher wisdom, you behold not what glory there is in the word of God. Now the garments of the Word, are the discourses of the Scriptures, and certain clothings of the Divine mind; and as His raiment shone white, so in the eyes of your understanding, the sense of the divine words becomes clear. Hence after Moses, Elias; that is, the Law and the Prophets in the Word. For neither can the Law exist without the Word, nor the Prophet, unless he prophesied of the Son of God.

For the incomprehensible brightness of the Divine nature oppresses our bodily senses. For if the sight of the body is unable to contain the sun's ray when opposite to the eyes which behold it, how can the corruption of our fleshly members endure the glory of God? And perhaps they were oppressed with sleep, that after their rest they might behold the sight of the resurrection. Therefore when they were awake they saw His glory. For no one, except he is watching, sees the glory of Christ. Peter was delighted, and as the allurements of this world enticed him not, was carried away by the glory of the resurrection. Hence it follows, And it came to pass as they departed, &c.

Peter, and those who were with him, were heavy with sleep, but when they were fully awake, they saw His majesty and the two men standing with Him. Not by mere chance, but by the reason of the mystery were the disciples heavy with sleep, namely, that they might see a representation of the resurrection after physical rest. Those who are awakened to the glory of the saints will see the majesty of the Lord more truly, the more they will rejoice in the immortality of their own flesh, in which they had conquered death. Then they will behold Moses and Elijah in glory, because they will better understand how not one jot or one tittle got passed from the law, nor the Lord came to dissolve the law or the prophets, but to fulfill them (Matthew V).

But Peter and those who were with him etc. After the demonstration of the promised glory, the Evangelist here subjoins the contemplation of the glory demonstrated. He narrates this sufficiently enough, because according to a fourfold state: first, as to the beginning; second, as to the progress, at the words: It came to pass, as they departed from him; third, as to the consummation, at the words: And as he was saying these things; fourth, as to the withdrawal, at the words: And while the voice was being made.

It should be known, however, that for the contemplation of divine revelations two things occur as it were at the beginning, namely, a burden on the part of nature and an aid on the part of grace; the first induces sleep, and the second awakens.

First, therefore, as to the burden on the part of nature falling asleep, it is said: But Peter and those who were with him were heavy with sleep, and so all were failing. Nor is this surprising, because they were encompassed by infirmity; whence Wisdom 9: "The corruptible body weighs down the soul, and the earthly dwelling presses down the mind that thinks upon many things." For since the nature of the exterior senses impedes our intellect from fixing its eye upon the Eternal Light, it is necessary at the beginning of contemplation that man, as though lulled to sleep, be alienated from the senses, as it were through sleep, which does not occur without a burdening of the senses. Whence the contemplative soul says in Song of Songs 5: "I sleep, and my heart watches"; and Job 33: "When deep sleep falls upon men, and they sleep in their bed, then he opens their ears and, instructing them, teaches them discipline"; and concerning this it is said in Genesis 2: "The Lord cast a deep sleep upon Adam."

Second, however, as regards the aid on the part of arousing grace, there is added: And awakening, they saw his majesty and the two men who stood with him. This wakefulness is through the desire and love of the Holy Spirit, according to that passage of Isaiah twenty-six: "Lord, my soul has desired you in the night, but also with my spirit within my heart I will watch for you in the morning." Moreover, this is most especially necessary in prayer: whence the Lord says to Peter and his companions, Matthew twenty-six: "Watch and pray, that you enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing," etc.; Mark thirteen: "Watch, be vigilant, and pray." "What I say to one, I say to all: Watch."

To this wakefulness, however, the promised reward especially invites us, according to that passage below in chapter twelve: "Blessed are those servants whom, when the lord comes, he shall find watching: amen I say to you," etc. The foreseen danger also invites us, according to that passage of First Peter, the last chapter: "Be sober and watch, because your adversary the devil," etc.; and Matthew twenty-four: "Amen I say to you: If the master of the house had known at what hour the thief would come, he would certainly have watched," etc.

Moreover, wakefulness is most especially necessary for contemplation, because grace once offered is most swiftly withdrawn: whence Song of Songs five: "I opened the bolt to my beloved, but he had turned aside and passed on."

In this awakening, however, the divine majesty is seen in creatures, according to that passage of Wisdom thirteen: "From the greatness of the beauty and of the creature," etc.; whence Isaiah six: "I saw the Lord sitting upon a high throne, and full," etc.

The divine humility is seen in the Scriptures: on account of which he says: And two men, that is, the Law and the Prophets, concerning which vision, below in the last chapter: "He opened their understanding, that they might understand the Scriptures"; and again: "Beginning from Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all things," etc.

On account of these two modes of contemplating, a twofold book was made: of Scripture and of creation, which are signified in the ascent and descent by the ladder of Jacob, Genesis twenty-eight; by the going out and coming in through the door, John ten; by the eagle and its young: Job thirty-nine: "Shall the eagle be raised up at your command?" and after: "Its young ones lick up blood."

He was bright as the lightning on the mountain and became more luminous than the sun, initiating us into the mystery of the future.

While Christ is engaged in prayer, Peter is heavy with sleep, for he was weak, and did what was natural to man; as it is said, But Peter and they that were with him were heavy with sleep. But when they awake, they behold His glory, and the two men with Him; as it follows, And when they were awake, they saw his glory, and the two men, that stood with him.

It says, "It is good for us to be here." "My desire is to depart and be with Christ, for that is far better." The diligent workman is not content to praise. Even more admirable, not only in affection but also in pious deeds, he promises a ministry of common worship for the building of three tabernacles. Although he did not know what he said, he promised an observance that does not heap up the fruits of piety in indiscreet carelessness but in untimely zeal. His ignorance came from his condition, but his promise from his devotion. The human condition is corruptible in this. This mortal body is not capable of making a tabernacle for God.

But Peter distinguished not only by earnest feeling, but also by devout deeds, wishing like a zealous workman to build three tabernacles, offers the service of their united labour; for it follows, Let us make three tabernacles, one for thee, &c.

Nor does the condition of man in this corruptible body allow of making a tabernacle to God, whether in the soul or in the body, or in any other place; and although he knew not what he said, yet a service was offered which not by any deliberate forwardness, but its premature devotion, receives in abundance the fruits of piety. For his ignorance was part of his condition, his offer of devotion.

(de Con. Ev. l. ii. c. 56.) Now in what Luke here says of Moses and Elias, And it came to pass as they departed from him, Peter said unto Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here, he must not be thought contrary to Matthew and Mark, who have so connected Peter's suggestion of this, as if Moses and Elias were still speaking with our Lord. For they did not expressly state that Peter said it then, but rather were silent about what Luke added, that as they departed, Peter suggested this to our Lord.

And it happened, while they were departing from Him, that Peter said to Jesus: Master, it is good for us to be here, and let us make three tents, one for You, one for Moses, and one for Elijah, not knowing what he said. Oh, what great happiness it would be to be present perpetually at the vision of the Deity among choirs of angels, if the transfigured humanity of Christ and the company of two saints seen even momentarily delighted enough for Peter to want to hold them in service so they wouldn't depart! Though in human condition he did not know what to say, he nevertheless showed a sign of the fervor instilled in him. For he did not know what he was saying, who forgot that the kingdom promised by the Lord to the saints was not in some place on earth, but in the heavens, nor could he or his fellow apostles, still burdened with mortal flesh, enter the state of immortal life, nor was a house made with hands necessary in that age. But even now, ignorance is marked by anyone who wishes to make three tents for the law, the prophets, and the Gospel, since these cannot at all be separated from each other, having one tabernacle, that is the Church of God.

And it came to pass, as they were departing. After the beginning of contemplation, he adds the progress of contemplation: in which two things are most especially required, namely surpassing joy over the gift bestowed and surpassing desire for its continuation, according to that passage of Ecclesiasticus twenty-four: "My spirit is sweeter than honey." "They who eat me shall yet hunger, and they who drink me shall yet thirst." For through these two things the soul is fixed in the act of contemplation, just as one eating is fixed upon food through delight and desire at once.

First therefore, as regards the joy over the gift bestowed, he says: And it came to pass, as they were departing from him, that is, as they wished to depart: Peter said to Jesus: Master, it is good for us to be here; in which Peter shows that the glory of contemplation was wondrously pleasing to him, as if he were saying that word of the Prophet in the Psalm: "But it is good for me to adhere to God"; because, as is said in Lamentations three, "The Lord is good to those who hope in him, to the soul that seeks him." And therefore Peter was saying: It is good for us to be here: because it is good to await Christ, according to that word of Lamentations three: "It is good to wait in silence for the salvation of God." A greater good is to taste Christ: First Peter two, "If indeed you have tasted that the Lord is sweet"; whence also Wisdom twelve: "O how good and how sweet is your Spirit, O Lord, in all things"! namely, to the upright of heart, according to that word of the Psalm: "How good is the God of Israel to those who are upright in heart"! Whence in the person of Christ and the contemplative soul, Elkanah says to Anna his wife, First Kings one: "Anna, why do you weep? And why is your heart afflicted? Am I not better to you than ten sons?" — But the greatest good is to rejoice with Christ, according to that word of Philippians one: "To be dissolved and to be with Christ is much better"; and Matthew twenty-five: "Well done, good and faithful servant, because you have been faithful over a few things, I will set you over many things: enter into the joy of your Lord." — The first therefore is good, because it is merit; the second is a greater good, because it is sustenance for the way; but the third is the greatest good, because it is the reward. In all these ways Peter wished to say, especially by reason of joy: It is good for us to be here.

Second, as regards the desire for continuing the gift, he adds: And let us make three tabernacles, to continue our joy, as the children of Israel did in figure, according to that word of Leviticus twenty-three: "Everyone who is of the race of Israel shall dwell in tabernacles, that your posterity may learn that I made the children of Israel to dwell in tabernacles."

Because, however, he did not desire the company of those three in a uniform manner, therefore he does not wish a single tabernacle uniformly for all, but desires that a proper tabernacle be made for each one. Whence he adds: One for you, as the principal: and one for Moses, as the lawgiver: and one for Elijah, as the excellent preacher, so that thus according to the diversities of dignities the dwelling places of the mansions may be distinguished. For so it will be in the kingdom of heaven, according to that word of John fourteen: "In my Father's house there are many mansions."

Now Peter was saying this through an excessive desire, which is customary among those engaged in contemplation; and on account of this it is added: Not knowing what he was saying, namely on account of the excess of desire, according to that passage of the Psalm: "Because my heart was inflamed, and my reins were changed, and I was brought to nothing and I knew not"; and on account of the depth of the mystery, according to that passage of the Song of Songs, chapter six: "I went down into the garden of nuts, to see the fruits of the valleys and to inspect," etc.; and a little later: "I knew not; my soul troubled me because of the chariots of Aminadab." And from this twofold cause Peter did not know what he was saying; whence in the Gloss: "Even if Peter, out of his own weakness, does not know what he says, nevertheless he gives an indication of the ardor implanted in him, since those whom he delighted to see, he also seeks to detain by his service. He erred, because on earth and in this mortal flesh he desired that there be given to himself and his fellow apostles the kingdom which is promised in heaven and to those who have been stripped of mortal flesh."

Now it should be noted that Peter was deceived first because he wished to remain in a state from which one must pass on. For it is said in the last chapter of Hebrews: "We have not here a lasting city"; but Peter wished to remain here. In this also certain persons are blameworthy who, while they wish to ascend the heights of contemplation, wish to rest there and refuse to descend to the labor of action. And these are signified by the sons of Reuben, of whom it is said in Numbers, chapter thirty-two, that they wished to remain beyond the Jordan. "To whom Moses said: Shall your brothers go to battle, and you sit here?" — as if to say: no. Whence "Jacob saw a ladder in his sleep," Genesis, chapter twenty-eight, "and Angels," not resting, but "ascending and descending by it."

Second, he was deceived in this, that he believed the shadow to have been fulfilled in this; whereas the Apostle says in First Corinthians, chapter thirteen: "We see now through a mirror in an enigma"; and he believed the tabernacle of glory to be material, whereas it is spiritual, according to that passage of the Psalm: "I will enter into the place of the wonderful tabernacle"; this is "the tabernacle which the Lord has pitched, and not man," as is said in Hebrews, chapter eight. And this is especially to be guarded against by contemplatives, lest they be deceived by the figures shown to them.

Third, because he wished to divide things that were united, and what was one he wished to make threefold. For one is the tabernacle in the glory of the Saints, according to that passage of John, chapter seventeen: "I will, Father, that where I am, they also may be with me"; and Revelation, chapter twenty-one: "Behold, the tabernacle of God with men, and he will dwell with them"; and John, chapter ten: "There shall be one fold and one shepherd." Now this deception was not through judgment and assent, but rather on account of the ecstasy of mind, concerning which Second Corinthians, chapter five: "Whether we be beside ourselves, it is for God," etc.; and the Psalm: "There is Benjamin, a youth, in ecstasy of mind."

the evangelist Luke notes this and in these terms: Not knowing what he said, that is, Peter not knowing what he said with reference to the Lord.

The dispensation was still at its beginning and not yet fulfilled. How would it have been fitting for Christ to abandon his love for the world and depart from his purpose of suffering on its behalf? By undergoing death in the flesh and by abolishing death by the resurrection from the dead, he redeemed all under heaven. Peter therefore knew not what he said.

For perhaps holy Peter imagined that the kingdom of heaven was at hand, and therefore it seemed good to him to abide on the mount.

He knew not what he said, for neither was the time come for the end of the world, or for the Saints' enjoyment of their promised hope. And when the dispensation was now commencing, how was it fitting that Christ should abandon His love of the world, Who was willing to suffer for it?

(Orat. de Trans. fig.) It were not good for thee, Peter, that Christ should abide there, for if He had remained, the promise made to thee would never receive its accomplishment. For neither wouldest thou have obtained the keys of the kingdom, nor the tyranny of death been abolished. Seek not bliss before its time, as Adam did to be made a God. The time shall come when thou shalt enjoy the sight without ceasing, and dwell together with Him who is light and life.

(ubi sup.) But the Lord ordained thee not the builder of tabernacles, but of the universal Church. Thy words have been brought to pass by thy disciples, by thy sheep, in building a tabernacle, not only for Christ, but also for His servants. But Peter said not this deliberately, but through the inspiration of the Spirit revealing things to come, as it follows, not knowing what he said.

(ubi sup.) It behoved Him also not to confine the fruit of His incarnation to the service of those only who were on the mount, but to extend it to all believers, which was to be accomplished by His cross and passion.

This, then, is the way how he demonstrates them to be aliens, even by keeping them in his own company! This is how he shows they ought to be relinquished: he associates them with himself instead! This is how he destroys them: he irradiates them with his glory! How would their own Christ act? I suppose He would have imitated the frowardness (of heresy), and revealed them just as Marcion's Christ was bound to do, or at least as having with Him any others rather than His own prophets! But what could so well befit the Creator's Christ, as to manifest Him in the company of His own foreannouncers? -to let Him be seen with those to whom He had appeared in revelations?-to let Him be speaking with those who had spoken of Him?-to share His glory with those by whom He used to be called the Lord of glory; even with those chief servants of His, one of whom was once the moulder of His people, the other afterwards the reformer thereof; one the initiator of the Old Testament, the other the consummator of the New? Well therefore does Peter, when recognizing the companions of his Christ in their indissoluble connection with Him, suggest an expedient: "It is good for us to be here" (good: that evidently means to be where Moses and Elias are); "and let us make three tabernacles, one for Thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias. But he knew not what he said." How knew not? Was his ignorance the result of simple error? Or was it on the principle which we maintain in the cause of the new prophecy, that to grace ecstasy or rapture is incident.

Subsequently, fleeing from threatening Jezebel, after one single (meal of) food and drink, which he had found on being awakened by an angel, he too himself, in a space of forty days and nights, his belly empty, his mouth dry, arrived at Mount Horeb; where, when he had made a cave his inn, with how familiar a meeting with God was he received! "What (doest) thou, Elijah, here? " Much more friendly was this voice than, "Adam, where art thou? " For the latter voice was uttering a threat to a fed man, the former soothing a fasting one. Such is the prerogative of circumscribed food, that it makes God tent-fellow with man-peer, in truth, with peer! For if the eternal God will not hunger, as He testifies through Isaiah, this will be the time for man to be made equal with God, when he lives without food.

(non occ.) Peter also was ignorant what he said, seeing that it was not proper to make three tabernacles for the three. For the servants are not received with their Lord, the creature is not placed beside the Creator.

"While he spoke, there came a cloud, and overshadowed them." That is the overshadowing of the divine Spirit, who is not dark with the emotions of humankind but unveils secrets. This is also revealed in another place when an angel says, "And the power of the Most High shall overshadow you." The effect of this is shown when the voice of God is heard, saying, "This is my beloved Son; hear him." Elijah is not the Son, and Moses is not the Son. This is the Son whom only you see, because they had withdrawn when he began to be described as Lord.… It was a luminous cloud that does not soak us with rainwater or the downpour of storm, but from dew that sprinkles the minds of men with faith sent by the voice of almighty God.

For it is the overshadowing of the divine Spirit which does not darken, but reveals secret things to the hearts of men.

(in Esai. c. 4. 5.) For the obscurity of the Law had passed away; for as smoke is caused by the fire, so the cloud by light; but because a cloud is the sign of calmness, the rest of the future state is signified by the covering of a cloud.

While he was speaking, a cloud came and overshadowed them. He who sought a material tabernacle received the shadow of the cloud, so that he might learn that in the resurrection, the saints are to be protected not by the covering of houses, but by the glory of the Holy Spirit. About which the Psalmist says: But the sons of men shall hope in the covering of your wings (Psalm 56). And in his Apocalypse, John says: And I did not see a temple in it, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple (Revelation 21).

And mark, that as when our Lord was baptized in Jordan, so also when He was glorified on the Mount, the mystery of the whole Trinity is declared; for His glory which we confess at baptism, we shall see at the resurrection. Nor in vain does the Holy Spirit appear here in the cloud, there in the form of a dove, seeing that he who now preserves with a simple heart the faith which he receives, shall then in the light of open vision look upon those things which he believed.

And as he was saying these things, etc. After the entrance and the progress, the Evangelist here determines the state or consummation of contemplation. Contemplation, however, is consummated in two things: of which the first is the manifestation of terrible majesty, and the second, the revelation of credible truth.

First, therefore, as regards the manifestation of terrible majesty, it is said: And as he was saying these things, a cloud came. This was indicative of the divine majesty; whence it appeared terrible to the children of Israel in the cloud; whence it is said at the end of Exodus: "After all things were completed, the cloud covered the tabernacle of testimony, and the glory of the Lord filled it; nor could Moses enter the tent of the covenant, the cloud covering all things and the majesty of the Lord shining forth." Similarly in 3 Kings 8 it is said: "It came to pass that when the priests had gone out, a mist filled the house of the Lord, and the priests could not minister because of the mist; for the glory of the Lord had filled the house of the Lord." Whence the cloud was a sign of supernal glory and majesty. And therefore it is added: And it overshadowed them, and they were afraid. For they perceived the divine power in the cloud, concerning which above in chapter one: "The power of the Most High shall overshadow you"; and therefore they were afraid on account of the presence of the supreme power, as Job, who said in chapter 31: "I always feared the Lord as swelling waves over me"; and Jeremiah 10: "Who shall not fear you, O King of the nations," etc.

According to the mystical sense, however, by the cloud can be understood the flesh of Christ: first, because it tempers the light of the Divinity to our eyes, so that we may gaze upon it; Exodus 19: "Now I will come to you in the darkness of a cloud, that the people may hear me speaking to you."

Second, because it is the vehicle of divine light over the darkened earth, according to that passage of Isaiah 19: "The Lord shall ascend upon a light cloud and shall enter Egypt." Third, because it drew its origin from the bitterness and penal condition of human nature, through the mediation of the Virgin Mary; which was prefigured in 3 Kings 18: "Behold, a little cloud like the footprint of a man was ascending from the sea."

Fourth, because it pours forth the water of saving grace, which it drew in at its origin, when it is stirred by the wind of prayer; whence Ecclesiasticus 43: "The healing of all is in the swiftness of the cloud."

From this contemplatives are instructed not only to raise their eyes to the radiant light of the Divinity, but also to the overshadowing cloud of the humanity. Which was prefigured in John 1, where the Lord said to Nathanael: "You shall see Angels," that is, contemplatives, "ascending and descending upon the Son of Man," because in the humanity the divine majesty lies hidden.

(in Matt. tom. 12.) Now His disciples being unable to bear this, fell down, humbled under the mighty hand of God, greatly afraid since they knew what was said to Moses, No man shall see my face, and lice. Hence it follows, And they feared as they entered into the cloud.

But while Peter spake, our Lord builds a tabernacle not made with hands, and enters into it with the Prophets. Hence it is added, While he thus spake there came a cloud and overshadowed them, to show that He was not inferior to the Father. For as in the Old Testament it was said, the Lord dwelt in the cloud, so now also a cloud received our Lord, not a dark cloud, but bright and shining.

Now observe, that the cloud was not black from the darkness of condensed air, and such as to overcast the sky with a horrible gloom, but a shining cloud, from which we were not moistened with rain, but as the voice of Almighty God came forth the dew of faith was shed upon the hearts of men. For it follows, And there came a voice out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear ye him. Elias was not His Son. Moses was not. But this is the Son whom you see alone.

And they were afraid as they entered into the cloud, and a voice came from the cloud, saying: This is my beloved Son, hear him. Human fragility cannot bear the sight of greater glory, and trembling with the whole mind and body, it falls to the ground. The more one seeks greater things, the more he collapses to lower things, if he does not know his own measure. Indeed, the voice of the Father speaking from heaven is heard, which bears witness to the Son, and teaches Peter the truth, removing his error, and indeed teaches the other apostles through Peter. This is (he says) my beloved Son, it is he who should have a tabernacle built, it is him who should be obeyed. This is the Son; Moses and Elijah are servants to him, they too should prepare a tabernacle for the Lord in the inner rooms of their hearts along with you. And note, just as when the Lord was baptized in the Jordan, so also on the glorified mountain, the mystery of the whole Trinity is declared, whose glory we confess in baptism, and which we will see in the resurrection. Nor is it in vain that the Holy Spirit appears here in a bright cloud, there in a dove, because he who now keeps the faith which he perceives with a simple heart, will then behold what he had believed with the clear light of vision, and by the same grace will be protected forever.

The Father's voice did not forbid them to listen to Moses and Elijah (that is, to the Law and the Prophets). It rather suggested to all of them that listening to his Son was to take precedence since he came to fulfill the Law and the Prophets. It impressed on them that the light of gospel truth was to be put ahead of all the types and obscure signs of the Old Testament. By the benevolent, divinely arranged plan when the moment of the cross was drawing near, he strengthened them so that the disciples' faith might not falter when the Lord was crucified. He revealed to them how also his humanity was to be lifted up by heavenly light through his resurrection. The heavenly voice of the Father gave assurance that the Son was coeternal to the Father in his divinity so that when the hour of the passion approached, they would be less sorrowful at his dying. They remembered that after his death he would soon be glorified as a human being, although in his divinity he had always been glorified by God his Father.Since the disciples were fleshly and still fragile in substance, they were afraid and fell upon their faces when they heard God's voice. Since the Lord was a benevolent master in everything, he consoled them at the same time by his word and his touch, and he lifted them up.

Second, as regards the revelation of credible truth, it is added: And as they entered into the cloud, namely, the cloud arousing them to reverence, according to what is said in Exodus 24: "Moses, entering into the midst of the cloud, ascended the mountain," where he heard the divine revelations.

Hence it is now added: A voice came from the cloud, saying: This is my beloved Son: by way of distinction it points him out, to show that he alone is Son by nature: whence in the Psalm: "From the womb before the daystar I begot you." And distinctions are set forth there both in this, that it says this, and in this, that it says my, and in this, that it says beloved: in which it declares that the property of filiation in Christ is personal and connatural and coequal. It is shown to be personal through the pronoun, which points out a definite person; whence he himself said in John 8, for the demonstration of his person: "I am the beginning, who also speak to you." - It is shown to be connatural through this, that it says my, according to that word of the Psalm: "The Lord said to me: You are my Son, today I have begotten you"; because he has no other father except God, for whose distinction it is said in John 20: "I ascend to my Father and your Father."

It is also shown to be coequal in this, that it adds beloved, that is, preeminently and supremely: whence Song of Songs 5: "My beloved, chosen out of thousands"; and John 5: "The Father loves the Son and shows him all things."

And because this truth was so worthy of belief that it showed all the sayings of Christ to be things that must be believed, therefore he adds: Hear him, not with the ear of the body alone, but also of the heart, as the Prophet says in the Psalm: "I will hear what the Lord speaks in me." Hear him, I say, with all reverence, according to the counsel of Sirach 32: "Listen in silence, and for your reverence good grace will come to you." Hear him, with all obedience, according to that word of Sirach 24: "Those who hear me shall not be confounded, and those who work in me shall not sin."

Hear him, with all diligence: whence below in chapter 19: "All the people hung upon him, hearing him," etc.

Now this voice strengthened the hearts of the disciples, so that even their own teaching would thereby become authoritative, according to that word of 2 Peter 1: "For we did not follow unlearned fables when we made known to you the power and presence of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were made beholders of his greatness. For receiving from God the Father," etc., up to that point: "When we were with him on the holy mountain."

How then should men suppose Him who is really the Son to be made or created, when God the Father thundered from above, This is my beloved Son! as if He said, Not one of My sons, but He who is truly and by nature My Son, according to whose example the others are adopted, He ordered them then to obey Him, when He added, Hear ye him. And to obey Him more than Moses and Elias, for Christ is the end of the Law and the Prophets. Hence the Evangelist adds significantly, And when the voice was past, Jesus was found alone.

This, to be sure, was what he wished to be understood as the meaning of that voice from heaven: "This is my beloved Son, hear Him" -Him, that is, not Moses or Elias any longer.

Well, but the admonition, says Marcion, of our God from heaven has commanded us not to hear Moses and the prophets, but Christ; Hear Him is the command. This is true enough. For the apostles had by that time sufficiently heard Moses and the prophets, for they had followed Christ, being persuaded by Moses and the prophets.

Lest in truth any one should suppose that these words, This is my beloved Son, were uttered about Moses or Elias.

They then departed, when our Lord's manifestation had begun. There are three seen at the beginning, one at the end; for faith being made perfect, they are one. Therefore are they also received into the body of Christ, because we also shall be one in Christ Jesus; or perhaps, because the Law and the Prophets came out from the Word.

And while the voice was being spoken, Jesus was found alone. When the Son began to be designated, the servants immediately departed, lest the paternal voice be thought to be addressed to them. Alternatively: as the voice was made over the Son, He was found alone, because when He reveals Himself to the chosen, God will be all in all (1 Cor. 15), indeed He with His own, Christ through all will be one, that is, the head will shine with the body. For which unity He said elsewhere: And no one has ascended into heaven, except He who descended from heaven, the Son of Man, who is in heaven (John 3).

And they were silent, and in those days told no one any of the things they had seen. The premeditation of the future kingdom and the glory of the conqueror had been shown on the mountain. Therefore the disciples are silent, and, at the Lord's command, tell no one of the vision until the Son of Man is risen from the dead, lest the magnitude of the matter be incredible, and after such glory, the subsequent cross creates scandal among unrefined minds.

And as the voice came, etc. Here lastly, after the consummation of the contemplation, the Evangelist adds its withdrawal, concerning which the Evangelist introduces two things: the first is the return of the accustomed vision, the second is the concealment of the vision that was shown.

First therefore, as regards the return of the accustomed vision, it is said: And when the voice was made, Jesus was found alone, namely without Moses and Elijah, just as He was before with them. And this is what the bride desired in Song of Songs eight: "Who will grant you to me as my brother, nursing at the breasts of my mother, that I may find you alone outside and kiss you, and now let no one despise me?" And here therefore He was found alone with them, so that they might understand the passing away of the Law and of prophecy and the permanence of evangelical truth, according to what is said in Matthew twenty-four: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away." Whence in the Gloss of Bede: "Alone He is seen, because, with the shadow of the Law and the Prophets departing, the true light is found, as the grace of the Gospel shines forth." Or, to show that He alone is the one who is to be adored and for whom a tabernacle is to be built, according to that passage in Deuteronomy six: "You shall fear the Lord your God and serve Him alone."

Or, to show that He alone is the one who can save: whence Acts four: "There is no other name under heaven given to men, by which we must be saved"; and Hebrews seven: "But Jesus, because He remains forever, has an eternal priesthood; whence He is also able to save in perpetuity, ever living to intercede for us."

Second, as regards the concealment of the vision shown, it is added: And they kept silent. For they knew it was written in Tobit twelve: "It is good to hide the secret of a king." For it was not yet the time for speaking, but rather for concealing, according to that passage in Ecclesiastes three: "A time for keeping silent and a time for speaking"; and Sirach twenty: "There is one who keeps silent, knowing the time of the fitting occasion. A wise man will keep silent until the right time, but the wanton and imprudent will not observe the time."

And such were the Apostles: on account of which it is added: And they told no one in those days anything of what they had seen: not because they wished to conceal it out of avarice, but because they wished to keep silent out of divine obedience. For the Lord had commanded this to them, according to that passage in Matthew seventeen: "Tell the vision to no one, until the Son of Man has risen from the dead."

Now a threefold reason can be assigned for this prohibition. The first was the instruction of contemplatives, whose role it is to conceal the divine secret, according to that passage in Isaiah twenty-four: "My secret is mine, my secret is mine." Whence Mary concealed the virginal birth for thirty years, Elizabeth her conception for five months, as is said above in chapter one: "She hid herself for five months"; Paul his rapture for fourteen years, Second Corinthians twelve: "I know a man fourteen years ago," etc.

The second reason was the instruction of preachers, that they should not set forth the word of truth unless they see the capacity of the hearers to believe and receive the word, according to that passage of Ecclesiasticus thirty-two: "Where there is no hearing, do not pour forth speech." Whence in the Gloss: "At the Lord's command, they are silent until the Son of Man rises from the dead, lest it be incredible on account of the greatness of the matter, and lest the cross following upon such great glory cause scandal"; and Jerome: "Surely it belongs to the teacher to consider the persons of the hearers, lest they mock before they hear."

The third reason was the instruction of all, that no one should wish to be praised, nor should anyone dare to praise in this life, according to that passage of Ecclesiasticus eleven: "Before death, praise no man, for a man is known in his children"; whence Ambrose: "Praise after death, proclaim after consummation."

As they came down from the mountain, he commanded them, "You must not speak openly of what you have seen to anyone." Why did he command this? He said this because he knew that others would not believe them but would take them for fools. They would say, "Do you know where Elijah came from?" and "See, Moses is buried, and no one has succeeded in finding his grave." There would be blasphemy and scandal because of this. He said, "Wait until you have received the power," because when you will speak and they will not believe, you will raise the dead for their confusion and your own glory.

(ubi sup.) This also our Lord commands, since He knew His disciples to be imperfect, seeing that they had not yet received the full measure of the Spirit, lest the hearts of others who had not seen should be prostrated by sorrow, and lest the traitor should be stirred up to a frantic hatred.

(ubi sup.) Now Jesus wishes not those things which relate to His glory to be spoken of before His passion. Hence it follows, And they kept it close. For men would have been offended, especially the multitude, if they saw Him crucified Who had been so glorified.

Now those things which began from the Word, end in the Word. For by this he implies that up to a certain time the Law and the Prophets appear, as here Moses and Elias; but afterwards, at their departure, Jesus is alone. For now abideth the Gospel, legal things having passed away.

Just as God completed the whole world in six days and rested on the seventh, so the lesser world may be led in most orderly fashion through six stages of successive illuminations to the repose of contemplation. As a figure of this, one ascended by six steps to the throne of Solomon; the Seraphim that Isaiah saw had six wings; after six days the Lord called Moses from the midst of the cloud, and Christ after six days, as is said in Matthew, led the disciples up the mountain and was transfigured before them.

Indeed, in this type of event, reason, harmony and example are served. For after six days the appearance of the Lord's glory is revealed. No doubt, with the cycles of six thousand years having unfolded, the glory of the heavenly kingdom is prefigured. And the three were taken up in analogy to the descent of the three, Shem, Ham and Japheth. By this the coming election to divine favor of the people is shown.

In the three thus taken up with Him, the election of people out of the three stocks of Sem, Cam, and Japhet is figured.

Now it is asked how after six days he took them and led them separately onto a high mountain, whereas the Evangelist Luke established the number at eight. The answer is easy because in Matthew the days in the middle are counted, but in Luke the first and last are added. For Luke does not say after eight days Jesus took Peter and James and John but "now about eight days after."

(Chapter 17 - Verse 1) And after six days, Jesus took Peter and James, and John his brother. Why Peter, James, and John are separated from the others in some places in the Gospels, or what privilege they have over the other apostles, we have frequently discussed. Now it is asked how he assumed them after six days, and led them to a high mountain apart: since the evangelist Luke mentions the number eight (Luke 9). But the answer is easy, because here the intermediate days are placed, the first and the last are added. For it is not said: After eight days Jesus took Peter, and James, and John; but on the eighth day.

He leads them to a high mountain apart. To lead the disciples to the mountains is part of the kingdom. They are led apart, because many are called, but few are chosen (Matthew 20:16 and 22:14).

It is made a question how it could be after six days that He took them, when Luke says eight. (Luke 9:28.) The answer is easy, that here one reckoned only the intervening days, there the first and the last are also added.

"And after six days He taketh with Him Peter and James and John."

Now another says, "after eight," not contradicting this writer, but most fully agreeing with him. For the one expressed both the very day on which He spake, and that on which He led them up; but the other, the days between them only.

But mark thou, I pray thee, the severe goodness of Matthew, not concealing those who were preferred to himself. This John also often doth, recording the peculiar praises of Peter with great sincerity. For the choir of these holy men was everywhere pure from envy and vainglory.

Wherefore doth He take with Him these only? Because these were superior to the rest. And Peter indeed showed his superiority by exceedingly loving Him; but John by being exceedingly loved of Him; and James again by his answer which he answered with his brother, saying, "We are able to drink the cup;" nor yet by his answer only, but also by his works; both by the rest of them, and by fulfilling, what he said. For so earnest was he, and grievous to the Jews, that Herod himself supposed that he had bestowed herein a very great favor on the Jews, I mean in slaying him.

But wherefore doth He not lead them up straightway? To spare the other disciples any feeling of human weakness: for which cause He omits also the names of them that are to go up. And this, because the rest would have desired exceedingly to have followed, being to see a pattern of that glory; and would have been pained, as overlooked. For though it was somewhat in a corporeal way that He made the disclosure, yet nevertheless the thing had much in it to be desired.

Wherefore then doth He at all foretell it? That they might be readier to seize the high meaning, by His foretelling it; and being filled with the more vehement desire in that round of days, might so be present with their mind quite awake and full of care.

Or because in six days this whole visible world was made; so he who is above all the things of this world, may ascend into the high mountain, and there see the glory of the Word of God.

(e Bed.) Justly was it after six days that He showed His glory, because after six ages is to be the resurrectiond.

(e Bed.) Or; He took only three disciples with Him, because many are called but few chosen. Or because they who now hold in incorrupt mind the faith of the Holy Trinity, shall then joy in the everlasting beholding of it.

In this Transfiguration undergone on the mount, the Lord fulfilled within six days the promise made to His disciples, that they should have a sight of His glory; as it is said, And after six days he took Peter, and James, and John his brother.

When the Lord was about to show His disciples the glory of His brightness, He led them into the mountain, as it follows, And he took them up into a high mountain apart. Herein teaching, that it is necessary for all who seek to contemplate God, that they should not grovel in weak pleasures, but by love of things above should be ever raising themselves towards heavenly things; and to show His disciples that they should not look for the glory of the divine brightness in the gulph of the present world, but in the kingdom of the heavenly blessedness. He leads them apart, because the saints are separated from the wicked by their whole soul and devotion of their faith, and shall be utterly separated in the future; or because many are called, but few chosen, It follows, And he was transfigured before them.

What man, then, of sound mind can possibly suppose that they were ignorant of anything, whom the Lord ordained to be masters (or teachers), keeping them, as He did, inseparable (from Himself) in their attendance, in their discipleship, in their society, to whom, "when they were alone, He used to expound" all things which were obscure, telling them that "to them it was given to know those mysteries," which it was not permitted the people to understand? Was anything withheld from the knowledge of Peter, who is called "the rock on which the church should be built," who also obtained "the keys of the kingdom of heaven," with the power of "loosing and binding in heaven and on earth? " Was anything, again, concealed from John, the Lord's most beloved disciple, who used to lean on His breast to whom alone the Lord pointed Judas out as the traitor, whom He commended to Mary as a son in His own stead? Of what could He have meant those to be ignorant, to whom He even exhibited His own glory with Moses and Elias, and the Father's voice moreover, from heaven? Not as if He thus disapproved of all the rest, but because "by three witnesses must every word be established.

But further, if Christ reproves the scribes and Pharisees, sitting in the official chair of Moses, but not doing what they taught, what kind of (supposition) is it that He Himself withal should set upon His own official chair men who were mindful rather to enjoin-(but) not likewise to practise-sanctity of the flesh, which (sanctity) He had in all ways recommended to their teaching and practising?-first by His own example, then by all other arguments; while He tells (them) that "the kingdom of heavens" is "children's; " while He associates with these (children) others who, after marriage, remained (or became)virgins; " while He calls (them) to (copy) the simplicity of the dove, a bird not merely innocuous, but modest too, and whereof one male knows one female; while He denies the Samaritan woman's (partner to be) a husband, that He may show that manifold husbandry is adultery; while, in the revelation of His own glory, He prefers, from among so many saints and prophets, to have with him Moses and Elias -the one a monogamist, the other a voluntary celibate (for Elias was nothing else than John, who came "in the power and spirit of Elias" ); while that "man gluttonous and toping," the "frequenter of luncheons and suppers, in the company of publicans and sinners," sups once for all at a single marriage, though, of course, many were marrying (around Him); for He willed to attend (marriages) only so often as (He willed) them to be.

On the other hand, he whose "heart" was habitually found "lifted up" rather than fattened up, who in forty days and as many nights maintained a fast above the power of human nature, while spiritual faith subministered strength (to his body), both saw with his eyes God's glory, and heard with his ears God's voice, and understood with his heart God's law: while He taught him even then (by experience) that man liveth not upon bread alone, but upon every word of God; in that the People, though fatter than he, could not constantly contemplate even Moses himself, fed as he had been upon God, nor his leanness, sated as it had been with His glory! Deservedly, therefore, even while in the flesh, did the Lord show Himself to him, the colleague of His own fasts, no less than to Elijah. For Elijah withal had, by this fact primarily, that he had imprecated a famine, already sufficiently devoted himself to fasts: "The Lord liveth," he said, "before whom I am standing in His sight, if there shall be dew in these years, and rain-shower.

And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother. This does not contradict what Luke says, "And it came to pass about eight days after these sayings" (Lk 9:28). For Luke counts both the first day and the last day on which they ascended the mountain. But Matthew counts only the days in between. Christ took Peter because of Peter's strong love for Him; He took John, because Christ loved him; and He took James, because James, too, was zealous. That James had zeal is evident from his promise to drink the cup that Christ would drink (Mt. 20:22) and from the fact that Herod slew him with the sword to please the Jews.

And bringeth them up onto a high mountain apart, and was transfigured before them: and His face did shine as the sun, and His raiment was white as the light. He brings them up onto a high mountain, showing that unless a man is raised up high, he does not become worthy of such divine visions. A mountain set "apart," because Christ would often perform the most wondrous of His miracles in secret, lest the multitude see Him as God and think that He was human in appearance only. When you hear "He was transfigured," do not think that He had cast off His body at that moment, for His body remained in its own form, as you hear mention of His face and His clothing. But it appeared more resplendent, the divine exhibiting in small part its effulgence as much as they were able to see. This is why He had also previously spoken of the Transfiguration as "the kingdom" of God (Mt 16:28), for it exhibited the indescribable majesty of His power, it showed that He is the true Son of the Father, and it had the aspect of the second coming on account of the ineffable radiance of Jesus' face.

In the preceding part he showed the power of the Gospel teaching, etc.; here he shows the end, which is future glory. And concerning this he does two things. First, he shows how it was demonstrated in the transfiguration; secondly, how one can arrive at it, in chapter 18, in that hour, etc. Concerning the first, two things. First, the future glory is demonstrated; secondly, he commands concealment; thirdly, he presents a question. The second is at and as they came down from the mountain, etc.; the third at and the disciples asked him, etc. Concerning the first, three things. First, the circumstances of the transfiguration are presented; secondly, the transfiguration itself; thirdly, its effect. The second is at and he was transfigured before them; the third at and the disciples hearing, fell upon their face. Now he presents three circumstances, namely: the time, the disciples, and the place. He presents the time when he says after six days. But here there is a literal question: why, immediately after he said, there are some of them that stand here, etc., was he not immediately transfigured? Chrysostom resolves this. First, so that he might kindle the desire of the apostles; secondly, so that he might mitigate their envy, because perhaps after that saying they were troubled. But what is it that here it says after six days, while in Luke it says after eight days? It is clear that Luke counts the day on which he spoke and the day of the transfiguration; but Matthew counts only the intermediate days; therefore, removing the first and last, there remain only six days. By the six days are signified the six ages, after which we hope to come to future glory. Likewise, in six days he perfected his works; and therefore after six days the Lord wills to show himself, because unless we are elevated to God above all creatures, which the Lord created in those six days, we cannot arrive at the kingdom of God. Then he took Peter, James, and John. Why not all? To signify that not all who are called will arrive; hence below at 20:16: many are called, but few are chosen. And why only three? To signify that none will arrive except in faith in the Trinity. Mark 16:16: he that shall believe and is baptized shall be saved. But why these rather than others? The reason is that Peter was the most fervent. John, because he was especially beloved. Likewise James, because he was the chief combatant against the enemies of the faith; hence Herod killed him first, because he believed he would accomplish something great for the Jews, as in Acts 12:2: and he killed James, etc., and it follows, because he saw that it pleased the Jews, etc. And he led them up into a high mountain apart, etc. Why onto a mountain? To signify that no one is led to contemplate unless he ascends the mountain, as in Genesis 19:17 concerning Lot: save yourself on the mountain. And he says high indeed, on account of the loftiness of contemplation. Isaiah 2:2: it shall be exalted above the hills, and all nations shall flow unto it, and many people shall go and say: come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord. Because above every height of knowledge and virtue will be that height of glory. Likewise apart, because they separated themselves from the wicked. Below at 25:32: he shall separate them, as lambs from goats.

Indeed, Jesus himself shone as the sun, indicating that he is the light which illuminates every one who comes into this world. And this is the sun to the eyes of the flesh, that is the sun to the eyes of the heart. His garments are a type of his church. For garments, unless held up by the one having donned them, fall. Paul was like the lowest hem of these garments. For he himself says, "For I am the least of the apostles," 14 and in another passage, "I am the last of the apostles." On a garment, the hem is the last thing and the least. Just as that woman who touched the Lord's hem was made well, so the church which came out of the Gentiles was saved by means of Paul's preaching.

The Transfiguration and the walking on the water are glimpses of the beauty and the effortless power over all matter which will belong to men when they are really waked by God.

(e Bed. in Luc.) Or; the raiment of Christ shadows out the saints, of whom Esaias says, With all these shalt than clothe thee as with a garment; (Isa. 49:18.) and they are likened to snow because they shall be white with virtues, and all the heat of vices shall be put far away from them. It follows, And there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with them.

[Daniel 7:9] "I beheld until thrones were set up, and the Ancient of days took His seat. His garment was as white as snow, and the hair of His head was like pure wool. His throne was composed of fiery flames and its wheels were set on fire. From before His presence there issued forth a rushing, fiery stream." We read something similar in John's Apocalypse: "After these things I was immediately in the Spirit, and lo, a throne was set up in heaven, and one was seated upon the throne; and He who sat upon it had the likeness of jasper and sardine stone, and there was a rainbow round about the throne like the appearance of emerald. Around the throne there were twenty-four other thrones, and upon the twenty-four thrones there sat twenty-four elders, clothed in shining garments; upon their heads was a golden crown, and lightning flashes issued from the throne, and voices and thunder. And in front of the throne there were seven torches of burning fire, which were the seven spirits of God. And in front of the throne lay a glassy sea like unto crystal." (Revelation 4:2-6) And so the many thrones which Daniel saw seem to me to be what John called the twenty-four thrones. And the Ancient of days is the One who, according to John sits alone upon His throne. Likewise the Son of man, who came unto the Ancient of days, is the same as He who, according to John, is called the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, and the titles of that sort (Revelation 5:5). I imagine that these thrones are the ones of which the Apostle Paul says, "Whether thrones or dominions..." (Colossians 1:16). And in the Gospel we read, "Ye yourselves shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel" (Matthew 19:28). And God is called the One who sits and who is the Ancient of days, in order that His character as eternal Judge might be indicated. His garment is shining white like the snow, and the hair of His head is like pure wool. The Savior also, when He was transfigured on the mount and assumed the glory of His divine majesty, appeared in shining white garments (Matthew 17:2). And as for the fact that His hair is compared to perfectly pure wool, the even-handedness and uprightness of His judgment is shown forth, a judgment which shows no partiality in its exercise. Moreover He is described as an elderly man, in order that the ripeness of His judgment may be established. His throne consists of fiery flames, in order that sinners may tremble before the severity of the torments, and also that the just may be saved, but so as by fire. The wheels of the throne are set aflame, or else it is the wheels of His chariot which are aflame. In Ezekiel also God is ushered on the scene seated in a four-horse chariot (Ezekiel 1:4-28), and everything pertaining to God is of a fiery consistency. In another place also a statement is made on this subject: "God is a consuming fire" (Deuteronomy 4:24), that we might know that wood, hay and stubble are going to burn up in the day of judgment. And in the Psalms we read: "Fire goeth before Him, and He shall set aflame all His enemies round about Him" (Psalm 97:3). A rushing, fiery stream proceeded from before Him in order that it might carry sinners to hell (Gehenna).

Certainly the Lord was transformed into that glory with which he would afterwards come in his own kingdom. The change accentuated in splendor. It did not diminish his outward appearance. Let it be that his body had become spiritual. Even his garments were changed, which were white to such a high degree that as another Evangelist would say, "And his clothes became dazzling white, as no fuller on earth could bleach them." What the mortal bleacher on earth is able to make is material and subject to touch, not supernatural and heavenly, which mocks the eyes and is only seen in a vision.

(V2.) And he was transfigured before them. Just as he will be at the time of judgment, so he appeared to the apostles. But when it says, 'He was transfigured before them,' no one can think that he lost or abandoned his original form and appearance, or that he took on a spiritual or aerial body. Rather, the evangelist demonstrates how he was transformed, saying.

And his face shone like the sun, and his garments became white as snow. Where the splendor of his face is shown and the whiteness of the garments is described, substance is not taken away but glory is transformed. His face shone like the sun. Certainly the Lord was transformed into that glory in which he would come afterwards in his kingdom. Transformation added splendor, it did not take away his face. Even if his body was spiritual, were the garments also changed, which were so white that another evangelist said: Such as no fuller on earth can make. But what the lightning can do over the earth is corporeal, and subject to touch, and not spiritual and airy, which deceives the eyes, and can only be seen in a mere illusion.

Such as He is to be in the time of the Judgment, such was He now seen of the Apostles. Let none suppose that He lost His former form and lineaments, or laid aside His bodily reality, taking upon Him a spiritual or ethereal Body. How His transfiguration was accomplished, the Evangelist shows, saying, And his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment became white as snow, For that His face is said to shine, and His raiment described to become white, does not take away substance, but confer glory. In truth, the Lord was transformed into that glory in which He shall hereafter come in His Kingdom. The transformation enhanced the brightness, but did not destroy the countenance, although the body were spiritual; whence also His raiment was changed and became white to such a degree, as in the expression of another Evangelist, no fuller on earth can whiten them. But all this is the property of matter, and is the subject of the touch, not of spirit and ethereal, an illusion upon the sight only beheld in phantasm.

Having taken therefore the leaders, "He bringeth them up into a high mountain apart, and was transfigured before them: and His face did shine as the sun, and His raiment was white as the light. And there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with Him."

But wherefore doth He also bring forward Moses and Elias? One might mention many reasons. And first of all this: because the multitudes said He was, some Elias, some Jeremias, some one of the old prophets, He brings the leaders of His choir, that they might see the difference even hereby between the servants and the Lord; and that Peter was rightly commended for confessing Him Son of God.

But besides that, one may mention another reason also: that because men were continually accusing Him of transgressing the law, and accounting Him to be a blasphemer, as appropriating to Himself a glory which belonged not to Him, even the Father's, and were saying, "This Man is not of God, because He keepeth not the Sabbath day;" and again, "For a good work we stone Thee not, but for blasphemy, and because that Thou, being a man, makest Thyself God:" that both the charges might be shown to spring from envy, and He be proved not liable to either; and that neither is His conduct a transgression of the law, nor His calling Himself equal to the Father an appropriation of glory not His own; He brings forward them who had shone out in each of these respects: Moses, because he gave the law, and the Jews might infer that he would not have overlooked its being trampled on, as they supposed, nor have shown respect to the transgressor of it, and the enemy of its founder: Elias too for his part was jealous for the glory of God, and were any man an adversary of God, and calling himself God, making himself equal to the Father, while he was not what he said, and had no right to do so; he was not the person to stand by, and hearken unto him.

And one may mention another reason also, with those which have been spoken of. Of what kind then is it? To inform them that He hath power both of death and life, is ruler both above and beneath. For this cause He brings forward both him that had died, and him that never yet suffered this.

But the fifth motive, (for it is a fifth, besides those that have been mentioned), even the evangelist himself hath revealed. Now what was this? To show the glory of the cross, and to console Peter and the others in their dread of the passion, and to raise up their minds. Since having come, they by no means held their peace, but "spake," it is said, "of the glory which He was to accomplish at Jerusalem;" that is, of the passion, and the cross; for so they call it always.

And not thus only did He cheer them, but also by the excellency itself of the men, being such as He was especially requiring from themselves. I mean, that having said, "If any man will come after me, let him take up his cross, and follow me;" them that had died ten thousand times for God's decrees, and the people entrusted to them, these persons He sets before them. Because each of these, having lost his life, found it. For each of them both spake boldly unto tyrants, the one to the Egyptian, the other to Ahab; and in behalf of heartless and disobedient men; and by the very persons who were saved by them, they were brought into extreme danger; and each of them wishing to withdraw men from idolatry; and each being unlearned; for the one was of a "slow tongue," and dull of speech, and the other for his part also somewhat of the rudest in his bearing: and of voluntary poverty both were very strict observers; for neither had Moses made any gain, nor had Elias aught more than his sheepskin; and this under the old law, and when they had not received so great a gift of miracles. For what if Moses clave a sea? yet Peter walked on the water, and was able to remove mountains, and used to work cures of all manner of bodily diseases, and to drive away savage demons, and by the shadow of his body to work those wonderful and great prodigies; and changed the whole world. And if Elias too raised a dead man, yet these raised ten thousand; and this before the spirit was as yet vouchsafed to them. He brings them forward accordingly for this cause also. For He would have them emulate their winning ways toward the people, and their presence of mind and inflexibility; and that they should be meek like Moses, and jealous for God like Elias, and full of tender care, as they were. For the one endured a famine of three years for the Jewish people; and the other said, "If thou wilt forgive them their sin, forgive; else blot me too out of the book, which thou hast written." Now of all this He was reminding them by the vision.

For He brought those in glory too, not that these should stay where they were, but that they might even surpass their limitary lines. For example, when they said, "Should we command fire to come down from heaven," and made mention of Elias as having done so, He saith, "Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of;" training them to forbearance by the superiority in their gift.

But some may ask, when he was transfigured before those who were led up by him into the lofty mountain, did he appear to them in the form of God or in the preincarnate form that he earlier had? Did he appear to those left below in the form of a servant, but to those who had followed him after the six days to the lofty mountain, did he have not the form of a servant but the form of God? Listen carefully, if you can, and at the same time be attentive spiritually. It is not simply said that he was transfigured, but with a certain necessary addition. Both Matthew and Mark have recorded this: he was transfigured before them. Is it therefore possible for Jesus to be transfigured before some but not before others?Do you wish to see the transfiguration of Jesus? Behold with me the Jesus of the Gospels. Let him be simply apprehended. There he is beheld both "according to the flesh" and at the same time in his true divinity. He is beheld in the form of God according to our capacity for knowledge. This is how he was beheld by those who went up upon the lofty mountain to be apart with him. Meanwhile those who do not go up the mountain can still behold his works and hear his words, which are uplifting. It is before those who go up that Jesus is transfigured, and not to those below. When he is transfigured, his face shines as the sun, that he may be manifested to the children of light, who have put off the works of darkness and put on the armor of light. They are no longer the children of darkness or night but have become the children of day. They walk honestly as in the day. Being manifested, he will shine to them not simply as the sun but as he is demonstrated to be, the sun of righteousness.

Mystically; When any one has passed the six days according as we have said, he beholds Jesus transfigured before the eyes of his heart. For the Word of God has various forms, appearing to each man according as He knows that it will be expedient for him; and He shows Himself to none in a manner beyond his capacity; whence he says not simply, He was transfigured, but, before them. For Jesus, in the Gospels, is merely understood by those who do not mount by means of exalting works and words upon the high mountain of wisdom; but to them that do mount up thus, He is no longer known according to the flesh, but is understood to be God the Word. Before these then Jesus is transfigured, and not before those who live sunk in worldly conversation. But these, before whom He is transfigured, have been made sons of God, and He is shown to them as the Sun of righteousness. His raiment is made white as the light, that is, the words and sayings of the Gospels with which Jesus is clothed according to those things which were spoken of Him by the Apostles.

If then the face of the Lord shone as the sun, and the saints shall shine as the sun, are then the brightness of the Lord and the brightness of His servants to be equal? By no means. But forasmuch as nothing is known more bright than the sun, therefore to give some illustration of the future resurrection, it is expressed to us that the brightness of the Lord's countenance, and the brightness of the righteous, shall be as the sun.

The Lord, again, in the retirement of the mount, had changed His raiment for a robe of light; but He still retained features which Peter could recognise. In that same scene Moses also and Elias gave proof that the same condition of bodily existence may continue even in glory-the one in the likeness of a flesh which he had not yet recovered, the other in the reality of one which he had not yet put off.

Then follows the transfiguration: and he was transfigured before them. And first the transfiguration is presented; secondly, the testimony, at while he was yet speaking, etc. Concerning the first, the transfiguration is presented; secondly, the manner; thirdly, Peter's admiration. He says therefore and he was transfigured, i.e., he changed his figure, before them. To be transfigured is the same as to be changed from one's proper figure, as is found in 2 Corinthians 11, that Satan transforms himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is not surprising if the just are transfigured into the figure of glory; therefore he was transfigured, because he set aside what was his own. Some have said that he assumed another body, which is false; but anyone who is changed in figure regarding his outward appearance is said to be transfigured: just as when someone is healthy and ruddy, when he is sick he becomes pale, and so is said to be transfigured. So Christ, because he appeared in another form than that in which he usually appeared, for his body was not luminous but only received brightness, is therefore said to have been transfigured. Therefore it follows and his face did shine as the sun; where the manner is touched upon. And first it is demonstrated with respect to the brightness of his face; secondly, with respect to the whiteness of his garments; thirdly, with respect to the testimony. He says therefore and his face did shine as the sun. Here he revealed the future glory, where bodies will be bright and shining. And this brightness was not from his essence, but from the brightness of his interior soul full of charity; Isaiah 58:8: then shall your light break forth as the morning, and it follows, and the glory of the Lord shall gather you up. Hence there was a certain refulgence in his body. For the soul of Christ saw God, and above every brightness, from the beginning of his conception; John 1:14: we saw his glory. If therefore in other blessed ones brightness is derived from the soul to the body, why not in Christ, who was God and man? It must be said that because he was God, the order of human nature was in his power. Now this is the order: that the parts communicate to each other, so that when the body is injured, there is compassion in the soul, and from the soul the body is affected. But this order was subject to Christ. Hence joy was so perfect in the higher part that it did not flow outward; hence he was both perfectly a wayfarer and perfectly a comprehensor. Hence when he willed, the overflow did not occur, but when he willed, the overflow occurred, and he appeared resplendent. But was not the endowment in Christ? Some say yes, and that he received all the endowments while on the way: the endowment of subtlety at his birth, of agility in walking on the waters, of brightness here, of impassibility in administering the sacrament of the altar. But I do not believe this, because an endowment is a certain property of glory itself. Hence that he walked on the sea, that he shone forth, all was by divine power, because the endowment of glory is incompatible with the state of a wayfarer; but it had a certain likeness, because his face did shine as the sun; Apocalypse 1:16: his face was as the sun shining in his power. But it can be objected that the just shall shine as the sun. Therefore the splendor of Christ will not be greater than that of others. I say that it will be. But because among sensible things there is nothing brighter to which it can be compared, therefore it is compared to the sun. And his garments became white as snow. Here concerning the garments. This shows that it was not by a change in Christ, nor by an endowment, because garments are not capable of receiving an endowment. By the garments the saints are signified; Isaiah 49:18: as I live, says the Lord, you shall be clothed with all these as with an ornament. And he says they became white as snow. Snow has whiteness and coldness; so the saints have the whiteness of glory; Wisdom 3:7: the just shall shine and shall run to and fro like sparks among the reeds, etc. Likewise they will have refreshment from the heat of concupiscence; in Psalm 67:15: they shall be made white as snow in Selmon. Or by the garments is understood the letter of sacred Scripture.

Also that Moses and Elias only out of the whole number of the saints stood with Christ, means, that Christ, in His kingdom, is between the Law and the Prophets; for He shall judge Israel in the presence of the same by whom He was preached to them.

While the scribes and Pharisees were testing him, he was unwilling to give signs from heaven to those demanding them; however, he silenced their perverse demand with a prudent response. Here, indeed, so that he might increase the faith of the apostles, he gave a sign from heaven. Thereupon Elijah descended from the place to which he had ascended. Moses rose from the lower regions.

(Verse 3.) And behold, Moses and Elijah appeared to them, talking with him. When the scribes and Pharisees tested him, seeking signs from heaven, he did not want to give them, but refuted their wicked request with a prudent response. But in order to increase the faith of the apostles, he gives a sign from heaven, with Elijah descending from where he had ascended, and with Moses rising from the dead. This is also commanded to Ahaz through Isaiah, to ask for a sign from above or from below (Isaiah 7 and 2 Kings 2). For what was said: Moses and Elias appeared to them, speaking with him; and in another Gospel it is reported that he announced what he would suffer in Jerusalem (Luke IX): The law and the prophets are shown, who announced with frequent voices both the passion of the Lord and his resurrection.

It is to be remembered also, that when the Scribes and Pharisees asked signs from heaven, He would not give any; but now, to increase the Apostles' faith, He gives a sign; Elias descends from heaven, whither he was gone up, and Moses arises from hell; (Is. 7:10.) as Ahaz is bidden by Esaias to ask him a sign in the heaven above, or in the depth beneath.

However, if any man discerns a spiritual sense in the Law agreeing with the teaching of Jesus, and in the Prophets finds the hidden wisdom of Christ, (1 Cor. 2:7.) he beholds Moses and Elias in the same glory with Jesus.

Now, not even to His apostles was His nature ever a matter of deception. He was truly both seen and heard upon the mount; true and real was the draught of that wine at the marriage of (Cana in) Galilee; true and real also was the touch of the then believing Thomas.

Since, therefore, He reserves to some future time His presence and speech face to face with Moses-a promise which was afterwards fulfilled in the retirement of the mount (of transfiguration), when as we read in the Gospel," Moses appeared talking with Jesus" -it is evident that in early times it was always in a glass, (as it were, )and an enigma, in vision and dream, that God, I mean the Son of God, appeared-to the prophets and the patriarchs, as also to Moses indeed himself.

And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elijah talking with Him. What were they talking about? "The ending," says Luke, "which He should accomplish in Jerusalem" (Lk. 9:31), namely, the Cross. Why did Moses and Elijah appear? To show that He is Lord of the law and of the prophets, and of the living and of the dead. For Elijah was a prophet and still lived, while Moses was a lawgiver and had died. They also appeared so that it might be seen that He was opposed neither to the law nor to God, for Moses would not have spoken with one opposed to his own laws, nor would Elijah the zealot have endured one who was opposed to God. And they appeared for yet another reason, to prove false the opinion of those who said that He was Elijah or one of the prophets. How did the disciples know that these two were Moses and Elijah? Not of course from icons, for at that time it was considered impious to draw pictures of men. It would seem, then, that they recognized them by the words which they were speaking. For Moses perhaps was saying, "Thou art He whose Passion I prefigured when I slaughtered the lamb and performed the Pascha;" and Elijah, "Thou art He Whose Resurrection I prefigured when I raised the widow's son;" and such words as these. By showing Moses and Elijah to the disciples, Christ teaches the disciples to imitate them, to be both meek and leaders of men, as was Moses, to be zealous and, when necessary, unyielding, as was Elijah, and to be fearless, as they both were, for the truth.

And behold there appeared to them Moses and Elijah. And why did they appear? Chrysostom assigns the reasons. The first reason is to confirm the faith of the disciples. He had asked above: whom do men say that the Son of man is? etc. And they said: some, Elijah, etc. But in order to show the difference between himself and them, he willed to bring them forth; Psalm 85:8: there is none among the gods like unto you, O Lord, etc. The second reason is to confute the Jews. For they said that he was a transgressor of the law; likewise they said that he was a blasphemer, as is found in John 10:33: for a good work we stone you not, but for blasphemy. Therefore, because Elijah was the holiest of all the prophets, and Moses was the lawgiver, he showed himself before Moses and Elijah, because he was not contrary to God, nor a transgressor of the law. The third reason is to show that he is the judge of the living and the dead, because Elijah was living, and Moses was dead. The fourth reason is for the reassurance of Peter; because Peter had rebuked the Lord concerning his death, therefore he shows that those who expose themselves to death are not to be rebuked, by invoking these two; because Elijah exposed himself to death before Jezebel, and similarly Moses exposed himself on account of the law. The fifth reason is that there were two things in him which he willed to show in these two, namely, meekness, which he shows in Moses, and the example of zeal for God, which he shows in Elijah, of whom it is said that Elijah rose up like fire, and his word burned like a torch. The sixth reason is assigned in the Gloss, because all the law and the prophets bore testimony to Christ. Hence Luke 24:44: all things must be fulfilled which are written in the law and the prophets concerning me. But then there is a question. Concerning Elijah it is not surprising if he was there, because he is living; but concerning Moses the question is how he was there. Some have said that an angel was there in his place. But this is nothing, because Moses was there in soul only. But how was he seen? It must be said that he was seen in the way angels are seen.

because Peter considered Moses and Elias to be equal in honour to the Lord, seeing that with reference to their equality he reckoned the number of the tabernacles, assigning one to each, the evangelist Luke notes this and in these terms: Not knowing what he said, that is, Peter not knowing what he said with reference to the Lord. Straightway moreover a cloud overshadowed them, and separated Moses and Elias from them and hid them from the disciples, and as for Jesus, who was left alone in the midst, the Father pointed out and showed him to the disciples saying: This is my son in whom I am well pleased, hear ye Him. Ye are mistaken, he says, in putting Him on an equality with the others, for He is my Son. They, like yourselves, are servants. Him therefore as Lord and as my Son, hear ye in all things.

Peter didn't know what he was saying, for before the Savior's Passion, resurrection and victory over death and corruption, it was impossible for Peter to be with Christ and to be permitted into the tents which are in heaven. These things would happen only after the Savior's resurrection and ascent into heaven.

E Bed. in Luc.: Or; raiment of Christ shadows out the saints, of whom Esaias says, "With all these shalt thou clothe thee as with a garment;" and they are likened to snow because they shall be white with virtues, and allthe heat of vices shall be put far away from them. It follows, "And there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with them. "Another reason is this; because the Jews were ever charging Jesus with being a transgressor of the Law and blasphemer, and usurping to Himself the glory of the Father, that He might prove Himself guiltless of both charges, He brings forward those who were eminent in both particulars; Moses, who gave the Law, and Elias, who was jealous for the glory of God. Another reason is, that they might learn that He has the power of life and death; by producing Moses, who was dead, and Elias, who had not yet experienced death. A further reason also the Evangelist discovers, that He might show the glory of His cross, and thus soothe Peter, and the other disciples, who were fearing His death; for they talked, as another Evangelist declares, "of His decease which He should accomplish at Jerusalem."Wherefore He brings forward those who had exposed themselves to death for God's pleasure, and for the people that believed; for both had willingly stood before tyrants, Moses before Pharaoh, Elias before Ahab. Lastly, also, He brings them forward, that the disciples should emulate their privileges, and be meek as Moses, and zealous as Elias.

You go astray, Peter, just as the other Evangelist attests: you do not know what you are saying. Do not seek three tabernacles. Seek only the tabernacle of the gospel in which the law and the prophets are to be recapitulated. By seeking three tabernacles you appear to be comparing incommensurably the two servants with the one Lord. Seek only the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, for in these there is one God, who is to be worshiped in the tabernacle of your heart.

(Verse 4.) But Peter, replying, said to Jesus: Lord, it is good for us to be here. He who had ascended to the mountains does not want to descend to earthly things; but always to persevere in the lofty things.

If you wish, let us make here three tabernacles: one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah. You are mistaken, Peter, as another evangelist testifies. You do not know what you are saying. Do not seek three tabernacles, for there is one tabernacle of the Gospel, in which the Law and the Prophets are recapitulated. But if you seek three tabernacles, do not compare servants with the Lord, but make three tabernacles: indeed, one for the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit; so that, since they are one divinity, there may be one tabernacle in your heart as well.

Yet art thou wrong, Peter, and as another Evangelist says, knowest not what thou sayest. (Luke 9:33.) Think not. of three tabernacles, when there is but one tabernacle of the Gospel in which both Law and Prophets are to be repeated. But if thou wilt have three tabernacles, set not the servants equal with their Lord, but make three tabernacles, yea make one for the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, that They whose divinity is one, may have but one tabernacle, in thy bosom.

What then saith the ardent Peter? "It is good for us to be here." For because he had heard that Christ was to go to Jerusalem and to suffer, being in fear still and trembling for Him, even after His reproof, he durst not indeed approach and say the same thing again, "Be it far from thee;" but from that fear obscurely intimates the same again in other words. That is, when he saw a mountain, and so great retirement and solitude, his thought was, "He hath great security here, even from the place; and not only from the place, but also from His going away no more unto Jerusalem." For he would have Him be there continually: wherefore also he speaks of "tabernacles." For "if this may be," saith he, "we shall not go up to Jerusalem; and if we go not up, He will not die, for there He said the scribes would set upon Him."

But thus indeed he durst not speak; but desiring however to order things so, he said undoubtingly, "It is good for us to be here," where Moses also is present, and Elias; Elias who brought down fire on the mountain, and Moses who entered into the thick darkness, and talked with God; and no one will even know where we are."

Seest thou the ardent lover of Christ? For look not now at this, that the manner of his exhortation was not well weighed, but see how ardent he was, how burning his affection to Christ. For in proof that not so much out of fear for himself he said these things, hear what he saith, when Christ was declaring beforehand His future death, and the assault upon Him: "I will lay down my life for Thy sake. Though I should die with Thee, yet will I not deny Thee."

And see how even in the very midst of the actual dangers he counselled amiss for himself. We know that when so great a multitude encompassed them, so far from flying, he even drew the sword, and cut off the ear of the high priest's servant. To such a degree did he disregard his own interest, and fear for his Master. Then because he had spoken as affirming a fact, he checks himself, and thinking, what if he should be again reproved, he saith, "If Thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles, one for Thee and one for Moses, and one for Elias."

What sayest thou, O Peter? didst thou not a little while since distinguish Him from the servants? Art thou again numbering Him with the servants? Seest thou how exceedingly imperfect they were before the crucifixion? For although the Father had revealed it to him, yet he did not always retain the revelation, but was troubled by his alarm; not this only, which I have mentioned, but another also, arising from that sight. In fact, the other evangelists, to declare this, and to indicate that the confusion of his mind, with which he spake these things, arose from that alarm, said as follows; mark, "He wist not what to say, for they were sore afraid;" but Luke after his saying, "Let us make three tabernacles," added, "not knowing what he said." Then to show that he was holden with great fear, both he and the rest, he saith, "They were heavy with sleep, and when they were awake they saw His glory;" meaning by deep sleep here, the deep stupor engendered in them by that vision. For as eyes are darkened by an excessive splendor, so at that time also did they feel. For it was not, I suppose, night, but day; and the exceeding greatness of the light weighed down the infirmity of their eyes.

Excited therefore by these revelations of secret realities, the apostle Peter, spurning the mundane and loathing earthly things, was seized by a certain excess of passion toward a yearning for eternal things. Filled up with the joy of the whole vision, he wished to dwell there with Jesus where he was delighting in Christ's manifested glory. Thus Peter said, "Lord, it is good for us to be here; if you wish, I will make three booths here, one for you and one for Moses and one for Elijah." But the Lord did not reply to this suggestion, for it was not wicked but inappropriate, since the world could not be saved except by Christ's death. And in the Lord's warning the faith of those who believe is called to account. Among the temptations of this life we should understand that we are to ask for endurance before glory. Good fortune in ruling cannot come before a time of enduring.

Also in supposing that tabernacles were to be built for conversation in heaven, in which houses are not needed, as it is written in the Apocalypse, I saw not any temple therein. (Rev. 21:22.)

Otherwise; At this view of the majesty of the Lord, and His two servants, Peter was so delighted, that, forgetting every thing else in the world, he would abide here for ever. But if Peter was then so fired with admiration, what ravishment will it not be to behold the King in His proper beauty, and to mingle in the choir of the Angels, and of all the saints? In that Peter says, Lord, if thou wilt, he shows the submission of a dutiful and obedient servant.

He was wrong moreover, in desiring that the kingdom of the elect should be set up on earth, when the Lord had promised to give it in heaven. He was wrong also in forgetting that himself and his fellow were mortal, and in desiring to come to eternal felicity without taste of death.

Subsequently, fleeing from threatening Jezebel, after one single (meal of) food and drink, which he had found on being awakened by an angel, he too himself, in a space of forty days and nights, his belly empty, his mouth dry, arrived at Mount Horeb; where, when he had made a cave his inn, with how familiar a meeting with God was he received! "What (doest) thou, Elijah, here? " Much more friendly was this voice than, "Adam, where art thou? " For the latter voice was uttering a threat to a fed man, the former soothing a fasting one. Such is the prerogative of circumscribed food, that it makes God tent-fellow with man-peer, in truth, with peer! For if the eternal God will not hunger, as He testifies through Isaiah, this will be the time for man to be made equal with God, when he lives without food.

Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus, Lord, it is good for us to be here: if Thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for Thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elijah. Peter, out of great love, did not want Christ to suffer, and so he said, "It is good to stay here and for Thee not to go down and be slain. And if anyone should come here we have both Moses and Elijah to help us. For Moses contended with the Egyptians, and Elijah called down fire out of heaven: such opponents do we have for any enemies who might come here." He spoke these things out of great fear, not knowing, as Luke says, what he was saying (Lk. 9:33). For either the extraordinary nature of the event had dumbfounded him, or he truly did not know what he was saying, when he spoke of wanting Jesus to remain on the mountain and not come down and suffer for our sake. But fearing to appear presumptuous, Peter said, "If Thou wilt."

Then follows Peter's response: and Peter answering, said, etc. And we can interpret this as referring either to carnality or to devotion. Chrysostom refers it to carnality. Above, Christ had said that he would suffer, and Peter had rebuked him, at which he reproved him. Hence Moses and Elijah appeared speaking of his passion; therefore when Peter heard them speaking of it, he could not bear to hear it. Hence he did not wish to oppose directly; therefore he thought that if they remained there, he would escape death. So, lest they depart quickly, he said let us make here three tabernacles. And why did he say one for Moses, and one for Elijah? Because he saw him disposed toward death, he wanted them to prevent his death. Concerning Elijah it is read in 4 Kings 1:10 that when the king sent a captain of fifty, he made fire come down from heaven. Likewise it is read of Moses in Numbers 16:32 that when a quarrel arose at the tabernacle, a cloud descended. Therefore he thought that through Moses a cloud could be obtained, and through Elijah, fire. But others refer it to Peter's devotion. And according to this he does two things: first, he touches upon the affection; secondly, the counsel, at if you will, etc. He says therefore Lord, it is good for us to be here. From exceeding fervor, seeing the glory, he was so moved that he would never have wished to be separated, if God had willed it. And what shall it be for those who will be in perfect glory? Hence those dwelling in that blessedness will never wish to be separated; Psalm 72:28: it is good for me to adhere to God, etc. Secondly, he gives counsel, and as Luke 9:23 says, not knowing what he said; hence he says if you will, let us make here three tabernacles: because we ought to submit our will to the divine will, as above at 6:10: your will be done, etc. Hence in this Peter spoke well; but in the other matter he spoke badly, because he believed that glory could be had without death, which is against 2 Corinthians 5:1: for we know, if our earthly house of this habitation be dissolved, that we have a building of God, a house not made with hands, eternal in heaven. Likewise because he believed that the glory of the saints would be in this world, which is not here but in heaven; above at 5:12: be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. Likewise because he believed that they would need dwellings; but they do not need them here, for they have them in heaven, as Apocalypse 21:3: behold the tabernacle of God with men. Likewise because he wanted three tabernacles to be made: for one suffices for the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Likewise because he compared Christ to the others: but this ought not to be done; Job 32:21: I will not equate God to man. Peter, all have one tabernacle, which is faith.

The Father is evidently revealing the Son when the ringing voice from heaven bursts forth so loudly. Through it he reveals to everyone the testimony coming from above. One must not think that the voice of God is audible. Nor can one perceive a bodiless being. Just as no one has ever seen God, so no one has ever heard God. The words "listen to him" have the power of making a necessary distinction. For he says listen to him, rather than to Moses or the prophet who had been introduced, because it was now time to go forward and advance from the introduction to the fulfillment, from the prefiguration to the true reality.

(ap. Anselm.) It is to be observed, that the mystery of the second regeneration, that, to wit, which shall be in the resurrection, when the flesh shall be raised again, agrees well with the mystery of the first which is in baptism, when the soul is raised again. For in the baptism of Christ is shown the working of the whole Trinity; there was the Son incarnate, the Holy Ghost appealing in the figure of a dove, and the Father made known by the voice. In like manner in the transfiguration, which is the sacrament of the second regeneration, the whole Trinity appeared; the Father in the voice, the Son in the man, and the Holy Spirit in the cloud. It is made a question how the Holy Spirit was shown there in the dove, here in the cloud. Because it is His manner to mark His gifts by specific outward forms. And the gift of baptism is innocence, which is denoted by the bird of purity. But as in the resurrection, He is to give splendour and refreshment, therefore in the cloud are denoted both the refreshment and the brightness of the rising bodies. It follows, And when the disciples heard it, they fell on their faces, and feared greatly.

This is the Son, this the Beloved, this the Accepted; and He it is who is to be heard, as the voice out of the cloud signifies, saying, Hear ye Him. For He is a fit teacher of doing the things He has done, who has given the weight of His own example to the loss of the world, the joy of the cross, the death of the body, and after that the glory of the heavenly kingdom.

Because Peter had asked imprudently, he does not merit the Lord's answer. But the Father answered for the Son so that the word of the Lord might be fulfilled: "I do not bear witness for myself, but the Father who sent me, he bears witness for me." The cloud appears bright and shades them, so that those who were looking for a material booth made from boughs or tents might be protected with the shade of a shining cloud. The voice of the Father speaking from heaven is also heard. It provides testimony and teaches Peter the truth with error removed, and in fact through Peter teaches all the apostles: "This is my beloved Son." It is for him that you must build the tabernacle, him you must obey. "My Son" is distinguished from his servants, Moses and Elijah. They, along with you, are to prepare a tabernacle for the Lord in the inner sanctum of their heart.

(Verse 5) While he was still speaking, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them. And behold, a voice from the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him. Because he had asked foolishly, he does not deserve an answer from the Lord, but the Father speaks for the Son, so that the word of the Lord may be fulfilled: I do not testify of myself, but the Father who sent me, he testifies of me (John 5:37 and 8:18). But the cloud is seen as both bright and shadowed: like those who sought the tabernacle from the fleshly leaves or tents, they would be covered by the shadow of the bright cloud. Moreover, the voice of the Father speaking from heaven is heard, which also testifies to the Son; and through Peter, with error removed, teaches the truth: even through Peter to the other apostles. This is, he says, my beloved Son: to him the tabernacle must be affixed, to him obedience must be given. Here is the son, those slaves are: Moses and Elias themselves must prepare a tabernacle for the Lord with you in the innermost depths of their heart.

While they thought only of an earthly tabernacle of boughs or tents, they are overshadowed by the covering of a bright cloud; While he yet spake, there came a bright cloud and overshadowed them. (Exod. 19:9, 16.)

Forasmuch as Peter had asked unwisely, he deserves not any answer; but the Father makes answer for the Son, that the Lord's word might be fulfilled, He that sent me, he beareth witness of me. (John 5:37.)

The voice of the Father is heard speaking from heaven, giving testimony to the Son, and teaching Peter the truth, taking away his error, and through Peter the other disciples also; whence he proceeds, This is my beloved Son. For Him make the tabernacle, Him obey; this is the Son, they are but servants; and they also ought as you to make ready a tabernacle for the Lord in the inmost parts of their heart.

What then? He Himself speaks nothing, nor Moses, nor Elias, but He that is greater than all, and more worthy of belief, the Father, uttereth a voice out of the cloud.

Wherefore out of the cloud? Thus doth God ever appear. "For a cloud and darkness are round about Him;" and, "He sitteth on a light cloud;" and again, "Who maketh clouds His chariot;" and, "A cloud received Him out of their sight;" and, "As the Son of Man coming in the clouds."

In order then that they might believe that the voice proceeds from God, it comes from thence.

And the cloud was bright. For "while he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them; and, behold, a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye Him."

For as, when He threatens, He shows a dark cloud; as on Mount Sinai; for "Moses," it is said, "entered into the cloud, and into the thick darkness; and as a vapor, so went up the smoke;" and the prophet said, when speaking of His threatening, "Dark water in clouds of the air;" so here, because it was His desire not to alarm, but to teach, it is a bright cloud.

And whereas Peter had said "Let us make three tabernacles," He showed a tabernacle not made with hands. Wherefore in that case it was smoke, and vapor of a furnace; but in this, light unspeakable and a voice.

Then, to signify that not merely concerning some one of the three was it spoken, but concerning Christ only; when the voice was uttered, they were taken away. For by no means, had it been spoken merely concerning any one of them, would this man have remained alone, the two being severed from Him.

Why then did not the cloud likewise receive Christ alone, but all of them together? If it had received Christ alone, He would have been thought to have Himself uttered the voice. Wherefore also the evangelist, making sure this same point, saith, that the voice was from the cloud, that is, from God.

And what saith the voice? "This is my beloved Son." Now if He is beloved, fear not thou, O Peter. For thou oughtest indeed to know His power already, and to be fully assured touching His resurrection; but since thou knowest not, at least from the voice of the Father take courage. For if God be mighty, as surely He is mighty, very evidently the Son is so likewise. Be not afraid then of those fearful things.

But if as yet thou receive it not, consider at least that other fact, that He is both a Son, and is beloved. For "This," it is said, "is My beloved Son." Now if He is beloved, fear not. For no one gives up one whom he loves. Be not thou therefore confounded; though thou lovest Him beyond measure, thou lovest Him not as much as He that begat Him.

"In whom I am well pleased." For not because He begat Him only, doth He love Him, but because He is also equal to Him in all respects, and of one mind with Him. So that the charm of love is twofold, or rather even threefold, because He is the Son, because He is beloved, because in Him He is well pleased.

But what means, "In whom I am well pleased?" As though He had said, "In whom I am refreshed, in whom I take delight;" because He is in all respects perfectly equal with Himself, and there is but one will in Him and in the Father, and though He continue a Son, He is in all respects one with the Father.

"Hear ye Him." So that although He choose to be crucified, you are not to oppose Him.

A voice from the cloud said, This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him. I am manifested through his preaching. I am glorified through his humility. So listen to him without hesitation. He is the truth and the life. He is my strength and wisdom. "Listen to him" whom the mysteries of the law foreshadowed, of whom the mouths of the prophets sang. "Listen to him" who by his blood redeemed the world, who binds the devil and seizes his vessels, who breaks the debt of sin and the bondage of iniquity. "Listen to him" who opens the way to heaven and by the pain of the cross prepares for you the steps of ascent into his kingdom.

I think that God, wishing to dissuade Peter from making three tabernacles, under which so far as it depended on his choice he was going to dwell, shows him a better tabernacle, so to speak, and far superior: the cloud. It is the function of a tabernacle to give shade to one who is in it and to shelter him, and the bright cloud overshadowed them. So God made, as it were, a more divine tabernacle, inasmuch as it was bright, that it might be to them a pattern of the resurrection to come. For the shining cloud gives shade to the righteous and at the same time protects them, gives them light and illuminates them. What would the shining cloud that gives shade to the righteous be? Is it perhaps the Father's power, from which comes the Father's voice saying that this is his Son in whom he is well pleased, urging those that are shaded by it to listen to him and to no one else? He speaks—just as of old so also for all times—through those whom he wishes. Perhaps the shining cloud is the Holy Spirit, giving shade to the righteous and announcing the words of God at work within it and saying, "This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased." I would even venture to say that the shining cloud is our Savior.

The bright cloud overshadowing the Saints is the Power of the Father, or perhaps the Holy Spirit; or I may also venture to call the Saviour that bright cloud which overshadows the Gospel, the Law, and the Prophets, as they understand who can behold His light in all these three.

The voice out of the cloud speaks either to Moses or Elias, who desired to see the Son of God, and to hear Him; or it is for the teaching of the Apostles.

He says therefore, Hear ye Him, as much as to say, Let the shadow of the Law be past, and the types of the Prophets, and follow ye the one shining light of the Gospel. Or He says, Hear ye Him, to show that it was He whom Moses had foretold, The Lord your God shall raise up a Prophet unto you of your brethren like unto me, Him shall ye hear. (Deut. 18:18.) Thus the Lord had witnesses on all sides; from heaven the voice of the Father, Elias out of Paradise, Moses out of Hades, the Apostles from among men, that at the name of Jesus every thing should bow the knee, of things in heaven, things on earth, and things beneath.

But, behold, with an abundance (of evidence) the Father from heaven replies, for the purpose of testifying to the Son: "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye Him." So, again, in that asseveration, "I have both glorified, and will glorify again," how many Persons do you discover, obstinate Praxeas? Are there not as many as there are voices? You have the Son on earth, you have the Father in heaven.

While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye Him. You, Peter, desire tabernacles made with hands, but the Father has formed around them another tabernacle not made with hands, the cloud, showing that just as He Himself appeared as God in a cloud to the men of old, so also does His Son now appear in a cloud. Here the cloud is bright, not dark as in the time of old, for He desires not to bring fear but to teach. Out of the cloud came the voice, to show that it was of God. "In Whom I am well pleased," that is, in Whom I rest and take pleasure. And He teaches: "Hear ye Him and if He willeth to be crucified, oppose Him not."

Then follows the testimony: and while he was yet speaking, behold a bright cloud overshadowed them, etc. Peter was speaking foolishly, therefore he was unworthy of an answer. He wanted a material testimony; therefore the Lord willed to show that the saints do not need one. Likewise he willed to show himself through the cloud; Psalm 67:35: his magnificence is in the clouds. But sometimes a bright cloud appears, and sometimes a dark cloud; in Exodus 19:18 it is said that a cloud of darkness appeared; but here a bright one appears, because it signifies the consolation of glory, for then they will be protected from all heat; Apocalypse 21:4: God shall wipe away all tears from the eyes of the saints, and death shall be no more, nor mourning, nor crying, nor sorrow shall be any more, for the former things are passed away. Then follows the testimony from the voice of the Father; hence and a voice from the cloud, saying, etc. But why from the cloud? To signify that it is the voice of the Father. The Lord dwells in the cloud. This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. The dignity of Christ is touched upon from the property of sonship, from the perfection of love, and from the conformity of operation. Hence he says this is, as though a singular Son. Others are sons by adoption; Psalm 81:6: I have said: you are gods, and all of you sons of the Most High; but this one is the true Son, namely in a singular way, as 1 John 5:20: the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, that we may know the true God. Likewise, in another way, beloved. Our love arises from the goodness of a creature. For a thing is not good because I love it, but because it is good, I love it. But the love of God is the cause of the goodness of things. And just as God poured out goodness upon creatures through creation, so upon his Son through generation, because he communicates all his goodness to the Son; hence creatures are blessed by participation, but to the Son he gave everything; John 3:35: the Father loves the Son and has given all things into his hands. Hence love itself proceeds from the Father loving the Son and from the Son loving the Father. But it happens that something is given to someone, and he does not make good use of what is given, and therefore does not please the giver; but God gave to this one the fullness, and he used it well; therefore he was pleased with him; hence he says in whom I am well pleased. The same is found above at 12:18: in whom I am well pleased, and in whom my soul rests. Because therefore he is such, hear him. Hence he intimates that he has been given as the teacher of all; Deuteronomy 18:15: the Lord will raise up a prophet from your nation; hear him as you would me. Or hear him, not Moses, not Elijah, except insofar as they teach Christ, or the teaching of Christ. Note that Christ had testimony from heaven from the Father, from hell from Moses, and from Elijah from paradise, and from the disciples from earth: that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those that are in heaven, on earth, and under the earth, Philippians 2:10. Likewise it should be noted that there is a twofold regeneration: one in baptism, the other when we shall be cleansed from every defilement of spirit. Hence in baptism Jesus was designated by the dove, which is a simple animal, to designate simplicity; it is also a fruitful animal, to designate the other regeneration. He appeared in a bright cloud, to designate brightness and the extinction of all concupiscence; Isaiah 4:5: and the Lord will create upon every place of Mount Sion, and where he is called upon, a cloud by day, and a smoke and the brightness of a flaming fire by night.

Through their speaking together it shows that the old prophets also spoke the same things as Jesus, even if enigmatically. In great awe the disciples fell on their faces, and the Savior raised them up. This shows that if Jesus had not been incarnate and had not been Mediator between God and humanity and strengthened his own nature, he would not have endured to hear the voice of God.

(Verse 6.) And when the disciples heard this, they fell on their faces and were exceedingly afraid. They were terrified for three reasons: either because they realized they had made a mistake, or because a shining cloud had covered them, or because they had heard the voice of God the Father speaking. For human frailty cannot bear the sight of greater glory and, trembling in mind and body, falls to the ground. The more one seeks greater things, the more one will collapse into lower things if one does not know one's own measure.

Their cause of terror is threefold. Because they knew that they had done amiss; or because the bright cloud had covered them; or because they had heard the voice of God the Father speaking; for human frailty cannot endure to look upon so great glory, and falls to the earth trembling through both soul and body. And by how much higher any one has aimed, by so much lower will be his fall, if he shall be ignorant of his own measure.

"And when they heard it, they fell on their face, and were sore afraid."

How was it that, when they heard these words, they were dismayed? And yet before this also a like voice was uttered at Jordan, and a multitude was present, and no one felt anything of the kind; and afterwards again, when also they said, "It thundered," yet neither at that time did they experience anything like this. How then did they fall down in the mount? Because there was solitude, and height, and great quietness, and a transfiguration full of awe, and a pure light, and a cloud stretched out; all which things put them in great alarm. And the amazement came thick on every side, and they fell down both in fear at once and in adoration.

Whereas the holy Apostles fell upon their faces, that was a proof of their sanctity, for the saints are always described to fall upon their faces, but the wicked to fall backwards.

A like danger to which also befell Peter, and John, and James, (who confronted not the same light) without risking the loss of their reason and mind; and if they, who were unable to endure the glory of the Son, had only seen the Father, they must have died then and there: "For no man shall see God, and live.

And when the disciples heard it, they fell on their faces, and were sore afraid. Not able to endure the brightness of the cloud, nor the voice, the disciples fell to the ground. Their eyes were also heavy with sleep, as Luke says (See Lk. 9:32), ("sleep" indicating the daze caused by the vision).

And the disciples hearing fell upon their face, and were very much afraid. Having presented the transfiguration, here he presents its effect upon the disciples. And first, fear is presented; secondly, Christ's strengthening against fear; thirdly, its effect. The second is at and Jesus came, etc.; the third at and they lifting up their eyes, saw no one. He says therefore and hearing. They heard the voice of the Father from the cloud, as is said in 2 Peter 1:18: this voice we heard when we were on the mountain. And he presents a sign of fear, because they fell upon their face. Then follows the fear: and they were very much afraid. But why were they afraid? Jerome gives three reasons. First, because they recognized that they had erred, as is said of Adam in Genesis 3:10: Lord, I heard your voice and was afraid, because I was naked. Likewise because they were enveloped in the cloud, they recognized the presence of the divine majesty; Exodus 13:21: and the Lord went before them to show the way by day in a pillar of a cloud, etc. And it is natural that everyone is astonished at what he is unaccustomed to. Likewise on account of the voice from the cloud; Deuteronomy 5:26: what is all flesh that it should hear the voice of the living God? And from this their strength failed, because they fell upon their face. But it should be noted that the wicked fall differently than the saints. The wicked fall backward, as is found in 1 Kings 4:18 concerning Eli, who when he had heard the reports about the ark of the Lord, fell from his chair and, his neck broken, expired. But the saints fall upon their faces; Apocalypse 7:11: they fell upon their faces. And the reason is that we do not see what is behind us. Ecclesiastes 2:14: the eyes of a wise man are in his head.

(Verse 8.) But lifting up their eyes, they saw no one except Jesus alone. Reasonably, after they had risen, they saw no one except Jesus alone: lest if Moses and Elijah had continued with the Lord, the uncertain voice of the Father would be seen, to whom he would give the testimony. Therefore, they see Jesus standing, the cloud having been taken away, and Moses and Elijah had vanished: because after the shadow of the Law and the Prophets had departed, which had covered the apostles with its veil, both lights are found in the Gospel.

And when they lifted up their eyes, they saw no man, save Jesus only; which was done with good reason; for had Moses and Elias continued with the Lord, it might have seemed uncertain to which in particular the witness of the Father was borne. Also they see Jesus standing after the cloud has been removed, and Moses and Elias disappeared, because after the shadow of the Law and Prophets has departed, both are found in the Gospel.

Consider the details of this passage. See if you can also say this: The disciples understood that the Son of God had been speaking with Moses. It was Moses who had said of God, "No one shall see my face and live." The disciples understood the testimony of Moses about God. They were not able to endure the radiance of the Word. They humbled themselves under the mighty hand of God.But after the touch of the Word, they lifted up their eyes. They saw Jesus only and no other. Moses, the law and Elijah the prophet had become one with the gospel of Jesus. They did not abide as they formerly were as three, but they became one. Think of these things in a spiritual sense.

And when they had lifted up their eyes, they saw no man, save Jesus only. He is seen to be alone, so that you will not imagine that the voice was for Moses or Elijah; indeed, the voice was for Christ, as He is the Son.

Then follows the effect of the strengthening: and they lifting up their eyes saw no one but only Jesus. And this is the effect of divine strengthening, because those strengthened by Christ see no one but Jesus, nor do they rejoice or find strength in anything except in him; Philippians 1:21: for to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain. Likewise they saw no one but only Jesus, because when the shadow of the law departs, and the teaching of the prophets, which are signified by Moses and Elijah, the teaching of Christ alone is held. Or, according to another reading, he alone remained, lest the voice seem to have been addressed to Moses or Elijah. Hence, when they no longer appeared, it was certain that the voice was addressed to him.

We must seek for reasons for individual sayings and actions of the Lord. After the coin was found, after the tribute paid, what do the apostles' sudden questions mean? Why precisely "at that time" did the disciples come to Jesus saying, "Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?" Because they had seen that the same tax had been paid for both Peter and the Lord. From the equal price they inferred that Peter may have been set over all the other apostles, since Peter had been compared with the Lord in the paying of the tax. So they ask who is greater in the kingdom of heaven. Jesus, seeing their thoughts and understanding the causes of their error, wants to heal their desire for glory with a struggle for humility.

(Chapter 18, Verse 1) At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, Who do you think is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? This has often been discussed and is still worth considering. We must examine the reasons for each of the Lord's words and actions. After finding the coin, after paying the taxes, what does the sudden question from the apostles mean? At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, Who do you think is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? Because they had seen the tribute paid by Peter and the Lord, equal in price, they decided that Peter should be preferred to all the other apostles, who had been compared to the Lord in the payment of the tribute. Therefore, they asked who is greater in the kingdom of heaven? And Jesus, seeing their thoughts and understanding the causes of their error, wanted to heal their desire for glory and their striving for humility.

The disciples seeing one piece of money paid both for Peter and the Lord, conceived from this equality of ransom that Peter was preferred before all the rest of the Apostles.

The disciples experienced some feeling of human weakness; wherefore the evangelist also adds this note, saying, "In that hour;" when He had preferred him to all. For of James too, and John, one was a firstborn son, but no such thing as this had He done for them.

Then, being ashamed to avow their feeling, they say not indeed openly, "Wherefore hast thou preferred Peter to us?" or, "Is he greater than we are?" for they were ashamed; but indefinitely they ask, "Who then is greater?" For when they saw the three preferred, they felt nothing of the kind; but now that the honor had come round to one, they were vexed. And not for this only, but there were many other things which they put together to kindle that feeling. For to him He had said, "I will give thee the keys;" to him, "Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona;" to him here, "Give unto them for me and thee;" and seeing too in general how freely he was allowed to speak, it somewhat fretted them. And if Mark saith, that they did not ask, but reasoned in themselves, that is nothing contrary to this. For it is likely that they did both the one and the other, and whereas before, on another occasion, they had had this feeling, both once and twice, that now they did both declare it, and reason among themselves.

But to thee I say, "Look not to the charge against them only, but consider this too; first, that they seek none of the things of this world; next, that even this passion they afterwards laid aside, and give up the first place one to another." But we are not able to attain so much as unto their faults, neither do we seek, "who is greatest in the kingdom of heaven;" but, who is greatest in the earthly kingdom, who is wealthiest, who most powerful.

Herein we ought to be imitators of the disciples, that when any question of doubt arises among us, and we find not how to settle it, We should with one consent go to Jesus, Who is able to enlighten the hearts of men to the explication of every perplexity. We shall also consult some of the doctors, who are thought most eminent in the Churches. But in that they asked this question, the disciples knew that there was not an equality among the saints in the kingdom of heaven; what they yet sought to learn was, how they were so, and lived as greater and less. Or, from what the Lord had said above, they knew Who was the best and who was great; but out of many great, who was the greatest, this Was not clear to them.

In the understanding of grace, or in ecclesiastical dignity, or at least in everlasting blessedness.

But further, if Christ reproves the scribes and Pharisees, sitting in the official chair of Moses, but not doing what they taught, what kind of (supposition). is it that He Himself withal should set upon His own official chair men who were mindful rather to enjoin-(but) not likewise to practise-sanctity of the flesh, which (sanctity) He had in all ways recommended to their teaching and practising?-first by His own example, then by all other arguments; while He tells (them) that "the kingdom of heavens" is "children's; " while He associates with these (children) others who, after marriage, remained (or became)virgins; " while He calls (them) to (copy) the simplicity of the dove, a bird not merely innocuous, but modest too, and whereof one male knows one female; while He denies the Samaritan woman's (partner to be) a husband, that He may show that manifold husbandry is adultery; while, in the revelation of His own glory, He prefers, from among so many saints and prophets, to have with him Moses and Elias -the one a monogamist, the other a voluntary celibate (for Elias was nothing else than John, who came "in the power and spirit of Elias" ); while that "man gluttonous and toping," the "frequenter of luncheons and suppers, in the company of publicans and sinners," sups once for all at a single marriage, though, of course, many were marrying (around Him); for He willed to attend (marriages) only so often as (He willed) them to be.

In that same hour came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? When they saw that Peter had been honored by Christ (for he had been honored by being instructed to give the coin for Christ and for himself), they fell prey to a human weakness and were stung by jealousy. So they approached and asked the Lord craftily, "Who is the greatest?"

Above the Lord showed the future glory in his transfiguration; here he treats of the advancement toward that glory. And it is divided into two parts, because first he teaches how one must arrive at it; secondly, certain persons are rebuked who inordinately seek preeminence in glory, which begins in chapter 20. Regarding the first, he first teaches how one must arrive at that glory by the common way; secondly, how by the way of perfection, which begins in chapter 19. First, because one arrives at glory through humility; therefore, first he shows the manner of humility; secondly, he forbids the causing of scandal, at but he who shall scandalize one of these little ones etc.; thirdly, he teaches that what has been inflicted must be forgiven, at and if your hand or your foot scandalize you, cut it off, and cast it from you. Regarding the first, the question of the disciples is set forth; secondly, the response of Christ. The occasion of the question is taken from what was said to Peter, that he should go to the sea, and pay the stater found in the fish for himself and for Peter; hence it seemed that he had preferred him to the others. And because they were still weak, they suffered a certain stirring of zeal and envy. But notice that when he led only three up to the mountain, they were not moved as they are here, when he prefers one alone. Hence they asked, who, do you think, is the greater in the kingdom of heaven? Since one does not arrive there through superiority, but through the spirit of humility; Phil 2:3: in humility, let each esteem others better than themselves, etc. In this request the following is to be imitated: that they were not desirous of earthly things, but of heavenly things; 2 Cor 4:18: while we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen, etc. But what of this? Should not preeminence in the kingdom of heaven be sought? It must be said that having eminence in the kingdom of heaven is twofold. Either such that we consider ourselves worthy; and this is pride and against the Apostle, Phil 2:3: in humility, let each esteem others better than themselves, etc. But to desire greater grace, so that greater glory may be ours, is not evil, as in 1 Cor 12:31: be zealous for the better gifts. Likewise, the apostles knew that in glory there were various mansions, just as star differs from star in brightness; therefore they asked, because they believed one was greater than another: against certain heretics who held the contrary.

It is, of course, the essence of Christianity that God loves man and for his sake became man and died. But that does not prove that man is the sole end of nature. In the parable, it was the one lost sheep that the shepherd went in search of:" it was not the only sheep in the flock, and we are not told that it was the most valuable — save in so far as the most desperately in need has, while the need lasts, a peculiar value in the eyes of Love. The doctrine of the Incarnation would conflict with what we know of this vast universe only if we knew also that there were other rational species in it who had, like us, fallen, and who needed redemption in the same mode, and that they had not been vouchsafed it. But we know none of these things. It may be full of life that needs no redemption. It may be full of life that has been redeemed. It may be full of things quite other than life which satisfy the Divine Wisdom in fashions one cannot conceive. We are in no position to draw up maps of God's psychology, and prescribe limits to His interests. We would not do so even for a man whom we knew to be greater than ourselves. The doctrines that God is love and that He delights in men, are positive doctrines, not limiting doctrines. He is not less than this. What more He may be, we do not know; we know only that He must be more than we can conceive.

He called a child to him to ask its age or to show the image of innocence. Or perhaps he actually set a child in their midst—he himself, who had not come to be served but to serve—to show them an example of humility.

(Verse 2.) And calling a little child, he set him in the midst of them, and said. Either simply any little child, to inquire about his age, and to demonstrate the likeness of innocence. Or certainly he placed a little child in their midst, who had come not to be served, but to serve, in order to give them an example of humility. Others interpret the little child as the Holy Spirit, whom he placed in the hearts of the disciples, in order to transform pride into humility.

Jesus seeing their thoughts would heal their ambitious strivings, by arousing an emulation in lowliness; whence it follows, And Jesus calling a little child, set him in the midst of them.

What then saith Christ? He unveils their conscience, and replies to their feeling, not merely to their words. "For He called a little child unto Him," saith the Scripture, "and said, Except ye be converted, and become as this little child, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven." "Why, you," He saith, "inquire who is greatest, and are contentious for first honors; but I pronounce him, that is not become lowest of all, unworthy so much as to enter in thither."

And full well doth He both allege that pattern, and not allege it only, but also set the child in the midst, by the very sight abashing them, and persuading them to be in like manner lowly and artless. Since both from envy the little child is pure, and from vainglory, and from longing for the first place; and he is possessed of the greatest of virtues, simplicity, and whatever is artless and lowly.

Not courage then only is wanted, nor wisdom, but this virtue also, humility I mean, and simplicity. Yea, and the things that belong to our salvation halt even in the chiefest point, if these be not with us.

The little child, whether it be insulted and beaten, or honored and glorified, neither by the one is it moved to impatience or envy, nor by the other lifted up.

Seest thou how again He calls us on to all natural excellencies, indicating that of free choice it is possible to attain them, and so silences the wicked frenzy of the Manichaeans? For if nature be an evil thing, wherefore doth He draw from hence His patterns of severe goodness? And the child which He set in the midst suppose to have been a very young child indeed, free from all these passions. For such a little child is free from pride and the mad desire of glory, and envy, and contentiousness, and all such passions, and having many virtues, simplicity, humility, unworldliness, prides itself upon none of them; which is a twofold severity of goodness; to have these things, and not to be puffed up about them.

After our Lord had rejected the companies of the wise, and the bands of cunning and crafty men, and had chosen those fishermen who were innocent and without instruction, He moreover taught them also to increase their simplicity, and not to abide in that first grade of their childlikeness only. And He took a child and set him in the midst of them, and looking at them all, He said, "Except ye be converted, and become like this child, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven." And this our Lord did because He saw that they sought to depart from the mind of their simplicity through a question of position of honour and to receive one a grade above the other. A question such as this the simple never seek to enquire into, but this question was born of a mind which desired to examine into matters with craftiness. And our Lord rebuked this outcome of a troublesome question, and said to His disciples, chiding and reproving them, "If ye are Mine ye must be simple men, and if ye desire the kingdom of heaven, ye must be like unto this child; as ye desire to receive the life which is to come abide in sincerity. If ye wish to become wise in the word of life abide in your ignorance, for from being simple I do not desire that ye become cunning, but from being simple become ye wise. For he that runneth to become cunning from being simple goeth downwards, but he that runneth to become simple from being cunning goeth upwards. The cunning man receiveth not My doctrine, and for the reason that ye are simple children I have chosen you. Ye have rejected cunning in others, beware lest it be in you and I reject you because of it. Let this child be a proof to you that as he desireth nothing of the world, and asketh for nothing of the children of men, neither rank nor honour, neither riches nor power, but only the mere food and clothing of which his childhood hath need, so also do ye become children like unto him, and upright and simple like unto him, that ye may be to Me chosen disciples, and that ye may be found by Me to be even as I have chosen you." Behold then, by this command also did Jesus our Lord incite us to simplicity, and He warned us to become innocent and upright.

And Jesus called a little child unto Him, and set him in the midst of them, and said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be turned back, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven. When the Lord sees the disciples under the sway of the passion of vainglory, He restrains them, showing them the way of humility by means of an unassuming child. For we must be as children in the humility of our mind, but not be infantile in our thoughts; and we must be as children in guilelessness, but not in foolishness. By saying, "Except ye be turned back," He showed that they had gone from humility to vainglory. You must turn back again to that place, which is humility, from which you departed.

Consequently, Christ's response is set forth, and it presents both an action and a saying of Christ; hence it says and Jesus calling unto him a little child. Who this little child was is explained in three ways. Chrysostom explains it as truly a little child, because he was free from passions, so as to provide an example of humility, as below in chapter 19:14: suffer the little children to come to me. And it is said that this child was the blessed Martial. It is explained another way, that Christ, considering himself as a little child, placed himself in the midst, saying unless you become as this little child, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven. Luke 20:27: I am in the midst of you as he who serves. In yet another way, because by the little child is understood the Holy Spirit, who makes people little, because he is the spirit of humility; Ezek 36:27: I will put my spirit in the midst of you.