Luke § 48

For John loving much, and therefore much beloved, thinks that they should be excluded from the privilege who did not practise obedience.

But answering, John said: Master, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we forbade him, because he does not follow with us. John, loving the Lord with special devotion and thus worthy to be loved back, thought he should be excluded from the benefit who did not use his service. But he is taught that no one should be excluded from the good he has in part, but rather to be encouraged towards what he does not yet have.

But John answering etc. After the teaching of humility toward those of one's own household, he teaches that humility must be maintained toward outsiders: concerning the introduction of which, three things are set forth. For first there is introduced on the part of the outsider the operation of virtue; second, on the part of the disciple the prohibition of rashness; third, on the part of the Master the persuasion of humility.

First therefore he introduces the operation of virtue on the part of the outsider, when he says: But John answering said: Master, we saw someone casting out demons in your name. For because the Lord had urged humility, John, wishing to know whether the teaching extends to outsiders, therefore responds and introduces this outsider working wonders. Now those who are outsiders to Christ can work miracles, according to that passage in Matthew 7: "Many will say to me: Lord, in your name we cast out demons and in your name we worked many mighty deeds." Then he will say to them: "Depart from me, you who work iniquity." Now this happens when someone has faith in the Lord Christ without the love of charity, according to that passage in First Corinthians 13: "If I should have faith so as to move mountains, but have not charity, I am nothing." And this is because charity is that which makes one a friend of Christ. In this, moreover, the power of the name of Christ is manifest, that it is of great efficacy even when invoked by outsiders, so that, according to that passage in Philippians 2, "at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, on earth, and under the earth." Whence below in the tenth chapter: "Lord, in your name even the demons are subject to us."

Second, he introduces the prohibition of rashness on the part of the disciple, when he says: And we forbade him, namely I together with others; which was not without the mark of presumption, since Proverbs 3: "Do not forbid him who is able to do good; if you can, do good yourself also." - Because nevertheless what is done from the swelling of pride is frequently cloaked under zeal for justice, therefore he adds: Because he does not follow you with us: and therefore he is not worthy to be like us in the working of miracles, who is not like us in the fulfillment of counsels. In this, however, pride lay hidden, as if he were saying that word of Isaiah 65: "Who say: Depart from me, do not come near me, for you are unclean." And that jealousy was apparent, of which Numbers 11 speaks concerning the men who prophesied in the camp without Moses, that "Joshua, the son of Nun, said: My lord Moses, forbid them. But he said: Why are you jealous for my sake?" Whence John, who was the foremost lover of the Lord and a zealot for His honor, wished to exclude from the preaching of Christ's name everyone who did not love the Lord. Whence Bede in the Gloss: "John, loving the Lord and beloved by the Lord, thinks that he who does not render service should be excluded from the benefit." Nevertheless he was mistaken, because, Philippians 1, "whether by occasion or by truth Christ is proclaimed, yet in this I rejoice and will rejoice."

"Teacher, we saw one casting out devils in Thy name, and we forbade him." Has the sting of envy troubled the holy disciples? Do they grudge those highly favoured? Have even they admitted within them a passion so abominable and hateful to God? "We saw one, they say, casting out devils in Thy name, and we forbade him." Tell me, dost thou forbid one who in Christ's name troubles Satan, and crushes evil demons? How was it not thy duty rather to reflect, that he was not the doer of these wonders, but that the grace which was in him wrought the miracle by the power of Christ? How therefore dost thou forbid him who in Christ wins the victory? "Yes," he saith; "for he followeth not with us." Oh blind speech! For what if he be not numbered among the holy Apostles, who is crowned with Christ's grace, yet is he equally with you adorned with apostolic powers. There are many diversities of Christ's gifts, as the blessed Paul teacheth, saying; "that to one is given the word of wisdom, but to another the word of knowledge: and to another faith; and to another gifts of healings."

What therefore is the meaning of his "not walking with us," or what is the force of the expression? Look then; for I will tell you as well as I can. The Saviour gave the holy Apostles authority over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all disease and all sickness among the people. And so they did; nor was the grace given them ineffectual. For they returned with joy, saying; "Lord, even the devils are subject to us in Thy name." They imagined, therefore, that leave was given not to any one else but to themselves alone to be invested with the authority which He had granted them. For this reason they draw near, and want to learn, whether others also might exercise it, even though they had not been appointed to the apostleship, nor even to the office of teacher.

We find something like this also in the ancient sacred Scriptures. For God once said to the hierophant Moses: "Choose thee seventy men of the elders of Israel, and I will take of the Spirit that is upon thee, and give it," He says, "to them." And when those who were chosen had assembled at the former tabernacle, two men only excepted, who had remained in the camp, and the spirit of prophecy descended upon them, not only those who were assembled in the holy tabernacle prophesied, but those also who had remained in the camp. But "Jeshua, it says, who stood before Moses, said, Eldad and Midad, lo! they prophesy in the camp. My lord Moses forbid them. And Moses said unto Jeshua, Enviest thou me? Would that all the Lord's people were prophets, the Lord putting His Spirit upon them." But it was Christ Who at that time made the hierophant Moses thus speak by the Holy Ghost: and here also in person He saith to the holy Apostles; "Forbid not him who is crushing Satan," that is, in His name, "for he is not against you," He says; "for he who is not against you is on your part." For on the part of us who love Christ, are all who wish to act to His glory, and are crowned by His grace. And this is a law to the churches continuing even to this day. For we honour only those who lift up holy hands, and purely and without fault or blame, in Christ's name, rebuke unclean spirits, and deliver multitudes from various diseases: for we know that it is Christ Who worketh in them.

But we ought to consider not so much the worker of the miracles, as the grace which was in him, who, by the power of Christ, performed miracles. But what if there should be both those which be numbered together with the Apostles, and those who are crowned with the grace of Christ; there are many diversities in Christ's gifts. But because the Saviour had given the Apostles power to cast out evil spirits, (Matt. 10:8.) they thought no one else but themselves alone was permitted to have this privilege granted to him, and therefore they come to enquire if it were lawful for others also to do this.

As if He said, On the side of you who love Christ, are all they who wish to follow those things which conduce to His glory, being crowned with His grace.

Because then our Lord had said, He who is least among you all, the same shall be great, John feared, lest perhaps they had done wrong in hindering a certain man by their own power. For a prohibition does not show the probitor to be inferior, but to be one who thinks himself somewhat superior. Hence it is added, And John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name, and we forbad him. Not indeed from envy, but to distinguish the working of miracles, for he had not received the power of working miracles with them, nor had the Lord sent him as He did them; nor did he follow Jesus in all things. Hence he adds, because he followeth not with us.

But it came to pass, when the days of his assumption were accomplished, he steadfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem. By 'day of assumption,' he means the time of his passion, which drawing near, he gradually approaches Jerusalem. Let the pagans cease, therefore, to mock as if he were merely a crucified man, as the time of his crucifixion was foreseen as God, and determined to go to the place where he was to be crucified with a firm face, that is, with resolute and fearless mind.

Let then the Heathen cease to mock the Crucified, as if He were a man, who it is plain, as God, both foresaw the time of His crucifixion, and going voluntarily to be crucified, sought with stedfast face, that is, with resolute and undaunted mind, the spot where He was to be crucified.

Now it came to pass, when the days were being fulfilled, etc. After having instructed the Apostles, the prelates of the Church, in humility of mind, he here instructs them secondly in equanimity of zeal. And this section has two parts, in the first of which is introduced the occasion of disordered zeal; and in the second is added the correction of inordinate zeal, through which they are instructed in equanimity of zeal: and the second part begins at: When his disciples saw this.

The occasion of disordered zeal arose from three sources, namely from the Lord's necessity, by which he was in need of lodging; from the authority of the disciples, by which they sought lodging; and from the inhospitality of the Samaritans, by which they refused lodging.

First, therefore, is introduced the necessity of the Lord, by which he was in need of lodging, because the time of his sojourning had come: which he indicates when he says: Now it came to pass, when the days of his assumption were being fulfilled, that is, when the time of his Passion was drawing near, through which he was to be taken up into heaven after the Resurrection: whence the Psalm concerning the Resurrection is inscribed "concerning the assumption of the morning"; John 13: "Jesus, knowing that the hour had come," etc.

When the time of the passion was approaching, it was fitting to draw near to the place of suffering; and therefore he adds: And he set his face steadfastly to go to Jerusalem, to suffer; because it is said below in the thirteenth chapter: "It is not fitting for a Prophet to perish outside Jerusalem"; therefore he wished to go there as to a place of shame and reproach. On account of which he notably states beforehand that he set his face steadfastly, namely through constancy and divine patience, according to that passage in Ezekiel, chapter three: "Behold, I have made your face stronger than their faces and your forehead harder than their foreheads, and like adamant and like flint have I made your face." Truly steadfast was the face that not only did not flee, but even approached the reproach of death unshaken, so that it was necessary for him to pass through the land of foreigners, according to what is said below in the seventeenth chapter: "As Jesus was going to Jerusalem, he passed through the midst of Samaria and Galilee." And so it was necessary for him to seek lodging among strangers, according to that passage in Jeremiah, chapter fourteen: "Why will you be as a sojourner in the land and as a traveler turning aside to lodge?"

It says, "When the days drew near for him to be received up, he set his face to go to Jerusalem." This means that after he would endure his saving passion for us, the time would come when he should ascend to heaven and dwell with God the Father, so he determined to go to Jerusalem. This is, I think, the meaning of his "set his face."

When the time was near at hand in which it behoved our Lord to accomplish His life-giving Passion, and ascend up to heaven, He determines to go up to Jerusalem, as it is said, And it came to pass, &c.

And I, on the contrary, the severe rebuke of Christ on His disciples, when they were for inflicting a like visitation on that obscure village of the Samaritans. The heretic, too, may discover that this gentleness of Christ was promised by the selfsame severest Judge.

No one's table or roof did He despise: indeed, Himself ministered to the washing of the disciples' feet; not sinners, not publicans, did He repel; not with that city even which had refused to receive Him was He wroth, when even the disciples had wished that the celestial fires should be forthwith hurled on so contumelious a town.

Because it was necessary that the true Lamb should there be offered, where the typical lamb was sacrificed; but it is said, he stedfastly set his face, that is, He went not here and there traversing the villages and towns, but kept on His way straight towards Jerusalem.

Secondly, there is added the authority of the disciples, by which they were seeking lodging, when he says: And he sent messengers before his face. For it befits the great Lord to have messengers as forerunners, according to what is said in Malachi, chapter three: "Behold, I send my Angel," that is, my messenger, "who will prepare the way before your face." So also we read concerning Jacob in Genesis, chapter thirty-two, that "he sent messengers before him."

And because good messengers faithfully and swiftly carry out the command of their lord, therefore it is added: And going, they entered into a city of the Samaritans, to prepare for him. These Samaritans were colonists placed in the cities of Samaria in place of the children of Israel who had been carried away to the Assyrians, as is said in Fourth Kings, chapter seventeen, that "the king of the Assyrians brought men from the cities of the Assyrians and placed them in the cities of Samaria in place of the children of Israel; and they possessed Samaria and dwelt in its cities"; and concerning these it is added afterwards in the same place, that "they were fearing the Lord, but nevertheless serving their own idols." They entered the city of these people not of their own will, since it is said in John, chapter four, that "Jews do not associate with Samaritans," but either compelled by necessity, which has no law, or by a special command of the Lord. For in the sending of the Apostles it is said in Matthew, chapter ten: "Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter into the cities of the Samaritans"; but that is said with regard to preaching, not however with regard to seeking lodging. For in John, chapter four, concerning this city it is said that "the disciples had gone away into the city to buy food"; and they did this by the Lord's command, who was showing that no man is to be despised, but that everyone is to be loved as a neighbor, as is said below in the tenth chapter concerning the Samaritan in the parable, that "he was neighbor to him who fell among robbers."

It would be untrue, then, to affirm that our Saviour did not know what was about to happen: for as He knows all things, He knew, of course, that His messengers would not be received by the Samaritans. Of this there can be no doubt. Why, then, did He command them to precede Him? The reason of it was His custom assiduously to benefit the holy Apostles in every possible way: and for this end His practice sometimes was to put them to the proof. As for instance, He was sailing once upon the lake of Tiberias with those named above; and while so doing he fell asleep purposely: and a violent wind having risen upon the lake, a rough and unusual storm began to rage, and the boat was in danger, and the crew in alarm. For He intentionally permitted the storm and the fury of the tempest to rage against the ship, to try the faith of the disciples, and to make manifest the greatness of His power. And this, also, was the result. For they, in the littleness of their faith, said, "Master, save us, we perish." And He at once arose and shewed that He is Lord of the elements; for He rebuked the sea and the tempest, and there was an exceeding great calm. And so also on this occasion: He knew, indeed, that those who went forward to announce that He would lodge with them would not be received by the Samaritans; but He permitted them to go, that this again might be a means of benefiting the holy Apostles.

What, then, was the purpose of this occurrence? He was going up to Jerusalem, as the time of His passion was already drawing near. He was about to endure the contumelies of the Jews; He was about to be set at nought by the scribes and Pharisees; and to suffer those things which they inflicted upon Him when they proceeded to the accomplishment of all violence and wicked audacity. In order, therefore, that they might not be offended when they saw Him suffering, as understanding that He would have them also to be patient, and not to murmur greatly, even though men treat them with contumely, He, so to speak, made the contempt they met with from the Samaritans a preparatory exercise in the matter. They had not received the messengers. It was the duty of the disciples, treading in the footsteps of their Lord, to bear it patiently as becometh saints, and not to say anything of them wrathfully. But they were not yet so disposed; but being seized with too hot indignation, they would have called down fire upon them from heaven, as far as their will went. But Christ rebuked them for so speaking.

It benefited them also in another way: they were to be the instructors of the whole world, and to travel through the cities and villages, proclaiming everywhere the good tidings of salvation. Of necessity, therefore, while seeking to fulfil their mission, they must fall in with wicked men, who would reject the divine tidings, and, so to speak, not receive Jesus to lodge with them. Had Christ, therefore, praised them for wishing that fire should come down upon the Samaritans, and that so painful a torment should be inflicted upon them, they would have been similarly disposed in many other instances, and when men disregarded the sacred message, would have pronounced their condemnation, and called down fire upon them from above. And what would have been the result of such conduct? The sufferers would have been innumerable, and no longer would the disciples have been so much physicians of the sick, as torturers rather, and intolerable to men everywhere. For their own good, therefore, they were rebuked, when thus enraged beyond measure at the contumely of the Samaritans: in order that they might learn that as ministers of the divine tidings, they must rather be full of longsuffering and gentleness; not revengeful; not given to wrath, nor savagely attacking those who offend them.

And He sends messengers to make a place for Him and His companions, who when they came to the country of the Samaritans were not admitted, as it follows, And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and altered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him. And they did not receive him.

But our Lord, Who knew all things before they came to pass, knowing that His messengers would not be received by the Samaritans, nevertheless commanded them to go before Him, because it was His practice to make all things conduce to the good of His disciples. Now He went up to Jerusalem as the time of His suffering drew near. In order then that they might not be offended, when they saw Him suffer, bearing in mind that they must also endure patiently when men persecute them, He ordained beforehand as a kind of prelude this refusal of the Samaritans. It was good for them also in another way. For they were to be the teachers of the world, going through towns and villages, to preach the doctrine of the Gospel, meeting sometimes with men who would not receive the sacred doctrine, allowing not that Jesus sojourned on earth with them. He therefore taught them, that in announcing the divine doctrine, they ought to be filled with patience and meekness, without bitterness, and wrath, and fierce enmity against those who had done any wrong to them.

Mark that He was unwilling to be received by those who He knew had not turned to Him with a simple heart. For if He had wished, He might have made them devout, who were undevout. But God calls those whom He thinks worthy, and whom He wills He makes religious. But why they did not receive Him the Evangelist mentions, saying, Because his face was as if he would go to Jerusalem.

And they did not receive him, because his face was set to go to Jerusalem. Because the Samaritans saw he was going to Jerusalem, they did not receive the Lord. For the Jews do not associate with Samaritans, as the Evangelist John shows.

Or the Samaritans see that our Lord is going to Jerusalem, and do not receive Him. For the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans, (John 4:9.) as John shows.

Thirdly is added the inhospitality of the Samaritans, by which they denied lodging, when it says: And they did not receive him, though he himself was their Lord; so that what is said in John 1 might be fulfilled: "He came unto his own, and his own received him not." The inhospitality of these was similar to the inhospitality of those of Gibeah toward the Levite: it is said in Judges 19 that "they sat in the street of the city, and no one would receive them into his house." These Samaritans were not admitted by the Jews to the worship of God, and therefore they were hostile to those going to Jerusalem.

And for this reason it is added: Because his face was set toward going to Jerusalem, that is, because they clearly recognized that he was going to Jerusalem to worship God according to the Jewish rite. Whence the Samaritan woman said to him in John 4: "Lord, our fathers worshipped on this mountain, but you say that Jerusalem is the place where one ought to worship." And between the Jews and the Samaritans there was contrariety over the place of prayer: just as also spiritually it now happens that spiritual men who worship God are mocked and despised and cast out by those who love the world. Whence Proverbs 14: "He who walks in an upright way and fears the Lord is despised by him who walks in an infamous way"; and Sirach 13: "As a wolf will have fellowship with a lamb, so the sinner with the just." Whence Wisdom 2: "The ungodly said: Let us circumvent the just man, because he is contrary to our works"; and a little later: "He is grievous to us even to behold, because his life is unlike that of others, and his ways are changed." For those who have dissimilarity of life do not easily have companionship on the way. And therefore the Samaritans, hating Jerusalem, were unwilling to show hospitality to one going to Jerusalem.

What is the meaning of what is written in the Gospel according to Luke: "And they did not receive him: because his face was going to Jerusalem" (Luke 9:53). Hastening, the Lord went to Jerusalem to fulfill the days of his assumption and to celebrate the Passover, about which he had said: "With desire I have desired to eat this Pasch with you, before I suffer" (Ibid. 22:15), and drink the cup, of which he said: "The cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?" (John 18:11). He confirmed all his doctrine on the gallows, according to what is written: "And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all things to myself." (Ibid. 12:32). He set his face steadfastly to go to Jerusalem. For it is necessary to have steadfastness and strength for one who is hurrying spontaneously toward passion. Hence to Ezekiel, to whom God had said: Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of scorpions, and art not afraid of them: I have made thy face strong against their face (Ezekiel 2:6 and 3:9); so that if perchance the hammer of the whole earth had risen up against him, he would be like a most enduring anvil and crush the hammer, of which it is written: "How is the hammer of the whole earth broken and shattered!" (Jeremiah 50:23) And he sent messengers, that is, Angels, before his sight (Luke 9:52). For it was fitting that the Angels should minister to the Son of God. Whether he calls the Apostles Angels, because even John, the precursor of the Lord, was called an Angel (Malachi 3:1; Matthew 11:10). And when they entered a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him, they did not receive him, because his face was going toward Jerusalem. The Samaritans and Jews are at odds with each other in enmity, and while all nations hate them, they are raging against each other with their own fury, while both contend for possession of the Law, and they persecute one another so much that after the Jews returned from Babylon, the Samaritans always obstructed the building of the Temple. And when even they wanted to build the Temple with them, the Jews replied: It is not lawful for us and you to build the Lord's house (1 Esdr. 4). Finally, for a great injury, the Pharisees reproached the Lord: Do you not have a demon, and are you not a Samaritan? (John 8.48). And in the parable of Jerusalem descending to Jericho, the Samaritan is placed as a sign and a miracle that he did good (Luke 10): and it is written to the Samaritan woman at the well: For Samaritans do not count themselves among the Jews (John 4.9). Therefore, the Samaritans seeing the Lord go towards Jerusalem, that is, to his enemies, as they had heard from his disciples who had come to prepare lodging, recognized him to be a Jew: and, as a Jew and a stranger, and one going to his enemies, they did not want to receive him. Although, with other understanding being submitted to us, it was the will of the Lord not to be received by the Samaritans, because he hastened to go to Jerusalem, where he was to suffer and shed his blood, so that, occupied with Samaritan hospitality and the teaching of that nation, he might not delay the day of suffering to which he had come. Hence he says in another place: "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 15:24). And he commanded the Apostles: "Do not enter the city of Samaria" (Ibid. 10:5), wishing to remove all occasion of Jewish persecution, so that they might not afterwards say, "We have crucified him," because he had joined himself to our enemies and adversaries. Therefore his face was set towards Jerusalem. And accordingly, by another interpretation, the Samaritans did not receive him: for he was hastening to enter Jerusalem. But that they did not receive him, was of the Lord's will. Finally, the Apostles, versed in the Law, in which they knew only justice- an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth- seek to avenge the injury, and to imitate Elijah, at whose word two captains of fifty soldiers were consumed by fire: and they say to the Lord: Wilt thou, we say, that fire should come down from heaven, and consume them? (Luke 9:51). Beautifully, they say, Wilt thou, we say: for even Elijah had said: If I be a man of God, let fire come down from heaven upon thee (2 Kings 1:10). Therefore, for the effectiveness of the speech of the Apostles, it is the will of the Lord. For if He had not commanded it, the Apostles would speak in vain, asking that fire descend upon them, and in other ways. If fire descended from heaven to the injury of Elijah's servants, and consumed the Jews and not the Samaritans, how much more should the flame rage against the impious Samaritans, to the contempt of the Son of God? The Lord, who had come not to judge but to save, not in power but in humility, not in the glory of the Father but in the lowliness of man, rebukes them because they have not remembered His doctrine and the goodness of the Gospel, in which He said: 'If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also' (Matt. 5:39) and 'Love your enemies' (Luke 6:35).

But if one understands that they did not receive Him for this reason, because He had determined to go to Jerusalem, an excuse is found for them, who did not receive Him. But we must say, that in the words of the Evangelist, And they did not receive him, is implied that He did not go into Samaria, but afterwards as if some one had asked St. Luke, he explained in these words, why they did not receive Him. And He went not to them, i. e. not that He was unable, but that He did not wish to go there, but rather to Jerusalem.

For they knew both that when Phineas had slain the idolaters it was counted to him for righteousness; (Numb. 25:8, Ps. 107:31) and that at the prayer of Elijah fire came down from heaven, that the injuries of the prophet might be avenged. (2 Kings 1:10, 12.)

But let him be avenged who fears. He who fears not, seeks not vengeance. At the same time the merits of the Prophets are likewise shown to have been in the Apostles, seeing that they claim to themselves the right of obtaining the same power of which the Prophet was thought worthy; and fitly do they claim that at their command fire should come down from heaven, for they were the sons of thunder.

For holy men who well knew that that death which detaches the soul from the body was not to be feared, still because of their feelings who feared it, punished some sins with death, that both the living might be struck with a wholesome dread, and those who were punished with death might receive harm not from death itself but from sin, which would be increased were they to live.

When the disciples had seen, etc. Having set forth the occasion of disordered zeal, he adds the correction of disordered zeal. Concerning which three things are introduced by the Evangelist, namely reprehensible indignation, reasonable rebuke, and memorable instruction. The first was in the spirit of the disciples, the second was in the word of the Lord, the third was in the Lord's deed.

First, therefore, as regards the blameworthy indignation in the mind of the disciples, it is said: But when his disciples James and John had seen: had seen, I say, the cruelty of that city, such that they could say that word of the Psalm: "I saw iniquity and contradiction in the city"; and again: "I was zealous on account of the wicked, seeing the peace of sinners." Whence they were moved with indignation, because they saw the Lord, whose majesty they had seen on the mountain with Moses and Elijah, thus despised on earth. — On account of which it is added: They said: Lord, do you wish that we command fire to descend from heaven and consume them? In this is shown the fury of indignation by which they were moved against those people, so that they wished to destroy them from the earth. Now these two especially said this because they were great zealots for the honor of the Lord: whence there could be said of them that word of Romans 10: "I bear them witness that they have indeed a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge"; just as the two sons of Jacob, moved by zeal for the injury done to them, destroyed the city of the Shechemites, as is said in Genesis 34.

Or they said this because they themselves had been with the Lord on the mountain, where they had come to know his majesty and had seen the companionship of Elijah: and therefore they wished to inflict a similar vengeance, according to what is said in 4 Kings 1, that "Elijah said: If I am a man of God, let fire descend from heaven and devour you and your fifty." And it was done so.

[Responding to the question "In the past the church used various kinds of compulsion in attempts to force a particular brand of Christianity on the community. Given sufficient power, is there not a danger of this sort of thing happening again?"]

Yes, I hear nasty rumors coming from Spain. Persecution is a temptation to which all men are exposed. I had a postcard signed "M. D." saying that anyone who expressed and published his belief in the Virgin Birth should be stripped and flogged. That shows you how easily persecution of Christians by the non-Christians might come back. Of course, they wouldn't call it persecution: they'd call it "compulsory reeducation of the ideologically unfit," or something like that. But, of course, I have to admit that Christians themselves have been persecutors in the past. It was worse of them, because they ought to have known better: they weren't worse in any other way. I detest every kind of religious compulsion.

But as yet they were not so, nay, being stirred up with fervid zeal, they wished to bring down fire from heaven upon them. It follows, And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, will thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, &c.

They thought it much juster that the Samaritans should perish for not admitting our Lord, than the fifty soldiers who tried to thrust down Elijah.