Hebrews 6
Commentary from 19 fathers
Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.
βαπτισμῶν διδαχῆς, ἐπιθέσεώς τε χειρῶν, ἀναστάσεώς τε νεκρῶν καὶ κρίματος αἰωνίου.
кр҃ще́нїй ᲂу҆че́нїѧ, возложе́нїѧ же рꙋ́къ, воскрⷭ҇нїѧ же ме́ртвыхъ и҆ сꙋда̀ вѣ́чнагѡ.
Now, how long shall we saw away along the same line on this question [i.e., what is permitted], when we have a long-standing practice which by anticipation has all but settled the question? Even though no scriptural passage prescribes it, it is strengthened by a custom that certainly arose from tradition. How can anything become normal practice if it has not first been handed down to us? But, you tell me, "You must always have a written source if you are going to plead the force of tradition."Let us look into the matter, then, of whether or not a tradition without a written source should be accepted. The answer will certainly be no if we cannot adduce examples of other observations which are without written source in Scripture and rest solely on the basis of tradition and yet have come to have the force of custom. To begin, for instance, with baptism: When we are about to enter the water, and, as a matter of fact, even a short while before, we declare in the presence of the congregation before the bishop that we renounce the devil, his pomps and his angels. After that, we are immersed in the water three times, making a somewhat fuller pledge than the Lord has prescribed in the gospel. After this, having stepped forth from the font, we are given a taste of a mixture of milk and honey and from that day, for a whole week, we forego our daily bath. We also receive the sacrament of the Eucharist that the Lord entrusted to all at the hour for supper, at our early morning meetings, and then from the hand of none but the bishops. Further, we make offerings for the dead on their anniversary to celebrate their birthday of eternal life. We consider fasting or kneeling during service on Sundays to be unlawful, and we enjoy the same privilege from Easter until Pentecost. We also are upset if any of our bread or wine falls to the earth at the Lord's Supper. Lastly, we make the sign of the cross on our foreheads at every turn, at our going in or coming out of the house, while dressing, while putting on our shoes, when we are taking a bath, before and after meals, when we light the lamps, when we go to bed or sit down, and in all the ordinary actions of daily life.
The Chaplet 3.1-4
Nor let any one think that, because baptism is proposed to them, heretics will be kept back from coming to the Church, as if offended at the name of a second baptism; nay, but on this very account they are rather driven to the necessity of coming by the testimony of truth shown and proved to them. For if they shall see that it is determined and decreed by our judgment and sentence, that the baptism wherewith they are there baptized is considered just and legitimate, they will think that they are justly and legitimately in possession of the Church also, and the other gifts of the Church; nor will there be any reason for their coming to us, when, as they have baptism, they seem also to have the rest. But further, when they know that there is no baptism without, and that no remission of sins can be given outside the Church, they more eagerly and readily hasten to us, and implore the gifts and benefits of the Church our Mother, assured that they can in no wise attain to the true promise of divine grace unless they first come to the truth of the Church. Nor will heretics refuse to be baptized among us with the lawful and true baptism of the Church, when they shall have learnt from us that they also were baptized by Paul, who already had been baptized with the baptism of John,36 as we read in the Acts of the Apostles.
Epistle LXXII
That we must not grieve the Holy Spirit, whom we have received. Paul the apostle to the Ephesians: "Grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, in which ye were sealed in the day of redemption. Let all bitterness, and wrath, and indignation, and clamour, and blasphemy, be taken away from you."
Treatise XII Three Books of Testimonies Against the Jews
But what is "the doctrine of baptisms"? Not as if there were many baptisms, but one only. Why then did he express it in the plural? Because he had said, "not laying again a foundation of repentance." For if he again baptized them and catechised them afresh, and having been baptized at the beginning they were again taught what things ought to be done and what ought not, they would remain perpetually incorrigible.
"And of laying on of hands." For thus did they receive the Spirit, "when Paul had laid his hands on them" (Acts xix. 6), it is said.
"And of the resurrection of the dead." For this is both effected in baptism, and is affirmed in the confession.
"And of eternal judgment." But why does he say this? Because it was likely that, having already believed, they would either be shaken [from their faith], or would lead evil and slothful lives, he says, "be wakeful."
It is not open to them to say, If we live slothfully we will be baptized again, we will be catechised again, we will again receive the Spirit; even if now we fall from the faith, we shall be able again by being baptized, to wash away our sins, and to attain to the same state as before. Ye are deceived (he says) in supposing these things.
Homily on Hebrews 9
"of faith toward God." For it is not necessary now, as it was from the beginning, to believe in God. For you have already believed through teaching. The structure is thus. Therefore, leaving the elementary of God, what is this? The doctrine of baptisms, the laying on of hands (by which, it says, you were enlightened), and the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment, let us press on to perfection. For it is not necessary, it says, always to speak the same things; for it has been said once and has come to pass, but it is necessary, it says, also to contribute what is among you, namely, a good conduct and a faith worthy of it. For this is perfection, to be two-handed in virtue, as it were, saying; Be sober; for there is no need to live carelessly, and again to be baptized, and through the laying on of hands to receive the Holy Spirit's visitation. "of instruction about baptism." Not as if there were many baptisms, Paul said this in the plural; for there is one baptism (Eph. 4:5); but this follows from the context. For if he were to instruct them again, and baptize them again; and again baptize those who have fallen away; then necessarily there would be many baptisms; but this is absurd. Therefore, it is not necessary to rebaptize you; but to remain with the former baptism.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
Perhaps these, still clinging to the law, thinking more in Jewish manners, because there are different and many baptisms in the law, wished also that the baptism of the New Covenant, which grants regeneration, should be administered many times, because they wished that the remission of sins should be considered worthy only once.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
"the laying on of hands." Those things that take place in baptism; or there, when the apostles laid on their hands, they gave the Spirit, which Simon the sorcerer also sought. (Acts 8:18-19) "the resurrection of the dead." For this also takes place in baptism through the form of rising up, and is confirmed in the confession; for we confess that we believe in the resurrection of the dead. "and eternal judgment." That is, of the coming judgment, which grants either eternal good or punishment. This seems to say: since it was likely that they would be shaken, although they had already believed, either that if we live deeply, or fall away from faith, we shall be baptized again, or again be able to wash away sins, and to share in the same things as before. For they err in thinking these things.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
Paul spoke of this in the plural not because there are many baptisms — for baptism is one (Eph. 4:5) — but because this would, as it were, follow as a consequence. If he were catechizing again, then he would also baptize again; and in the case of apostasy, he would baptize again: by necessity there would be many new baptisms, but this is absurd. Therefore you must not repeat baptism, but abide by the first baptism. Perhaps they, as those who firmly adhered to the law, even under grace recognized many baptisms in the Jewish manner. Note that baptism follows repentance. Since repentance by itself cannot render us clean, we are therefore baptized, so that everything may be the work of the grace of Christ.
Through this they received the Holy Spirit, so as to prophesy and work miracles. When, it says, Paul laid his hands on them, they received the Holy Spirit (Acts 19:6).
This occurs at baptism under the figure of immersion in water and rising from it, and is affirmed in the confession of faith, for we confess that we believe in the resurrection of the dead.
That is, a judgment that gives either eternal blessings or punishments. He seems to say this because they were probably wavering, even though they had already believed, or were living badly and carelessly, saying at the same time: be vigilant. It is impossible to say that if we have lived negligently, or have fallen away from the faith, we will be baptized again, will again receive the opportunity to be washed from sins and be deemed worthy of the very same things we were deemed worthy of before. You are deceived, he says, reasoning in this way.
Commentary on Hebrews
282. – The second thing in that process are the sacraments of faith. But these are two sacraments of those entering: for those are the only ones the Apostle is discussing here. The first is baptism, by which we are reborn; the second is confirmation, by which we are strengthened.
283. – In regard to the first he says, of baptism. But this seems contrary to what is stated in Ephesians (4:5): 'One faith, one baptism.' Therefore, there are not several baptisms. I answer that there are three kinds of baptism, namely, of water, of desire, and of blood. But the last two have no force, unless they are referred to the first, because the first one must be intended, if it cannot be actually received by a person with the use of freedom. Hence, there are not three sacraments, but one sacrament, by which we are reborn unto salvation: 'Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of heaven' (Jn. 3:5). Of the other two, baptism of blood produces more of baptism's effects, provided that the first is desired, or the opposite is not present in the mind, as is clear in the case of the Holy Innocents, who were not of an opposite mind. For baptism has its power from the merit of Christ's Passion: 'All we who are baptized in Christ Jesus are baptized in his blood' (Rom. 6:3). Therefore, just as one who is baptized is conformed sacramentally to Christ's death, so the martyr is conformed really. Therefore, the baptism of blood produces the total effect of baptism in the sense of washing away all guilt and punishment for sin; but it does not imprint a character. Therefore, if one who had undergone martyrdom without baptism of water were to rise, he would have to be baptized. Penance, however, does not produce as many of baptism's effects, because it does not take away all punishment, although it takes away all guilt. But just as a martyr conforms himself to Christ's Passion by external suffering, so a penitent by internal suffering: 'They that are Christ's have crucified their flesh with the vices and concupiscences' (Gal. 5:24). Therefore, penance can be so great that it would remove all guilt and punishment, as happened to the good thief and to Magdalene. Hence, penance is called baptism, inasmuch as it performs the function of baptism. And because baptism cannot be repeated, penance was instituted. Therefore, the others are called baptisms, because they produce the effect of baptism; but there is only one baptism, because the others produce no effect, unless the first is intended.
284. – The second sacrament of those who are entering is imposed by the laying on of hands; hence, he says, and laying on of hands. But this is twofold: one is productive of miracles, as when Christ cured the sick by laying his hands on them: 'He, laying his hands on everyone of them, cured them' (Lk. 4:40). And this is not sacramental. But the other is sacramental and is found in two sacraments: first, in the sacrament of Orders: 'Impose not hands lightly on anyone' (1 Tim. 5:22); secondly, in the sacrament of confirmation unto renovation: 'By the laver of regeneration and renovation of the Holy Spirit' (Tit. 3:5). For in confirmation the Holy Spirit is given for strength to enable a man to boldly confess Christ's name before men. For just as in the natural order a man is first born and then grows and becomes strong, so, too, in the order of grace.
285. – Thirdly, there follows the terminus of motion, at which the motion is terminated. This is twofold: the first is the resurrection of bodies, which is the foundation of faith, because without it our faith is in vain (1 Cor. 15:14). Therefore, he says, of the resurrection of the dead. Secondly, we expect a reward, which is conferred by the judge: 'All things that are done, God will bring into judgement' (Ec. 12:14); therefore, he says, and of eternal judgement: not that that judgement will last a thousand years, as Lactantius taught, because it will last but a moment. But it is called eternal, because the sentence passed then will last for ever: 'These shall go into eternal punishment, but the just into eternal life' (Mt. 15:46). It should be noted that all the things he says he desires to treat here are, as it were, the rudiments of the faith; hence he preaches them to newcomers, as is recorded in Ac (17:18) and in other places.
Commentary on Hebrews
And this will we do, if God permit.
καὶ τοῦτο ποιήσομεν, ἐάνπερ ἐπιτρέπῃ ὁ Θεός.
И҆ сїѐ сотвори́мъ, а҆́ще бг҃ъ повели́тъ.
"And this we will do." Which? To be carried to perfection. "if God permits." The phrase "if God permits" is not to indicate that God does not always permit (for God always permits the good and perfect), but as is customary for us to say, If God wills, we will do this. At the same time, it also teaches us from this that everything depends on that will, and we should not rely confidently or arrogantly on our own judgment and power, even in matters generally acknowledged. This is explicitly encouraged by the apostle James.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
"This we will do" – what? – that is, to go on to perfection, if God also wills it. He said this not as though God did not command it, but as he usually spoke, that if it is pleasing to God, then this is precisely what I also want to do.
And at the same time He teaches us here that we should make everything dependent on His will and that even in unquestionably good deeds we should not trust our own judgment and our own strength. The Apostle Jude also clearly persuades us of this same thing.
Commentary on Hebrews
286. – Then (v. 3) he shows how difficult it is to carry out his intention. For it is difficult both in itself and in relation to his hearers. Hence he does three things: first, he suggests that in this he especially needs divine help; secondly, he mentions their weakness (v. 4); thirdly, he proposes a simile (v. 7).
287. – He says, therefore: Let us go on to things more perfect, and this shall we do, if God permit. He says less than he means, for it is not only necessary that God permit, but He must do all things: 'In his hand are both we and our words' (Wis. 7:16). Therefore, he must place all things under the confidence of divine help: 'Without me you can do nothing' (Jn. 16:5); 'For you should say: If the Lord will, and if we shall live, we do this or that' (Jas. 4:15).
Commentary on Hebrews
For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
ἀδύνατον γὰρ τοὺς ἅπαξ φωτισθέντας γευσαμένους τε τῆς δωρεᾶς τῆς ἐπουρανίου καὶ μετόχους γενηθέντας Πνεύματος Ἁγίου
Невозмо́жно бо просвѣще́нныхъ є҆ди́ною и҆ вкꙋси́вшихъ да́ра нбⷭ҇нагѡ, и҆ прича́стникѡвъ бы́вшихъ дх҃а ст҃а́гѡ,
4–6Now we ought to be aware that there are some Lazaruses even now who, after having become friends of Jesus, have become sick and died. As dead persons they have remained in the tomb and the land of the dead with the dead.… Consider the one who has fallen away from Christ and returned to the Gentiles’ life after he has received knowledge of the truth. He has been enlightened and tasted the heavenly gift and become a partaker of the Holy Spirit … yet now is in hades with the shades and the dead and to be in the land of the dead or the tombs.Whenever, therefore, on behalf of such a person, Jesus comes to his tomb and, standing outside it, prays and is heard, he asks that there be power in his voice and words, and he cries out with a loud voice to summon him who was his friend to the things outside the life of the Gentiles and their tomb and cave.
Commentary on the Gospel of John 28.54-56
One with the perfected, and yet we could never say on that account that the teaching of the Spirit is superior to the teaching of the Son, but only that the Son condescends to the imperfect, while the Spirit is the seal of the perfected; even so it is not on account of the superiority of the Spirit over the Son that the blasphemy against the Spirit is a sin excluding impunity and pardon, but because for the imperfect there is pardon, while for those who have tasted the heavenly gift.
4–6“It is impossible to restore again to repentance” through a second baptism “those who have once been baptized, who have tasted the heavenly gift” through the medicine which they received, “have become partakers of the Holy Spirit” through the gifts received from the Spirit, “have tasted the goodness of the Word of God” in the new gospel and were armed with the power of the age to come in the promises prepared for the pious ones, but now “have fallen away” again. Those who propose two baptisms ask for the crucifixion again of the Son of God and for his dishonor. But crucifixion was performed once and will not be performed once more, and baptism was conceded as an “absolver” and is not conceded a second time to the sinner.
Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews
4–6Could Paul teach in opposition to his own act? He had at Corinth forgiven sin through penance; how could he himself speak against his own decision? Since, then, he could not destroy what he had built, we must assume that what he says was different from, but not contrary to, what had gone before. For what is contrary is opposed to itself; what is different has ordinarily another meaning. Things that are contrary are not such that one can support the other. Inasmuch, then, as the apostle spoke of remitting penance, he could not be silent as to those who thought that baptism was to be repeated. And it was right first of all to remove our anxiety and to let us know that, even after baptism, if any sinned, their sins could be forgiven them, lest a false belief in a reiterated baptism should lead astray those who were destitute of all hope of forgiveness. And second, it was right to set forth in a well-reasoned argument that baptism is not to be repeated.…So, then, that which he says in this epistle to the Hebrews, that it is impossible for those who have fallen to be “renewed unto repentance, crucifying again the Son of God and putting him to open shame,” must be considered as having reference to baptism, wherein we crucify the Son of God in ourselves that the world may be by him crucified for us. We triumph, as it were, when we take to ourselves the likeness of his death. We put to open shame upon his cross principalities and powers and triumphed over them, that in the likeness of his death we, too, might triumph over the principalities whose yoke we throw off. But Christ was crucified once and died to sin once, and so there is but one, not several baptisms.… And indeed I might also say to anyone who thought that this passage spoke of repentance, that things which are impossible from the human point of view are possible with God. God is able whenever God wills to forgive us our sins, even those which we think cannot be forgiven. And so it is possible for God to give us that which it seems to us impossible to attain. For it seemed impossible that water should wash away sin, and Naaman the Syrian thought that leprosy could not be cleansed by water. But that which was impossible, God who gave us such great grace made to be possible. Similarly it seemed impossible that sins should be forgiven through repentance, but Christ gave this power to his apostles, which has been transmitted to the priestly office. That, then, has become possible which was impossible. But by true reasoning, the apostle convinces us that the reiteration by anyone of the sacrament of baptism is not permitted.
Concerning Repentance 2.2.7-12
4–5And see how putting them to shame, and forbiddingly he begins. "Impossible." No longer (he says) expect that which is not possible; (For he said not, It is not seemly, or, It is not expedient, or, It is not lawful, but "impossible," so as to cast [them] into despair), if ye have once been altogether enlightened.
Then he adds, "and have tasted of the heavenly gift. If ye have tasted" (he says) "of the heavenly gift," that is, of forgiveness. "And been made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and tasted the good word of God" (he is speaking here of the doctrine) "and the powers of the world to come" (what powers is he speaking of? either the working of miracles, or "the earnest of the Spirit" - 2 Cor. i. 22).
What is, "having tasted of the heavenly gift"? it is, "of the remission of sins": for this is of God alone to bestow, and the grace is a grace once for all. "What then? shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? Far from it!" (Rom. vi. 1, Rom. vi. 2.) But if we should be always going to be saved by grace we shall never be good. For where there is but one grace, and we are yet so indolent, should we then cease sinning if we knew that it is possible again to have our sins washed away? For my part I think not.
He here shows that the gifts are many: and to explain it, Ye were counted worthy (he says) of so great forgiveness; for he that was sitting in darkness, he that was at enmity, he that was at open war, that was alienated, that was hated of God, that was lost, he having been suddenly enlightened, counted worthy of the Spirit, of the heavenly gift, of adoption as a son, of the kingdom of heaven, of those other good things, the unspeakable mysteries; and who does not even thus become better, but while indeed worthy of perdition, obtained salvation and honor, as if he had successfully accomplished great things; how could he be again baptized?
"And tasted," he says, "the good word of God"; and he does not unfold it; "and the powers of the world to come," for to live as Angels and to have no need of earthly things, to know that this is the means of our introduction to the enjoyment of the worlds to come; this may we learn through the Spirit, and enter into those sacred recesses.
What are "the powers of the world to come"? Life eternal, angelic conversation. Of these we have already received the earnest through our Faith from the Spirit. Tell me then, if after having been introduced into a palace, and entrusted with all things therein, thou hadst then betrayed all, wouldest thou have been entrusted with them again?
Homily on Hebrews 9
4–6It is out of the question, he is saying, for those who have approached all-holy baptism, shared in the grace of the divine Spirit and received the type of the eternal goods to make their approach again and be granted another baptism. This is no different, in fact, from fixing the Son of God to the cross again and besmirching him again with the dishonor already shown. As he in his own case endured the passion once, we too likewise ought share the passion with him once. We are buried with him in baptism, and we rise with him; so it is not possible for us to enjoy the gift of baptism again.… Our former self was crucified with him in baptism by receiving the type of death. By “goodness of the Word of God” he meant the promise of good things; “powers of the age to come” is the term he used of baptism and the grace of the Spirit: through them it is possible to attain the promised goods.Now, the apostle said this to teach the believers from Jews not to think all-holy baptism is like the Jewish baptisms: they did not wash away sins, but cleansed the body of apparent defilement—hence they were applied many times and frequently. This baptism of ours, on the contrary, is one only, for the reason that it involves the type of the saving passion and resurrection and prefigures for us the resurrection to come. The followers of Novatian use these words to contest the truth, failing to understand that the divine apostle, far from prohibiting the remedies of repentance, set the limit for divine baptism.… After all, his writings to the Corinthians and the Galatians testify to the fact that he preaches repentance everywhere, and he disseminates these teachings everywhere.
Interpretation of Hebrews 6
"For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened." He did not say that it is difficult, unprofitable, or improper, but impossible, so as to cast them into despair of hoping for a second cleansing. "Having tasted the gift." The forgiveness of sins, which is in baptism; for this is a heavenly gift. For no one can give such things except one, God. "and having become partakers of the Holy Spirit."After the forgiveness of sins, then comes the partaking of the Holy Spirit; for He does not dwell in a body burdened with sins; By the laying on of hands, as he says above (Heb. 6:2).
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
He did not say "unprofitable," or "unseemly," but "impossible," so that he drove them to despair regarding the hope of a second baptism.
That is, the forgiveness of sins. For no one is able to give this, except God alone.
After the remission of sins follows the communion of the Holy Spirit: for He does not dwell in a body burdened with sins. And the Holy Spirit was communicated through the laying on of hands, as was also said above.
Commentary on Hebrews
288. – Then when he says, it is impossible, he shows their weakness. For they were weak in hearing. For just as in material things no state is so dangerous as that of a recidivus, so in spiritual things one who falls into sin after grace rises with more difficulty. In regard to this he does three things: first, he lists the good things they had received; secondly, the difficulty caused in them from being recidivi (v. 6); thirdly, he assigns the reason (v. 6b).
289. – Some of the goods are present and some future. But in the present they had spiritual rebirth; in regard to this he says enlightened, namely by baptism. And baptism is fittingly called an enlightenment, because it is the beginning of spiritual rebirth, in which the intellect is enlightened by faith: 'You were heretofore darkness but now light in the Lord' (Eph. 5:8). They are also partakers of God's goods; hence he says, who have tasted the heavenly gift. That gift is grace and is called heavenly, because God gave it from heaven: 'God gave gifts to men' (Ps. 67:19); 'Every best gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from Father of lights' (Jas. 1:17). They are also partakers of the divine goodness: 'For by whom he has given most great and precious promises' (2 Pt. 1:4). Therefore, he says, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit. For all gifts are given from love; therefore, he attributes that participation to the Holy Spirit. For to participate is to take a part. But Christ alone had the Holy Spirit in fulness: 'God does not give the Spirit by measure' (Jn. 3:24). For the other saints received of His fulness and were made partakers not of His substance, but of His distributions: 'There are diversities of graces, but the same Spirit' (1 Cor. 12:4).
Commentary on Hebrews
And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
καὶ καλὸν γευσαμένους Θεοῦ ρῆμα δυνάμεις τε μέλλοντος αἰῶνος,
и҆ до́брагѡ вкꙋси́вшихъ бж҃їѧ гл҃го́ла и҆ си́лы грѧдꙋ́щагѡ вѣ́ка,
"and having tasted the good word of God." The teaching concerning the mind of Christ. "the powers of the age to come." For we shall all give an account of the words we have lived by, and both punishment and rest are everlasting. For in these things is the power of the age to come. That is, the seriousness [ἀῤῥαβῶνα] of the coming age, namely, faith in Christ.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
"the powers of the age to come." Powers of the coming age. That there will certainly be a resurrection, and that we shall all give an account of the life we have lived, and that both punishment and rest are inescapable, and such things, for these indeed are the powers of the coming age. Or that the pledge of the coming age is faith in Christ. Powers of the coming age, Instead of what the future age can teach. For those who have tasted, in common, what has been taken figuratively [τροπικῶς], signifying, those who have learned, have been instructed. What then can the future do, and what is its necessity and work? Because in it each finds the reward of what he has done, since there is no end either to the punishment in it, nor to the happiness, because then the unfailing judgment and the just will be revealed more clearly, and many other things. Therefore, those who have learned these things along with the others, he says, and having fallen away, it is impossible, and thereafter.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
"And the powers of the age to come," which is to say, "having learned what things the coming age is capable of." For "having tasted" means "having learned" or "having been instructed," as it commonly means, being taken in a figurative manner. But what can the coming age do? And what are its needs and work? In that age each one finds the reward for the things one did; that neither the punishment nor the blessing in that age has an end; that then whatever deed was not unmindful of the judge but was righteous will appear, etc. He says that for those who have learned these things with others and then have fallen away, it is impossible to bring to repentance.
Fragments on the Epistle to the Hebrews 6.5
He did not say directly what this is, but of course he gives us to understand that he says this about every spiritual teaching.
Thus he calls either the powers to perform miracles, or to live like angels, in the sense of not needing anything of this world, but looking toward the future, and already here receiving the immaterial and spiritual pledge of the life to come.
Commentary on Hebrews
289 (cont.). – Also in the present day they had instruction of His doctrine; hence, he says, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God. That word is called good, because it is the word of eternal life: 'Lord, to whom shall we go; you have the words of eternal life' (Jn. 6:69); 'How sweet are your words to my palate' (Ps. 119:103). But he says, tasted, because it not only enlightens the intellect, but also refreshes the affections, in which there is a certain savoring: 'Taste and see that the Lord is sweet' (Ps. 33:8).
290. – 'We are saved by hope' (Rom. 8:24). Therefore, he says, and the powers of the age to come. But some of these they have not only in hope, but in an inchoate way, and these are the endowments of the soul, namely, vision, possession, and fruition, and these are possessed inchoatively inasmuch as faith, hope and charity, which correspond to them, are possessed in the present. But the others are goods possessed only in hope, as the endowments of the body, namely, subtility, agility, impassability and clarity.
Commentary on Hebrews
If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
καὶ παραπεσόντας, πάλιν ἀνακαινίζειν εἰς μετάνοιαν, ἀνασταυροῦντας ἑαυτοῖς τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ παραδειγματίζοντας.
и҆ ѿпа́дшихъ, па́ки ѡ҆бновлѧ́ти въ покаѧ́нїе, второ́е распина́ющихъ сн҃а бж҃їѧ себѣ̀ и҆ ѡ҆блича́ющихъ.
Those then who are to repent, if they do repent, will be strong in faith, if they now repent while the tower is building. For if the building be finished, there will not be more room for any one, but he will be rejected. This privilege, however, will belong only to him who has now been placed near the tower.
Hermas, Vision 3
Therefore the apostate withal will recover his former "garment," the robe of the Holy Spirit; and a renewal of the "ring," the sign and seal of baptism; and Christ will again be "slaughtered; " and he will recline on that couch from which such as are unworthily clad are wont to be lifted by the torturers, and cast away into darkness, -much more such as have been stripped.
On Modesty
"and have fallen away, to renew them again unto repentance, seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh and put Him to an open shame." "Renew them," he says, "unto repentance," that is, by repentance, for unto repentance is by repentance. What then, is repentance excluded? Not repentance, far from it! But the renewing again by the laver. For he did not say, "impossible" to be renewed "unto repentance," and stop, but added how "impossible, [by] crucifying afresh."
To "be renewed," that is, to be made new, for to make men new is [the work] of the layer only: for (it is said) "thy youth shall be renewed as the eagle's." (Ps. ciii. 5.) But it is [the work of] repentance, when those who have been made new, have afterwards become old through sins, to set them free from this old age, and to make them strong. To bring them to that former brightness however, is not possible; for there the whole was Grace.
"Crucifying to themselves," he says, "the Son of God afresh, and putting Him to an open shame." What he means is this. Baptism is a Cross, and "our old man was crucified with [Him]" (Rom. vi. 6), for we were "made conformable to the likeness of His death" (Rom. vi. 5; Phil. iii. 10), and again, "we were buried therefore with Him by baptism into death." (Rom. vi. 4.) Wherefore, as it is not possible that Christ should be crucified a second time, for that is to "put Him to an open shame." For "if death shall no more have dominion over Him" (Rom. vi. 9), if He rose again, by His resurrection becoming superior to death; if by death He wrestled with and overcame death, and then is crucified again, all those things become a fable and a mockery. He then that baptizeth a second time, crucifies Him again.
But what is "crucifying afresh"? [It is] crucifying over again. For as Christ died on the cross, so do we in baptism, not as to the flesh, but as to sin. Behold two deaths. He died as to the flesh; in our case the old man was buried, and the new man arose, made conformable to the likeness of His death. If therefore it is necessary to be baptized [again], it is necessary that this same [Christ] should die again. For baptism is nothing else than the putting to death of the baptized, and his rising again.
And he well said, "crucifying afresh unto themselves." For he that does this, as having forgotten the former grace, and ordering his own life carelessly, acts in all respects as if there were another baptism. It behooves us therefore to take heed and to make ourselves safe.
On two grounds then he said that the thing was impossible, and he put the stronger last: first, because he who has been deemed worthy of such [blessings], and who has betrayed all that was granted to him, is not worthy to be again renewed; neither is it possible that [Christ] should again be crucified afresh: for this is to "put Him to an open shame."
There is not then any second layer: there is not [indeed]. And if there is, there is also a third, and a fourth; for the former one is continually disannulled by the later, and this continually by another, and so on without end.
Homily on Hebrews 9
What then (you say)? Is there no repentance? There is repentance, but there is no second baptism: but repentance there is, and it has great force, and is able to set free from the burden of his sins, if he will, even him that hath been baptized much in sins, and to establish in safety him who is in danger, even though he should have come unto the very depth of wickedness. And this is evident from many places. "For," says one, "doth not he that falleth rise again? or he that turneth away, doth not he turn back to [God]?" (Jer. viii. 4.) It is possible, if we will, that Christ should be formed in us again: for hear Paul saying, "My little children of whom I travail in birth again, until Christ be formed in you." (Gal. iv. 19.) Only let us lay hold on repentance.
For behold the love of God to man! We ought on every ground to have been punished at the first; in that having received the natural law, and enjoyed innumerable blessings, we have not acknowledged our Master, and have lived an unclean life. Yet He not only has not punished us, but has even made us partakers of countless blessings, just as if we had accomplished great things. Again we fell away, and not even so does He punish us, but has given medicine of repentance, which is sufficient to put away and blot out all our sins; only if we knew the nature of the medicine, and how we ought to apply it.
Homily on Hebrews 9
The apostles raised the dead. And this was the power of the resurrection. He said, "hold him up to contempt," because if baptism is a mystery, it suffices once and for all. And if the matter happens a second time, it is an act of despising and ridicule.
Fragments on the Epistle to the Hebrews 6.6
"and having fallen away." It is impossible to renew a city to repentance after having lost all these things and having fallen away. What then? Should we cast away repentance? May it never be, (thus says the holy Cyril in the sixth book of "On the Veneration and Worship in Spirit and Truth") but rather the repentance through baptism. For it is necessary first to consider repentance and the renunciation of wicked deeds, and thus to be baptized. Therefore, he says, the repentance in baptism, from which he also said, "To renew what is proper to baptism," and "To crucify again, which is also proper to this baptism." For those being baptized are crucified with the Lord. Therefore, he who wishes to repent again through the second baptism crucifies Christ by being crucified with Him.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
"they crucify again for themselves the Son of God." What does it mean, crucify again for themselves the Son of God and setting an example? He says from above, crucify again for themselves and bringing shame. But he says it is of this kind; once Christ was crucified, and we too, once, are crucified with him through baptism. Therefore, he says, one who thinks there is a second baptism, as far as he is concerned, crucifies the Lord from above. For what else does the one who thinks he is being crucified a second time through baptism do, except that he also considers himself to be crucified a second time, through what he does? But to crucify a second time, he says, Christ, as far as it pertains to him, is nothing other than to set an example for him and to bring him to shame. For once crucified, he is therefore immortal. But he who re-crucifies does this as a falsehood, which brings him shame as if he had only pretended to die once.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
Otherwise.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
What does it mean to crucify again? Calling it a second crucifixion and a second passion [πάθος], if such repentance exists, and the worthiness to receive the remission through baptism was achieved only by the cross of Christ. Therefore, those who understand this desire again to see Christ being crucified, mocked, and typified. Oh, the audacity and shamelessness! If anyone contemplates such things. And indeed, through these, they shake their thoughts, so that having become hopeless of being able to attain such repentance, they strive for virtue instead.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
What does it mean, "crucifying for themselves anew the Son of God and holding him up to contempt"? He says that they crucify him again for themselves and dishonor him. This is what he means here: Christ was crucified once and for all, and we have been crucified together with him through baptism. Then he says that such a one, imagining that there is a second baptism, like their [first] baptism into him, crucifies the Lord again. For what else does the one do who intends to be crucified a second time with him than to deem that Christ has been crucified a second time through the things he does? But he says that to crucify Christ a second time (insofar as it applies to him) is nothing other than to ridicule and dishonor him. For having died once and for all he is immortal thereafter, but the one who crucifies him anew posits this lie, inasmuch as he reproaches him as a liar when he says that he died once and for all.
Fragments on the Epistle to the Hebrews 6.6
That is, through repentance. What is this? Is repentance really rejected? By no means. But rather, renewal through a second baptism. For renewal is the effect of baptism alone, as the prophet also says: "your youth is renewed like the eagle's" (Ps. 103:5); whereas the effect of repentance consists in this, that it frees from the old state and makes strong. But it cannot restore to the former brightness. For in baptism everything was the work of grace. Therefore by "repentance," he says, he means precisely baptism. For first everyone repents of their former life, then is baptized, as he himself said above: "conversion from dead works." And from what follows it is clear that he rejects a second baptism.
Baptism is the cross. "Our old man is crucified with Him," and "we are united with Him in the likeness of His death." And again: "we are buried with Him through baptism." For just as Christ died on the cross in the flesh, so we in baptism die to sin. Therefore, whoever is baptized a second time crucifies Christ a second time, insofar as it is in his power. But this is absurd. For He died once and rose again, and "death no longer has dominion over Him" (cf. Rom. 6:4–9). Thus, there is no second baptism, just as there is no second cross. For what would prevent there being a third, and a fourth, and so on to infinity? He did not simply say "they crucify again" and stop there; but he added "in themselves," to show that we, living our lives carelessly on the assumption that there exists another baptism, do everything as though we ourselves were sustaining within ourselves this wicked opinion.
That is, they triumph over, they put to shame. This can be understood in two ways: either that those who crucified the Lord devised at that time such a manner of death for His disgrace, one that was obviously accursed and shameful, and appointed for evildoers; or that Christ, having been crucified once, is in subsequent time confessed to be immortal. Therefore, the one who crucifies Him a second time makes this confession false, which brings dishonor to Christ, who tasted death only once and thereafter is immortal. Thus, the impossibility of this matter is confirmed in two ways: first, because one who was deemed worthy of such blessings and squandered them all is no longer worthy to enjoy those same blessings again; and second, even more so, because it is impossible for the Son of God to be crucified again.
Commentary on Hebrews
291. – Then when he says, and then commit apostasy, he shows the difficulty in rising, after one has fallen. Here it should be noted that he does not say, 'fallen', but 'fallen away', i.e. completely fallen, because if they had merely fallen, it should not be difficult to rise: 'A just man shall fall seven times, and shall rise again' (Pr. 24:16). But if the Apostle had said it is impossible for those who have fallen away to rise again, then it might be said that in this he was signifying how extremely difficult it is to rise, both because of sin and because of pride, as in the devils. But because he says that those who have once fallen away cannot be renewed unto penance, and there is no sin in this world that man cannot repent of, there must be another explanation. Hence, it should be noted that a certain Novatian, who was a priest of the church in Rome, made this the occasion of his error. For he declared that no one could rise to penance after baptism. But this opinion is false, as Athanasius says in a letter to Serapion, because Paul himself received the incestuous Corinthians, as shown in 2 Cor (chap. 2); and likewise in Gal (4:19), because he says: 'My little children, of whom I am in labor again, until Christ be formed in you.' Therefore, it must be understood, as Augustine says, that he does not say that it is impossible to repent, but that it is impossible to be renewed again, i.e., baptized: 'By the laver of regeneration and renovation of the Holy Spirit' (Tit 3:5). For a man could never repent in such a way that he could be baptized again. The Apostle says this because according to the Law, the Jews were baptized frequently, as is shown in Mark (chap. 7). Consequently, it was in order to remove that error that the Apostle says this.
292. – Then when he says, since they crucify the Son of God on their own account, he gives the reason why baptism cannot be repeated, namely because baptism is a configuration to Christ's death, as is clear from Romans (6:13); 'all we who are baptized in Christ, are baptized in his death.' But this death is not repeated, because 'Christ rising again from the dead, dies now no more' (Rom. 6:9). Therefore, those who are repeatedly baptized crucify Christ again. Or, another way, it denotes that it is repugnant to Christ's grace for people to sin frequently and then be baptized again. Then the emphasis is not on the repetition of baptism, but on the falling away of the sinner, who, as far as in him lies, crucifies Christ again: 'Christ died once for our sins' (1 Pt. 3:18). Therefore, when you sin after baptism, then as far as in you lies, you give occasion for Christ to be crucified again; and in this way hold him up to contempt and stain yourself, washed in His blood: 'He loved us and washed us from our sins in his blood' (Rev. 1:15).
294. – But it should be noted that according to one explanation the Apostle wished to show by the above that those who have been baptized once cannot be baptized again or be renewed again to penance in another life: 'Whatsoever your hand is able to do, do it earnestly: for neither work nor reason nor wisdom nor knowledge shall be in hell, whither you are hastening' (Ec. 9:10): 'The night comes when no man can work' (Jn. 9:4). Therefore, let it be explained once more, i.e., after this life, and there is a reason for this. For two things cause penance: one is that which gives it efficacy, namely, the merit of Christ's Passion: 'He is the propitiation for our sins' (1 Jn. 2:2). The other is the example of penance, which we have in Christ by considering His austerity, poverty, and Passion: 'Christ also suffered for us, leaving you an example that you should follow his steps' (1 Pt. 2:21). Thus, therefore, is understood what he says, crucifying again, i.e., receiving the fruit of the cross of Christ, and this in regard to that which gives efficacy to penance; and hold him up to contempt as to the example of repenting.
Commentary on Hebrews
For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God:
γῆ γὰρ ἡ πιοῦσα τὸν ἐπ’ αὐτῆς πολλάκις ἐρχόμενον ὑετὸν καὶ τίκτουσα βοτάνην εὔθετον ἐκείνοις δι’ οὓς καὶ γεωργεῖται, μεταλαμβάνει εὐλογίας ἀπὸ τοῦ Θεοῦ·
Землѧ́ бо пи́вшаѧ сходѧ́щїй на ню̀ мно́жицею до́ждь и҆ ражда́ющаѧ бы̑лїѧ дѡ́браѧ ѡ҆́нымъ, и҆́миже и҆ дѣ́лаема быва́етъ, прїе́млетъ блгⷭ҇ве́нїе ѿ бг҃а:
7–8Our earth, that is, our heart, receives blessings if it receives “the rain” of the doctrine of the law “that often falls upon it” and brings forth the fruit of works. But if it does not have a spiritual work but “thorns and thistles,” that is, cares of the world or the desire of pleasures and riches, “it is worthless and near to being cursed; its end is to be burned.” For that reason, each one of the hearers, when he assembles to hear, receives “the shower” of the Word of God; and, if one indeed brings forth the fruit of a good work, one will obtain “a blessing.” But if a person disdains the received Word of God and frequently neglects to hear it and subjects himself to the care and passion of secular affairs, as one who would suffocate the Word “with thorns,” he will procure “a curse” for a blessing, and, instead of receiving a blessing, his “end is to be burned.” Therefore, he says, “I will give you your rains in their season.”
Homilies on Leviticus 16.2.4-6
7–8Let us see then whether by an illustration used by the apostle in the epistle to the Hebrews, we are able to prove that by one operation God has mercy upon one while he hardens another. It is not God’s intent to harden, but while having a good purpose, hardening follows as a result of the inherent principle of wickedness in such persons, so that he is said to harden him who is hardened. … As regards the rain there is one operation, but the ground which is cultivated produces fruit, while that which is neglected and is barren produces thorns.
On First Principles 3.1.10
7–8Let us hear the oracles of God with fear, with fear and much trembling. For (it is said) "Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice unto Him with trembling." (Ps. ii. 11.) But if even our joy and our exultation ought to be "with trembling," of what punishment are we not worthy, if we listen not with terror to what is said, when the things spoken, as now, are themselves fearful?
For having said that "it is impossible for those who have fallen away" to be baptized a second time, and to receive remission through the layer, and having pointed out the awfulness of the case, he goes on: "for the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God. But if it bear thorns and thistles, it is rejected, and nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned."
Let us then fear, beloved! This threat is not Paul's, these words are not of man: they are of the Holy Ghost, of Christ that speaketh in him. Is there then any one that is clear from these thorns? And even if we were clear, not even so ought we to be confident, but to fear and tremble lest at any time thorns should spring up in us. But when we are "thorns and thistles" through and through, whence (tell me) are we confident? And are becoming supine? What is it which makes us inert? If "he that thinketh he standeth" ought to fear "lest he fall"; for (he says) "Let him that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest he fall" (1 Cor. x. 12); he that falleth, how anxious ought he to be that he may rise up again! If Paul fears, "lest that by any means, when he had preached to others, he himself should be a castaway" (1 Cor. ix. 27); and he who had been so approved is afraid lest he should become disapproved: what pardon shall we have who are already disapproved, if we have no fear, but fulfill our Christianity as a custom, and for form's sake. Let us then fear, beloved: "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven." (Rom. i. 18.) Let us fear, for it "is revealed" not "against impiety" only, but "against all unrighteousness." What is "against all unrighteousness"? [Against all] both small and great.
Homily on Hebrews 10
7–8In this passage he intimates the lovingkindness of God towards man: and the teaching [of the Gospel] he calls "rain": and what he said above, "when for the time ye ought to be teachers" (c. v. 12), this he says here also. Indeed in many places the Scripture calls the teaching "rain." For (it says) "I will command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it" (Isa. v. 6), speaking of "the vineyard." The same which in another place it calls "a famine of bread, and a thirst of water." (Amos viii. 11.) And again, "The river of God is full of waters." (Ps. lxv. 9.)
"For land," he says, "which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it." Here he shows that they received and drank in the word, yea and often enjoyed this, and yet even so they were not profited. For if (he means) thou hadst not been tilled, if thou hadst enjoyed no rains, the evil would not have been so great. For (it is said) "If I had not come and spoken unto them they had not had sin." (John xv. 22.) But if thou hast often drunk and received [nourishment], wherefore hast thou brought forth other things instead of fruits? For (it is said) "I waited that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth thorns." (Isa. v. 2.)
Thou seest that everywhere the Scripture calleth sins "thorns." For David also saith, "I was turned into mourning when a thorn was fixed in me." (Ps. xxxii. 4, so Ps. xxxii. 4 LXX.) For it does not simply come on us, but is fixed in; and even if but a little of it remain in, even if we take it not out entirely, that little of itself in like manner causes pain, as in the case of a thorn. And why do I say, 'that little of itself'? Even after it has been taken out, it leaves therein for a long time the pain of the wound. And much care and treatment is necessary, that we may be perfectly freed from it. For it is not enough merely to take away the sin, it is necessary also to heal the wounded place.
But I fear however lest the things said apply to us more than to others. "For," he says, "the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it." We are ever drinking, ever hearing, but "when the sun is risen" (Matt. xiii. 6) we straightway lose our moisture, and therefore bring forth thorns. What then are the thorns? Let us hear Christ saying, that "the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and it becometh unfruitful." (Matt. xiii. 22.)
Homily on Hebrews 10
7–8"For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it," he says, "and bringeth forth meet herbs." Because nothing is so meet as purity of life, nothing so suitable as the best life, nothing so meet as virtue.
"And bringeth forth" (saith he) "herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God." Here he says that God is the cause of all things, giving the heathen a blow, who ascribed the production of fruits to the power of the earth. For (he says) it is not the hands of the husbandman which stir up the earth to bear fruits, but the command from God. Therefore he says, "receives blessing from God."
And see how in speaking of the thorns, he said not, "bringing forth thorns," nor did he use this word expressive of what is useful; but what? "Bearing" [literally "putting out"] "thorns," as if one should say, "forcing out," "throwing out."
"Rejected" (he says) "and nigh unto cursing." Oh! how great consolation in this word! For he said "nigh unto cursing," not "a curse." Now he that hath not yet fallen into a curse, but is come to be near [thereto], may also come to be far off [therefrom].
And not by this only did he encourage them, but also by what follows. For he did not say "rejected and nigh unto cursing," "which shall be burned," but what? "Whose end is to be burned," if he continue [such] (he means) unto the end. So that, if we cut out and burn the thorns, we shall be able to enjoy those good things innumerable and to become approved, and to partake of blessing.
And with good reason did he call sin "a thistle," saying "that which beareth thorns and thistles"; for on whatever side you lay hold on it, it wounds and stings, and it is unpleasant even to look at.
Homily on Hebrews 10
7–8Would you like to know in what way the faithful are compared with clouds in holy writ? Isaiah says, “I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon them.” Moses was speaking as if he were a cloud when he said, “May my teaching drop as the rain.” The letters of the apostles are spiritual rain for us. As a matter of fact, what does Paul say in his letter to the Hebrews?: “For land which has drunk the rain that often falls upon it,” and again, “I planted, Apollos watered.”
Homilies on the Psalms, Alternate Series 73 (psalm 96)
7–8By “rain” he referred metaphorically to instruction.
Interpretation of Hebrews 6
7–8“For the earth, which produces.” In the parable, he speaks of the land and the people, he rain, however, is called the teaching, as elsewhere, "I command the clouds," says God, "not to rain upon the vineyard;" (Isa. 5:2) and again, "the river of God was filled with waters;" (Ps. 144:10) these, he who, having been graced by God to teach, was filled with the waters from above, that is, with gifts. those who have often heard and have been metaphorically watered by the saving word of faith, and either have benefited or gained nothing from it. "suitable vegetation." What is a suitable vegetation? The proper constitution, the virtuous life; for nothing is so well-placed, that is, appropriate and agreeable, as the purity of life. "for those for whom it is cultivated." Since he spoke about land and fruits, he remained in the metaphor. The good life is produced by the teachers (for these are the ones who cultivate), as those who partake of the virtue of the students.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
7–8It is indeed cultivated for the salvation and benefit of those who bear fruit. If it is so, as the Lord says (Jn. 15:1), the Father is the farmer, and the Son is the sower, sowing the precious seed (Matt. 13:3); if the plant is suitable for them, that is, if the farming appears (for we owe it to God to bear fruit, as it is said somewhere (Rom. 6:22): "But now, having been enslaved to God, you have your fruit to holiness"). If therefore we cultivate this, namely for God, in order to please Him with a virtuous life, we are also deemed worthy of His blessing.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
7–8"receives a blessing from God." For the fruitful land is blessed by God. Who is the fruitful land? The virtuous man. "producing thorns." He did not say "bearing [Τίκτουσα]," but "producing [Ἐκφέρουσα]," hinting at the unnaturalness of the production, as if he said, "spitting out [ἐκβράσσουσα]." And "producing" indicates the production until the end and death. For he did not say "carrying out [Ἐξενεγκοῦσα]," but "producing [Ἐκφέρουσα]"; note this. And by thorns and thistles, he speaks of sin, because it strikes from all sides and corrupts the one who holds it. "and near to a curse."He spoke of the greatest comfort. For he did not say, "It is a self-curse," but rather, "and near to a curse." And one who is near to a curse can also become far away through repentance. For if he had said, "And it is a curse," he would have had to despair. But now, he says, "and near to a curse," speaking in fear and with caution; "Behold, you have become near to the curse; be afraid lest you fall into it, and flee from it." For one who is near can also flee; for he has not yet been seized. "whose end is for burning." See again how securely he speaks, lest it be thought that the greatest remedy among men casts out repentance. For he did not say, "He who has accepted thorns and thistles is burned," but rather, "whose end is for burning." If we endure until the end, he says, and carry out the thorns until the very end, then we will be burned, indicating by contrast that if we do not endure the thorns until the end, but change our minds, we will not be burned.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
7–8“It is cultivated” manifestly for their salvation and the enjoyment of those producing fruit. And if “the Father is the vinedresser,” just as the Lord says, and again the Son is also the sower, “the one sowing the good seed,” if the crop is suitable for them, that is, if the fruit appears—for we also ought to bear fruit for God, as he says somewhere, “but now having become slaves to God, produce your fruit for sanctification”—then if this is the case, we farm manifestly because of God, in order that we may please him with a virtuous life. Therefore we also will be deemed worthy of his blessing.
Fragments on the Epistle to the Hebrews 6.7
By "earth" he calls the soul, and by "rain" – teaching, as also in another place: "I will command the clouds," says God, "not to pour... rain" upon the vineyard (Isa. 5:6). And again: "the river of God is full of water" (Ps. 65:10), that is, he who has received from God the gift of teaching others is filled with waters from above, or gifts. Here he gives to understand that they both received and drank the word, and were often deemed worthy of it, and nevertheless did not profit from it, which he also said above: "by this time you ought to be teachers" (Heb. 5:12).
A life filled with virtue, that is. For there is nothing so useful, that is, becoming and desirable, as purity of life.
"Grass," he says, that is, a virtuous life, the earth brings forth for those for whom it is cultivated, and for them it is "useful": for those very ones, bearing virtue, will enjoy it. Some understood "for them" as meaning: for the teachers; for indeed, good conduct is cultivated by them, so that they are partakers in the virtue of their students.
Here he silently rebukes the Greeks, who attribute the growing of fruits to the power of the earth. And it is not even the hands of the farmer that produce the fruits, but everything, he says, is the work of God: He Himself blesses and gives abundance of fruits.
Commentary on Hebrews
293. – Having showed the difficulty involved in pursuing his intention, a difficulty arising from their guilt, the Apostle now resorts to a simile to explain this: first, in regard to good earth; secondly, in regard to bad earth (v. 8).
295. – But the simile which is presented here about the earth can be connected to that which was stated above, let us go on to things more perfect, and then the sense will be: If we go on we will have a blessing like the good earth; or it can be connected with what was just said according to both explanations, either about baptism or about the other life. The one about baptism is more literal and then the sense is: Just as the cultivated earth, if it brings forth thorns again, is not cultivated but is burned, so a man who sins after baptism is not washed again.
296. – In regard to the good earth he mentions three things: first, the benefit bestowed; secondly, the fruit it brings (v. 7b); thirdly, the reward (v. 7c).
297. – This earth is the human heart: 'But that on good ground are they who in a good and perfect heart, hearing the word, keep it and bring forth fruit in patience' (Lk. 8:15). It is called earth, because just as earth needs rain, so a man needs God's grace: 'You have visited the earth and have plentifully watered it' (Ps. 64:10). 'And as the rain and the snow come down from heaven and return no more thither, but soak the earth and water it, and make it to spring, and give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater, so shall my word be which shall go forth from my mouth: it shall not return to me void, but it shall do whatsoever I please, and shall prosper in the things for which I sent it' (Is. 55:10). But the benefit it receives and the doctrine of faith is as rain which falls on the hearts of those who hear the words of preachers and teachers: 'I will command the clouds to rain no more upon it' (Is. 5:6); 'He pours out showers like a flood, which flow from the clouds that cover all above' (Jb. 36:27). He drinks this rain, when he understands what he hears and is drawn to it: 'All you that thirst, come to the waters, and you that have no money, make haste, buy and eat' (Is. 55:1). This doctrine is above it, because some doctrine is from the earth and inclines a person to cling to earthly things; another is from heaven, namely, which teaches heavenly things: 'For this is not wisdom descending from above, but earthly, sensual, devilish' (Jas. 3:15); and then he continues: 'But the wisdom that is from above, first, indeed, is chaste, then peaceable, modest, easy to persuade, consenting to the good, without dissimulation' (Jas. 3:17). Or above it, i.e., above the faculty of human reason: for the other sciences were founded according to human reason, but this is divinely inspired: 'For many things are shown to you above the understanding of men' (Sir. 3:25). But he does not say, 'always' or 'rarely', but often, because as Augustine says: 'If always, then it becomes worthless; if rarely, then it is not enough and is neglected'; 'I have often heard such things as these' (Jb. 16:2).
298. – The fruit is that it brings forth vegetation useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated. These are good works, which a man performs by the doctrine received: 'Let the earth bring forth the green herb, and such as may seed' (Gen. 1:11). This earth is cultivated, first of all, by God: 'My Father is the husbandman' (Jn. 15:1); it is also cultivated by the prelate: 'I have planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase' (1 Cor. 3:6). It is also cultivated by the man himself: 'Diligently till your ground' (Pr. 24:27). It is suitable for God unto glory: 'Do all for the glory of God' (1 Cor. 10:31); for the one who acts, it is suitable unto eternal life: 'You have your fruit unto sanctification, and the end life everlasting' (Rom. 6:22).
299. – Then, when he says, he receives a blessing from God, he mentions the reward, namely, a divine blessing. But that blessing is no less than the production of goodness in us: in the present life it is imperfect, but in the future life it will be perfect: 'Unto this you are called, to inherit a blessing' (1 Pt. 3:9).
Commentary on Hebrews
But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.
ἐκφέρουσα δὲ ἀκάνθας καὶ τριβόλους, ἀδόκιμος καὶ κατάρας ἐγγύς, ἧς τὸ τέλος εἰς καῦσιν.
а҆ и҆зносѧ́щаѧ тє́рнїѧ и҆ волче́цъ непотре́бна є҆́сть и҆ клѧ́твы бли́з̾, є҆ѧ́же кончи́на въ пожже́нїе.
He did not say "producing growth," as he said above concerning "vegetation," but "bringing forth," as if to say — expelling and casting out a certain excess. "Thorns and thistles" are the cares of life, the deceitfulness of riches, and in general every sin, as David also says: "I became a sufferer when a thorn was driven into me" (Ps. 31:4). A thorn does not simply enter but is driven in, and if we have not pulled it all out but a little of it remains, it causes great pain and requires treatment and care. But there is also the thistle: wherever you touch it, it wounds, and everywhere it is unpleasant — on earth it brings disgrace, and in the age to come especially so.
He said that good land is blessed by God; but the unfruitful – he did not simply say: cursed, but "near to a curse," so that they would not despair. For whoever is "near a curse" can also be far from it.
And this, so that we would not despair. For he did not say: the earth will be burned, but "whose end is burning," that is, if it remains fruitless to the end. Thus, it is possible to avoid fruitlessness and burn away the thorns, and become useful, and be deemed worthy of blessing.
Commentary on Hebrews
300. – Then when he says, but that which brings forth thorns and briars is reprobate, he deals with bad earth and does two things: first, he mentions the evil fruit; secondly, the punishment (v. 8b). The fruit, therefore, are the thorns, i.e., minor sins, and the briars, i.e., graver sins, which prick one's own conscience and sometimes another's, namely, sins against one's neighbor: 'Thorns and thistles shall it bring forth to you' (Gen. 3:18). In regard to the punishment he mentions three things: first, divine reprobation; secondly, the judge's condemnation (v. 8c), thirdly, the final punishment (v. 8d). In regard to the first he says, is reprobate. For just as predestination is the source of reward, so reprobation is the sign of condemnation. Therefore, the fact that a person is frequently watered with salutary precepts is a sign of reprobation, if he continues to sin: 'Call them reprobate silver, for the Lord has rejected them' (Jer. 6:30). The condemnation is that he is very near unto a curse: 'Depart, you accursed, into everlasting fire' (Mt. 25:41). The punishment is that his end is to be burnt: 'Every garment mingled with blood shall be burnt, and be fuel for the fire' (Is. 9:5).
Commentary on Hebrews
But, beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation, though we thus speak.
Πεπείσμεθα δὲ περὶ ὑμῶν, ἀγαπητοί, τὰ κρείττονα καὶ ἐχόμενα σωτηρίας, εἰ καὶ οὕτω λαλοῦμεν.
[Заⷱ҇ 313] Надѣ́емсѧ же ѡ҆ ва́съ, возлю́бленнїи, лꙋ́чшихъ и҆ придержа́щихсѧ спⷭ҇нїѧ, а҆́ще и҆ та́кѡ глаго́лемъ.
9–10After the apostle said these words and discouraged them from sinning and being in want of propitiation, he changed his tone and encouraged them, as if to say, “If there is no second baptism to purify you, your deeds and charity are to be an eternal baptism for you.” “Though,” he says, “we speak thus” and close the door of mercy before the just ones lest they may sin, nevertheless the door of mercy is open for penitents. “God is not so unjust as to overlook your work,” that is, your gift, “and the love” which you have for the saints and the poor who are in Jerusalem.
Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews
Having therefore sufficiently rebuked them, and alarmed and wounded them, he in turn heals them, so as not to cast them down too much, and make them supine. For he that strikes one that is "dull," makes him more dull. So then he neither flatters them throughout, lest he should make them supine, nor does he wound them throughout, but having inserted a little to wound them, he applies much to heal in what follows.
For what does he say? We speak not these things, as having condemned you, nor as thinking you to be full of thorns, but fearing lest this should come to pass. For it is better to terrify you by words, that ye may not suffer by the realities. And this is specially of Paul's wisdom.
Moreover he did not say, We think, or, we conjecture, or, we expect, or, we hope, but what? "But beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation, though we thus speak." Which word he also used in writing to the Galatians: "But I am persuaded of you in the Lord, that ye will be none otherwise minded." (Gal. v. 10.) For in that instance, inasmuch as they were greatly to be condemned, and he could not praise them from things present, he does it from things future ("that ye will be none otherwise minded," he says): he said not, ye are, but "ye will be none otherwise minded." But here he encourages them from things present. "We are persuaded better things of you, beloved, and things that accompany to salvation, though we thus speak." And since he was not able to say so much from things present, he confirms his consolation from things past.
Homily on Hebrews 10
Having sufficiently struck them by calling them sluggish, and saying other things, he now comforts them; therefore he did not say, "I think," but "I am convinced." "and things pertaining to salvation." Being near. "even though we speak in this way." He says, I know that you will not produce thorns and thistles, but I strike only with words, so that I may make you stronger.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
Having sufficiently rebuked and frightened them, he again consoles, so as not to make them completely careless. For whoever punishes a lazy person severely makes him even lazier. Therefore he says: I say this not because I have condemned you, and not because I consider you full of thorns, but because I fear lest this happen to you. And he did not say: we expect of you, but: "we hope," that is, we are in firm confidence concerning you, that you do not live this way, but better, and that you care for your own salvation, even though we expressed ourselves so strongly. So he says this either about their life, namely, that you are so thorny, or about the recompense, that you are not "near to cursing" and not to "burning," but a different recompense is appointed for you. Pay attention also to what follows.
Commentary on Hebrews
301. – Because the Apostle had said many seemingly harsh things about their state, now to keep them from despair, he shows the intention he had in saying these things, namely, to snatch them from danger. Hence, he does two things: first, he shows the confidence he had in them; secondly, the reason for this confidence (v. 10).
302. – He says, therefore: I have stated that the earth which brought forth thorns and briars is reprobate, but lest you suppose that I consider you such, we feel sure of better things for you and nearer to salvation because of your faith and charity. Thus, he commends their state on two points, namely, on what they had been, because the fact that he says, better things, he supposes that they were in a good state; secondly, on what they awaited in the future, namely, things nearer to salvation: 'Now our salvation is nearer than when we believed' (Rom. 13:11). For the more one makes progress in the good, the nearer he gets to salvation. Then he continues, though we speak thus, i.e., even though we speak this way, it is in order to make you cautious: and this proceeds from charity: 'The just man shall correct in mercy, and shall reprove me' (Ps. 140:5).
Commentary on Hebrews
For God is not unrighteous to forget your work and labour of love, which ye have shewed toward his name, in that ye have ministered to the saints, and do minister.
οὐ γὰρ ἄδικος ὁ Θεὸς ἐπιλαθέσθαι τοῦ ἔργου ὑμῶν καὶ τοῦ κόπου τῆς ἀγάπης ἧς ἐνεδείξασθε εἰς τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ, διακονήσαντες τοῖς ἁγίοις καὶ διακονοῦντες.
Не ѡ҆би́дливъ бо бг҃ъ, забы́ти дѣ́ла ва́шегѡ и҆ трꙋда̀ любвѐ, ю҆́же показа́сте во и҆́мѧ є҆гѡ̀, послꙋжи́вше ст҃ы̑мъ и҆ слꙋжа́ще.
"For God is not unrighteous to forget your work, and the love, which ye have showed toward His name, in that ye have ministered unto the saints and do minister." O how did he here restore their spirit, and give them fresh strength, by reminding them of former things, and bringing them to the necessity of not supposing that God had forgotten. (For he cannot but sin who is not fully assured concerning his hope, and says that God is unrighteous. Accordingly he obliged them by all means to look forward to those future things. For one who despairs of present things, and has given up exerting himself, may be restored by [the prospect of] things future.) As he himself also said in writing to the Galatians, "Ye did run well" (Gal. v. 7): and again, "Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain." (Gal. iii. 4.)
And as in this place he puts the praise with the reproof, saying, "When for the time ye ought to be teachers" (c. v. 12), so also there, "I marvel that ye are so soon removed." (Gal. i. 6.) With the reproof is the praise. For respecting great things we marvel, when they fail. Thou seest that praise is concealed under the accusation and the blame. Nor does he say this concerning himself only, but also concerning all. For he said not, I am persuaded, but "we are persuaded better things of you," even good things (he means). He says this either in regard to matters of conduct, or to the recompense. In the next place, having said above, that it is "rejected and nigh unto a curse," and that it "shall be for burning," he says, we do not by any means speak this of you. "For God is not unrighteous to forget your work, and love."
Homily on Hebrews 10
"For God" (he says) "is not unrighteous to forget your love" and the zeal "which ye have showed toward His Name, in that ye have ministered unto the saints, and do minister." He testifies great things of them, not deeds only; but deeds done with alacrity, which he says also in another place, "and not only so, but they gave themselves also to the Lord and to us." (2 Cor. viii. 5.)
"Which" (he says) "ye have showed toward His Name, in that ye have ministered to the saints, and do minister." See how again he soothes them, by adding "and do minister." Still even at this time (he says) ye are ministering, and he raises them up by showing that they had done [what they did] not to them [the saints], but to God. "Which ye have showed" (he says); and he said not "unto the saints," but "towards God," for this is "toward His Name." It is for His Name's sake (he means) that ye have done all. He therefore who has the enjoyment from you of so great zeal and love, will never despise you nor forget you.
Homily on Hebrews 10
"For God is not unjust." Therefore, we are convinced of the good things concerning you, knowing that God is not unjust. If He is not unjust, He will not forget your good work and the love which you have shown in His name, having endured all for Him. So do not lose heart, but always hope for better things; for God is always righteous. Therefore, I have not spoken about you in a discouraging way; for I know that you are not worthy of curses. "in serving the saints."Greatly testifies to them, not only by works, but also by works done with eagerness; for serving is a sign of eagerness. To the saints, that is, to the faithful. For every believer is holy, even if he is of the world [κοσμικὸς]. But see how he ministers to them. For he did not say, having served, and stood; but added, and serving; that is, continuing to do the same.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
See how he encouraged and strengthened them in the hope of better things, reminding them of their former deeds and the righteousness of God: for if God is righteous, He will not forget your work, that is, your mercy, your brotherly love, but will repay you. Therefore do not despair, but fully hope for better things, since God is perfectly just. So it was not about you that I spoke what I spoke harshly, for I know that you are not worthy of condemnation.
He gives an important testimony about them, pointing not only to their deeds, but also to their deeds done with zeal. For to serve is a sign of zeal. He speaks of the love and mercy which they showed not merely to their brethren, but in the name of God. See what the greatest consolation is: that we do things not for people, but for God, as Christ also says in the Gospel: "you did it to Me" (Matt. 25:40). For whoever cares for the unrighteous for the sake of God's name does it for God. "The saints," that is, the faithful. For every believer is holy, even if he be a layperson. "For the unbelieving husband," he says, "is sanctified by the believing wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the believing husband" (1 Cor. 7:14). Thus, faith here produces sanctification. Therefore, let us be attentive not only to monastics as to saints, but also to laypeople: the former, of course, are holy both in faith and in life, but laypeople too are holy in faith, and many also in life. See how he comforts them. For having said "having served," he did not stop, but added "and serving," that is, even now you are doing the same thing.
Commentary on Hebrews
303. – Then (v. 10) he gives the reasons for the confidence: one is based on their past good works; the other on God's promise (v. 13). But because the Apostle had said two things, namely, that he had confidence in them and that he spoke harshly to them, he does two things: first, he gives reason for the first; secondly, the reason for the second (v. 11).
304. – The reason he has confidence in them is that he remembers the many good works they did; hence he says, In your case we feel sure of better things. And why? Because God is not so unjust as to overlook your works. But on the other hand it says in Ez. (18:24): 'If the just man turn himself away from his justice and do iniquity according to all the abominations which the wicked man does, shall he live?' And a bit later he continues: 'All his justices, which he has done, shall not be remembered', and then: 'The way of the Lord is not right.' I answer that a man who falls after grace can react in two ways: he might persist in evil, and then God forgets all his justices; or he might repent, and then He remembers his previous good works, because they are accounted as merit. Hence, a Gloss says that after dying, they revive.
305. – But another doubt arises, because it is obvious that justice regards merit. Therefore, if God's justice requires that He not forget, if he repents, as the Gloss says, then his rising from sin falls under merit, so that he merits grace: which is impossible. I answer that there are two kinds of merit: one rests on justice and is called condign; the other rests entirely on mercy and is called congruous. It is of the latter that he says that it is just, i.e., congruous, i.e., that a man who performed many good deeds should merit. For that mercy is somehow annexed to justice more than in the case of one who never did anything. It is in this sense that God does not forget our work and our love; for eternal life is due to charity alone: 'If anyone loves me, he will keep my word' (Jn. 14:23). For whatever does not proceed from charity is not meritorious: 'If I have not charity, it profits me nothing' (1 Cor. 13:3). Hence, he does not say merely, of your work, but adds, and your love, because, as Gregory says: 'The love of God is not idle, for it performs great things, if it is present: if one refuses to act, there is no love'; 'Let us not love in word nor in tongue, but in deed and in truth' (1 Jn. 3:18). Therefore, he continues, which you have showed for his sake: 'All whatsoever you do in word or in work, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ' (Col. 3:17).
306. – What they have showed and in what, he shows when he says, 'in serving the saints', namely, by relieving their needs: 'Whoever will be the greater among you, let him be your minister' (Mt. 20:26). 'Communicating to the necessities of the saints' (Rom. 12:13). And because perseverance is necessary in all things, he continues, as you still do. Therefore, if you have sinned, He will grant pardon out of mercy annexed to justice.
Commentary on Hebrews
And we desire that every one of you do shew the same diligence to the full assurance of hope unto the end:
ἐπιθυμοῦμεν δὲ ἕκαστον ὑμῶν τὴν αὐτὴν ἐνδείκνυσθαι σπουδὴν πρὸς τὴν πληροφορίαν τῆς ἐλπίδος ἄχρι τέλους,
Жела́емъ же, да кі́йждо ва́съ ꙗ҆влѧ́етъ то́жде тща́нїе ко и҆звѣще́нїю ᲂу҆пова́нїѧ да́же до конца̀,
"We," then, according to the noble apostle, "wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. For in Christ neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith which worketh by love." And we desire that every one of you show the same diligence to the full assurance of hope, down to "made an high priest for ever, after the order of Melchizedek." Similarly with Paul "the All-virtuous Wisdom" says, "He, that heareth me shall dwell trusting in hope." For the restoration of hope is called by the same term "hope." To the expression "will dwell" it has most beautifully added "trusting," showing that such an one has obtained rest, having received the hope for which he hoped. Wherefore also it is added, "and shall be quiet, without fear of any evil."
The Stromata Book 2
“We,” according to the good apostle, “wait for the hope of righteousness, for in Christ neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is of any avail, but faith working through love.” “We desire each one of you to show the same earnestness in realizing the full assurance of hope,” and so on to, “having become a high priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek.” Wisdom, full of every virtue, uses similar words to Paul’s: “Anyone who listens to me will live safely, trusting in hope.” The establishment of hope and hope itself are spoken of interchangeably. That is why he has done admirably to add the word trusting to “will live safely.” He is showing that the sort of person who has hold of the hope he hoped for is at peace. This is why he adds, “And he will be tranquil, without fear, free from all evil.” The apostle speaks openly in the first letter to the Corinthians when he says expressly, “Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ,” to bring this about. If you imitate me and I imitate Christ, then you are imitating Christ as he is representing God. So he establishes a target for faith in “the likeness to God so far as possible in justice and holiness combined with practical wisdom,” and the goal in the actualization of the promise on the basis of faith.
The Stromata Book 2
11–12Why then did we say these things? "But we desire that everyone of you do show the same diligence to the full assurance of hope unto the end; that ye be not slothful, but followers of them who through faith and patience inherit the promises."
"We desire," he says, and we do not therefore merely labor for, or even so far as words go, wish this. But what? "We desire" that ye should hold fast to virtue, not as condemning your former conduct (he means), but fearing for the future. And he did not say, 'not as condemning your former conduct, but your present; for ye have fainted, ye are become too indolent'; but see how gently he indicated it, and did not wound them.
For what does he say? "But we desire that every one of you do show the same diligence unto the end." For this is the admirable part of Paul's wisdom, that he does not expressly show that they "had" given in, that they "had" become negligent. For when he says, "We desire that every one of you" - it is as if one should say, I wish thee to be always in earnest; and such as thou wert before, such to be now also, and for the time to come. For this made his reproof more gentle and easy to be received.
And he did not say, "I will," which would have been expressive of the authority of a teacher, but what is expressive of the affection of a father, and what is more than "willing," "we desire." All but saying, Pardon us, even if we say what is distasteful.
"We desire that every one of you do show the same diligence to the full assurance of your hope unto the end." Hope (he means) carries us through: it recovers us again. Be not wearied out, do not despair, lest your hope be in vain. For he that worketh good hopeth also good, and never despairs of himself.
"That ye may not become dull." Still "become"; and yet he said above, "seeing ye are become dull of hearing." (c. v. 11.) Observe however how he limited the dullness to the hearing. And here he hints the very same thing; instead of 'that ye may not continue in it,' he says [this]. But again he leads on to that future time for which they were not yet responsible; saying in effect "that ye may not become too slothful": since for that which is not yet come we could not be responsible. For he who in regard to the present time is exhorted to be in earnest, as being remiss, will perhaps become even more slothful, but he who is exhorted with reference to the future, not so.
"We desire" (he says) "that every one of you." Great is his affection for them: he cares equally for great and small; moreover he knows all, and overlooks no one, but shows the same tender care for each, and equal value for all: from which cause also he the rather persuaded them to receive what was distasteful in his words.
"That ye be not slothful," he says. For as inactivity hurts the body, so also inactivity as to what is good renders the soul more supine and feeble.
Homily on Hebrews 10
11–12"But followers" (he says) "of them, who through faith and patience inherit the promises." And who they are, he tells afterwards. He said before, "Imitate your own former well-doings." Then, lest they should say, What? He leads them back to the Patriarch: bringing before them examples of well-doing indeed from their own history, but of the thought of being forsaken, from the Patriarch; that they might not suppose that they were disregarded and forsaken as worthy of no account, but might know that it is [the portion] of the very noblest men to make the journey of life through trials; and that God has thus dealt with great and admirable men.
Now we ought (he says) to bear all things with patience: for this also is believing: whereas if He say that He gives and thou immediately receivest, how hast thou also believed? Since in that case this is no longer of thy faith, but of Me, the Giver. But if I say that I give, and give after an hundred years, and thou hast not despaired; then hast thou accounted Me worthy to be believed, then thou hast the right opinion concerning Me. Thou seest that oftentimes unbelief arises not from want of hope only, but also from faintheartedness, and want of patience, not from condemning him who made the promise.
Homily on Hebrews 10
This love that you continue to show, he says, "we desire [Επιθυμοῦμεν]." He did not say, "We want [βουλόμεθα]," but rather, it was more affectionate, "We desire," he says. "to show the same diligence." Then someone might say, "If you are convinced about the better things concerning us, and you know our works and our ministry to the saints, why then were you afraid to call us sluggish, and remembering the thorns? Why? Because "we desire each one of you," he says, "to show the same diligence to the full assurance of hope until the end", that is, to be steadfast in your faith in Christ and the hope that comes from it. And he did not say, We wish; which would have been a teaching authority; but, we desire; which is of paternal affection. For this is not something we wish in words only, but our soul burns for you. For such a thing is meant by the phrase, we desire.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
As if in response to someone's question: "Why did you say this, Paul, if you did not wish to punish us?" — he says that he said this desiring that you would conduct yourselves well in the future also; not condemning you for the past, but being concerned about the future. And he did not say "I want," which would indicate a teacher's authority, but "I desire," which is characteristic of fatherly love. For I do not desire this merely in words, but my soul burns for you. Understand the expression "I desire" in this way. And not simply for you collectively, but for each one individually: so he cared for all, both small and great, and knew them all. That they might show "full assurance of hope," that is, that they might display complete and perfect hope and not be troubled. See how he does not strike directly and does not say: you have despaired and have not yet come to your senses, but speaks as if to say: I want you to always be diligent, and to be in the future what you are now.
Commentary on Hebrews
307. – Then (v. 11) he assigns the reason why he spoke so sharply to them, namely, from a desire for their salvation. Hence, in regard to this he does three things: first, he shows his desire; secondly, he mentions the imminent danger (v. 12); thirdly, he explains by an example (v. 12b).
308. – He says, therefore, We have said these things not as though we despaired of you, but rather because we desire that everyone, i.e., each one of you: 'God is my witness, how I long after you all in the bowels of Jesus Christ' (Phil. 1:8). But what do we desire? that you show the same carefulness, i.e., that you be careful to show by your works this carefulness for doing good that you have always had. Hence, it is clear that carefulness is required for doing acts of godliness: 'Martha, Martha, you are careful' (Lk. 10:41) and for one's own salvation: 'Carefully study to present yourself approved unto God' (2 Tim. 2:15). And why? To realize the full assurance of hope, namely, that by fulfilling what you have begun, you may obtain what you hope: 'Hope confounds not' (Rom. 5:5). And this, until the end: 'For he that shall persevere to the end, he shall be saved' (Mt. 24:13).
Commentary on Hebrews
That ye be not slothful, but followers of them who through faith and patience inherit the promises.
ἵνα μὴ νωθροὶ γένησθε, μιμηταὶ δὲ τῶν διὰ πίστεως καὶ μακροθυμίας κληρονομούντων τὰς ἐπαγγελίας.
да не лѣни́ви бꙋ́дете, но подража́телє наслѣ́дствꙋющихъ ѡ҆бѣтова̑нїѧ вѣ́рою и҆ долготерпѣ́нїемъ.
"that you may not be sluggish." And this is also for their healing; for it leads them to the future time.And although he said above, "You have become sluggish," (Heb. 5:11) he then said to their listening ears, "but now, all of you have become sluggish." "imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises." Then he lists those who inherited the promises through faith, such as Abraham. What is meant by "through patience"? That is, through endurance. For he endured the promise being set forth for so many years, and still remained believing. For if the gift were to follow immediately upon the promise of God, there would no longer be any need for faith or endurance on the part of the one receiving the promise, since God would be completely truthful. But if, having promised, he is delayed, and the one receiving the promise patiently waits for the delay, then he believes purely, then he endures with self-control.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
And this is for their consolation: for he refers this to the future time. And although above he said: "because you have become dull of hearing" (Heb. 5:11): for up to this point he was indicating the dullness of hearing; but now, he says, I am taking care beforehand that this dullness not touch your soul. For just as inactivity and immobility harm the body, so also the lack of exercise in good deeds makes the soul too negligent.
Above he reminded them of the virtues they formerly possessed, setting before them an example from their own deeds. Now he leads them up to the patriarch Abraham. Lest they think that, as unworthy of any word, they have been forgotten and abandoned by God, he points out that living a life amid trials is the lot of especially illustrious men, and that God dealt in this way with great men. For if He had immediately given what He promised, their faith could not have been revealed; but now He delays the fulfillment so that through patience their faith might be made manifest. For faith in the One who promised becomes evident when someone, not receiving what was promised for a long time, nevertheless believes that he will receive it and does not despair. Therefore I express these reproaches to you in order to restore you and so that you might "imitate those who through faith and patience inherit the promises." And who these men are, he explains further. But notice how he placed faith first, then patience, because patience proceeds from faith. For whoever does not believe that the One who promised will assuredly give, that person will not be patient either.
Commentary on Hebrews
309. – Then when he says, so that you may not be sluggish, he indicates the danger, which is laziness. For laziness is the fear of a future good action, because one fears that he may fail or not repent: 'The slothful man says: There is a lion in the way' (Pr. 26:13). Hence, slothful persons always allege obstacles as an excuse.
310. – Then (12b) he gives the example. As if to say: Be not slothful, but rather imitate the example of the prophets: 'For an example of suffering evil, of labor and of patience, take the prophets' (Jas. 5:10); and of other saints, namely the apostles: 'Be you followers of me, as I also am of Christ' (1 Cor. 4:16). Be you, therefore, imitators of those who through faith, without which it is impossible to please God (Heb. 11:6) and patience against adversity, inherit the promises. For by formed faith and patience the promised inheritance is obtained: 'The saints by faith conquered kingdoms, wrought justice, obtained promises' (Heb. 11:33).
Commentary on Hebrews
For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he sware by himself,
Τῷ γὰρ Ἀβραὰμ ἐπαγγειλάμενος ὁ Θεός, ἐπεὶ κατ’ οὐδενὸς εἶχε μείζονος ὀμόσαι, ὤμοσε καθ’ ἑαυτοῦ,
[Заⷱ҇ 314] А҆враа́мꙋ бо ѡ҆бѣтова́ѧ бг҃ъ, поне́же ни є҆ди́нѣмъ и҆мѧ́ше бо́льшимъ клѧ́тисѧ, клѧ́тсѧ собо́ю,
13–15Having boldly reflected on the faults of the Hebrews, and sufficiently alarmed them, he consoles them, first, by praises, and secondly (which also is the stronger ground), by the thought that they would certainly attain the object of their hope. Moreover he draws his consolation, not from things future, but again from the past, which indeed would the rather persuade them. For as in the case of punishment, he alarms them rather by those things future, so also in the case of the prizes set before them, he encourages them by these things past, showing herein God's way of dealing. And that is, not to bring in what has been promised immediately, but after a long time. And this He does, both to present the greatest proof of His power, and also to lead us to Faith, that they who are living in tribulation without having received the promises, or the rewards, may not faint under their troubles.
And omitting all the rest, though he had many whom he might have mentioned, he brought forward Abraham both on account of the dignity of his person, and because this had occurred in a special way in his case.
And yet at the end of the Epistle he says, that "all these, having seen the promises afar off, and having embraced them, received them not, that they without us should not be made perfect." "For when God made promise to Abraham" (he says) "because He could swear by no greater, He sware by Himself, saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee. And so after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise." How then does he say at the end of the Epistle that "he received not the promises," and here, that "after he had patiently endured he obtained the promise"? How did he not receive? How did he obtain? He is not speaking of the same things in this place and in the other, but makes the consolation twofold. God made promises to Abraham, and after a long space of time He gave the things spoken of in this place, but those others not yet.
"And so after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise." Seest thou that the promise alone did not effect the whole, but the patient waiting as well? Here he alarms them, showing that oftentimes a promise is thwarted through faintheartedness. And this he had indeed shown through the instance of the Jewish people: for since they were faint-hearted, therefore they obtained not the promise. But now he shows the contrary by means of Abraham. Afterwards near the end of the Epistle he proves something more also: that even though they had patiently endured, they did not obtain; and yet not even so are they grieved.
Homily on Hebrews 11
As God has no one superior to him (he is saying), his oath was witness; he swore by himself, in fact.
Interpretation of Hebrews 6
Of those who through faith inherited the promises, many have died, but they were kept safe for others; he only remembers Abraham, both because of the dignity of his person and because he especially was deemed worthy and attained the promises. And through this, he shows that one should not be faint-hearted, but should wait for God, having the habit not to hastily bring about the promised things, but through a long time. "He swore by Himself." When did God swear by himself? In those very words, in which he says, "By myself I have sworn." (Gen. 22:16) Perhaps also the word "Amen" could be considered a divine oath; for "Amen," truly "Amen," signifies nothing else but a confirmation of the truth; and what else could truth be but God? Therefore, when you see Christ saying, "Amen, amen, I say to you," understand that he swears by having no one greater than himself, and the "Amen" is an oath, just as the Father also swears. Yet some have thought that the Son swears to Abraham; for the Word swears, "Amen, I will bless you." For Scripture says that the angel spoke to Abraham. But nowhere do they say that the Father is an angel, but the Son is the angel of the great counsel.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
13–14Since there were many who inherited the promises by faith, he has for now passed over all the rest, leaving them for later, and recalls only Abraham, both because of the importance of his person, and especially because he both was deemed worthy of and received the promise. And by this he also shows that one must not give in to faintheartedness, but hope in God, Who customarily does not fulfill a promise quickly, but after a long time. And when did God "swear by Himself"? Either in the very words in which He says: "I have sworn by Myself." Or perhaps someone might say that in the word "truly" is contained God's oath by Himself; for "truly" means "in truth." This is nothing other than an affirmation of truth; but who can truth be other than God? So too the Lord in the Gospel, saying: "Truly, truly, I say to you" (e.g., John 6 and others), swears with this very same oath; He swears by Himself, just as the Father does, since He has no one higher by whom to swear. However, some have thought that the Son Himself was the one then conversing with Abraham; for Scripture says: "the Angel said to Abraham" (Gen. 18). But in no way, they say, could the Father be an Angel, but the Son is the Angel of great counsel.
Commentary on Hebrews
311. – Above, the Apostle showed why he had confidence in them, namely, because of the good they performed; here he shows the same because of the promise made to the Patriarchs. Hence, he does two things: first, he mentions the promise; secondly, he assigns the reason for what he says (v. 16). In regard to the first he does three things: first, he shows to whom the promise was made; secondly, he shows that the way the promise was given was suitable (v. 13b); thirdly, the effect of the promise (v. 15).
312. – When God made a promise to Abraham: 'To Abraham were the promises made and to his seed' (Gal. 3:16). The reason for this is that by faith we adhere to God; consequently, by faith we obtain the promise. For the first example of faith was found in Abraham, and this because he was the first to withdraw from associating with unbelievers: 'Go forth out of your country, and from your kindred, and out of your father's house' (Gen. 12:1); secondly, because he was the first to believe something above nature: 'Who against hope believed in hope' (Rom. 4:18). Hence, Gen. (15:6): 'Abraham believed God and it was reputed to him unto justice.' For he was the first to receive the seal of faith, namely, circumcision (Rom. 4:11).
313. – The manner in which the promise was suitable for two reasons: first, because of the oath; secondly, by reason of the words of the promise (v. 14).
314. – He says, therefore: God, wishing to show that His promise is firm and stable, since he had no one greater by whom to swear: 'The Lord is high above all nations' (Ps. 112:4), swore by himself: 'By my own self have I sworn, says the Lord' (Gen. 22:16). In this you have an example that an oath is not of itself unlawful, because the Scripture does not attribute to God anything which of itself is a sin. For Scripture intends to direct and lead us to God: 'Be you followers of God, as most dear children' (Eph. 5:1). Nevertheless, frequent swearing is forbidden: 'Let not your mouth be accustomed to swearing' (Sir. 23:9), and so are oaths taken in vain: 'You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain' (Ex. 20:7).
Commentary on Hebrews
Saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee.
λέγων· ἦ μὴν εὐλογῶν εὐλογήσω σε καὶ πληθύνων πληθυνῶ σε·
гл҃ѧ: вои́стиннꙋ блгⷭ҇вѧ̀ блгⷭ҇влю́ тѧ и҆ ᲂу҆множа́ѧ ᲂу҆мно́жꙋ тѧ̀.
315. – Then (v. 14) he shows the manner in which the promise was made. As if to say: Do not believe me, unless I bless you. A blessing refers to bestowing benefits: 'The blessing of the Lord makes men rich' (Pr. 10:22); I will multiply you, which pertains to numerous offspring. Both promises were made to Abraham, as is clear from Gen. (14 & 15). But he repeats the words, blessing, I will bless, in order to designate both temporal and spiritual goods, and the continuance of his blessing. Or, 'blessing I will bless' in the multitude of holy offspring, which is designated by the stars of heaven: 'Look up to heaven and number the stars if you can. And he said unto him: So shall your seed be' (Gen. 15:5). And multiplying, I will multiply in the number of evil and perverse children, which are designated by the sands of the seashore. Or I will bless you in the good things of grace and multiply you in the good things of glory: 'How great is the multitude of your sweetness, O Lord' (Ps. 30:20).
Commentary on Hebrews
And so, after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise.
καὶ οὕτω μακροθυμήσας ἐπέτυχε τῆς ἐπαγγελίας.
И҆ та́кѡ долготерпѣ́въ, полꙋчѝ ѡ҆бѣтова́нїе.
Yet though making a promise and doing it with an oath, he did not immediately fulfill the promise; instead, the patriarch needed great patience, and only with the passage of a great length of time did he thus see the realization of the promise.
Interpretation of Hebrews 6
"And so, having patiently." You see that the patience of Abraham accomplished something? He said that by being patient he obtained the promise, in order to show the great power of patience, and that it was not the promise alone that accomplished everything; but also patience. "he attained the promise." And yet in the end, it says that all these, having seen them from afar and embraced them, did not receive the promises, so that they would not be made perfect apart from us. How then does he say here, "he attained the promise?" And we say, he did not speak about the same things. For the things here he has given to him, concerning which he now spoke, but those there, he keeps, concerning which he says at the end of the Epistle, "And the end of all their opposition." (Heb. 12:3) And the end of all opposition and dispute to confirm the things spoken by him is the oath. Both, however, the obtaining and the not yet obtaining, serve as encouragement to the faint-hearted; the one, that we also, if we endure patiently, will obtain; the other, that, since he has not yet obtained it, though perfected many years ago, we who are still struggling are not foolish because we have not yet obtained it.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
In what way does he say at the end of the epistle that they "saw them only from afar" and "rejoiced" at the fulfillment of the promises (Heb. 11:13), yet now says that Abraham "received what was promised"? He is not speaking of the same thing here and there; rather, here he speaks of earthly promises, which Abraham received after a long time, while there he speaks of heavenly ones, which he had not yet received. Nevertheless, both—what he received and what he had not yet received—serve as consolation for the fainthearted: the one because we too shall receive if we show patience, the other because if the one who attained perfection so many years before has not yet received, then we are exceedingly foolish to be indignant that we have not yet received. Notice how he said "having patiently endured, he received what was promised," in order to show the great power of patience, and that the promise alone did not accomplish everything, but patience as well. Here he also instills fear in them, making clear by way of the opposite that faintheartedness hinders the fulfillment of the promise. And this is what happened in the wilderness with the ancient people, who grew fainthearted and utterly failed to receive the promise. So then, someone may ask: why did the saints, having endured long, not receive, as it says at the end of the epistle? They will certainly receive. But the murmurers among the people neither received nor will receive.
Commentary on Hebrews
316. – The effect of the promise was that Abraham, having patiently endured, obtained the promise. For patient endurance consists not only in doing something great, but also in waiting a long time. But Abraham had the promise, although he never possessed the pace of a foot of land, as it says in Ac (7:5); furthermore, even until his old age he possessed no offspring. But he still kept his hope: 'Take, my brethren, for an example of suffering evil, of labor and patience, the prophets who spoke in the name of the Lord' (Jas. 5:10); 'Look unto Abraham your father and to Sarah that bore you' (Is. 51:2).
Commentary on Hebrews
For men verily swear by the greater: and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife.
ἄνθρωποι μὲν γὰρ κατὰ τοῦ μείζονος ὀμνύουσι, καὶ πάσης αὐτοῖς ἀντιλογίας πέρας εἰς βεβαίωσιν ὁ ὅρκος·
Человѣ́цы бо бо́льшимъ кленꙋ́тсѧ, и҆ всѧ́комꙋ и҆́хъ прекосло́вїю кончи́на во и҆звѣще́нїе клѧ́тва (є҆́сть).
"For men verily swear by the greater, and an Oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife. But God because He could swear by no greater, sware by Himself." Well, who then is He that sware unto Abraham? Is it not the Son? No, one says. Certainly indeed it was He: however, I shall not dispute thereon. So when He the Son sweareth the same oath, "Verily, verily, I say unto you," is it not plain that it was because He could not swear by any greater? For as the Father sware, so also the Son sweareth by Himself, saying, "Verily, verily, I say unto you." He here reminds them also of the oaths of Christ, which He was constantly uttering. "Verily, verily, I say unto thee, he that believeth on Me shall never die."
What is, "And an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife"? It is instead of, "by this every doubtful question is solved": not this, or this, but every one.
Homily on Hebrews 11
"an end of all dispute." And the conclusion of all contradiction and dispute to confirm what is said is the oath. For indeed many things are spoken and disputed on each side; but the oath, coming last and confirming, resolves all doubts.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
That is, an oath resolves the dispute in every contradiction. For much is said and objected in argument from both sides, but the oath, being the final word and confirming, resolves everything that is doubtful.
Commentary on Hebrews
317. – Then when he says, Men indeed swear by a greater than themselves, he states the reason for the foregoing. In regard to this he does three things: first, he mentions a human custom; secondly, the reason behind the custom; thirdly, the fruit of the promise (v. 18).
318. – Two human customs are mentioned: one in regard to that by which one swears; the other in regard to the effect of an oath: in all their disputes an oath is final for confirmation. Now that by which one swears is greater, and reasonably so. For swearing is nothing more than settling a doubt. Therefore, just as in the sciences nothing is settled except by something more certain, so, because nothing is more certain with men than God, one swears by Him, as by something greater and more certain.
319. – But sometimes one swears by the Son, Who is less; as when one says, 'by Christ' or by the creature, as Joseph swore by the health of Pharaoh (Gen. 42:16). I answer that there are two ways of swearing by God: one is by a simple attestation, as when one says, 'By God, it is so.' As if to say: God is my witness that it is as I say: 'For God is my witness, who I serve in spirit' (Rom. 1:9). Another way is by execration, which occurs when something, such as the head of the soul or something of that sort, is offered unto God for vengeance, if it is not so. This is the way the Apostle swore in 2 Cor (1:23): 'But I call God to witness upon my soul.' As if to say: I offer my soul as witness, for which I take God's name. And this is very solemn. But one swears by a creature not as such, but inasmuch as some sign of God's power is resplendent in it. For since all power is from God (Rom. 13:1), then, inasmuch as someone exercises power over a group, if he swears by it, he swears by God, Whose power is reflected in it. This is the way Joseph swore by the health of Pharaoh. This, therefore, is what he says, Men swear by one greater than themselves.
320. – But it should be noted that those who are otherwise known as perjurers must be kept from taking oaths, because the greatest reverence should be shown an oath, and from their past actions it is presumed that they will not show an oath proper reverence. Likewise, children should not be compelled to take an oath before the years of puberty, because they do not yet have perfect use of reason to know what reverence must be paid an oath. Also persons of high stations; because an oath is required of those about whose words or actions there is doubt. But it detracts from persons of high station, when one doubts the truth of what they say. Hence, in the Decretals (q. 2, ch. 4) it says that a priest should not take an oath for some slight cause. But the causes in which it is lawful to swear are the following: for strengthening peace, as Laban swore (Gen. 31:48); secondly, for preserving one's good name; thirdly, for pledging fealty, as vassals swore to their lord; fourthly, for having obedience fulfilled, if something honorable is commanded by a superior; fifthly, for obtaining security; sixthly, for attesting to a truth, which is the way the Apostle swore: 'God is my witness, whom I serve in my spirit' (Rom. 1:9).
321. – Then when he says, and an oath is final for confirmation, he mentions the effect of an oath, which is to put an end to all controversy. For just as in the sciences one stops when he has reduced his proof to the first principles, so is the divine law, when one comes to the first truth, he stops and this is the time, when the first truth is invoked as a witness: 'The master of the house shall be brought to the gods and he shall swear' (Ex. 22:8). Thus all questions and all controversies are settled.
Commentary on Hebrews
Wherein God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed it by an oath:
ἐν ᾧ περισσότερον βουλόμενος ὁ Θεὸς ἐπιδεῖξαι τοῖς κληρονόμοις τῆς ἐπαγγελίας τὸ ἀμετάθετον τῆς βουλῆς αὐτοῦ, ἐμεσίτευσεν ὅρκῳ,
Въ не́мже ли́шше хотѧ̀ бг҃ъ показа́ти наслѣ́дникѡмъ ѡ҆бѣтова́нїѧ непрело́жное совѣ́та своегѡ̀, хода́тайствова клѧ́твою:
“Through this” oath “God desired to show more convincingly to the heirs of the promise” that God’s promise, because indeed it is God’s, will never be changed. God’s oath was infallible in its being interposed, that is, between God, the angel and Abraham.
Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews
God, however, ought to have been believed even without an oath: "wherein" (he says) "God willing more abundantly to show unto the heirs of promise the immutability of His counsel, confirmed it by an oath." In these words he comprehends also the believers, and therefore mentions this "promise" which was made to us in common with them. "He mediated" (he says) "by an oath." Here again he says that the Son was mediator between men and God.
Homily on Hebrews 11
When he said above, "the full assurance of the hope," he made clear that God furnished to Abraham "full assurance," not that which belonged to his conduct through works but that which belonged to him through God's redemptive plan.
Fragments on the Epistle to the Hebrews 6.17
It was necessary, therefore, he says, to believe in God who had promised without an oath, but since God wanted to do something more, he mediated the promise by an oath. "to show the firmness of His counsel." He also came to us. For we are the heirs of the promise, being the seed of Abraham; and if we are the seed, then we are also heirs. "He mediated with an oath." See what he prepares. That the Son was thereafter the mediator of God and men (for he has also become a mediator in the incarnation); and then he mediated with the Father and with Abraham, confirming him with an oath; for the Word was he who both spoke to Abraham and swore. The meaning of the interpretation is well-founded, so that it may be thus. God, that is, the Word, wanting to show the unchangeable nature of those glorifying the Father, mediated with the Father and with Abraham with an oath, that is, he became a mediator in the oath. For through him, as the Word, God and the Father swore.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
That is, precisely because an oath gives people full assurance, God also swears. Or, "therefore," instead of: in that He swore, he says, God by Himself, He abundantly proved to us that He will in every way and immutably fulfill what He promised. For although God ought to have been believed even without an oath, nevertheless He condescends for our sake and looks not to His own dignity, but, in order to convince us, permits unworthy things to be said about Himself. For we who are faithful, blessed in his seed, which is Christ, are heirs of the promise. See how even then he says that the Son is the mediator between God and men. For by Himself, as the Word, God and Father swore.
Commentary on Hebrews
322. – Then when he says, So when God desired to show more abundantly to the heirs of the promise the immutability of his purpose, he interposed an oath, he states the reason why God willed to swear, namely, to show the immutability of His promise. Hence, he says, wherein, i.e., by the fact that He interposed an oath, desiring more abundantly to show; for it was abundant that He promised, but more abundant that He swore, desiring, I say, to show to the heirs of the promise, i.e., of the thing promised: 'They that are the children of the promise are accounted for the seed' (Rom. 9:8), to show, I say, the immutability of his purpose. It should be noted in regard to things which proceed from God that two things must be considered, namely, the coming-forth of things and God's counsel by which such a coming-forth is caused. God's counsel is absolutely unchangeable: 'My counsel shall stand and all my will shall be done' (Is. 46:10). But the disposition is quite changeable, for the Lord sometimes announces something according as the order and coming-forth of things requires, as in Is (38:1) 'Take order with your house, for you shall die and not live'; for the cause of his sickness was such that he should die from it. Also in Jonah (3:4): 'Yet forty days and Nineveh shall be destroyed', because it had deserved destruction: 'I will suddenly speak against a nation and a kingdom, to root out, to pull down and to destroy it. If that nation against which I have spoken shall repent of their evil, I also will repent of the evil I have thought to do to them' (Jer. 18:7). In this case the prophecy is a threat. But sometimes something is announced according to God's eternal counsel, and in that case God never repents or retracts it: 'But the triumpher in Israel will not spare, and will not be moved to repentance' (1 Sam. 15:29). Yet it should be noted that whenever God promises something under oath, it is a prophecy of predestination which reveals God's plan. Such a promise is absolutely unchangeable.
Commentary on Hebrews
That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:
ἵνα διὰ δύο πραγμάτων ἀμεταθέτων, ἐν οἷς ἀδύνατον ψεύσασθαι Θεόν, ἰσχυρὰν παράκλησιν ἔχωμεν οἱ καταφυγόντες κρατῆσαι τῆς προκειμένης ἐλπίδος·
да двѣма̀ ве́щьми непрело́жными, въ ни́хже невозмо́жно солга́ти бг҃ꙋ, крѣ́пкое ᲂу҆тѣше́нїе и҆́мамы прибѣ́гшїи ꙗ҆́тисѧ за предлежа́щее ᲂу҆пова́нїе,
With this hope, then, let us attach ourselves to the one who is faithful to promises and just in judgments. The one who bids us to refrain from lying is all the less likely to lie. For nothing is impossible to God, save lying.
1 Clement 27.1-2
Through Moses God gave commandments about sacrifices, and the whole book of Leviticus is taken up with acceptable ways for them to be carried out. The Lord, through the prophets, found fault with those who contemptuously misstated these things, calling them disobedient to the commandment. He told them, “I have not asked you to do these things!… Neither did I speak to your fathers about sacrifices, nor give them commands about whole burnt offerings.”Some have put forth the opinion that either the Scriptures do not agree or that God, who gave the commandment, is a liar. But in this there can be no disagreement—far from it. The Father, who is truth, cannot lie, “for it is impossible for God to lie,” as Paul affirms. Actually, these things are plain to those who accept the writings of the law with faith and look at them in the right way. Here is my explanation, and may God grant by your prayers that I am not too far from the truth. It does not appear to me that God gave the commandments and the law concerning sacrifices right away when he led them out of Egypt. Nor did he who gave the law really pay any attention to the whole burnt offerings, as such. He was looking ahead to those things that were prefigured and pointed out by them. “For the law has but a shadow of the good things to come.” And “Those regulations were set forth until the time of reformation.”9 That is why the whole law did not deal with sacrifices, although it did include commands concerning them. By means of these commands it began to teach people, calling them away from idols and drawing them to God, giving them proper teaching for the times in which they lived. So you see, God did not give the people those commands about sacrifices and offerings when he brought them out of Egypt, nor even when they first came to Mount Sinai. God is not like people, that he should want those things for himself. No, he gave the commandment so that they might know him and his Word (the Son)—and forget about those so-called gods that do not really exist but appear to do so because of the show people put on.
Festal Letters 19.4
18–20“Through two unchangeable things” … the former is that he swore by himself. The latter is that David said, “The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind, that you are a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.” It is by this means that we who have been made coheirs of his promise “might have strong encouragement.” We “have fled for refuge” in order to protect ourselves, not for God’s justice, in order that God may draw and drive us away from the evils of this world, and may open for us the way “into the inner shrine behind the curtain.” We do not go in first. We do not go into the shrine of the tabernacle, where Moses went, but into the inner shrine in heaven, “where Jesus has gone as a forerunner, having become a high priest forever,” not in order to offer the victims of sacrifices, like Aaron, but to offer the word for all nations, like Melchizedek.
Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews
"That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible that God should lie." What are these two? The speaking and promising; and the adding an oath to the promise. For since among men that which is confirmed by an oath is thought more worthy of credit, on this account He added that also.
Seest thou that He regardeth not His own dignity, but how He may persuade men, and endures to have unworthy things said concerning Himself. That is He wishes to impart full assurance. And in the case of Abraham indeed the Apostle shows that the whole was of God, not of his patient endurance, since He was even willing to add an oath, for He by whom men swear, by Him also God "sware," that is "by Himself." They indeed as by one greater, but He not as by one greater. And yet He did it. For it is not the same thing for man to swear by himself, as for God. For man has no power over himself. Thou seest then that this is said not more for Abraham than for ourselves: "that we" (he says) "might have strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold on the hope set before us." Here too again, "after he had patiently endured he obtained the promise."
"Now" he means, and he did not say "when He swore." But what the oath is, he showed, by speaking of swearing by a greater. But since the race of men is hard of belief, He condescends to the same things with ourselves. As then for our sake He swears, although it be unworthy of Him that He should not be believed, so also did the Apostle make that other statement "He learned from the things which He suffered," because men think the going through experience more worthy of reliance.
What is "the hope set before us"? From these past events (he says) we conjecture the future. For if these came to pass after so long a time, so certainly the others will. So that the things which happened in regard to Abraham give us confidence also concerning the things to come.
Homily on Hebrews 11
"Through two unchangeable things," namely, that God would never be able to lie about what had been promised and that he made the promise with an oath.
Fragments on the Epistle to the Hebrews 6.18
"that by two unchangeable things." Two things, both that God has promised, and that He has added an oath to the promise. For since among men the oath seems more trustworthy, on account of this He also added it Himself. "In which it is impossible." In which, instead of "from which," from these two things, the promise is shown to be most trustworthy, and it is impossible for God to lie. Therefore, just as He swore by us (although it is unworthy of Him to swear), so also understand the "from which" He learned what He suffered. For men also consider it more credible to come through experience. "we might have a strong encouragement," That is, a great exhortation and urging. "who have fled." To him, he says. "to hold," let us have strong encouragementto lay hold to the hope set before us. From those, he says, that were said to Abraham, let us be faithful also to the things to come, and to the kingdom of heaven. For this is our hope, which now is set before us in expectation, but then will be realized, as it was said; From those things, this will be understood. There it was made true, that in these things we may believe. And that for this reason he swore then, that now we may believe concerning the things to come. For there was nothing else, he says, and the things then promised with oaths, or the future hope of the faithful.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
What kind and what kind? Both by the fact that He simply spoke and promised, and by the fact that He joined an oath to the promise. Since among people that which is confirmed with an oath is considered more trustworthy, God also joined one. "In which," instead of "from them" — from these two things the promise is most trustworthy, and "it is impossible for God to lie." Therefore, just as He swore for our sake, even though it is unworthy of Him to swear, so also understand that He "learned from the things which He suffered" (Heb. 5:8). For people also consider more trustworthy that which is known from experience.
That is, great consolation and encouragement. This is said not so much in relation to Abraham as in relation to us who have fled to Him, that is, who have placed our hope in Him. In what then do we have encouragement? In holding fast to "the hope set before us": that is, that we, on the basis of what was given to Abraham, would be convinced also regarding the promises concerning us, and would not doubt regarding the future and heavenly blessings for which we hope; on the contrary, that we would firmly and securely hold fast to this hope and not lose it. For the promise to Abraham is a promise to us as well, and preeminently to us who have believed in Christ, as was said above.
Commentary on Hebrews
323. – Then (v.18) he shows the fruit of the promise: first, he shows what that fruit is; secondly, what follows upon it (v. 19).
324. – The fruit, of course, is that our hope is certain; hence, he says, that we might have strong, i.e., firm, encouragement of hope, by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible that God should be false, namely, by God who promises and does not lie: 'God is not a man that he should lie' (Num. 23:19) and by the oath in which there is a stronger confirmation of the truth. But it should be noted that just as sensual delight is a sense experience and memory of the past, so hope is of the future: 'None that trust in him shall fail in strength' (1 Mac 2:61); 'They that hope in the Lord shall renew their strength, and they shall take wings as eagles; they shall run and not be weary, they shall walk and not faint' (Is. 40:31). We may have, I say, we who have fled for refuge from the evils of the world and the onslaught of the enemy, to seize the hope set before us: 'Lord, you have been my refuge' (Ps. 89:11); 'The name of the Lord is a strong tower; the just runs to it and shall be exalted' (Pr. 18:10).
Commentary on Hebrews
Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and stedfast, and which entereth into that within the veil;
ἣν ὡς ἄγκυραν ἔχομεν τῆς ψυχῆς ἀσφαλῆ τε καὶ βεβαίαν καὶ εἰσερχομένην εἰς τὸ ἐσώτερον τοῦ καταπετάσματος,
є҆́же а҆́ки ко́твꙋ и҆́мамы дꙋшѝ, тве́рдꙋ же и҆ и҆звѣ́стнꙋ, и҆ входѧ́щꙋю во внꙋ́треннѣйшее завѣ́сы,
"Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul both sure and steadfast, and which entereth into that within the veil." He shows, that while we are still in the world, and not yet departed from this life, we are already among the promises. For through hope we are already in heaven. He said, "Wait; for it shall surely be." Afterwards giving them full assurance, he says, "nay rather by hope." And he said not, "We are within," but "It hath entered within," which was more true and more persuasive. For as the anchor, dropped from the vessel, does not allow it to be carried about, even if ten thousand winds agitate it, but being depended upon makes it steady, so also does hope.
And see how very suitable an image he has discovered: For he said not, Foundation; which was not suitable; but, "Anchor." For that which is on the tossing sea, and seems not to be very firmly fixed, stands on the water as upon land, and is shaken and yet is not shaken. For in regard to those who are very firm, and philosophic, Christ with good reason made that statement, saying, "Whosoever hath built his house on a rock." But in respect of those who are giving way, and who ought to be carried through by hope, Paul hath suitably set down this. For the surge and the great storm toss the boat; but hope suffers it not to be carried hither and thither, although winds innumerable agitate it: so that, unless we had this hope we should long ago have been sunk. Nor is it only in things spiritual, but also in the affairs of this life, that one may find the power of hope great. Whatever it may be, in merchandise, in husbandry, in a military expedition, unless one sets this before him, he would not even touch the work. But he said not simply "Anchor," but "sure and steadfast," that is not shaken. "Which entereth into that within the veil"; instead of "which reacheth through even to heaven."
Homily on Hebrews 11
By "curtain" he referred to heaven: the Lord promised to give the kingdom of heaven to those believing in him.
Interpretation of Hebrews 6
"we have as an anchor," which stabilizes the wavering ships, and hope makes those who are shaken by temptations brave, committed, and patient. "safe and committed." Not simply an anchor, but also safe and secure. For there is an anchor that does not keep the ship unshaken when it is smaller than it ought to be. "which enters." In order that, he says, while we are still here, hope may enter into the kingdom of heaven, that is, so that we may already be in our hopes. See what hope does. It anticipates what is to come. "enters into the inner sanctuary behind the curtain." The inner part of the curtain is called heaven.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
We have this hope as an anchor. For just as an anchor gives stability to ships during a storm, so too hope makes firm and patient those who waver under the influence of temptations. He did not simply say "anchor," but "sure and steadfast." For there is an anchor that does not preserve the stability of a ship, either when it is damaged or when it is too light. Quite rightly he recalled not a foundation, but an anchor: because a foundation applies to people who are very firm and wise, whereas an anchor applies to those undergoing a storm, which is what they were, being buffeted by temptations.
Above he said: hope, for what we hope for will come to pass. Now, assuring more perfectly, he says that we already possess this in hope. For hope, having entered within heaven, has brought it about that we are already at the promised blessings, even though we are still on earth, even though we have not yet received them. Such power does hope have, that it makes the earthly into the heavenly. But just as in the Old Testament the veil separated the Holy of Holies from the rest of the tabernacle, so too heaven is for us a veil separating the earthly from the most divine and supraheavenly.
Commentary on Hebrews
325. – Then when he says, we have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, he shows that faith will obtain that promise; and he makes use of a simile. For he compares hope to an anchor, which just as it secures a ship in the sea, so hope secures the soul in God in this world, which is, as it were, a kind of sea: 'So is this great sea, which stretches wide its arms' (Ps. 103:25); hence, it is made of iron: 'I know whom I have believed and I am certain' (2 Tim. 1:12). Also it should be firm, so that it is not easily removed from the ship; thus a man should be held fast to that hope as an anchor. And hope is that the anchor is fixed to a low place, but hope is fixed in the highest, namely, to God. For nothing in the present life is so firm that the soul could be secure and at rest; hence, it says in Gen. (8:8) that the dove found no place where her foot might rest. And, therefore, he says that this hope should enter into the inner shrine behind the veil. For the Apostle understands the present condition of the Church by the holy things that were in the tabernacle; but by the holy of holies, which was separated from the saints by a veil, he understands the state of future glory. Therefore, he wills that the anchor of our hope be fixed in that which is now veiled from our eyes: 'The eye has not seen, O God, besides thee, what things you have prepared for them that wait for you' (Is. 64:4); 'How great is the multitude of your sweetness, O Lord, which you have hidden for them that fear you!' (Ps. 30:20).
Commentary on Hebrews
Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
ὅπου πρόδρομος ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν εἰσῆλθεν Ἰησοῦς, κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδὲκ ἀρχιερεὺς γενόμενος εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα.
и҆дѣ́же прⷣте́ча ѡ҆ на́съ вни́де і҆и҃съ, по чи́нꙋ мелхїседе́ковꙋ первосщ҃е́нникъ бы́въ во вѣ́ки.
Then after this he led on to Faith also, that there might not only be hope, but a very true hope. For after the oath he lays down another thing too, even proof by facts, because "the forerunner is for us entered in, even Jesus." But a forerunner is a forerunner of some one, as John was of Christ.
Now he did not simply say, "He is entered in," but "where He is entered in a forerunner for us," as though we also ought to attain. For there is no great interval between the forerunner and those who follow: otherwise he would not be a forerunner; for the forerunner and those who follow ought to be in the same road, and to arrive after each other.
"Being made an High Priest forever after the order," he says, "of Melchisedec." Here is also another consolation, if our High Priest is on high, and far better than those among the Jews, not in the kind of Priesthood only, but also in the place, and the tabernacle, and the covenant, and the person. And this also is spoken according to the flesh.
Those then, whose High Priest He is, ought to be greatly superior. And as great as the difference is between Aaron and Christ, so great should it be between us and the Jews. For see, we have our victim on high, our priest on high, our sacrifice on high: let us bring such sacrifices as can be offered on that altar, no longer sheep and oxen, no longer blood and fat. All these things have been done away; and there has been brought in their stead "the reasonable service." But what is "the reasonable service"? The offerings made through the soul; those made through the spirit. ("God," it is said, "is a Spirit, and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth"); things which have no need of a body, no need of instruments, nor of special places, whereof each one is himself the Priest, such as, moderation, temperance, mercifulness, enduring ill-treatment, long-suffering, humbleness of mind.
Homily on Hebrews 11
Paul added that "Christ" has become "an eternal high priest" for us, in that Christ leads all those believing through him in each generation to God based on the hope of the resurrection.
Fragments on the Epistle to the Hebrews 6.20
He augmented their confidence with the name forerunner: if he is our forerunner and has gone up for us, we too must follow and be granted ascent.
Interpretation of Hebrews 6
He is a high priest forever, not in offering sacrifices (having offered his own body once), but in being a mediator leading the believers to the Father; through him (he says, remember) we both have had access to the Father. The Lord himself says in the sacred Gospels, "No one comes to the Father except through me." We must be aware, of course, that the divine apostle made mention of the oaths sworn to Abraham so that the unchanging character of the divine will should be brought out; it endures in advance the stability of high priesthood according to the order of Melchizedek, the oath being linked to the word at this place.
Interpretation of Hebrews 6
"where Jesus has entered as a forerunner on our behalf." Having said that our hope enters into heaven, he confirms what has been said, trusting this by the facts. For Christ himself entered there; and not only did he enter, but he entered on our behalf. And where our forerunner has entered, there it is necessary for us also to enter. For the forerunner is the forerunner of those who follow; and the difference between the forerunner and those who follow is not very great, just as between John and Christ. Do not be disturbed, then; as long as we have not yet entered, we will enter where our forerunner is. The "on our behalf" is extended so that he may be called our forerunner. The fact that he entered in the flesh is on our behalf, so that we also, having flesh, may obtain entrance. "Having become a high priest." And this is a great encouragement, if indeed our high priest is above and much better than those among the Jews; first, in manner; for he is not according to their order, but according to the order of Melchizedek; then, in place and tabernacle; for he is above and in heaven; third, in the covenant; for it is upon greater and more perfect promises; likewise, in permanence; for he is eternal, and not temporary; lastly, in person; for he is the Son of God. Therefore, do not lose heart. And well is the term "having become," because it was according to the flesh that he became a high priest.
The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews
Having said that our hope ascends to heaven, he confirms what was said by attesting it with deeds. For He too, Christ, entered; and not simply entered, but entered as a forerunner, that is, as if persuading us that we too must enter. For a forerunner goes ahead of someone following after him, and the distance between the forerunner and those following after him is not great at all, just as between John and Christ. Therefore do not be troubled: soon we too shall enter there, where our forerunner is. But he was not satisfied with saying "forerunner," but added also "for us," for greater persuasiveness, as if saying: He Himself had no need to enter there, for why would He, when He is God? But just as He assumed flesh for our sake, so too for our sake He entered within heaven, in order to open the way for us. Therefore we ourselves shall necessarily enter as well. Or the expression "for us" means: to intercede for us before the Father, just as the high priest entered the Holy of Holies once a year, praying for the people.
And this is the greatest consolation: if our High Priest is in heaven, then He is also far superior to the Jewish high priests, namely: in the manner of appointment, for He is not after the order of those, but "after the order of Melchizedek"; and in place and tabernacle, for He is on the mountain and in heaven; in covenant, for it concerns greater and more perfect blessings; and in permanence, for He is eternal, not temporary; and finally, in person, for He is the Son of God. Therefore do not lose heart. But all this is said of Christ according to the flesh, for according to the flesh He also became High Priest.
Commentary on Hebrews
325 (cont.). – This, our forerunner, who has entered there, has fixed there; hence, it says in Jn (14:2): 'I go to prepare a place for you.' 'He shall go up that shall open the way before them' (Mic. 2:13). Therefore, he says that Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf within the veil and has fixed our hope there, as it says in the collect of vigil and of Ascension day. Yet because the high priest alone was permitted to enter within the veil (Lev 16), he says that Jesus has entered on our behalf, having become a high priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek. Notice how elegantly the Apostle returns to his main theme. For he had begun to speak of the priesthood and then digressed; but now he returns to it, as is obvious.
Commentary on Hebrews
THEREFORE leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,
Διὸ ἀφέντες τὸν τῆς ἀρχῆς τοῦ Χριστοῦ λόγον ἐπὶ τὴν τελειότητα φερώμεθα, μὴ πάλιν θεμέλιον καταβαλλόμενοι μετανοίας ἀπὸ νεκρῶν ἔργων, καὶ πίστεως ἐπὶ Θεόν,
Тѣ́мже ѡ҆ста́вльше нача́ла хрⷭ҇то́ва сло́во, на соверше́нїе да веде́мсѧ, не па́ки ѡ҆снова́нїе покаѧ́нїѧ полага́юще ѿ ме́ртвыхъ дѣ́лъ, и҆ вѣ́ры въ бг҃а,