1 Timothy 1
Commentary from 37 fathers
Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.
Τιμοθέῳ γνησίῳ τέκνῳ ἐν πίστει· χάρις, ἔλεος, εἰρήνη ἀπὸ Θεοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν καὶ Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ τοῦ Κυρίου ἡμῶν.
тїмоѳе́ю прⷭ҇номꙋ ча́дꙋ въ вѣ́рѣ: блгⷣть, млⷭ҇ть, ми́ръ ѿ бг҃а ѻ҆ц҃а̀ на́шегѡ и҆ хрⷭ҇та̀ і҆и҃са гдⷭ҇а на́шегѡ.
"Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith."
This too is encouraging. For if he evinced such faith as to be called peculiarly Paul's "own" son, he might be confident also with respect to the future. For it is the part of faith not to be cast down or disturbed, though circumstances occur that seem contrary to the promises. But observe he says, "my son," and even "mine own son," and yet he is not of the same substance. But what? was he of irrational kind? "Well," says one, "he was not of Paul, so this does not imply 'being of' another." What then? was he of another substance? Neither was it so, for after saying "mine own son," he adds, "in the faith," to show that he was really "his own son," and truly from him. There was no difference. The likeness he bore to him was in respect to his faith, as in human births there is a likeness in respect of substance. The son is like the father in human beings, but with respect to God the proximity is greater. For here a father and a son, though of the same substance, differ in many particulars, as in color, figure, understanding, age, bent of mind, endowments of soul and body, and in many other things they may be like or unlike, but there is no such dissimilarity in the divine Essence. "By commandment." This is a stronger expression than "called", as we learn from other passages. As he here calls Timothy "mine own son," in like manner he says to the Corinthians, "in Christ Jesus I have begotten you," i.e. in faith; but he adds the word "own," to show his particular likeness to himself, as well as his own love and great affection for him. Notice again the "in" applied to the faith. "My own son," he says, "in the faith." See what an honorable distinction, in that he calls him not only his "son," but his "own" son.
"Grace, mercy, and peace from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord."
Why is mercy mentioned here, and not in the other Epistles? This is a further mark of his affection. Upon his son he invokes greater blessings, with the anxious apprehension of a parent. For such was his anxiety, that he gives directions to Timothy, which he has done in no other case, to attend to his bodily health; where he says, "Use a little wine for thy stomach's sake, and thine often infirmities" (1 Tim. v. 23.) Teachers indeed stand more in need of mercy.
"From God our Father," he says, "and Jesus Christ our Lord."
Here too is consolation. For if God is our Father, He cares for us as sons, as Christ says, "What man is there of you, whom if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone?" (Matt. vii. 9.)
Homily on 1 Timothy 1
To Timothy, a genuine child in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace from God our Father and Christ Jesus our Lord.
a genuine child. Wow! The faith that Timothy demonstrated, that even through it he became a genuine child of Paul! For nothing changed according to the faith.
Grace, mercy. Here mercy is prayed for, not as usual, showing both the desire towards it, and that teachers need more mercy.
On the guidance into the love of God, which is not required by legal necessity.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
That is, begotten by me through faith. The preposition "in" – εν – means "through," as the apostle also says elsewhere: "I have begotten you in Christ Jesus through the gospel" (1 Cor. 4:15). And praising him, he calls him not only a son, but also a "true" one – true, because Timothy more than others preserves a likeness to him in faith, and because the apostle Paul sincerely loved him. Very wisely he added: "in faith," so as to encourage Timothy all the more toward it. For if from the beginning he showed such faith that he was deemed worthy to be called a son of Paul, and a true son, then all the more must he now clothe himself in it as in full armor, so as not to be troubled or lose heart. To show courageous boldness is a matter of faith.
Nowhere in other epistles did the apostle include the word "mercy," but only here. This is because out of great love he asks for more for his son, as if fearing and trembling for him; he gave him instructions even regarding the stomach. Also because teachers have need of especial mercy.
Here again is consolation. For if God is our Father, then He cares for us as for children. Consequently, He will both have mercy and give grace, so that we may all be benefited and have peace with our enemies.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
He describes the person greeted from three viewpoints: first, from his name, when he says, to Timothy: there was a certain disciple there named Timothy (Acts 16:1); second from his love, when he says, his beloved: for I have no man so of the same mind who with sincere affection is solicitous for you (Phil 2:20); third, from his sonship, when he says, son in faith, i.e., converted by him: I have sent to you Timothy, who is my dearest son and faithful in the Lord (1 Cor 4:17).
Then he mentions the good things he wishes, and shows their origin. Here it should be noted that in the other epistles two things are mentioned, but here three are mentioned, because prelates need more. Hence he says, grace and mercy, first to him, and then to the others. Mercy is taken here for the remission of sins, because this comes from God's mercy; but grace for the public display of graces which prelates need. Or grace for sanctifying grace; but mercy for the divine gift of being raised to spiritual charisms: the grace of God and his mercy is with the saints, and he has respect to his chosen (Wis 4:15). And peace with you and through you to others: let the mountains receive peace (Ps 71:3).
But from whom? From God, to be given to the people: every best gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights (Jas 1:17). And from Christ Jesus our Lord: by whom he has given us most great and precious promises (2 Pet 1:4).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine,
Καθὼς παρεκάλεσά σε προσμεῖναι ἐν Ἐφέσῳ, πορευόμενος εἰς Μακεδονίαν, ἵνα παραγγείλῃς τισὶ μὴ ἑτεροδιδασκαλεῖν
Ꙗ҆́коже ᲂу҆моли́хъ тѧ̀ пребы́ти во є҆фе́сѣ, и҆ды́й въ македо́нїю, да завѣща́еши нѣ̑кимъ не и҆́накѡ ᲂу҆чи́ти,
Let not those who seem worthy of credit, but teach strange doctrines, fill thee with apprehension. Stand firm, as does an anvil which is beaten. It is the part of a noble athlete to be wounded, and yet to conquer. And especially, we ought to bear all things for the sake of God, that He also may bear with us. Be ever becoming more zealous than what thou art. Weigh carefully the times. Look for Him who is above all time, eternal and invisible, yet who became visible for our sakes; impalpable and impassible, yet who became passible on our account; and who in every kind of way suffered for our sakes.
Epistle of Ignatius to Polycarp
Such and so great is the patience of Christ; and had it not been such and so great, the Church would never have possessed Paul as an apostle.
Treatise IX On the Advantage of Patience
Paul’s fellow workers and fellow soldiers, as he himself called them, numbered many thousands, the majority of whom he considered worthy of an everlasting memorial, for he has made his testimony to them enduring in his own letters. Moreover, Luke also, as he lists those known to him, makes mention of them by name. So Timothy is recorded as the first one called to oversee the church of Ephesus, just as Titus was for the churches in Crete.
Ecclesiastical History 3.4
"As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia."
Observe the gentleness of the expression, more like that of a servant than of a master. For he does not say "I commanded," or "bade" or even "exhorted," but "I besought thee." But this tone is not for all: only meek and virtuous disciples are to be treated thus. The corrupt and insincere are to be dealt with in a different manner, as Paul himself elsewhere directs, "Rebuke them with all authority" (Tit. ii. 15); and here he says "charge," not "beseech," but "charge some that they teach no other doctrine." What means this? That Paul's Epistle which he sent them was not sufficient? Nay, it was sufficient; but men are apt sometimes to slight Epistles, or perhaps this may have been before the Epistles were written.
He had himself passed some time in that city. There was the temple of Diana, and there he had been exposed to those great sufferings. For after the assembly in the Theater had been dissolved, and he had called to him and exhorted the disciples, he found it necessary to sail away, though afterwards he returned to them. It were worth enquiry, whether he stationed Timothy there at that time. For he says, that "thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine": he does not mention the persons by name, that he might not, by the openness of his rebuke, render them more shameless. There were in that city certain false Apostles of the Jews, who wished to oblige the faithful to observe the Jewish law. This is meant by "teaching another doctrine."
Homily on 1 Timothy 1
As I urged you, stay in Ephesus when you go to Macedonia, so that you may command certain people not to teach false doctrines.
See the words of the petitioner and teacher: stay in Ephesus. (For Paul's Epistle was rather not sufficient to correct these.) Here, however, he was appointed bishop by laying on of hands.
So that you may command certain people. Paul did not say, "Please," but, as to the corrupt, he says, "command with severity."
not to teach false doctrines. There were some false apostles from the Jews again leading people to the law, and teaching other counterfeit doctrines.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Pay attention to what a meek speech this is, how he spoke to him in the voice not of a teacher, but of a servant. He did not say: I commanded, but: "I asked." So should we treat our own disciples, but with the corrupt and not fully devoted — differently. The Apostle implores him to remain in Ephesus. For the epistle that he sent to the Ephesians was not sufficient: people do not pay as much attention to epistles. However, perhaps this was even before the epistle. It is supposed that it was then that Paul appointed Timothy as bishop. This is probable, for he says the following further on.
He did not say: to entreat, but: "to exhort," which is more authoritative and strict. He did not name them by name, so that through exposure he would not make them more shameless. "To teach otherwise" means to introduce other teachings. For among the Jews there were many false apostles, who out of love for glory and from the desire to be called teachers were inclining the faithful to the law of Moses.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Here begins the message of this epistle, which is a sort of pastoral guide composed by the Apostle for Timothy, instructing him in all matters pertaining to the exercise of his prelacy, and teaching the order in which he should arrange his desires: first, therefore, he instructs him on the management of spiritual affairs; second, of temporal affairs, in chapter four, at now the Spirit (1 Tim 4:1).
First, therefore, it pertains to a prelate to teach according to the rule of faith, lest the beliefs of his subjects be harmed: I have prayed for you that your faith fail not: and you being once converted, confirm your brethren (Luke 22:32). Second, that he instruct them in matters pertaining to divine worship, which cannot be done properly unless one's faith is right. First, therefore, he instructs him about the faith; second, about the worship of God, in chapter two, at I desire therefore (1 Tim 2:1); third, about appointments to ecclesiastical offices, in chapter three, at a faithful saying (1 Tim 3:1).
But it should be noted that in the early Church the pernicious error was being spread that legal observances should be kept along with the Gospel. But the Apostle rejects this: first, by showing the condition of the law; second, by citing his own experience, at I give him thanks. In regard to the first he does three things: first, he shows what must be repudiated in the law; second, what must be accepted, at now the end of the commandment; third, he concludes to the law's present status, at but we know that.
What is to be repudiated in the law are the things that have been wickedly added, but were not given by God, and proceed from a carnal understanding of the law. First, he teaches that false fables and genealogies are to be rejected; second, he assigns the reason, at which furnish questions.
He says, therefore: you ought to do as I desired you, since I cannot command: have they made you a ruler? Be not lifted up: be among them as one of them (Sir 32:1), that you might charge some not to teach otherwise: not to give heed to fables and endless genealogies.
Or in another way: two things pertain to a prelate: to restrain those who teach what is false; hence he says, not to teach otherwise: if anyone preach to you a gospel besides that which you have received, let him be anathema (Gal 1:9); you shall not add to the word that I speak to you; neither shall you take away from it (Deut 4:2). Second, if it should happen that some are teaching what is false, he should forbid the people to listen to them: not to give heed to fables and endless genealogies.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.
μηδὲ προσέχειν μύθοις καὶ γενεαλογίαις ἀπεράντοις, αἵτινες ζητήσεις παρέχουσι μᾶλλον ἢ οἰκονομίαν Θεοῦ τὴν ἐν πίστει·
нижѐ внима́ти ба́снемъ и҆ родосло́вїємъ безконє́чнымъ, ꙗ҆̀же стѧза̑нїѧ творѧ́тъ па́че, не́жели бж҃їе строе́нїе, є҆́же въ вѣ́рѣ.
Let my spirit be counted as nothing for the sake of the cross, which is a stumbling-block to those that do not believe, but to us salvation and life eternal. "Where is the wise man? where the disputer? " Where is the boasting of those who are styled prudent? For our God, Jesus Christ, was, according to the appointment of God, conceived in the womb by Mary, of the seed of David, but by the Holy Ghost. He was born and baptized, that by His passion He might purify the water.
Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians
Be not deceived with strange doctrines, "nor give heed to fables and endless genealogies," and things in which the Jews make their boast. "Old things are passed away: behold, all things have become new." For if we still live according to the Jewish law, and the circumcision of the flesh, we deny that we have received grace. For the divinest prophets lived according to Jesus Christ. On this account also they were persecuted, being inspired by grace to fully convince the unbelieving that there is one God, the Almighty, who has manifested Himself by Jesus Christ His Son, who is His Word, not spoken, but essential. For He is not the voice of an articulate utterance, but a substance begotten by divine power, who has in all things pleased Him that sent Him.
Epistle of Ignatius to the Magnesians
You must not be panic-stricken by those who have an air of credibility but who teach heresy. Stand your ground like an anvil under the hammer. A great athlete must suffer blows to conquer. And especially for God’s sake must we put up with everything, so that God will put up with us. Show more enthusiasm than you do. Mark the times. Be on the alert for him who is above time, the Timeless, the Unseen, the One who became visible for our sakes, who was beyond touch and passion, yet who for our sakes became subject to suffering and endured everything for us.
Epistle of Ignatius to Polycarp
Inasmuch as certain men have set the truth aside, and bring in lying words and vain genealogies, which, as the apostle says, "minister questions rather than godly edifying which is in faith," and by means of their craftily-constructed plausibilities draw away the minds of the inexperienced and take them captive, [I have felt constrained, my dear friend, to compose the following treatise in order to expose and counteract their machinations.] These men falsify the oracles of God, and prove themselves evil interpreters of the good word of revelation. They also overthrow the faith of many, by drawing them away, under a pretence of [superior] knowledge, from Him who rounded and adorned the universe; as if, forsooth, they had something more excellent and sublime to reveal, than that God who created the heaven and the earth, and all things that are therein.
Against Heresies Book 1, Preface.1
For this is the affinity of the apostolical teaching and the most holy "faith delivered unto us," which the unlearned receive, and those of slender knowledge have taught, not "giving heed to endless genealogies," but studying rather [to observe] a straightforward course of life; lest, having been deprived of the Divine Spirit, they fail to attain to the kingdom of heaven.
Fragments from the Lost Writings of Irenaeus, Fragment XXXVI
The same matter is turned and twisted by the heretics and the philosophers, and the same questions are involved: Whence comes evil? And what is its purpose? And whence human history? And how? And, what Valentinus has lately propounded—whence God? All of this ensues from an excessive exercise of mind and from an abortive birth. Wretched Aristotle! Who has taught them this dialectic art, cunning in building up and pulling down, using many shifts in sentence, making forced guesses at truth, stiff in arguments, busy in raising contentions, contrary even to itself, dealing backwards and forwards with every subject, so as really to deal with none! Hence, those “fables and endless genealogies,” and “unprofitable questions” and “words that spread like a cancer,” from which the apostle restraining us, testifies of philosophy by name, that it ought to be shunned.… When Paul spoke of “endless genealogies,” we can now recognize the hand of Valentinus, according to whom the “aeon” generates its own grace, sense and truth. Whoever this is, it is not of one divine name but of a new name, who supposedly then produces word and life, humanity and church in the first pair of aeons.
Prescriptions Against Heretics 7 and 33
But in the few words there always arises certainty to him; nor is he permitted to give his inquiries a wider range than is compatible with their solution; for "endless questions" the apostle forbids. It must, however, be added, that no solution may be found by any man, but such as is learned from God; and that which is learned of God is the sum and substance of the whole thing.
A Treatise on the Soul
Unhappy Aristotle! who invented for these men dialectics, the art of building up and pulling down; an art so evasive in its propositions, so far-fetched in its conjectures, so harsh, in its arguments, so productive of contentions-embarrassing even to itself, retracting everything, and really treating of nothing! Whence spring those "fables and endless genealogies," and "unprofitable questions," and "words which spread like a cancer? " From all these, when the apostle would restrain us, he expressly names philosophy as that which he would have us be on our guard against.
The Prescription Against Heretics
Such an opinion did the Valentinians assert of themselves. When again he mentions "endless genealogies," one also recognises Valentinus, in whose system a certain ¦on, whosoever he be, of a new name, and that not one only, generates of his own grace Sense and Truth; and these in like manner produce of themselves Word and Life, while these again afterwards beget Man and the Church.
The Prescription Against Heretics
Now, even suppose that you are initiated into the entire fable, will it not occur to you that you have heard something very like it from your fond nurse when you were a baby, amongst the lullabies she sang to you about the towers of Lamia, and the horns of the sun? Let, however, any man approach the subject from a knowledge of the faith which he has otherwise learned, as soon as he finds so many names of ¦ons, so many marriages, so many offsprings, so many exits, so many issues, felicities and infelicities of a dispersed and mutilated Deity, will that man hesitate at once to pronounce that these are "the fables and endless genealogies" which the inspired apostle by anticipation condemned, whilst these seeds of heresy were even then shooting forth? Deservedly, therefore, must they be regarded as wanting in simplicity, and as merely prudent, who produce such fables not without difficulty, and defend them only indirectly, who at the same time do not thoroughly instruct those whom they teach.
Against the Valentinians
Moreover, the commandment, “Do not bear a burden on the sabbath day,” seems to me impossible. For by these words the Jewish teachers have fallen into “endless fables,” as the apostle says, by saying that it is not reckoned a “burden” if someone has shoes without nails, but that it is a “burden” if someone has gallic shoes with nails. And if someone carries something on one shoulder, they judge it a “burden,” but if he carries it on both shoulders, they will deny it is a burden.
On First Principles 4.1.2
In this passage we note the novelty as well as the viciousness of their devices, and how they go beyond all other heresies. They support their madness by seductive arguments calculated to deceive the simple. The Greeks, as the apostle has said, make their attack with excellency and persuasiveness of speech and with fallacies that have the aura of plausibility. The Jews, departing widely from the divine Scriptures, now, as the apostle again has said, contend about “fables and endless genealogies.” Meanwhile the Manichaeans and Valentinians with them, and others, corrupt the divine Scriptures, putting forth fables of their own invention. But the Arians are bolder than them all and have shown that the other heresies are but their younger sisters, whom, as I have said, they surpass in impiety, emulating them all, and especially the Jews, in their circumventions.
History of the Arians 8.66
I will take the fool’s line and propound some examples drawn from the things of a lower world. “I am become a fool; you have compelled me.” What indeed is more foolish than to debate over the majesty of God, which rather occasions questionings, than receiving godly instruction which is by faith. But to arguments let arguments reply. Let words make answer to them. Rather we will answer with love, the love which is in God, issuing of a pure heart and good conscience and faith unfeigned.
Exposition of the Christian Faith 4.5.60
"Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies."
By "fables" he does not mean the law; far from it; but inventions and forgeries and counterfeit doctrines. For, it seems, the Jews wasted their whole discourse on these unprofitable points. "That thou mightest charge some," he says, "that they teach no other doctrine, neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies." Why does he call them "endless"? It is because they had no end, or none of any use, or none easy for us to apprehend.
Mark how he disapproves of questioning. For where faith exists, there is no need of question. Where there is no room for curiosity, questions are superfluous. Questioning is the subversion of faith. For he that seeks has not yet found. He who questions cannot believe. Therefore it is his advice that we should not be occupied with questions, since if we question, it is not faith; for faith sets reasoning at rest. But why then does Christ say, "Seek and ye shall find, knock and it shall be opened unto you" (Matt. vii. 7); and, "Search the Scriptures, for in them ye think ye have eternal life"? (John v. 39.) The seeking there is meant of prayer and vehement desire, and He bids "search the Scriptures," not to introduce the labors of questioning, but to end them, that we may ascertain and settle their true meaning, not that we may be ever questioning, but that we may have done with it.
And he justly said, "Charge some that they teach no other doctrine, neither give heed to fables, and endless genealogies, which minister questions rather than the dispensation of God in faith." Justly has he said this, for faith is the best medicine of our souls. This questioning therefore is opposed to the dispensation of God. For what is dispensed by faith? To receive His mercies and become better men; to doubt and dispute of nothing; but to repose in confidence. For what "ministers questions" displaces faith and that which faith hath wrought and builded. Christ has said that we must be saved by faith; this these teachers questioned and even denied. For since the announcement was present, but the issue of it future, faith was required. But they being preoccupied by legal observances threw impediments in the way of faith.
He seems also here to glance at the Greeks, where he speaks of "fables and genealogies," for they enumerated their Gods.
Homily on 1 Timothy 1
Paul here discourses about the common theme of all of his letters written to those converted from the Gentiles. He does this to point out that often things said by converts from Judaism may undermine the genuine piety of Gentile converts. In the case of the Galatians, he found that they were observing things required by the law, including especially the rite of circumcision. He pointed out that the use of genealogies was a particularly bad practice, because it made it possible for Jews to argue that Christ was not the promised offspring of Abraham and David and thereby throw into confusion Gentiles who are not well grounded in the Scriptures. He calls these genealogies “endless” because they can be turned in a great variety of bewildering directions. They are called “myths” because they contain only narration and nothing really necessary to the understanding of salvation.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Believers of Jewish background, taking pride in their knowledge of the Old Testament, laid certain questions before Gentile believers. They did this in order to take advantage of their ignorance of these same divine words, and in the attempt to persuade them to embrace the law as a way of life. They rehearsed with them the human genealogy of the Lord as descended from Abraham and David. Therefore, Paul instructs Timothy to block these people and to prevent them from corrupting the teaching. The others he orders not to listen. He calls their ideas “myth” because they involve the Jewish, Mishna-like exposition of the Scripture, which focuses on superfluous and useless questions, rather than the essential divine economy of salvation.
Interpretation of the First Letter to Timothy
nor to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies, who provide questions rather than the household of God, which is by faith.
nor to pay attention to myths. Paul calls myths the fictional doctrines. For the one who speaks these things teaches a different doctrine.
and endless genealogies. For they counted the forefathers and ancestors, like the Jews around the divine Abraham, adorning themselves with them, and doing nothing good themselves. But the term "endless," means those who have no useful end, either those who speak or those who listen.
who provide inquiries. If inquiries is in condemnation, how does Christ say, "Seek and you will find," (Matt. 7:7) and, "Do you seek the Scriptures?" (Jn. 5:39) because seeking is of the means. For it is sometimes good to seek, as in, "Seek first the kingdom of heaven." (Matt. 6:33) It is even evil to seek, as the philosophers do, the heavenly and the essence of God. Therefore, here you will seek, he says, the foolish things, the combative ones.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Fables he calls not the law itself, but the observances and false dogmas.
They used to enumerate grandfathers and great-grandfathers, hoping thereby to claim for themselves a certain historical glory. He called them "endless" either because they go back to remote times, or because they have no good purpose, or because they lack clarity, are hard to grasp, and are tangled. It is likely that the apostle here also hints at the Greeks, for they have myths and genealogies in which they enumerate their gods.
That is, God established such a dispensation so that everything in it would be received by faith, but they introduce inquiries and upset this dispensation of God. Or that God willed to grant us something great and manifested toward us an ineffable dispensation. It is faith that brings about this dispensation of His goodness, and by no means origin. Meanwhile, they were introducing inquiries. How can this be? How shall we believe concerning the future? Inquiry drives out faith. However, why did the Lord say: "Seek, and you shall find" (Matt. 7:7)? And again: "Search the Scriptures" (John 5:39)? The first expression — "seek" — speaks of petition, of intense desire; the second — "search" — means: study the true meaning of the Scriptures, learn them, and cease all further investigation.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
But there have been certain heretics who, disdaining the Old Testament, explained that the Apostle repudiated it when he said: do not give heed to fables and endless genealogies. Augustine answers them by saying that the Apostle makes use of the stories and genealogies of the Old Testament: Abraham had two sons; the one by a bondwoman, and the other by a free woman (Gal 4:22). Therefore, if he had repudiated it, he would not have made use of it.
That is why he says, fables, not the law given in writing, but handed down orally, namely, the Talmud; not the things Moses transmitted orally, but the things others added to it, such as the silly fable that Adam had another wife, from whom demons were born: you have made void the commandment of God for your tradition (Matt 15:6); they will be turned unto fables (2 Tim 4:4).
The reason for this prohibition is that they furnish questions, i.e., contentions: contend not in words (2 Tim 2:14); it is an honor for a man to separate himself from quarrels (Prov 20:3); rather than the edification of God, which is in faith, i.e., when a person has been confirmed in the true faith, to which all doctrine should tend.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:
τὸ δὲ τέλος τῆς παραγγελίας ἐστὶν ἀγάπη ἐκ καθαρᾶς καρδίας καὶ συνειδήσεως ἀγαθῆς καὶ πίστεως ἀνυποκρίτου,
Коне́цъ же завѣща́нїѧ є҆́сть любы̀ ѿ чи́ста се́рдца и҆ со́вѣсти бл҃гі́ѧ и҆ вѣ́ры нелицемѣ́рныѧ,
None of these things is hid from you, if ye perfectly possess that faith and love towards Christ Jesus which are the beginning and the end of life. For the beginning is faith, and the end is love.
Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians
Nothing is so injurious to mankind as to undervalue friendship; and not to cultivate it with the greatest care; as nothing, on the other hand, is so beneficial, as to pursue it to the utmost of our power. This Christ has shown, where He says, "If two of you shall agree on earth, as touching anything that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of My Father" (Matt. xviii. 19); and again, "Because iniquity shall abound, love shall wax cold." (Matt. xxiv. 12.) It is this that has been the occasion of all heresies. For men, because they loved not their brethren, have envied those who were in high repute, and from envying, they have become eager for power, and from a love of power have introduced heresies. On this account Paul having said, "that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine," now shows that the manner in which this may be effected is by charity. As therefore when he says, "Christ is the end of the Law" (Rom. x. 4), that is, its fulfillment, and this is connected with the former, so this a commandment implied in love. The end of medicine is health, but where there is health, there is no need to make much ado; so where there is love, there is no need of much commanding. But what sort of love does he speak of? That which is sincere, which is not merely in words but which flows from the disposition, from sentiment, and sympathy. "From a pure heart," he says, either with respect to a right conversation, or sincere affection. For an impure life too produces divisions. "For every one that doeth evil, hateth the light." (John iii. 20.) There is indeed a friendship even among the wicked. Robbers and murderers may love one another, but this is not "from a good conscience," not "from a pure" but from an impure "heart," not from "faith unfeigned," but from that which is false and hypocritical. For faith points out the truth, and a sincere faith produces love, which he who truly believes in God cannot endure to lay aside.
Homily on 1 Timothy 2
The end of all divine Scriptures is the love for the Being in which we should rejoice and love for the being that can rejoice with us in that love. … Whoever … thinks that he understands the divine Scriptures or any part of them so that it does not build the double love of God and of our neighbor does not understand it at all. Whoever finds a lesson there useful to the building of charity, even though he has not said what the author may be shown to have intended in that place, has not been deceived.… But anyone who understands in the Scriptures something other than that intended by them is deceived, although they do not lie.
On Christian Doctrine 1.35.39-1.36.40-41
When all these things have been said and considered, I am unwilling to contend about words, for such contention is profitable for nothing but the subverting of the hearer. But the law is profitable for edification if one uses it lawfully. For the end of the law “is love out of a pure heart, and a good conscience and faith unfeigned.” And our Master knew it well, for it was on these two commandments that he hung all the law and the prophets.
Confessions 12.18
Faith, hope and charity, those three virtues for whose building up is mounted all the scaffolding of the Bible, are only in the soul that believes what it does not yet see, and hopes and loves what it believes. Therefore there can be love even of One who is not known, if yet he is believed. Doubtless, we must beware lest the soul, believing what it does not see, fabricates for itself an image of that which is not and bases its hope and love upon a lie. Then there will not emerge that “charity from a pure heart and a good conscience and a faith unfeigned, which is the end of the commandment.”
On the Trinity 8.4.6
When anyone knows the end of the commandments to be charity “from a pure heart, and a good conscience and an unfeigned faith” and has related all of his understanding of the divine Scriptures to these three, he may approach the treatment of these books with security. For when he says “charity” he adds “from a pure heart,” so that nothing else would be loved except that which should be loved. And he joins with this “a good conscience” for the sake of hope, for he in whom there is the smallest taint of bad conscience despairs of attaining that which he believes in and loves. Third, he says “an unfeigned faith.” If our faith involves no lie, then we do not love that which is not to be loved, and living justly, we hope for that which will in no way deceive our hope.
On Christian Doctrine 1.40.44
When the promised vision, “face to face,” has come, we shall behold the Trinity—that Trinity which is not only incorporeal but perfectly inseparable and truly changeless—far more clearly and surely than we now behold its image in ourselves. This present vision, through a mirror and in an enigma, as offered to us in this life, belongs not to any one who can perceive in their own mind all that we have here set out by our analysis but to those who see the mind as a reflective image. In this way they are able to relate what they see to the One whose image it is. They reach through their actual vision of the image to a presumptive vision of the original, which cannot yet be seen face to face. The apostle does not say, “We see now a mirror” but “we see now through a mirror.” Those who see the mind as it may be seen, and in it that Trinity of which I have attempted to give a variety of descriptions, yet without believing or understanding it to be the image of God: they are seeing as if in a mirror. But so far from seeing through the mirror him who is now to be seen only in that way, they are unaware that the mirror seen is a mirror—which is to say, an image. If they knew it, they might be conscious of the need to seek and in some measure even now to see, through this mirror, him whose mirror it is—their hearts being purified by faith unfeigned, so that he who is seen now through a mirror may at last be seen face to face. But if they despise the faith that purifies hearts, no understanding of the most subtle analysis of our mind’s nature can serve but to condemn them, on the testimony of their own understanding itself.
On the Trinity 15.23.44-15.24.44
Now, you know, I think, not only the nature of your prayer but its object, and you have learned this, not from me but from him who has humbled himself to teach us all. Happiness is what we must seek and what we must ask of the Lord God. Many arguments have been fashioned by many men about the nature of happiness, but why should we turn to the many men or the many arguments? Brief and true is the word in the Scripture of God, “Happy is the people whose God is the Lord.” “The aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and sincere faith,” that we may belong to that people and that we may be able to attain to contemplation of God and to eternal life with God.
Letters 130.13.24
Ascend the mountain and see the end. Christ is the mountain; come to him, and from there you will see the end of all perfection. What is the end? Ask Paul, “Now the purpose of this charge is charity, from a pure heart and a pure conscience and faith unfeigned,” and in another place, “love is the fulfillment of the law.” … Therefore, whatever you do, do it for the love of Christ, and let the intention or end of all your actions look to him. Do nothing for the sake of human praise, but everything for love of God and the desire for eternal life.
Sermons 137.1
The goal of the command is love from a pure heart and of a good conscience and sincere faith.
For since this was the case, the practice of teaching others also ceased. How so? Because from not loving, envy entered some against the teachers due to their desire to be teachers themselves. Therefore, the practice of teaching others ceased.
For he says, from a pure heart. For it is also possible to love from an impure heart, like the friendships of thieves toward thieves. From a pure heart, as well as perfect love, he says, you yourself command. Indeed, those things which are the chief parts of speeches, are repeated at the beginning and at the end by those who give commands, because these are easier to remember.
and of a good conscience. I do not seek, Paul said, that which is extended merely to words, which can also be in hypocrisy, but that which proceeds from the heart, and is pure in that way: which comes from conscience and from the thought that arises from it, which alone has no hypocrisy. For who would be the one to deceive himself, or try to conceal it?
Commentary on 1 Timothy
If you, he says, will admonish them not to teach otherwise, you will achieve this, namely love. If you instill love in them, then every corrupt doctrine will find no place among them. Before, when there was no love, there was envy; from envy came love of power; from love of power the desire to teach; and from this, heresies. But now it is not so. He demands sincere love, love not in words, but "from the heart," and a heart that is "pure" and not darkened by hypocrisy — love that is formed from the disposition of the soul and compassion.
When robbers love robbers, this comes not from a good conscience but from an evil one, and not from unfeigned faith. Whoever sincerely believes in God will never allow himself to depart from true love, for it embraces all. But a robber kills those passing by. From this you can conclude that whoever does not have love does not have faith either.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Then when he says, now the end, he shows what should be kept of the law. In regard to this he does two things: first, he proves this; second, that there is a danger for those who do not hold this, at from which things.
In regard to the first it should be noted that the old law is called the law of the commandments, because it is hemmed in by commandments and precepts: making void the law of commandments contained in decrees (Eph 2:15). What is to be especially retained, therefore, is that toward which all the commandments of the law are ordained, namely, charity: you shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind (Matt 22:37), to which is added: on these two commandments depends the whole law and the prophets (Matt 22:40).
But how is charity the end of the commandment? To answer this, two things must be considered: that all the precepts of the law are concerned with acts of the virtues, and that through the acts of the virtues one man is ordained to another; because whenever one of our powers is concerned with an end, all other similar powers are ordained to it as to an end. For example, the art of making bridles is ordained to the art of riding, which is its end; and this is ordained to the leader of the cavalry.
Now the theological virtues have the ultimate end as their object, all the other virtues being concerned with the means to the end. Therefore, all other virtues look to the theological virtues as to an end. But among the theological virtues the one which is closest to the ultimate end has the nature of an end more than the other ones. Now faith points out the ultimate end, and hope makes one tend toward it; but charity unites one to it. Therefore, all are ordained to charity. And that is why charity is the end of the commandments.
But since the means dispose to the end, and the precepts are ordained to charity; therefore, they dispose to it. Hence he says, from a pure heart. For the precepts of the virtues aim at forming a pure heart: some of these virtues are ordained to moderating the passions properly, namely, those virtues whose matter is the passions, i.e., temperance, which moderates concupiscence; meekness, which moderates anger; and fortitude, which moderates fears and boldnesses. But these passions would disturb purity of heart; consequently, the virtues aim at purifying the heart.
But is a pure heart required for charity? The answer is yes; for it is impossible for an impure heart to be prompt in regard to charity: because a thing loves that which is in conformity with it. But an impure heart loves that which conforms to it among the passions. Therefore, it needs to be freed of the passions: the righteous love you (Song 1:3).
Some virtues set man straight in relation to his neighbor, and it is from this that he has a good conscience, because he does not do to others what he does not want done to himself: all things whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you also to them (Matt 7:12). Consequently, whatever is against one's neighbor is against conscience; hence he says, and a good conscience. Consequently, one who does not have a good conscience cannot love God in a pure manner, because one who does not have a good conscience fears punishment. But fear cannot co-exist with love, for it flees from God rather than joins one to him. Consequently, the commandments which rectify one's conscience dispose one well for charity.
Other virtues set a man straight in regard to possessing the true faith, namely, the virtues by which we worship God; for example, the virtue of latria and others of that sort, which are ordained to removing errors and confirming in the hearts of the faithful a solid belief in God. For one who does not have the true faith cannot love God, because whosoever believes something falsely about God does not love God; for one who does not believe does not love, because love can fix itself only on the things proposed to it by the intellect. Consequently, whatever makes for true faith makes for true charity. That is why he says, from a pure heart, because these things make the heart pure: blessed are the clean of heart; for they shall see God (Matt 5:8); and a good conscience: for our glory is this: the testimony of our conscience (2 Cor 1:12); and an unfeigned faith, i.e., one which is true.
And so the virtues and the precepts are ordained to an end which is charity, which arises from those three things.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
ὧν τινες ἀστοχήσαντες ἐξετράπησαν εἰς ματαιολογίαν,
въ ни́хже нѣ́цыи погрѣши́вше, ᲂу҆клони́шасѧ въ сꙋеслѡ́вїѧ,
What is this vain juggling with words? Is he aware that it is God of whom he speaks, Who was in the beginning and is in the Father, nor was there any time when he was not? He knows not what he says nor what he affirms, but he endeavors, as though he were constructing the pedigree of a mere man, to apply to the Lord of all creation the language which properly belongs to our nature here below.
Against Eunomius 2.9
"From which some having swerved have turned aside to vain jangling."
He has well said, "swerved," for it requires skill, to shoot straight and not beside the mark, to have the direction of the Spirit. For there are many things to turn us aside from the right course, and we should look but to one object.
Homily on 1 Timothy 2
In the ark and in the house, one and the same church was prefigured. As for those who perished outside the ark in the flood and in those who died by the sword outside that house, a twofold mystery can be considered: In the flood the baptism of Christians is prefigured. So it seems to me to apply now for the current time, and not unfittingly. Heretics, if they remain outside the church, by their baptism, deserve punishment, not life. Those who, denying Christ, leave the church catholic, will perish in eternal punishment. For blessed Peter expounds the mystery of the ark in these words, … “while God patiently waited in the days of Noah during the building of the ark in which a few persons, eight in all, were saved through water: this prefigured baptism, which saves you now; it is not a removal of dust from the body but an appeal to God for a clean conscience.” With similar intent the apostle Paul teaches, “The aim of this instruction is love from a pure heart, a good conscience and a sincere faith.”
On the Forgiveness of Sins 1.20
from which some, having missed the mark, have turned aside to empty talk.
from which. Being, of the things spoken, of the household of God in faith, and of sincere love.
having missed the mark. For it requires skill, so as not to fall outside the aim of the truth.
to empty talk. What he said above: To inquiries and genealogies, now he says, to empty talk.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
The word ἀστοχήσαντες is used of those who shoot poorly. Therefore here too, he says, skill is needed in order to throw straight and not miss the target. But some have departed from love and faith, and as a result have turned aside to vain talk. And how this happens, he adds the following.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Above he showed the value and usefulness of the virtues; here he explains why they are needed, namely, because whoever lacks them runs into the danger of false doctrine. In regard to this he does two things: first, he shows the falsity of the doctrine into which they lead; second, the false condition of those who teach it, at desiring to be.
He says, therefore: the end of the commandment is charity, and these are the sources of the law from which some flee: they have spoken vain things, everyone to his neighbor (Ps 11:3).
And note that departure from charity is the cause of false doctrine, because those who do not love charity fall into falsehood: they who have not believed the truth have consented to iniquity (2 Thess 2:12). Similarly, those who lose purity of heart: for those with a heart infected by the passions judge all things according to their emotional state, and not according to God: the sensual man perceives not the things that are of the Spirit of God (1 Cor 2:14). Similarly, those with a bad conscience, because they cannot rest in the truth; hence they seek what is false and find their rest in it: having faith and a good conscience (1 Tim 1:19). Similarly, those who have a false faith: he who is unfaithful deals unfaithfully (Isa 21:2).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
θέλοντες εἶναι νομοδιδάσκαλοι, μὴ νοοῦντες μήτε ἃ λέγουσι μήτε περὶ τίνων διαβεβαιοῦνται.
хотѧ́ще бы́ти законоꙋчи́телє, не разꙋмѣ́юще ни ꙗ҆̀же глаго́лютъ, ни ѡ҆ ни́хже ᲂу҆твержда́ютъ.
For both the law and the Gospel are the energy of one Lord, who is "the power and wisdom of God;" and the terror which the law begets is merciful and in order to salvation. "Let not alms, and faith, and truth fail thee, but hang them around thy neck." In the same way as Paul, prophecy upbraids the people with not understanding the law. "Destruction and misery are in their ways, and the way of peace have they not known." "There is no fear of God before their eyes." "Professing themselves wise, they became fools." "And we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully." "Desiring to be teachers of the law, they understand," says the apostle, "neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm." "Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned."
The Stromata Book 1
It is encouraging to the faithful but distressing to the heretical to see these heresies overthrown. Moreover, their further question, “whether the Unoriginated be one or two,” shows how false are their views, how treacherous and full of guile. It is not for the Father’s honor that they say this but for the dishonor of the Word. Accordingly, if any one should answer, unaware of their craft, that “the Unoriginated is one,” they immediately spurt out their own venom, saying, “ ‘Therefore the Son is among things originated,’ and well have we said, ‘He was not before his generation.’ ” This in turn elicits all sorts of disturbances and confusions, separating the Son from the Father and reckoning the Framer of all among his works. Now first they may be convicted on this score, that, while blaming the Nicene bishops for their use of phrases not in Scripture, though these are not injurious but subversive of their irreligion, they themselves went off upon the same fault, that is, using words not in Scripture, and those that show contempt for the Lord, being “without understanding either what they are saying or the things about which they make assertions.”
Discourses Against the Arians 1.9.30
"Desiring to be teachers of the law."
Here we see another cause of evil, the love of power. Wherefore Christ said, "Be not ye called Rabbi" (Matt. xxiii. 8); and the Apostle again, "For neither do they keep the law, but that they may glory in your flesh." (Gal. vi. 13.) They desire preeminence, he means, and on that account disregard truth.
"Understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm."
Here he censures them, because they know not the end and aim of the Law, nor the period for which it was to have authority. But if it was from ignorance, why is it called a sin? Because it was incurred not only from their desiring to be teachers of the law, but from their not retaining love. Nay, and their very ignorance arose from these causes. For when the soul abandons itself to carnal things, the clearness of its vision is dimmed, and falling from love it drops into contentiousness, and the eye of the mind is blinded. For he that is possessed by any desire for these temporal things intoxicated, as he is, with passion, cannot be an impartial judge of truth. "Not knowing whereof they affirm."
For it is probable that they spoke of the law, and enlarged on its purifications and other bodily rites. The Apostle then forbearing to censure these, as either nothing, or at best a shadow and figure of spiritual things, proceeds in a more engaging way to praise the law, calling the Decalogue here the law, and by means of it discarding the rest. For if even these precepts punish transgressors, and become useless to us, much more the others.
Homily on 1 Timothy 2
Two walls must adhere to the cornerstone in order to preserve “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace”—one from the Jews and the other from the Gentiles. We mustn’t let our minds be put off by the great number of reprobate Jews, among whom were the builders; those, that is, who “wished to be teachers of the law,” but as the apostle says about them, “do not understand either what they are saying or the things about which they are making their assertions.” It was as a result of this mental blindness, after all, that they rejected the stone which was put at the head of the corner. But it wouldn’t be put at the head of the corner unless it offered to the two peoples coming from different points a peaceful joining, a coupling of grace.
Sermons 204.3
Therefore, let us not love ourselves but him, and in feeding his sheep let us seek those things that are his, not those things that are ours. For in some inexplicable way whoever loves himself, not God, does not love himself; and whoever loves God, not himself, does himself love himself. For he who cannot live of himself dies, of course, by loving himself. Then he who loves himself so that he may not live does not love himself. But when he from whom comes life is loved, by not loving himself, he who does not love himself—precisely that he may love him from whom he has life—loves himself all the more. Therefore, let those who feed Christ’s sheep not be “lovers of themselves,” that they may not feed them as their own but as his. Let them not wish to acquire their own gains from them, as “lovers of money,” or to be their lords, as “haughty,” or to glory over honors which they take from them, as “proud,” or to go so far as even to create heresies, as “blasphemous,” or to not yield to the holy fathers, as “disobedient to parents.” Let them return evils for goods to those who wish them to perish because they do not wish them to perish, as “ungrateful.” Let them not kill their own souls and those of others, as “wicked.” Let them not sunder the motherly bowels of the church, as “irreligious,” not feel no compassion for the weak, as “without affection,” not attempt to taint the reputation of the saints, as “detractors,” or not fail to rein in their worst desires, as “incontinent.” Let them not engage in lawsuits, as “unmerciful,” or fail to know how to give help, as “without kindness.” Let them not point out to the enemies of the godly the things that they have learned ought to be kept secret, as “traitors.” Let them not disturb the human sense of shame by shameless pursuits, as “licentious,” or fail to understand what they say or assert, as if they were “blinded.” Let them not prefer carnal enjoyments to spiritual joys, as “lovers of pleasures more than of God.”
Tractates on John 123.5
What, therefore, if the soul and spirit of a human being is given by God himself, whenever it is given; and given, too, by propagation from its own kind? Now this is a position which I neither maintain nor refute. Nevertheless, if it must be defended or confuted, I certainly recommend its being done by clear and certain proofs. Nor do I deserve to be compared with senseless cattle because I avow myself to be as yet incapable of determining the question, but rather with cautious persons, because I do not recklessly teach what I know nothing about. But I am not disposed on my own part to return railing for railing and compare this man with brutes. Rather, I warn him as a son to acknowledge that he is really ignorant of that which he knows nothing about. I warn him not to attempt to teach that which he has not yet learned, lest he should deserve to be compared with those persons whom the apostle mentions as “desiring to be teachers of the law, understanding neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertions.”
On the Soul and Its Origin 1.16.26
This, therefore, is the upright and most exact faith of the holy Fathers, that is, the confession of faith. But as Paul says, “the god of this world has blinded the minds of unbelievers that they should not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ.” Accordingly some, after having ceased to go along the straight road of truth, dash themselves against the rocks, “when they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertions.” For after attributing the glory of the sonship only to the Word begotten of God the Father, they say that another son of the seed of David and Jesse has been conjoined to him and has a share in the filiation and of the glory proper to God and of the very indwelling of the Word and has had almost everything from him but has nothing at all of his own.
Letters 55.41
desiring to be teachers of the law, not understanding either what they say or the matters about which they make confident claims.
desiring to be teachers of the law. Another excuse for failure. For not only, he says, does hostility lead to this, but also ambition for honor, which itself arises from hatred and envy.
not understanding either what they say. He wants to show that they truly came from love of power to wanting to be teachers. For neither do they know the law, nor about the things about which they make confident claims. For if they had known the law, they would have believed in Christ, which is also said elsewhere. "Tell me, you who want to be under the law, do you not hear the law?" (Gal. 4:21) For if they had known the law, they would certainly have believed that it leads to Christ.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
That is, suffering from love of power and passion for glory. They would not have been such, if they had love and faith.
Here he accuses them of knowing neither the purpose of the law nor the time until which it was destined to hold sway. But perhaps they sinned out of ignorance, and therefore do not deserve condemnation? No! Their ignorance arose from love of power and from the fact that they had no love. For, he says, desiring to be lawmakers and teachers of the law, they pay no attention to the truth, so that they themselves are to blame for their ignorance. What then do they affirm? Perhaps about purifications and various other bodily practices observed according to the law.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Then when he says, desiring to be teachers of the law, he describes the condition of those who teach false things: first, their restless ambition; second, their shortcomings.
In regard to the first he says, desiring to be teachers of the law: they love the first place at feasts; and to be called by men, Rabbi (Matt 23:6); do not be many masters (Jas 3:1).
In regard to the second he says, understanding neither: they have not known nor understood; they walk in darkness (Ps 81:5); the sun of understanding has not risen upon us (Wis 5:6); the things they say by quoting authorities they do not understand; nor whereof they affirm, i.e., by way of drawing a conclusion.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
Οἴδαμεν δὲ ὅτι καλὸς ὁ νόμος, ἐάν τις αὐτῷ νομίμως χρῆται,
[Заⷱ҇ 279] Вѣ́мы же, ꙗ҆́кѡ до́бръ зако́нъ (є҆́сть), а҆́ще кто̀ є҆го̀ зако́ннѣ твори́тъ,
"But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully. Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man."
The law, he seems to say, is good, and again, not good. What then? if one use it not lawfully, is it not good? Nay even so it is good. But what he means is this; if any one fulfills it in his actions; for that is to "use it lawfully" as here intended. But when they expound it in their words, and neglect it in their deeds, that is using it unlawfully. For such an one uses it, but not to his own profit. And another way may be named besides. What is it? that the law, if thou use it aright, sends thee to Christ. For since its aim is to justify man, and it fails to effect this, it remits us to Him who can do so. Another way again of using the law lawfully, is when we keep it, but as a thing superfluous. And how as a thing superfluous? As the bridle is properly used, not by the prancing horse that champs it, but by that which wears it only for the sake of appearance, so he uses the law lawfully, who governs himself, though not as constrained by the letter of it. He uses the law lawfully who is conscious that he does not need it, for he who is already so virtuous that he fulfills it not from fear of it, but from a principle of virtue, uses it lawfully and safely: that is, if one so use it, not as being in fear of it, but having before his eyes rather the condemnation of conscience than the punishment hereafter. Moreover he calls him a righteous man, who has attained unto virtue. He therefore uses the law lawfully, who does not require to be instructed by it. For as points in reading are set before children; but he who does what they direct, without their aid, from other knowledge, shows more skill, and is a better reader; so he who is above the law, is not under the schooling of the law. For he keeps it in a much higher degree, who fulfills it not from fear, but from a virtuous inclination; since he that fears punishment does not fulfill it in the same manner as he that aims at reward. He that is under the law doth it not as he that is above the law. For to live above the law is to use it lawfully. He uses it lawfully, and keeps it, who achieves things beyond the law, and who does not need its instructions. For the law, for the most part, is prohibition of evil; now this alone does not make a man righteous, but the performance of good actions besides. Hence those, who abstain from evil like slaves, do not come up to the mark of the law. For it was appointed for the punishment of transgression. Such men indeed use it, but it is to dread its punishment. It is said, "Wilt thou not be afraid of the power? do that which is good" (Rom. xiii. 3): which implies, that the law threatens punishment only to the wicked. But of what use is the law to him whose actions deserve a crown? as the surgeon is of use only to him who hath some hurt, and not to the sound and healthy man.
Homily on 1 Timothy 2
The purpose of the law is to prohibit all iniquity and to set a minimum standard for those in need of it. For those who have been justified and freed from sin it is superfluous. These are the baptized, who need not to be instructed to refrain from sin, but rather to be taught to conform to the pattern in which they now stand.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Accordingly “the law is holy and the commandment holy, just and good.” It commands what ought to be commanded, and prohibits what ought to be prohibited. “Was that which is good, then, made death to me? God forbid.” The fault lies in making a bad use of the commandment, which in itself is good. “The law is good if one uses it lawfully.” But he makes a bad use of the law who does not subject himself to God in humble piety, so that, with the aid of grace, he may become able to fulfill the law. He who does not use the law lawfully receives it to no other end than that his sin, which was latent before the prohibition, should be made apparent by his transgression.
To Simplician: on Various Questions 1.1.6
Indeed, “the precepts are good,” as Pelagius says, if we use them lawfully. And in virtue of our strong conviction “that the good and just God could not have prescribed impossibilities,” we are admonished both what to do in easy things and what to ask for in difficult ones. Indeed, all things are easy for love, to which alone the burden of Christ is light, or which alone is itself the burden which is light.
On Nature and Grace 1.69.83
To use the law appropriately is to keep its purpose, that is, to lead one to Christ the Lord. Those who refrain from the sins that Paul mentions are living in conformity with the law.
Interpretation of the First Letter to Timothy
And we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully.
that the law is good. If it's anything other than this [that is, using it lawfully], it's not good. But who is the one who lawfully uses it? The one who is sent to faith through it. For the law does not have the power to justify, but it leads to Christ who is able to justify. For the one who fulfills it, not the one who interprets it, lawfully uses it.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
That is, if someone not only explains it in words but also fulfills it in deed. For whoever studies the ordinances of the law but does not fulfill them uses the law unlawfully. Or alternatively, the one who is led by it to Christ uses the law lawfully. The law, not having the power to guide or justify, directs the one seeking righteousness to Christ — and this is its purpose: so that the one who prefers Christ to the law uses the law lawfully, that is, as the law itself commands.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Then when he says, but we know that the law is good, he describes the status of the law in regard to two things: first, as to the goodness of the law; second, as to the end and intention of the lawgiver, at knowing this.
He says, therefore: we know with certainty that the law is good and not evil, as some heretics claim: the law of the Lord is unspotted, converting souls (Ps 18:8); the law indeed is holy and the commandment holy, and just, and good (Rom 7:12). But it can happen that someone uses what is good in an evil manner. Therefore, since the law is good, it is required that a man use it well. That is why he says, if a man use it lawfully. Otherwise it becomes deadly (Rom 8).
For there are in the law certain commandments that are moral and some that are ceremonial. The ceremonial laws have been given in figures to Christ and to the Church. But they need to be understood not only carnally but also spiritually, and as a figure of the truth to come; and it is important to know that they are not to be kept forever, but cease when the truth has appeared: I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt (Jer 31:31). That is the way a Gloss explains it.
But the Apostle seems to be speaking of the moral precepts, because he continues by saying that the law was made for sinners, and these are moral precepts. The proper use of these precepts is that a man not attribute more to them than is contained in them. For the law was given in order that sin be recognized: for I had not known concupiscence, if the law did not say: you shall not covet (Rom 7:7). Therefore, the hope of justification must not be placed in them, but in faith alone: we account a man to be justified by faith, without the works of the law (Rom 3:28).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
εἰδὼς τοῦτο, ὅτι δικαίῳ νόμος οὐ κεῖται, ἀνόμοις δὲ καὶ ἀνυποτάκτοις, ἀσεβέσι καὶ ἁμαρτωλοῖς, ἀνοσίοις καὶ βεβήλοις, πατρολῴαις καὶ μητρολῴαις, ἀνδροφόνοις,
вѣ́дый сїѐ, ꙗ҆́кѡ првⷣникꙋ зако́нъ не лежи́тъ {не положе́нъ}, но беззакѡ́ннымъ и҆ непокори̑вымъ, нечести̑вымъ (же) и҆ грѣ́шникѡмъ, непра́вєднымъ и҆ сквє́рнымъ, ѻ҆тца̀ и҆ ма́тере досади́телємъ, мꙋжеꙋбі́йцамъ,
Why, then, did the Lord not form the covenant for the fathers? Because "the law was not established for righteous men." But the righteous fathers had the meaning of the Decalogue written in their hearts and souls, that is, they loved the God who made them, and did no injury to their neighbour. There was therefore no occasion that they should be cautioned by prohibitory mandates (correptoriis literis), because they had the righteousness of the law in themselves. But when this righteousness and love to God had passed into oblivion, and became extinct in Egypt, God did necessarily, because of His great goodwill to men, reveal Himself by a voice, and led the people with power out of Egypt, in order that man might again become the disciple and follower of God; and He afflicted those who were disobedient, that they should not contemn their Creator; and He fed them with manna, that they might receive food for their souls (uti rationalem acciperent escam); as also Moses says in Deuteronomy: "And fed thee with manna, which thy fathers did not know, that thou mightest know that man cloth not live by bread alone; but by every word of God proceeding out of His mouth doth man live." And it enjoined love to God, and taught just dealing towards our neighbour, that we should neither be unjust nor unworthy of God, who prepares man for His friendship through the medium of the Decalogue, and likewise for agreement with his neighbour,-matters which did certainly profit man himself; God, however, standing in no need of anything from man.
Against Heresies Book 4
For when you take away the cause of fear, sin, you have taken away fear; and much more, punishment, when you have taken away that which gives rise to lust. "For the law is not made for the just man".
The Stromata Book 4
For this was the law from the first, that virtue should be the object of voluntary choice. Wherefore also the commandments, according to the Law, and before the Law, not given to the upright (for the law is not appointed for a righteous man), ordained that he should receive eternal life and the blessed prize, who chose them.
The Stromata Book 7
If they who are weak and incapable of the deeper mystery are edified by the letter, let them understand that if “anyone neglects the teachings of the Lord and lies to his neighbor over a deposit, or by a partnership, or by robbery, he is declared guilty of a great sin. But let this be absent from the church of God.… For I say boldly concerning you that “you did not so learn Christ” nor “were you so taught.” Besides, the law itself does not teach these things to the saints and the faithful. Do you want to know that these are not said about the saints and the faithful? Hear the apostle when he distinguishes between them, “The law was not laid down for the just but for the unjust and for those not subject, for the wicked and the impure, for the father-killers and for the mother-killers,” and for those similar to these. Because, therefore, for such men as this the apostle says, “the law was imposed,” the church of God, having left behind the letter, is built up to greater holiness by the spirit, since heaven forbid that it would ever be polluted with such misdeeds.
Homilies on Leviticus 4.2
You see here that he distinguishes two covenants, the old and the new, and says that the new would not be like the old which was given to the fathers. For the old covenant was given as a law to the Jews, when they had fallen from the religion of their forefathers, and had embraced the manners and life of the Egyptians, and had declined to the errors of polytheism and the idolatrous superstitions of the Gentiles. It was intended to raise up the fallen, and to set on their feet those who were lying on their faces, by suitable teaching. “For the law, it is said, is not for the righteous, but for the unjust and disorderly, for the unrighteous and sinners, and for those like them.”
The Proof of the Gospel 1.4
The Lord touched the leper in order to show that the law was not an obstacle to him who had constituted the law.… The leper was afraid to touch the Lord lest he defile him. But the Lord touched the leper to show him that he would not be defiled, he, at whose rebuke the defilement fled from the defiled one. … Samson ate honey from the dead body of an impure animal, and with the jawbone of a dead ass he was victorious and rescued Israel. God gave him water from the dead jawbone.
Commentary on Tatian’s Diatessaron 12.21
I consider not wealth but virtue as liberty, for it does not bow to the wishes of the stronger, and it is laid hold of and possessed by one’s own greatness of soul. The wise man is always free. He is always held in honor; he is always master of the laws. The law is not made for the just but for the unjust. The just man is a law unto himself, and he does not need to summon the law from afar, for he carries it enclosed in his heart, and it is said to him, “Drink water out of your own vessels and from the stream of your own well.”
Letter 37: To Simplician
"But for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers."
He calls the Jews "lawless and disobedient" too. "The law (he says) worketh wrath," that is, to the evil doers. But what to him who is deserving of reward? "By the law is the knowledge of sin." (Rom. iii. 20.) What then with respect to the righteous? "the law is not made," he says, "for a righteous man." Wherefore? Because he is exempted from its punishment, and he waits not to learn from it what is his duty, since he has the grace of the Spirit within to direct him. For the law was given that men might be chastened by fear of its threatenings. But the tractable horse needs not the curb, nor the man that can dispense with instruction the schoolmaster.
Thus he does not stop at the mention of sins in general, nor of these only, but goes over the several kinds of sin, to shame men, as it were, of being under the direction of the law; and having thus particularized some, he adds a reference to those omitted, though what he had enumerated were sufficient to withdraw men. Of whom then does he say these things? Of the Jews, for they were "murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers": they were "profane and unholy," for these too he means when he says, "ungodly and sinners," and being such, the law was necessarily given to them. For did they not repeatedly worship idols? did they not stone Moses? were not their hands imbrued in the blood of their kindred? Do not the prophets constantly accuse them of these things? But to those who are instructed by a heavenly philosophy, these commandments are superfluous.
Homily on 1 Timothy 2
“The law is not made for the righteous,” and yet “the law is good, if one uses it lawfully.” Now by connecting together these two seemingly contrary statements, the apostle warns and urges his reader to sift the question and solve it. For how can it be that “the law is good, if one uses it lawfully,” if what follows is also true: “Knowing this, that the law is not made for the righteous”? For who but a righteous man lawfully uses the law? Yet it is not for him that it is made, but for the unrighteous.… The unrighteous man therefore lawfully uses the law, that he may become righteous. But when he has become so, he must no longer use it as a vehicle, for he has arrived at his journey’s end—or rather (that I may employ the apostle’s own simile, which has been already mentioned) as a schoolmaster, seeing that he is now fully instructed.
On the Spirit and the Letter 1.10.16
The righteous, upon whom no law need be imposed, spend no small part—as if a tithe—but the whole extent of their lives in spiritual works. They are free of the legal tax of tithing. If a good and holy need presents itself, they are free to relax their fasting without any scruple. For it is not a paltry tithe that is being subtracted by those who have offered their all to the Lord along with themselves. Certainly the person who offers nothing of his own will and is compelled by legal necessity, without recourse, to pay his tithes to God, cannot do this without being seriously guilty of fraud. Hence it is eminently clear that the one who is responding fully to grace cannot be a slave of the law, watching out for things that are forbidden and carrying out things that are commanded, and that the perfect are those who do not make use even of things permitted by the law.
Conferences 21.29.2
Avoid pride, into which it is natural for anyone to fall. Pursue humility, in which everyone ought to grow. Let your beloved self not be ignorant of the laws of the church, in order that you may keep the rights of your authority within the rules and regulations of the Fathers. To be sure, it is said “that the law is not aimed at the good man,” because he fulfills the norm of the precept already by the free judgment of his will. True love holds within itself both the authority of the apostles and the moral requirements.
Sermons 230.2
9–10understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the righteous but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for sexually immoral persons, for men who practice homosexuality, for enslavers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing contrary to sound doctrine.
understanding this. And Paul says that the one who knows has used the law legitimately, knowing that he does not need it for living rightly. But who is this? The one who lives morally through virtue, and not through fear of the law.
for the lawless and disobedient. This is also said elsewhere; "The law was added because of transgressions." (Gal. 3:19) So for the righteous and not transgressing, there will be no law, but for those who do not have virtue from themselves, but are in need of the threat of the law. And then he specifies them, hinting that the Jews possess these things.
to the ungodly and sinners. For those who continuously worship idols, those who sacrifice their children to demons, those who stone Moses (Num. 14:10), and Jews who are defiled by civil murders, would they not be all these things?
and if there is any other thing contrary to sound doctrine. For all these are passions of a corrupted soul. But such a soul acts contrary to sound and good teaching.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
From the time when we were born again of water and the Spirit, we have become sons of God and members of his household. For this reason St. Paul calls the faithful “saints.” Therefore we do not grieve but rejoice over the death of the saints. We are not under the law but under grace, having been justified by faith and having seen the one true God. For the law is not laid down for the just, nor do we serve as children, held under the law, but we have reached the estate of mature manhood and are fed on solid food, not on that which leads to idolatry. The law was good, as a lamp shining in a dark place until the day dawns, and the morning star rose in our hearts. The living water of divine knowledge has driven away pagan seas, and now all may know God. The old creation has passed away, and all things are made new.
On Divine Images 1.21
Because he does not wait for the law to teach him what must be done. This he knows, and he does not fear punishment. By the righteous man here understand one who has attained perfection in virtue: one who not out of fear before the law, but for the sake of the good itself hates evil, who becomes wholly virtue and does more than the law requires, considering it unworthy to be guided by that which threatens him with punishment; but living courageously in virtue, rises above everything characteristic of children; just as a physician is useful for one who has wounds and who is sick, but not for one who is healthy, or a bridle is necessary for a restless horse, but not for a calm one.
The Apostle enumerates sins by categories in order to make those guilty of exclusively following the law feel ashamed. And such precisely were the Jews. They constantly bowed down to idols, sacrificed their children to gods, attempted to stone Moses, their hands were stained with blood — were they not impious and murderers? You will find in them all the remaining vices as well, if you trace their history. This is precisely why the law was given to them, so that it would restrain these vices. About this he also speaks in another place: the law "was added because of transgressions" (Gal. 3:19). But for the righteous, as those no longer inclined to transgressions, the law is not necessary.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Then when he says, knowing, he shows the status of the law from the viewpoint of the lawgiver's intention: first, he gives his supposed intention; second, his real intention, at but for the unjust.
The supposed intention is excluded when he says, the law is not made for the just man. There can be two false interpretations of this: one is that a just man does not obey the law; and this is false, because if he disobeyed it in its moral precepts, he would not be just. Hence even Christ was made under the law. The other is that a just man is not obliged to the precepts of the law and that he would not sin, if he acted contrary to it. This, too, is false.
The true sense is this: on the supposition that whatever is laid on someone is laid on him as a burden, the law is not laid on the just man as a burden, because his interior disposition inclines him to what the law commands. Consequently, it is not a burden for him: these are a law to themselves (Rom 2:14).
Or another way: the law is not made for the just man but for the unjust. As if to say: if all were just, there would be no need to make a law, because everyone would be a law unto himself. The aim of good men should be to induce others to virtue. But some are disposed to virtue of themselves; others have a mind well disposed to virtue, but not of themselves. For these a friendly admonition is enough, and there is no need of force. But others are not well disposed either by themselves or by another; it is for such that the law is absolutely necessary, as is clear in the Ethics.
Then when he says, but for the unjust and disobedient, he mentions the true intention: first, he describes in a general way those for whom law is necessary; second, in a special way, at for murderers of fathers.
But it should be noted that, as it is said: every sin is iniquity (1 John 3:4), and, consequently, is opposed to some right. But since there are two kinds of right, namely, natural and positive, whatever is evil in itself is opposed to a natural right; but whatever is evil because it is forbidden is opposed to a positive right.
In regard to the first he says, but for the unjust, i.e., those who act against the natural law: they have transgressed the laws, they have changed the ordinances, they have broken the everlasting covenant (Isa 24:5). In regard to the second he says, and disobedient to human precepts: disobedient to parents (Rom 1:30). And these two types bear on the nature of sin.
But he mentions others which are based on one's relationship to others: these are against God or against one's neighbor or against oneself. Against God it is called ungodliness, because godliness is concerned with the worship of God; hence he says, for the ungodly. Against one's neighbor he says, for sinners: the wicked shall not rise again in judgment, nor sinners in the council of the just (Ps 1:5); we by nature are Jews and not sinners of the gentiles (Gal 2:15).
But according to Augustine, sins are distinguished into two types: spiritual, which are called deeds, and carnal, which are called shameful acts; hence he says, for the wicked in regard to spiritual sins: he who hides his sins shall not prosper (Prov 28:13); in regard to the carnal sins he says, and defiled: Judah has profaned the holiness of the Lord which he loved (Mal 2:11).
Then he lists sins specifically: first, he names certain specific sins; second, he subsumes all of them under a general category: and whatever other thing is contrary to sound doctrine. In regard to the first he does two things; first, he mentions sinful deeds; second, the sinful persons, at for liars, for perjured persons. In regard to the first: first, he lists sinful deeds; second, shameful acts.
Sins of deed are those directed toward injuring one's neighbor; and the closer such a person is to the sinner, the graver is the sin, because relatives have a closer tie with us. First, therefore, he speaks of one's father; second, of his mother: honor your father and your mother (Exod 20:12); he who strikes his father or mother shall be put to death (Exod 21:15). Then he continues with other sins against one's neighbor which he says, for manslayers: if a man kill his neighbor on set purpose and by lying in wait for him: you shall take him away from my altar, that he may die (Exod 21:14).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
πόρνοις, ἀρσενοκοίταις, ἀνδραποδισταῖς, ψεύσταις, ἐπιόρκοις, καὶ εἴ τι ἕτερον τῇ ὑγιαινούσῃ διδασκαλίᾳ ἀντίκειται,
блꙋдникѡ́мъ, мꙋжело́жникѡмъ, разбо́йникѡмъ, (клеветникѡ́мъ, скотоло́жникѡмъ,) лжи̑вымъ, клѧтвопрестꙋ́пникѡмъ, и҆ а҆́ще что̀ и҆́но здра́вомꙋ ᲂу҆че́нїю проти́витсѧ,
"For murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liers, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine."
For all the things which he had mentioned were the passions of a corrupted soul, and contrary, therefore, to sound doctrine.
Homily on 1 Timothy 2
Although what had been said was sufficient, nevertheless for the sake of completeness the apostle also added in general: "and for everything." From this it becomes clear that such passions gain access from distorted dogmas, for they are all contrary to sound teaching.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Then he lists the shameful acts: first, those which are according to nature, which he says, for fornicators: fornicators and adulterers God will judge (Heb 13:4); second, those against nature, when he says, for those who defile themselves with mankind: nor the effeminate shall possess the kingdom of God (1 Cor 6:10).
Then he mentions sins of the tongue, when he says, for liars: therefore, putting away lying, speak the truth, every man with his neighbor (Eph 4:25). Second, sins in relation to oaths, when he says, for perjured persons.
Then he gathers all these sins under one heading when he says, and whatever other thing is contrary to sound doctrine: and you shall not find iniquity in my tongue; neither shall folly be found in my mouth (Job 6:30); speak you the things that become sound doctrine (Titus 2:1).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.
κατὰ τὸ εὐαγγέλιον τῆς δόξης τοῦ μακαρίου Θεοῦ, ὃ ἐπιστεύθην ἐγώ.
по бл҃говѣ́стїю сла́вы бл҃же́ннагѡ бг҃а, є҆́же мнѣ̀ ᲂу҆вѣ́рено бы́сть.
"According to the glorious Gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust."
Thus the Law is still necessary for the confirmation of the Gospel, yet to those who obey it is unnecessary. And he calls the Gospel "glorious." There were some who were ashamed of its persecutions, and of the sufferings of Christ, and so for the sake of these, as well as for others, he has called it "the glorious Gospel," thus showing that the sufferings of Christ are our glory. And perhaps he glances too at the future. For if our present state is exposed to shame and reproach, it will not be so hereafter; and it is to things future, and not to things present, that the Gospel belongs. Why then did the Angel say, "Behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, for unto you is born a Saviour"? (Luke ii. 10.) Because He was born to be their Saviour, though His miracles did not commence from His birth. "According to the Gospel," he saith, "of the blessed God." The glory he means is either that of the service of God, or, in that if present things are filled with its glory, yet much more will things future be so; when "His enemies shall be put under His feet" (1 Cor. xv. 25), when there shall be nothing opposed, when the just shall behold all those blessed things, which "eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, and which hath not entered into the heart of man." (1 Cor. ii. 9.) "For I will" says our Saviour, "that they also may be with Me, where I am, that they may behold My glory, which Thou hast given Me." (John xvii. 24.)
Homily on 1 Timothy 2
according to the Gospel of the glory of the blessed God, which was committed to me.
according to the Gospel of glory. But what is sound doctrine? It is that which is according to the Gospel of God. That Gospel is called the Gospel of glory, because through it Christ, who chose the cross, is most glorified.
Concerning Paul's own calling to be an evangelist, by grace of God, from being a persecutor.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
So connect this passage with the words: "contrary to sound doctrine" (1 Tim. 1:10), which is "according to the gospel." And he calls it the gospel of glory for the sake of those who are ashamed of persecutions and the sufferings of Christ, showing that both the sufferings of Christ and persecutions constitute the glory of Christ. Or else the apostle calls the Gospel the gospel of glory because he hints at the future glory. For if, he says, our present state is full of shame, the future one is glorious. And this glory the Gospel proclaims to us, for the entire gospel relates to the future, not to the present time. Or else the apostle speaks here of the service to God, which the Gospel teaches us.
Me, and not the false apostles: their gospel is a gospel of dishonor, and not of glory.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Then when he says, which is according to the Gospel, he shows that the Gospel spreads sound doctrine, which is described from three things: first, from the end when he says, of the glory, which it announces: declare his glory among the gentiles (Ps 95:3); second, from the author of glory, when he says, of the blessed God: which in his times he shall show who is the blessed and only mighty, the king of kings and the lord of lords (1 Tim 6:15). Third, from the minister, when he says, which has been committed to my trust: when they had seen that to me had been committed the gospel of the uncircumcision (Gal 2:7).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that he counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry;
Καὶ χάριν ἔχω τῷ ἐνδυναμώσαντί με Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ τῷ Κυρίῳ ἡμῶν, ὅτι πιστόν με ἡγήσατο, θέμενος εἰς διακονίαν
[Заⷱ҇ 280] И҆ благодарю̀ ᲂу҆крѣплѧ́ющаго мѧ̀ хрⷭ҇та̀ і҆и҃са гдⷭ҇а на́шего, ꙗ҆́кѡ вѣ́рна мѧ̀ непщева̀, положи́въ (мѧ̀) въ слꙋ́жбꙋ,
Consider how he abounds in the expressions of humility. For so “to me last of all he appeared,” he says. He views himself alone “as one born out of due time.” He himself is “the least of all the apostles,” and not even worthy of this appellation. And he was not content even with these, but that he might not seem in mere words to be humble-minded, he states both reasons and proofs: of his being “one born out of due time,” his seeing Jesus last; and of his being unworthy even of the name of an apostle, “his persecuting the church.” For one who is simply humble-minded sets down the reasons for his contrition. To Timothy he makes mention of these same things, saying, “I thank him who has given me strength for this, Christ Jesus our Lord, because he judged me faithful by appointing me to his service, though I formerly blasphemed and persecuted and insulted him.”
Homilies on First Corinthians 38.5
If you have sinned and God has pardoned your sin, receive your pardon and give thanks. But do not be forgetful of your sin. It is not that you should fret over the thought of it, but that you may school your soul not to grow lax or relapse again into the same snares. This is what Paul did, not hiding his actions as a blasphemer, persecutor and injurer. It is as if he were saying: “Let the life of your servant be openly exposed, so that the loving kindness of the Lord might be all the more apparent. For although I have received the remission of sins, I do not reject the memory of those sins.” And this not only made transparent the loving kindness of the Lord but made the man himself the more remarkable. For when you have learned who he was before, then you will be the more astonished at him. When you see what he came to be out of what he was, then you will commend him the more. So if you have greatly sinned, you yourself upon being changed will hope all the more by seeing him. Such an example comforts those who are in despair and causes them again to stand tall.
Homilies Concerning the Statues 12.1
The advantages arising from humility are generally acknowledged, and yet it is a thing not easily to be met with. There is affectation of humble talking enough and to spare, but humbleness of mind is nowhere to be found. This quality was so cultivated by the blessed Paul, that he is ever looking out for inducements to be humble. They who are conscious to themselves of great merits must struggle much with themselves if they would be humble. And he too was one likely to be under violent temptations, his own good conscience swelling him up like a gathering humor. Observe therefore his method in this place. "I was intrusted," he had said, "with the glorious Gospel of God, of which they who still adhere to the law have no right to partake; for it is now opposed to the Gospel, and their difference is such, that those who are actuated by the one, are as yet unworthy to partake of the other; as we should say, that those who require punishments, and chains, have no right to be admitted into the train of philosophers." Being filled therefore with high thoughts, and having used magnificent expressions, he at once depresses himself, and engages others also to do the like. Having said therefore that "the Gospel was committed to his trust"; lest this should seem to be said from pride, he checks himself at once, adding by way of correction, "I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that He counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry." Thus everywhere, we see, he conceals his own merit, and ascribes everything to God, yet so far only, as not to take away free will. For the unbeliever might perhaps say, If everything is of God, and we contribute nothing of ourselves, while He turns us, as if we were mere wood and stone, from wickedness to the love of wisdom, why then did He make Paul such as he was, and not Judas? To remove this objection, mark the prudence of his expression, "Which was committed," he says, "to my trust." This was his own excellence and merit, but not wholly his own; for he says, "I thank Christ Jesus, who enabled me." This is God's part: then his own again, "Because He counted me faithful." Surely because he would be serviceable of his own part.
Homily on 1 Timothy 3
And what is this, "Who enabled me"? I will tell you. He had so heavy a burden to sustain, that he needed much aid from above. For think what it was to be exposed to daily insults, and mockeries, and snares, and dangers, scoffs, and reproaches, and deaths; and not to faint, or slip, or turn backward, but though assaulted every day with darts innumerable, to bear up manfully, and remain firm and imperturbable. This was the effect of no human power, and yet not of Divine influence alone, but of his own resolution also. For that Christ chose him with a foreknowledge of what he would be, is plain from the testimony He bore to him before the commencement of his preaching. "He is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles and kings." (Acts ix. 15.) For as those who bear the royal standard in war require both strength and address, that they may not let it fall into the hands of the enemy; so those who sustain the name of Christ, not only in war but in peace, need a mighty strength, to preserve it uninjured from the attacks of accusers. Great indeed is the strength required to bear the name of Christ, and to sustain it well, and bear the Cross. For he who in action, or word, or thought, does anything unworthy of Christ, does not sustain His name, and has not Christ dwelling in him. For he that sustains that name bears it in triumph, not in the concourse of men, but through the very heavens, while all angels stand in awe, and attend upon him, and admire him.
Homily on 1 Timothy 3
"I thank the Lord, who hath enabled me." Observe how he thanks God even for that which was his own part. For he acknowledges it as a favor from Him that he was "a chosen vessel." For this, O blessed Paul, was thy own part. "For God is no respecter of persons." But I thank Him that he "thought me worthy of this ministry." For this is a proof that He esteemed me faithful. The steward in a house is not only thankful to his master that he is trusted, but considers it as a sign that he holds him more faithful than others: so it is here.
Homily on 1 Timothy 3
And I am grateful to Christ Jesus our Lord, who has strengthened me, because He considered me faithful, appointing me to minister.
Since Paul said, "which was committed to me," (1 Tim. 1:11) so that he might not seem to boast, he attributes everything to God, and he says, "I have grace because He has given me this power," for the Gospel to be entirely believed.
who has strengthened me." For Paul says, I have been given a great burden, and I am in need of much strength from God.
because He considered me faithful. Then Paul shows that something has also been brought in from us. For God is not indiscriminately selective of some. For the matter would have been disapproved. And he says; "because He considered me faithful." But how could God consider one who is not worthy of faith to be faithful? He is faithful, who does not take any of God's things to himself, but also commits his own things to God.
to minister. That is, of the Gospel. He says "minster" because it means to preach. The proof that I considered myself trustworthy is that the ministry of the Gospel was entrusted to me.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Since he said: "which was committed to my trust" (1 Tim. 1:11), then, lest it seem that he is boasting, he refers everything to God, and says: one must thank Him Who gave me the strength to be able to take upon myself such a burden. Indeed, it was not proper to human strength — to stand against daily dangers threatening death. Such is true humility: but our humility is in words, and not in the depths of the soul.
Lest any of the unbelievers should say: if everything belongs to God and nothing is contributed by us, then why did He make Paul such but not Judas? — the apostle, removing this objection, says: God did not simply strengthen me, nor without consideration, but because I proved faithful. He did not even say it that way, but: "He counted me faithful," again concealing his own merits. I do not claim, he says, that I was faithful, but that He counted me as such. How is this evident? From the fact that He appointed me to the ministry. For how would He have appointed me if He had not seen capability in me? This is like how in households stewards give thanks to their masters for the management entrusted to them, which they present as a sign that their masters consider them more worthy of trust than others. And God says of him: "he is My chosen vessel, to proclaim My name" (Acts 9:15). Thus, he was fit not only for preaching, but also to accomplish in deed that for which he was deemed fit — for this he received power from God. For whoever intends to preach the name of Christ, the great name, so as to impress it upon the souls of believers through preaching, has need of no small power. This is accomplished by the one who in all things worthily both thinks, and speaks, and acts regarding it; whoever is not such does not accomplish it. For how can one preach Christ who does not have Christ wholly within himself? Thus, in all things Paul was faithful, and he attributed nothing to himself of what belonged to the Lord; on the contrary, even his own he called God's. "I labored," he says, "more than all of them, yet not I, but the grace of God" (1 Cor. 15:10), and much else of the same kind.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Then when he says, I gave him thanks, he proves by his own experience what he had been during the time of the law, and what he had acquired in the time of grace: first, he shows what had happened to him during both times; second, he urges Timothy to imitate him, at this precept, I commend to you. In regard to the first he does two things: first, he shows what has been given to him under the law, and what was given to him under the Gospel; second, he assigns the reason, at a faithful saying. The first part is divided into three parts: first, he shows the dignity he received under the Gospel; second, the sins to which he was subject under the law, at who before was a blasphemer; third, how he was liberated, at but I obtained the mercy of God.
But in order to be a minister of the Gospel three things are required: first, that he be assigned to it: how shall they preach, unless they be sent (Rom 10:15); second, that he be fit, i.e., that he be faithful: here now it is required of a minister that he be found faithful (1 Cor 4:2); third, that he be strong enough to carry on.
He lists these three things in reverse order, saying: I give him thanks who has strengthened me to pursue the tasks imposed: the hand of the Lord was with me, strengthening me (Exod 3:14); then the second, when he says, for that he has counted me faithful, putting me in the ministry: who is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord has appointed over his family (Matt 24:45); and this because he sought only the things of God. He enlarges on the first, when he says, in the ministry, i.e., entrusting this ministry to me: separate me Saul and Barnabas for the work whereunto I have taken them (Acts 13:2); they are the ministers of Christ: I am more (2 Cor 11:23).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.
τὸν πρότερον ὄντα βλάσφημον καὶ διώκτην καί ὑβριστήν· ἀλλ’ ἠλεήθην, ὅτι ἀγνοῶν ἐποίησα ἐν ἀπιστίᾳ,
бы́вша мѧ̀ и҆ногда̀ хꙋ́льника и҆ гони́телѧ и҆ досади́телѧ: но поми́лованъ бы́хъ, ꙗ҆́кѡ невѣ́дый сотвори́хъ въ невѣ́рствїи:
For, when affirming that Christ came for this end, that He might save sinners, of whom himself had been the "first," what does he add? "And I obtained mercy, because I did (so) ignorantly in unbelief." Thus that clemency of God, preferring the repentance of a sinner to his death, looks at such as are ignorant still, and still unbelieving, for the sake of whose liberation Christ came; not (at such) as already know God, and have learnt the sacrament of the faith.
On Modesty
For one who errs by simplicity may be pardoned, as the blessed Apostle Paul says of himself, "I who at first was a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious; yet obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly."
Epistle LXXII
At this point in my discourse I confess my amazement at the wise dispensation of the Holy Spirit, in limiting the epistles of the others to a small number but granting grace to Paul, the former persecutor, to write fourteen. For it was not as though Peter and John were less than Paul that he withheld the gift in their case—God forbid!—but that his doctrine might be beyond question, he gave the grace to the former enemy and persecutor to write more, that thus we might all be confirmed in our faith. Indeed, all were astonished at Paul and said, “Is not this he who used to make havoc” previously “and who has come here for the purpose of taking us in bonds to Jerusalem?” Do not be astonished, Paul says, “I know that ‘it is hard for me to kick against the goad.’21 I know that ‘I am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God,’ but ‘I acted ignorantly.’ For I considered the preaching of Christ to be the destruction of the law, for I did not know that he came ‘to fulfill the law, not to destroy it.’23 But ‘the grace of our Lord has abounded beyond measure in me.’ ”
Catechetical Lecture 10:18
Then observe how he magnifies the mercy and loving-kindness of God, in describing his former life, "who was formerly," he says, "a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious." And when he speaks of the still unbelieving Jews, he rather extenuates their guilt. "For I bear them record that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge." (Rom. x. 2.) But of himself he says, "Who was a blasphemer and a persecutor." Observe his lowering of himself! So free was he from self-love, so full of humility, that he is not satisfied to call himself a persecutor and a blasphemer, but he aggravates his guilt, showing that it did not stop with himself, that it was not enough that he was a blasphemer, but in the madness of his blasphemy he persecuted those who were willing to be godly.
Homily on 1 Timothy 3
"But I obtained mercy because I did it ignorantly in unbelief."
Why then did other Jews not obtain mercy? Because what they did, they did not ignorantly, but willfully, well knowing what they did. For this we have the testimony of the Evangelist. "Many of the Jews believed on Him, but because of the Pharisees they did not confess Him. For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God." (John xii. 42, 43.) And Christ again said to them, "How can ye believe, who receive honor one of another" (John v. 44)? and the parents of the blind man "said these things for fear of the Jews, lest they should be put out of the synagogue." (John ix. 22) Nay the Jews themselves said, "Perceive ye how we avail nothing? behold, the world is gone after Him." (John xii. 19) Thus their love of power was everywhere in their way. When they admitted that no one can forgive sins but God only, and Christ immediately did that very thing, which they had confessed to be a sign of divinity, this could not be a case of ignorance.
Homily on 1 Timothy 3
But where was Paul then? Perhaps one should say he was sitting at the feet of Gamaliel, and took no part with the multitude who conspired against Jesus: for Gamaliel does not appear to have been an ambitious man. Then how is it that afterwards Paul was found joining with the multitude? He saw the doctrine growing, and on the point of prevailing, and being generally embraced. For in the lifetime of Christ, the disciples consorted with Him, and afterwards with their teachers, but when they were completely separated, Paul did not act as the other Jews did, from the love of power, but from zeal. For what was the motive of his journey to Damascus? He thought the doctrine pernicious, and was afraid that the preaching of it would spread everywhere. But with the Jews it was no concern for the multitude, but the love of power, that influenced their actions. Hence they say, "The Romans will come and take away both our place and nation." (John xi. 48.) What fear was this that agitated them, but that of man?
Homily on 1 Timothy 3
But it is worthy of enquiry, how one so skillful in the law as Paul could be ignorant? For it is he who says, "which He had promised before by His holy prophets." (Rom. iv. 2.) How is it then that thou knowest not, thou who art zealous of the law of their fathers, who wert brought up at the feet of Gamaliel? Yet they who spent their days on lakes and rivers, and the very publicans, have embraced the Gospel, whilst thou that studiest the law art persecuting it! It is for this he condemns himself, saying, "I am not meet to be called an Apostle." (1 Cor. ix. 9.) It is for this he confesses his ignorance, which was produced by unbelief. For this cause, he says, that he obtained "mercy." What then does he mean when he says, "He counted me faithful"? He would give up no right of his Master's: even his own part he ascribed to Him, and assumed nothing to himself, nor claimed for his own the glory which was due to God. Hence in another place we find him exclaiming, "Sirs, why do ye these things to us? we also are men of like passions with you." (Acts xiv. 15.) So again, "He counted me faithful." And again, "I labored more abundantly than they all, yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me." (1 Cor. xv. 10.) And again, "It is He that worketh in us both to will and to do." (Phil. ii. 13.) Thus in acknowledging that he "obtained mercy," he owns that he deserved punishment, since mercy is for such. And again in another place he says of the Jews, "Blindness in part is happened to Israel." (Rom. xi. 25)
Homily on 1 Timothy 3
We heard the reading from the apostle, and perhaps some of you may be worried by what is written there, “According to the justice which is from the law, I was without reproach. Whatever was a gain for me, that I have regarded as a dead loss on account of Christ.” Then he went on to say, “I have reckoned it to be not only a dead loss, but even muck, that I may gain Christ and may be found in him, not having my own justice which is from the law, but the justice which is from the faith of Jesus Christ.” The question is, how could he consider conducting himself without reproach according to the justice which is from the law, to be so much muck and loss? After all, who gave the law?… But let us listen to what he says in another place, “It was not as a result of works,” he says, “which we have done ourselves, but according to his own mercy that he saved us, by means of the bath of rebirth.” And again, “I, who was previously a blasphemer and persecutor, and an overbearing man; but I obtained mercy,” and so on. On the one hand he affirmed that he conducted himself without reproach; on the other he confessed he had been a sinner of such proportions that no sinners need despair of themselves, precisely because even Paul had found remission.
Sermons 170.1
From being a persecutor he was changed into “a preacher and the teacher of the nations.” “Previously,” he says, “I was a blasphemer and persecutor and an insolent man. But the reason I obtained mercy was this, that Christ Jesus might demonstrate his forbearance first of all in me, and for the instruction of those who were going to trust him for eternal life.” It is by the grace of God, you see, that we are saved from our sins, in which we are languishing. God alone is the medicine that cures the soul. The soul was well able to injure itself but quite unable to cure itself. In the body, too, after all, people have it in their power to get sick, but not equally in their power to get better. I mean, if they exceed the proper limits, and live self-indulgent lives and do all the things that undermine the constitution and are injurious to health, the day comes, if that’s what they want, when they fall sick. When they’ve so fallen, though, they don’t get better. In order to fall sick, you see, they apply themselves to self-indulgence. But in order to get better, they must apply the doctor’s services to their health.… And so it goes with the soul.
Sermons 278.1-2
What then is this “grace for grace”? By faith we first win God’s favor; and for us who were not worthy to have our sins forgiven, from the very fact that, though unworthy, we received so great a gift, it is called grace. What is grace? That which is given gratuitously. That which is bestowed, not paid back. If it was owed, recompense was paid, not grace bestowed.… Having acquired this grace of faith, you will be just by faith. “For the just man lives by faith.” And you will first win God’s favor from living by faith. When you have won God’s favor from living by faith, you will receive as a reward immortality and everlasting life. And that is grace.… Paul acknowledges this grace when he says that he had before been a blasphemer and a persecutor, and insulting, “but I obtained mercy.”
Tractates on John 3.9-10
Paul introduces a new kind of admonition by exhorting others “by the mercy of God.” Why does he not exhort through God’s might, or majesty, or glory? Why by his mercy? Because it was through that mercy alone that Paul escaped from the criminal state of a persecutor and obtained the dignity of his great apostolate. He himself tells us this, “For I formerly was a blasphemer, a persecutor and a bitter adversary; but I obtained the mercy of God.” … “I exhort you by the mercy of God.” Paul asks—rather, God himself is asking through Paul—for God has greater desire to be loved than feared. God is asking because he wants to be not so much a Lord as a Father.
Sermons 108
though I was formerly a blasphemer and a persecutor and a violent man; but I was shown mercy because I acted ignorantly in unbelief.
though I was formerly a blasphemer. See how Paul increases the mercy of God, remembering his former life, and showing whom he chose to have mercy on.
And a persecutor. For Paul would say: Not only was I uttering blasphemies, but also by persecuting others, I compelled them to speak blasphemies.
but I was shown mercy. Paul shows himself worthy of punishment, for mercy is shown in these cases.
because I acted ignorantly. If Paul did it ignorantly, he was shown mercy; why then were not the Jews also shown mercy? And we say, first of all, that they do not want it. For those who approached Christ were shown mercy. But why did not all see the vision as Paul did? For if so, all would have approached. Because Paul persecuted out of ignorance, but those others did so knowingly. Heard the evangelist saying that many of the Pharisees and Jews believed, but they did not confess it; "For they loved the glory of men more than the glory of God." (Jn. 12:43) And again Jesus said to them; "How can you believe, who receive glory from one another?" (Jn. 5:44) And again: "This they said, his parents said, because of the Jews, so that they themselves would not be put out of the synagogue." (Jn. 9:22) And the Jews themselves were saying, "Do you see that we are not benefiting at all? Behold, the whole world is going after him." (Jn. 12:19) Did you see them sinning in knowledge, for the sake of ambition? At that time Paul was perhaps at the feet of Gamaliel, not associating with the crowd, and after that, seeing the faith of Christ increasing, he was zealous with the zeal of God, though not in full knowledge.
in unbelief. From the law, Paul read about Christ. Therefore, since he did not immediately believe in Christ, he calls the matter concern, born from unbelief.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
See how he, describing his former life, exalts the mercy of God. Even when he speaks of the Jews, who are worthy of every contempt, he ascribes nothing of the sort to them, but about himself he recounts thus: not only, he says, was I myself a blasphemer, and not only did I strengthen evil within myself, but I also persecuted those who wished to live piously, and I did not simply do this, but with particular ferocity.
He shows himself worthy of punishment, though the mercy of God extends even to such people. Why then were the other Jews not shown mercy? Because they sinned not out of ignorance, but quite deliberately. For "many," he says, "believed in Him, but because of the Pharisees they did not confess Him,... for they loved the glory of men more than the glory of God" (John 12:42–43). And Christ says: "How can you believe, when you receive glory from one another?" (John 5:44). And the Jews themselves said among themselves: "Do you see that you are gaining nothing? The whole world has gone after Him" (John 12:19). They were always driven by the passion for preeminence. And again, they themselves said: "Who can forgive sins but God alone?" (Luke 5:21). Then Jesus immediately performed that which they held to be a sign of divine power. So why then did they not believe? Was it out of ignorance? But perhaps someone will say: where was Paul at that time? — At the feet of Gamaliel, who had nothing in common with the rebellious crowd: he was occupied with his own affairs. How then did Paul afterwards imprison people? He saw that the preaching was spreading, and ultimately zeal for the law drove him to this, whereas the Jews did everything out of love of power. But how is it that Paul, being so learned in the law, did not recognize Christ through Scripture? He condemns himself precisely for this — that he suffered from ignorance which arose from unbelief, for which reason, he says, he was shown mercy.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
But what sort of person was he under the law? A sinner, first of all, against God: who before was a blasphemer of Christ's name: bring forth the blasphemer without the camp and let them that heard him put their hands upon his head, and let all the people stone him (Lev 24:14). Hence this statement referred to him. Second, against his neighbor, and a persecutor: I am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God (1 Cor 15:9). And contumelious in words and deeds: I heard the reproaches of many (Jer 20:10).
Then when he says, but I obtained the mercy of God, he shows how he was freed through Christ. In regard to this he does two things: first, he states that mercy freed him; second, that now he has a superabundance of goods, at now the grace.
In regard to the first he says, but I obtained the mercy of God: the mercies of the Lord that we are not consumed (Lam 3:22); he has mercy on whom he will: and whom he wills he hardens (Rom 9:18). But on my part there is some excuse, because I did it ignorantly. He says less than he means to say, because it is one thing to act ignorantly, and something else to act through ignorance: one acts ignorantly, if he does not know what he is doing; but even if he knew, he would still do it: as in the case of a person who, believing that he is killing a wild animal, actually kills his enemy, whom he would gladly have killed in any case. But one acts through ignorance, when he does something which he would not have done had he known: as when a person actually kills his father, whom he would not have killed, had he known, but whom he nevertheless has killed, thinking that it was his enemy.
But Paul acted through ignorance, because if he had known that Christ is the Son of God, he would not have acted as he did. But the Jews did not kill Christ through ignorance, but ignorantly, because if they had known he was the Christ, they would still have killed him: and that servant who knows the will of his lord and did not according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes (Luke 12:47).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.
ὑπερεπλεόνασε δὲ ἡ χάρις τοῦ Κυρίου ἡμῶν μετὰ πίστεως καὶ ἀγάπης τῆς ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ.
ᲂу҆преꙋмно́жисѧ же блгⷣть гдⷭ҇а на́шегѡ (і҆и҃са хрⷭ҇та̀) съ вѣ́рою и҆ любо́вїю ꙗ҆́же ѡ҆ хрⷭ҇тѣ̀ і҆и҃сѣ.
"And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus."
This is added, lest hearing that he obtained mercy, we should understand by it only, that being deserving of punishment, as a persecutor and blasphemer, nevertheless he was not punished. But mercy was not confined to this, that punishment was not inflicted; many other great favors are implied by it. For not only has God released us from the impending punishment, but He has made us "righteous" too, and "sons," and "brethren," and "heirs," and "joint-heirs." Therefore it is he says, that "grace was exceeding abundant." For the gifts bestowed were beyond mercy, since they are not such as would come of mercy only, but of affection and excessive love.
Homily on 1 Timothy 3
Having thus enlarged upon the love of God which, not content with showing mercy to a blasphemer and persecutor, conferred upon him other blessings in abundance, he has guarded against that error of the unbelievers which takes away free will, by adding, "with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus." Thus much only, he says, did we contribute. We have believed that He is able to save us.
Homily on 1 Timothy 3
And the grace of our Lord overflowed exceedingly with faith and love which are in Christ Jesus.
the grace of our Lord overflowed exceedingly. For not only, he says, did He leave unpunished one deserving of punishment, but He also justified him, and made him a son, and a friend, and an heir.
with faith and love. Moreover, it abounded with my faith and love, and both came to me through Christ himself.
For he says "in Christ Jesus." And Paul spoke of faith and love, that it is one thing to believe, but not to do the things of those who love Christ. However, he showed that it is necessary for us to bear something as well.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Having said much and great things about the love of Christ for mankind, about how He showed mercy to him who was worthy of the most terrible punishment, he now says that He not only granted this, but also deemed him worthy of adoption, made him a brother, a son, a friend, and a co-heir: so abundantly was the grace of His love for mankind revealed. But lest someone say: since everywhere it is grace, therefore there is no free will, the apostle adds: "with faith and love." For faith, he says, I contributed by believing that He can save me; and love I also acquired myself "in Christ Jesus": because the cause of my love for God is Christ, and not the law. By this he shows that love must be joined with faith. For the fulfillment of the commandments depends on love, as the Lord said: "If you love Me, keep My commandments" (Jn. 14:15).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
In regard to the second he says, now the grace of our Lord has abounded exceedingly: and where sin abounded, grace did more abound (Rom 5:20); with faith and love. For he produced the effect of faith through the active love which is in Christ Jesus: through Christ Jesus that we may receive the promise of the Spirit by faith (Gal 3:14).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.
Πιστὸς ὁ λόγος καὶ πάσης ἀποδοχῆς ἄξιος, ὅτι Χριστὸς Ἰησοῦς ἦλθεν εἰς τὸν κόσμον ἁμαρτωλοὺς σῶσαι, ὧν πρῶτός εἰμι ἐγώ·
[Заⷱ҇] Вѣ́рно сло́во и҆ всѧ́кагѡ прїѧ́тїѧ досто́йно, ꙗ҆́кѡ хрⷭ҇то́съ і҆и҃съ прїи́де въ мі́ръ грѣ́шники спⷭ҇тѝ, ѿ ни́хже пе́рвый є҆́смь а҆́зъ.
For this (rule), even in his own person, the apostle has laid down. For, when affirming that Christ came for this end, that He might save sinners, of whom himself had been the "first," what does he add? "And I obtained mercy, because I did (so) ignorantly in unbelief.
On Modesty
Moreover, Paul says in the epistle to Timothy, even though he himself had later become an apostle of Jesus, “this is a faithful saying, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief.” For some unknown reason he [Celsus] forgot or did not think of saying anything about Paul, who after Jesus established the churches in Christ.… Why then is it outrageous if Jesus, wanting to show mankind the extent of his ability to heal souls, chose infamous and most wicked men and led them on so far that they were an example of the purest moral character to those who were converted by them to the gospel of Christ?
Against Celsus 1.63
What the apostles received, they passed on without change, so that the doctrine of the mysteries (the sacraments) and Christ would remain correct. The divine Word—the Son of God—wants us to be their (the apostles') disciples. It is appropriate for them to be our teachers, and it is necessary for us to submit to their teaching alone. Only from them and from those who have faithfully taught their doctrine do we get, as Paul writes, “faithful words, worthy of complete acceptance.” With them we are back to ground level, because they did not become disciples as a result of what they heard from others. Rather, they were eyewitnesses and servants of God the Word, and they handed down what they heard directly from him.
Letter 2, Section 7
It is no humility to think that you are a sinner when you really are a sinner. But whenever one is conscious of having done many great deeds but does not imagine that he is something great in himself, that is true humility. When a man is like Paul and can say, "I have nothing on my conscience," and then can add, "But I am not justified by this," and can say again, "Christ Jesus came to save sinners of whom I am the chief," that is true humility. That man is truly humble who does exalted deeds but, in his own mind, sees himself as lowly.
On the Incomprehensible Nature of God 5.6
The favors of God so far exceed human hope and expectation, that often they are not believed. For God has bestowed upon us such things as the mind of man never looked for, never thought of. It is for this reason that the Apostles spend much discourse in securing a belief of the gifts that are granted us of God. For as men, upon receiving some great good, ask themselves if it is not a dream, as not believing it; so it is with respect to the gifts of God. What then was it that was thought incredible? That those who were enemies, and sinners, neither justified by the law, nor by works, should immediately through faith alone be advanced to the highest favor. Upon this head accordingly Paul has discoursed at length in his Epistle to the Romans, and here again at length. "This is a faithful saying," he says, "and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners."
As the Jews were chiefly attracted by this, he persuades them not to give heed to the law, since they could not attain salvation by it without faith. Against this he contends; for it seemed to them incredible, that a man who had mis-spent all his former life in vain and wicked actions, should afterwards be saved by his faith alone. On this account he says, "It is a saying to be believed."
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
"This is a faithful saying," he says. But why is it to be believed?
This appears both from what precedes and from what follows. Observe how he prepares us for this assertion, and how he then dwells upon it. For he hath previously declared that He showed mercy to me "a blasphemer and a persecutor"; this was in the way of preparation. And not only did He show mercy, but "He accounted me faithful." So far should we be he means, from disbelieving that He showed mercy. For no one, who should see a prisoner admitted into a palace, could doubt whether he obtained mercy. And this was visibly the situation of Paul, for he makes himself the example. Nor is he ashamed to call himself a sinner, but rather delights in it, as he thus can best demonstrate the miracle of God's regard for him, and that He had thought him worthy of such extraordinary kindness.
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
But how is it, that he here calls himself a sinner, nay, the chief of sinners, whereas he elsewhere asserts that he was "touching the righteousness which is in the law blameless"? Because with respect to the righteousness which God has wrought, the justification which is really sought, even those who are righteous in the law are sinners, "for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God." Therefore he does not say righteousness simply, but "the righteousness which is in the law." As a man that has acquired wealth, with respect to himself appears rich, but upon a comparison with the treasures of kings is very poor and the chief of the poor; so it is in this case. Compared with Angels, even righteous men are sinners; and if Paul, who wrought the righteousness that is in the law, was the chief of sinners, what other man can be called righteous? For he says not this to condemn his own life as impure, let not this be imagined; but comparing his own legal righteousness with the righteousness of God, he shows it to be nothing worth, and not only so, but he proves those who possess it to be sinners.
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
They may choose to read, “It is a man’s saying, and worthy of all acceptation.” We are content to err with the Greeks, that is to say, with the apostle himself, who spoke Greek. Our version, therefore, is, “it is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation.”
Letters 27.3
We heard the blessed apostle Paul saying, “The word is human and worthy of total acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the foremost.” So it’s a human word, and worthy of total acceptance. Why human, and not divine? Without the slightest doubt, unless this word were also divine, it would not be worthy of total acceptance. But this word is both human and divine in the same sort of way that Christ himself is both man and God. So if we are right in understanding this word to be not only human but also divine, why did the apostle prefer to call it human rather than divine?… So the aspect he chose was the one by which Christ came into the world. He came, after all, insofar as he was man. Because insofar as he was God, he was always there.
Sermons 174.1
There was no reason for Christ the Lord to come, except to save sinners. Eliminate diseases, eliminate wounds, and there is no call for medicine. If a great doctor has come down from heaven, a great invalid must have been lying very sick throughout the whole wide world. This invalid is the whole human race.
Sermons 175.1
“For all have sinned,” either in Adam or by themselves, “and are deprived of the glory of God.” Consequently, the whole human mass ought to be punished, and if the deserved punishment of damnation were rendered to all, beyond all doubt it would be justly rendered. This is why those who are liberated from it by grace are not called vessels of their own merits but “vessels of mercy.” But whose mercy was it but him who sent Jesus Christ into this world to save sinners, whom he foreknew, predestined, called, justified and glorified? Hence, who could be so advanced in foolish insanity as not to render ineffable thanks to the mercy of this God who liberates those whom he has wished, considering that one could not in any way reproach the justice of God in condemning all entirely?
On Nature and Grace 1.4.4-1.5.5
Pay attention to the apostle Paul, “The word is faithful and worthy of total acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the first.” He said, “of whom I am the first.” How was he the first? Weren’t there so many Jews who were sinners before him? Weren’t there any sinners before him in the whole human race?… So what’s the meaning of “of whom I am the first”? That I am worse than all of them. By first he meant us to understand worst.… Remember Saul, and you’ll discover why. Isn’t he the one who wasn’t satisfied with only one hand to stone Stephen, and who took care of the coats of the others? Isn’t he the one who persecuted the church everywhere?… So he it is who was the number one persecutor. There was none worse than he.
Sermons 175.6-7
What was foreknown about the malice of Jews and what was properly decreed regarding the passion of Christ were very different and quite contrary. For the will to murder did not proceed from the same place as the will to die. Nor did their heinous crime and the Redeemer’s patience arise from a single spirit. Our Lord did not himself cause the wicked hands of his attackers to be laid on him, but he permitted this. He did not force what was going to happen actually to happen simply by foreknowing it. Yet it was for this purpose that he had taken on flesh, so that it might happen. Finally, so disparate were the motives of the Crucified and of those crucifying, that what was undertaken by Christ could not be abolished, what was committed by those others could indeed have been put to a halt. He who came “to save sinners” did not deny his mercy even to his own murderers, but turned the evil of godless people to the good of believers.
Sermons 67.2-3
The saying is trustworthy and deserving of full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the foremost.
The saying is trustworthy, that is, the spoken word is true. "You will know from me," Paul says. "of whom I am the foremost." And yet elsewhere he says, "According to the righteousness which is in the law made blameless." (Philip. 3:6)
How then does Paul call himself sinful and the foremost of sinners? And we say that righteousness from the law, when compared with that from faith, is not only not righteousness, but also the first sin. "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." (Rom. 3:23) In this comparison, it has also been used elsewhere, where it says: "For even that which has been glorified has not been glorified in this part, because of the surpassing glory." (2 Cor. 3:10)
Commentary on 1 Timothy
This is a short psalm, but it annihilates the boundless wickedness of pagans who believe that the glory of the heavenly majesty could not have descended to the humility of suffering. How foolish they are. For their thinking is confounded by the Source of the world’s realization that it has been freed! As Paul says, “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the chief.”
Explanation of the Psalms 3.9
Having said above that He had mercy on me, a persecutor, he continues: do not marvel and do not doubt the greatness of the gift. For He came into the world for this very reason, to save all sinners. And so the word is faithful and worthy of acceptance. Because it is impossible not to trust what has been granted; on the contrary, since the goodness of the Giver is infinite, it deserves trust and acceptance. This is also directed against the Jews who were devoted to the law, to show them that without faith it is impossible to be saved.
Why then, having said in another place, "as for legalistic righteousness, blameless" (Phil. 3:6), does he now place himself first among sinners? Because before the righteousness in Christ, the righteousness according to the law is now sin, since its time has already passed. While it was its time, it was righteousness, just as at night the moon and a candle are light. But when Christ appeared like the sun, He eclipsed it. Thus, he who makes use of the candle of legalistic righteousness when the sun of Christ's righteousness has shone forth errs and acts foolishly. And in another place the apostle says about this: "what was glorious has come to have no glory" (2 Cor. 3:10).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Above he described his own state both in regard to sins under the law and in regard to good in the time of grace; here he shows the reason of these benefits in terms of divine pity: first, he proposes the divine pity in general; second, he applies it to his case, at of whom I am the chief; third, his thanks, at now to the King of ages. In regard to the first he does two things: first, he commends the truth he is about to propose; second, he shows the divine power, at that Christ Jesus came.
In regard to the first he says, a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners. Now two things make a saying commendable, namely, it is true and it is acceptable. For sometimes a saying is true but hard, and it stirs up hatred: am I then become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? (Gal 4:16). But this saying is, first of all, true; hence he says, a faithful saying: these words are most faithful and true (Rev 22:6). It is also acceptable, because it concerns our salvation; hence he says, and worthy of all acceptation: and the Lord answered the angel who spoke in me good words, comfortable words (Zech 1:13).
Another version reads: a human saying, because it is concerned with men's being uplifted: when the goodness and kindness of God, our Savior, appeared (Titus 3:4).
The saying is this: Christ Jesus came into this world to save sinners. That he came into the world expresses a twofold nature, namely, the divine, in which he existed before he appeared in the world: I came forth from the Father and am come into the world (John 16:28), and the human, in which he appeared. And because he is God, he fills heaven and earth (Jer 23:24). Hence it is not in virtue of his divine nature that he is in a place, but in virtue of the human nature: he was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knows him not (John 1:10).
But why did he come? To save sinners, i.e., for the salvation of all people: God did not send his Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world may be saved by him (John 3:17); I came not to judge the world, but to save the world (John 12:47).
But suppose no one had sinned. Would Christ still have come? It seems not; because he came in order to save sinners. Otherwise, there would have been no need for the Incarnation. Hence, too, a Gloss says: remove the disease, and there is no need for the remedy. The answer to this is clear from the words of the Fathers. But this question is not one of great importance, because God decreed the plan according to which things are to occur. And we do not know what he would have decreed, if he had not foreseen sin. Nevertheless, the Scriptures seem to state expressly that there would have been no Incarnation, if man had not sinned. This is the opinion that I am inclined toward.
Then when he says, of whom I am the chief, he adapts this saying to his own case: first, by admitting that he is a sinner; second, by saying that he was rescued, at but for this cause I have obtained mercy. He says, therefore: of whom I am the chief. Here a heretic says that Adam's soul was in Paul, and passed from body to body. As if to say: I am the chief sinner, because Adam's soul is my soul. But this contradicts the Apostle's statement in Romans: for when the children were not yet born, nor had done any good or evil (that the purpose of God, according to election might stand), not of works but of him who calls, it was said to her: the elder shall serve the younger (Rom 9:11). Therefore, the soul does not exist before the body. He is the chief sinner, therefore, not being first in time but in the amount of guilt: the just is first accuser of himself (Prov 18:17); I am the most foolish of men, and the wisdom of men is not with me (Prov 30:2).
But was the Apostle the greatest of sinners? It seems that Judas was greater. Some say that Paul's sin was more general, because it was against the whole Church. But that means nothing, because Paul acted in unbelief, whereas many Jews persecuted the Church out of malice. The answer is that he is the chief, not in the sense that he was the greatest of all sinners then living, but the greatest of the sinners that had been saved. As if to say: he came to save sinners, of whom I am the chief; which is to be understood of those who had preceded the Apostle, because many others had persecuted the Church before him.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
My religion says nothing about such planes except that all men are on one plane and that by no means a high one. There are saints indeed in my religion: but a saint only means a man who really knows he is a sinner.
Alarms and Discursions, The High Plains (1910)
We actually are, at present, creatures whose character must be, in some respects, a horror to God, as it is, when we really see it, a horror to ourselves. This I believe to be a fact: and I notice that the holier a man is, the more fully he is aware of that fact. Perhaps you have imagined that this humility in the saints is a pious illusion at which God smiles. That is a most dangerous error. It is theoretically dangerous, because it makes you identify a virtue (i.e., a perfection) with an illusion (i.e., an imperfection), which must be nonsense. It is practically dangerous because it encourages a man to mistake his first insights into his own corruption for the first beginnings of a halo round his own silly head. No; depend upon it, when the saints say that they--even they--are vile, they are recording truth with scientific accuracy.
The Problem of Pain, Chapter 4: Human Wickedness
Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.
ἀλλὰ διὰ τοῦτο ἠλεήθην, ἵνα ἐν ἐμοὶ πρώτῳ ἐνδείξηται Ἰησοῦς Χριστὸς τὴν πᾶσαν μακροθυμίαν, πρὸς ὑποτύπωσιν τῶν μελλόντων πιστεύειν ἐπ’ αὐτῷ εἰς ζωὴν αἰώνιον.
Но сегѡ̀ ра́ди поми́лованъ бы́хъ, да во мнѣ̀ пе́рвѣмъ пока́жетъ і҆и҃съ хрⷭ҇то́съ всѐ долготерпѣ́нїе, за ѡ҆́бразъ хотѧ́щихъ вѣ́ровати є҆мꙋ̀ въ жи́знь вѣ́чнꙋю.
To all sins, then, committed whether by flesh or spirit, whether by deed or will, the same God who has destined penalty by means of judgment has nevertheless engaged to grant pardon by means of repentance. For he has said to the people, “Repent, and I will save you”; and again, “I live, says the Lord, and I will have repentance rather than death.” Repentance, then, is “life,” since it is preferred to “death.” That repentance, O sinner, like myself (nay, rather, less than myself, for preeminence in sins I acknowledge to be mine), do you so hasten to so embrace, as a shipwrecked man the protection of some plank. This will draw you forth when sunk in the waves of sins and will bear you forward into the port of the divine clemency.
On Repentance 4
That repentance, O sinner, like myself (nay, rather, less than myself, for pre-eminence in sins I acknowledge to be mine ), do you so hasten to, so embrace, as a shipwrecked man the protection of some plank.
On Repentance
God indeed says that he called Paul on account of his excellent capacity, as he said to Ananias, “for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings.” That is to say, he was capable of service and the accomplishment of great deeds. God gives this as the reason for his call. But Paul himself everywhere ascribes it to grace and to God’s inexpressible mercy. He says this in the words, “I received mercy for this reason, that in me, as the foremost, Jesus Christ might display his perfect patience for an example to those who were to believe in him for eternal life.”
Commentary on Galatians 1
Paul pointed out to all the deeds he had dared to commit before. He thought that it was better for his former life to be publicized to all in order to make evident the greatness of the gift of God than to cover up his ineffable and indescribable mercy by shrinking from proclaiming his own sins to all. He therefore recounted in detail his persecutions, his plots, his fights against the church. He says, "I am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God"; and again, "that Jesus came to save sinners of whom I am the chief." And once more, "You have heard of my former way of life in Judaism; how beyond all measure I persecuted the church of God and ravaged it." Indeed, to give, as it were, some kind of return to Christ for his long-suffering toward him, by telling plainly what sort he was and what an enemy and foe he had saved, he very frankly revealed the battle which in the beginning he had waged with consuming zeal against Christ. And because of this he held out good hope even to those who had despaired of themselves.
Homilies on John 10.1
"Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might show forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on Him to life everlasting."
See how he further humbles and depreciates himself, by naming a fresh and less creditable reason. For that he obtained mercy on account of his ignorance, does not so much imply that he who obtained mercy was a sinner, or under deep condemnation; but to say that he obtained mercy in order that no sinner hereafter might despair of finding mercy, but that each might feel sure of obtaining the like favor, this is an excess of humiliation, such that even in calling himself the chief of sinners, "a blasphemer and a persecutor, and one not meet to be called an Apostle," he had said nothing like it.
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
This will appear by an example. Suppose a populous city, all whose inhabitants were wicked, some more so, and some less, but all deserving of condemnation; and let one among that multitude be more deserving of punishment than all the rest, and guilty of every kind of wickedness. If it were declared that the king was willing to pardon all, it would not be so readily believed, as if they were to see this most wicked wretch actually pardoned. There could then be no longer any doubt. This is what Paul says, that God, willing to give men full assurance that He pardons all their transgressions, chose, as the object of His mercy, him who was more a sinner than any; for when I obtained mercy, he argues, there could be no doubt of others: as familiarly speaking we might say, "If God pardons such an one, he will never punish anybody"; and thus he shows that he himself, though unworthy of pardon, for the sake of others' salvation, first obtained that pardon.
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
Therefore, he says, since I am saved, let no one doubt of salvation. And observe the humility of this blessed man; he says not, "that in me he might show forth" His "longsuffering," but "all longsuffering"; as if he had said, greater longsuffering He could not show in any case than in mine, nor find a sinner that so required all His pardon, all His long-suffering; not a part only, like those who are only partially sinners, but "all" His longsuffering.
"For a pattern to those who should hereafter believe." This is said for comfort, for encouragement. But because he had spoken highly of the Son, and of the great love which He hath manifested, lest he should be thought to exclude the Father from this, he ascribes the glory to Him also.
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
So note how this Saul, later Paul, ironically “congratulates himself” on having attained to the mercy of God, because he was found to be the first, that is the most outstanding, in sins!… This was so that others could all say to themselves, “if Paul was cured, why should I despair? If such a desperately sick man was cured by such a great physician, who am I, not to fit those hands to my wounds, not to hasten to the care of those hands?” That people might be able to say that sort of thing, that’s why Saul was made into an apostle out of a persecutor. When a doctor comes to a new place, he looks for someone there who’s been despaired of and cures him, even if he finds he’s very poor, provided he finds him a desperate case. He is not looking for a fee but displaying his skill.
Sermons 175.9
But for that very reason I was shown mercy, so that in me, the foremost, Jesus Christ might display his unlimited patience as an example to those who would believe in him and receive eternal life.
But for that very reason I was shown mercy. See what humble thing Paul said. He says, "Since I, the most sinful of all, have been saved, there is no longer need to doubt about salvation." For he wants to show that he was not saved as one worthy of salvation, but in order not to cause others to despair of their salvation.
unlimited patience. Oh, the humility of Paul! For every kind of evil, he says, I was in need of unlimited patience, not a part of it, as those who have sinned only in part.
as an example. For encouragement, for demonstration.
to receive eternal life. For the faith that is in Christ is for eternal life.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
We bring to mind how the holy apostle Paul recounts his transgressions and puts his soul in the last and nethermost place, saying, “Jesus Christ came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief.” … When and at what time did he say this? After great struggles, after mighty works, after the preaching of the gospel of Christ which he proclaimed throughout the whole world, after continual deaths and manifold tribulations which he suffered from the Jews and from the heathen. Even then he saw himself as only making a beginning. He was of the opinion not merely that he had not yet attained to purity of soul but that he would not even number himself among the disciples of Christ, as was fitting.
An Epistle to Abba Symeon of Caesarea
Pay attention to his humility. I was shown mercy, he says, so that none of those who have sinned would despair, but would have full hope of forgiveness, since the greatest of all sinners — Paul — receives salvation. By this the apostle shows that he himself did not deserve forgiveness, but for the sake of the salvation of others was deemed worthy of this lovingkindness of God. He did not simply say: that in me He might show longsuffering, but "all longsuffering," as if saying: having sinned infinitely, I needed "all" mercy, "all" His lovingkindness, and not in part, like those who sinned in part. "As a pattern," he says, that is, as an example, for the comfort and for the forgiveness of all who wish to believe.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
And he says this to show that whatever God does, he does to show his goodness: the Lord has made all things for himself (Prov 16:4); full of the glory of the Lord is his work (Sir 42:16), and for our benefit; hence he says, for this cause I have obtained mercy: first of all, for his glory. That in me first, i.e., first, in the order of time, or first in the order of rank.
Christ Jesus might show forth all patience, i.e., perfect patience, because although he was provoked, he did not punish but rather exalted his adversary; and this for our benefit. Hence he says, for the information, i.e., the instruction, of those who shall believe in him unto life everlasting. As if to say: in order that sinners may not hesitate to approach him: being made a pattern for the flock from the heart (1 Pet 5:3).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen.
τῷ δὲ βασιλεῖ τῶν αἰώνων, ἀφθάρτῳ, ἀοράτῳ, μόνῳ σοφῷ Θεῷ, τιμὴ καὶ δόξα εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας τῶν αἰώνων· ἀμήν.
Цр҃ю́ же вѣкѡ́въ нетлѣ́нномꙋ, неви́димомꙋ, є҆ди́номꙋ премⷣромꙋ бг҃ꙋ, чтⷭ҇ь и҆ сла́ва во вѣ́ки вѣкѡ́въ. А҆ми́нь.
It was of Him, too, that he had said in a previous passage: "Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, to the only God; " so that we might apply even the contrary qualities to the Son Himself-mortality, accessibility-of whom the apostle testifies that "He died according to the Scriptures," and that "He was seen by himself last of all," -by means, of course, of the light which was accessible, although it was not without imperilling his sight that he experienced that light.
Against Praxeas
Fitly did that temporal king and Thy servant once sing of Thee as the King Eternal, saying, Thou art fairer than the children of men, who amongst men art very God and man. But the time would fail us, ages and succeeding generations too, to render unto thee thy fitting salutation as the mother of the King Eternal,
Oration Concerning Simeon and Anna
We know that of all the names by which Deity is indicated some are expressive of the Divine majesty, employed and understood absolutely, and some are assigned with reference to the operations over us and all creation. When the apostle says, “Now to the immortal, invisible, only wise God,” and the like, by these titles he suggests conceptions which represent to us the transcendent power. In other cases, however, God is spoken of in the Scriptures as gracious, merciful, full of pity, true, good, Lord, Physician, Shepherd, Way, Bread, Fountain, King, Creator, Artificer, Protector, Who is over all and through all, Who is all in all; these and similar titles contain the declaration of the operations of the Divine loving kindness in the creation.
Against Eunomius 2.11
We must first turn our words to prayer. I say this because, sometimes, when prayer accompanies a teaching, it will serve to provide us with a demonstration of the things we are seeking to prove.… And Paul often does this at the beginning of his epistles. He first mentions God and then does not go on to his teaching until he pays to God the glory and praise due to him. Listen: "To the King of ages, the immortal, the invisible, the only God of wisdom, be honor and glory for ever and ever! Amen."
On the Incomprehensible Nature of God 3.2
"Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen."
For these things, then, we glorify not the Son only, but the Father. Here let us argue with the heretics. Speaking of the Father, he says, "To the only God." Is the Son then not God? "The only immortal." Is the Son then not immortal? Or does He not possess that Himself, which hereafter He will give to us? Yes, they say, He is God and immortal, but not such as the Father. What then? is He of inferior essence, and therefore of inferior immortality? What then is a greater and a less immortality? For immortality is nothing else than the not being subject to destruction. For there is a greater and a less glory; but immortality does not admit of being greater or less: as neither is there a greater and a less health. For a thing must either be destructible, or altogether indestructible. Are we men then immortal even as He? God forbid! Surely not! Why? because He has it by nature, but we adventitiously.
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
Why then do you make the difference? Because the Father, he says, is made such as He is by no other: but the Son is what He is, from the Father. This we also confess, not denying that the Son is generated from the Father incorruptibly. And we glorify the Father, he means, for having generated the Son, such as He is. Thus you see the Father is most glorified, when the Son hath done great things. For the glory of the Son is referred again to Him. And since He generated Him omnipotent and such as He is in Himself, it is not more the glory of the Son than of the Father, that He is self-sufficient, and self-maintained, and free from infirmity.
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
It has been said of the Son, "By whom He made the worlds." Now there is a distinction observed among us between creation and workmanship. For one works and toils and executes, another rules; and why? because he that executes is the inferior. But it is not so there; nor is the sovereignty with One, the workmanship with the Other. For when we hear, "By whom He made the worlds," we do not exclude the Father from creation. Nor when we say, "To the King immortal," do we deny dominion to the Son. For these are common to the One and the Other, and each belongs to Both. The Father created, in that He begat the creating Son; the Son rules, as being Lord of all things created. For He does not work for hire, nor in obedience to others, as workmen do among us, but from His own goodness and love for mankind. But has the Son ever been seen? No one can affirm this. What means then, "To the King immortal, invisible, the only wise God"? Or when it is said, "There is no other name whereby we must be saved": and again, "There is salvation in no other"?
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
"To Him be honor and glory forever. Amen."
Now honor and glory are not mere words; and since He has honored us not by words only, but by what He has done for us, so let us honor Him by works and deeds. Yet this honor touches us, while that reaches not Him, for He needs not the honor that comes from us, we do need that which is from Him.
In honoring Him, therefore, we do honor to ourselves. He who opens his eyes to gaze on the light of the sun, receives delight himself, as he admires the beauty of the star, but does no favor to that luminary, nor increases its splendor, for it continues what it was; much more is this true with respect to God. He who admires and honors God does so to his own salvation, and highest benefit; and how? Because he follows after virtue, and is honored by Him. For "them that honor Me," He says, "I will honor." How then is He honored, if He enjoys no advantage from our honor? Just as He is said to hunger and thirst. For He assumes everything that is ours, that He may in anywise attract us to Him. He is said to receive honors, and even insults, that we may be afraid. But with all this we are not attracted towards Him!
Homily on 1 Timothy 4
He is the only Son of God, our Lord. For he is born One of One, because there is one brightness of light, and there is one word of the understanding. Neither does an incorporeal generation degenerate into the plural number or suffer division. The One who is born is in no way separated from the One who gives life. He is the one and only, the unique. He is as thought is to the mind, as wisdom is to the wise, as a word is to the understanding, as valor is to the brave. As the Father is said by the apostle to be “alone wise,” so likewise the Son alone is called wisdom. He is then the “only Son.” In glory, everlastingness, virtue, dominion, power, he is what the Father is. Yet all these he has not unoriginately as the Father but from the Father, as the Son, without beginning and equal. Although he is the head of all things, yet the Father is the head of him. For so it is written, “The head of Christ is God.”
Commentary on the Apostles’ Creed 6
But if you think that God is seen by those who are pure in heart in this world, why did Moses, who had previously said, “I have seen the Lord face to face, and my life is preserved,” afterwards plead that he might see him distinctly? And because he said that he had seen God, the Lord told him, “You cannot not see my face. For no one shall see my face and live.” For this reason also the apostle calls him the only invisible God, who dwells in light unapproachable, whom no man has seen nor can see.
Against the Pelagians 3.12
In order to attain that vision by which we see God as he is, he has warned us that our hearts must be cleansed. As objects are called visible in our fashion of speaking, so God is called invisible lest he be thought to be a material body. Yet he will not deprive pure hearts of the contemplation of his essence, since this great and sublime reward is promised, on the Lord’s own word, to those who worship and love God. At the time when he appeared visibly to bodily eyes, he promised that his invisible being also would be seen by the clean of heart, “He that loves me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him and will manifest myself to him.” It is certain that this nature of his, which he shares with the Father, is equally as invisible as it is equally incorruptible.
Letters 147.19.48
So this faith is also a rule for salvation, to “believe in God the Father almighty,” creator of all things, “king of the ages, immortal and invisible.” He is indeed the almighty God who at the origin of the world made all things out of nothing. He is before the ages and made and governs the ages. He doesn’t, after all, grow with time, or stretch out in space, nor is he shut in or bounded by any material. He abides with and in himself as full and perfect eternity, which neither human thought can comprehend nor tongue describe.
Sermons 215.2
Let us hold firmly that Father and Son and Holy Spirit in their own proper nature, their proper substance, are together and equally invisible. We believe them to be together and equally immortal, together and equally imperishable. There is one place where the apostle states all these things simultaneously, “Now to the king of ages, immortal, invisible, imperishable, to the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen.”
Sermons 277.15
To the King of the ages, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.
To the King of the ages. These things concerning the holy accepted Trinity. For such titles are common to the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. For these are found elsewhere concerning the Son, elsewhere concerning the Spirit, but now concerning the Father.
to the only wise God. Having reasoned about Christ's love, Paul also remembers the Father and sends up praise to himself, so that no one might think the Father is a sharer in the love toward us. For on account of the love toward us, the holy Trinity must be glorified, since the love is common.
Instruction concerning faithful and honorable service, which is without risk.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Since the apostle said something very great about the Son, namely, that He saves the despairing, lest anyone think that the Father is deprived of His glory, he also sends up glory to Him. All this is common to the Son as well. For He too is the King of the ages. If He is the Creator of the ages, then how is He not the King, incorruptible, invisible in His Divinity, and the only wise One? He Himself is the wisdom of the Father. The same must be said also of the Spirit. He said "the only wise" not to contrast the Father with the Son and the Spirit; no, but to show that although both angels and men possess wisdom, truly wise is God alone, as the source of wisdom, while all other creatures that possess wisdom become partakers of it. "Honor and glory" not in words only, but also in deeds. Glory and honor rendered in word only shows us to be merely grateful, but that rendered in deed makes us imitators of Him — which is far greater. God requires from us the glorification of Him both in word, so that we may love Him, attend to Him, and obey Him, and through this ourselves receive benefit; just as one who marvels at the glory of sunlight provides benefit to himself, enjoying the light and making use of it in his works, while one who does not make use of it brings harm and deprivation upon himself.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Then when he says, to the King of ages, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever, he expresses his gratitude: In regard to the first he does two things: first, he commends the one to whom he gives thanks; second, he expresses the thanks, at honor and glory.
First, he commends him because of his power; second, because of his unique nature.
In regard to the first he says, to the King. His dominion is the greatest, because he is the sole ruler and has free power, not limited by statutes, as one with political power. The one God is the Lord of all things; hence he says, the only God: King of kings and Lord of lords (Rev 19:16); God is the king of the earth (Ps 46:8). Again, a king's power lasts no more than 50 years; but he is the King of ages: your kingdom is a kingdom of all ages: and your dominion endures throughout all generations (Ps 144:13); the power of the earth is in the hand of the Lord (Sir 10:4). To this King belongs also the nature of God.
In regard to this it should be noted that the first difference between natural things is that some are corruptible and some incorruptible: among incorruptible things, some are visible and bodily, as the heavenly bodies; others are invisible and spiritual, as the angels. Angels are divided, according to the Platonists, into gods who are supreme by their nature, and into intellects which are not gods, but are still divine, and into souls. But with us there is but one God: hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord (Deut 6:4).
He says, immortal, therefore, to distinguish him from corruptible things; invisible, to show that he belongs among the invisible things, and to distinguish him from visible things. He says, the only God, and not to the only immortal and invisible being, because he is by nature the only God, although he could be called the only immortal and only invisible, i.e., holding the first rank ahead of others: who only has immortality (1 Tim 6:16).
Then when he says, be honor and glory, he expresses his thanks. As if to say: honor is due him because of his power over every creature; brightness and glory are due him in acknowledgment of his supreme goodness: benediction and glory and wisdom and thanksgiving, honor and power and strength to our God (Rev 7:12), forever and ever, because the duration of the others is for a short time: all flesh is grass, and all the glory thereof as the flower of the field (Isa 40:6).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war a good warfare;
Ταύτην τὴν παραγγελίαν παρατίθεμαί σοι, τέκνον Τιμόθεε, κατὰ τὰς προαγούσας ἐπὶ σὲ προφητείας, ἵνα στρατεύῃ ἐν αὐταῖς τὴν καλὴν στρατείαν,
[Заⷱ҇ 281] Сїе́ же завѣща́нїе предаю́ ти, ча́до тїмоѳе́е, по бы́вшихъ на тѧ̀ пре́жде прⷪ҇ро́чествїихъ, да во́инствꙋеши въ ни́хъ до́брое во́инство,
As the apostle also says in the Epistle to the Romans, "For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith," teaching the one salvation which from prophecy to the Gospel is perfected by one and the same Lord. "This charge," he says, "I commit to thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war the good warfare; holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck," because they defiled by unbelief the conscience that comes from God. Accordingly, faith may not, any more, with reason, be disparaged in an offhand way, as simple and vulgar, appertaining to anybody. For, if it were a mere human habit, as the Greeks supposed, it would have been extinguished. But if it grow, and there be no place where it is not; then I affirm, that faith, whether founded in love, or in fear, as its disparagers assert, is something divine; which is neither rent asunder by other mundane friendship, nor dissolved by the presence of fear.
The Stromata Book 2
What is this deposit? Is it so secret as to be supposed to characterize a new doctrine? or is it a part of that charge of which he says, "This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy? " and also of that precept of which he says, "I charge thee in the sight of God, who quickeneth all things, and before Jesus Christ who witnessed a good confession under Pontius Pilate, that thou keep this commandment? " Now, what is (this) commandment and what is (this) charge? From the preceding and the succeeding contexts, it will be manifest that there is no mysterious hint darkly suggested in this expression about (some) far-fetched doctrine, but that a warning is rather given against receiving any other (doctrine) than that which Timothy had heard from himself, as I take it publicly: "Before many witnesses" is his phrase.
The Prescription Against Heretics
The office of a Teacher and that of a Priest is of great dignity, and to bring forward one that is worthy requires a divine election. So it was of old, and so it is now, when we make a choice without human passion, not looking to any temporal consideration, swayed neither by friendship, nor enmity. For though we be not partakers of so great a measure of the Spirit as they, yet a good purpose is sufficient to draw unto us the election of God. For the Apostles, when they elected Matthias, had not yet received the Holy Spirit, but having committed the matter to prayer, they chose him into the number of the Apostles. For they looked not to human friendships. And so now too it ought to be with us. But we have advanced to the extreme of negligence; and even what is clearly evident, we let pass. Now when we overlook what is manifest, how will God reveal to us what is unseen? as it is said, "If ye have not been faithful in that which is little, who will commit to you that which is great and true?" But then, when nothing human was done, the appointment of Priests too was by prophecy. What is "by prophecy"? By the Holy Spirit. For prophecy is not only the telling of things future, but also of the present. It was by prophecy that Saul was discovered "hidden among the stuff." For God reveals things to the righteous. So it was said by prophecy, "Separate me Barnabas and Saul." In this way Timothy also was chosen, concerning whom he speaks of prophecies in the plural; that, perhaps, upon which he "took and circumcised him," and when he ordained him, as he himself says in his Epistle to him, "Neglect not the gift that is in thee." Therefore to elevate him, and prepare him to be sober and watchful, he reminds him by whom he was chosen and ordained, as if he had said, "God hath chosen thee. He gave thee thy commission, thou wast not made by human vote. Do not therefore abuse or bring into disgrace the appointment of God." When again he speaks of a charge, which implies something burdensome, he adds, "This charge I commit to thee, son Timothy." He charges him as his son, his own son, not so much with arbitrary or despotic authority as like a father, he says, "my son Timothy." The "committing," however, implies that it is to be diligently kept, and that it is not our own. For we did not obtain it for ourselves, but God conferred it upon us; and not it only, but also "faith and a good conscience." What He hath given us then, let us keep. For if He had not come, the faith had not been to be found, nor that pure life which we learn by education. As if he had said, "It is not I that charge thee, but He who chose thee," and this is meant by "the prophecies that went before on thee." Listen to them, obey them.
And say; what chargest thou? "That by them thou shouldest war a good warfare." They chose thee, that then for which they chose thee do thou, "war a good warfare." He named "a good warfare," since there is a bad warfare, of which he says, "As ye have yielded your members instruments to uncleanness and to iniquity." Those men serve under a tyrant, but thou servest under a King. And why calls he it a warfare? To show how mighty a contest is to be maintained by all, but especially by a Teacher; that we require strong arms, and sobriety, and awakenedness, and continual vigilance: that we must prepare ourselves for blood and conflicts, must be in battle array, and have nothing relaxed. "That thou shouldest war in them," he says. For as in an army all do not serve in the same capacity, but in their different stations; so also in the Church one has the office of a Teacher, another that of a disciple, another that of a private man. But thou art in this. And, because this is not sufficient he adds,
Homily on 1 Timothy 5
It was according to divine revelation that I, Paul, laid hands on you and entrust to you the work of teaching.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
With the name of “son,” Paul gives his blessing to Timothy.
Interpretation of the Letter to the Romans
By recalling prophecy, Paul makes it clear that Timothy received the laying on of hands in accordance with divine revelation, and after numerous signs that he, Timothy, had been so elected.
Interpretation of the First Letter to Timothy
I entrust this command to you, Timothy, my child, according to the prophecies previously made about you, so that by them you may wage the good warfare.
this command. It means careful observation.
I entrust. As to a child, Paul says, I command, not according to any authority applying to masters.
according to the prophecies previously. For the sake of emphasis it is placed there. However, the order is this: As soldiers next to those prophecies which have gone before concerning you, that is, as suitable soldiers, responding to the prophecies which were about you. For according to the revelation of the Spirit, Timothy was chosen by Paul as a disciple, and was circumcised, and was ordained a bishop.
them you may wage the good warfare. As a soldier of Christ fighting with spiritual weapons in every way against spiritual enemies.
by them. Namely, by the prophecies: for they have chosen you. Therefore, because of which you were received and by whom you were chosen, serve in them and through them, that is, through the Spirit Himself through whom the prophecies exist.
the good warfare. For there is also a bad warfare, concerning which it is said: "Just as you have presented your members as weapons for sin and impurity." (Rom. 6:13)
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Since he used the word "charge," and a charge is something commanding, he added: "my son Timothy." For I do not say this to you in a commanding way, but as to a son. He also said: "I commit," in order to explain the strictness of keeping, because what we have is not ours, but God's. Therefore, what He has granted, we must keep. "According to the prophecies previously made concerning you." The calling of teacher and priest, being great, requires a divine indication, so that a worthy person may receive this calling. Therefore in ancient times priests were chosen by prophecy, that is, by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, for prophecy consists precisely in declaring what exists in the present time. So Timothy too was chosen for the priesthood. But since he speaks of many prophecies, he perhaps means both when he first received him into the number of disciples, and when he circumcised him, and when he ordained him — all of this was accomplished with prophecy. Therefore he says: "I commit to you... this charge... according to the prophecies previously made concerning you," that is, looking to those prophecies, and as if being taught by them what you must do, I urge you to walk worthily of them and not put them to shame.
What do I command you? That you should wage war in them, that is, that you should not bypass their laws, but as they chose you and for what they chose you, "as a good soldier." For there is also an evil service of a soldier, when someone presents his members as instruments of sin and impurity. The apostle mentioned warfare in order to show that a mighty battle has been raised against all, and especially against the teacher. Therefore one must be vigilant and not show on one's part the slightest weakness.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Then when he says, this precept, I commend to you, he instructs Timothy to keep certain things in mind: first, he reminds him of the task entrusted to him; second, he instructs him on its proper performance; third, he shows how to use it.
He says, therefore: this precept, namely, to guard the end of the law, i.e., always cling to charity and not to Jewish fables, I commend to you, as a faithful trust, because that is how it has been entrusted to you.
But how? According to the prophecies going before on you, i.e., because this Gospel is not out of harmony with the prophecies which you have already learned, because he was the son of a Jewish mother: and we have the more firm prophetical word: whereunto you do well to attend, as to a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawn (2 Pet 1:19); do not despise prophecies (1 Thess 5:20); or according to the prophecies going before on you, i.e., according to what I and the other saints have known about you through the spirit of prophecy telling what should be delivered over to you; that you war in them, i.e., in the prophecies, a good warfare.
But there are two kinds of warfare: spiritual and carnal: for the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty to God unto the pulling down of fortifications (2 Cor 10:4). In good warfare two things are expected of the soldiers, namely, that they do nothing contrary to military discipline, and not become weak through ease: everyone who strives for mastery refrains himself from all things (1 Cor 9:25). Likewise, two things are required on the part of the warfare: namely, that he subdue those who are acting against the republic, and submit himself to those to whom he is subject. So is it also in spiritual warfare, because it is ordained to the destruction of all who exalt themselves and to the bringing into captivity every understanding unto the obedience of Christ, as it is stated in 2 Corinthians 10. And this is the true warfare of which he says, that you war in them a good warfare.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck:
ἔχων πίστιν καὶ ἀγαθὴν συνείδησιν, ἥν τινες ἀπωσάμενοι περὶ τὴν πίστιν ἐναυάγησαν·
и҆мѣ́ѧ вѣ́рꙋ и҆ бл҃гꙋ́ю со́вѣсть, ю҆́же нѣ́цыи ѿри́нꙋвше, ѿ вѣ́ры ѿпадо́ша:
If we think over the rest of faults, tracing them from their generations, let us begin with covetousness, "a root of all evils," wherewith, indeed, some having been ensnared, "have suffered shipwreck about faith." Albeit covetousness is by the same apostle called idolatry.
On Idolatry
Moreover, if the crime of Hymenaeus and Alexander-blasphemy, to wit-is irremissible in this and in the future age, of course the apostle would not, in opposition to the determinate decision of the Lord, have given to Satan, under a hope of pardon, men already sunken from the faith into blasphemy; whence, too, he pronounced them "shipwrecked with regard to faith," having no longer the solace of the ship, the Church.
On Modesty
But the sectarians, who have fallen away from the teaching of the church and made shipwreck concerning the faith, wrongly think that evil has some sort of eternal existence. They arbitrarily imagine another god besides the true One, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. They fantasize that he is the unmade producer of evil and the head of wickedness, who is also artificer of creation. These men one can easily refute, not only from the divine Scriptures but also from the human understanding itself, the very source of these insane imaginations.
Against the Heathen 6.3
What storm at sea was ever so fierce and wild as this tempest within the churches? In it every landmark of the Fathers has been moved. Every foundation, every bulwark of opinion has been shaken. Everything buoyed up on the unsound is dashed about and shaken down. We attack one another. We are overthrown by one another. If our enemy is not the first to strike us, we are wounded by the comrade at our side. If an enemy soldier is stricken and falls, his fellow soldier tramples him down. There is at least this bond of union between us that we hate our common foes, but no sooner has the enemy gone by than we find enemies in one another. And who could make a complete list of all the wrecks? Some have gone to the bottom on the attack of the enemy, some through the unsuspected treachery of their allies, some from the blundering of their own officers. We see, as it were, whole churches, crews and all, dashed and shattered upon the sunken reefs of deceitful teaching, while others of the enemies of the Spirit of salvation have seized the helm and made shipwreck of the faith.
On the Spirit 30.77
The truth of the Lord encompasses him, so that he is not afraid of the terror of the night or of the thing that walks about in darkness. Therefore, “Zabulon shall dwell by the sea.” Thus he may look upon the shipwrecks of others while himself free from danger. He may behold others driven here and there on the sea of this world, those who are borne about by every wind of doctrine, while himself persevering on the ground of an immovable faith.
On the Blessings of the Patriarchs, Chapter 5
In all circumstances, beloved, we need faith—faith, the mother of virtues, the medicine of salvation—without it we cannot grasp any teaching on sublime matters. But those who are without faith are like people trying to cross the sea without a ship. They are able to swim for a while by using hands and feet, but when they have gone farther out they are soon swamped by the waves. So, also, those who have recourse to their own reasoning before accepting any knowledge are inviting shipwreck, even as Paul speaks of those “who have made shipwreck of the faith.”
Homilies on John 33.1
"Holding faith, and a good conscience."
For he that would be a Teacher must first teach himself. For as he who has not first been a good soldier, will never be a general, so it is with the Teacher; wherefore he says elsewhere, "Lest when I have preached to others, I myself should be a cast-away." "Holding faith," he says, "and a good conscience," that so thou mayest preside over others. When we hear this, let us not disdain the exhortations of our superiors, though we be Teachers. For if Timothy, to whom all of us together are not worthy to be compared, receives commands and is instructed, and that being himself in the Teacher's office, much more should we. "Which some having put away, have made shipwreck concerning the faith." And this follows naturally. For when the life is corrupt, it engenders a doctrine congenial to it, and from this circumstance many are seen to fall into a gulf of evil, and to turn aside into Heathenism. For that they may not be tormented with the fear of futurity, they endeavor to persuade their souls, that what we preach is false. And some turn aside from the faith, who seek out everything by reasoning; for reasoning produces shipwreck, while faith is as a safe ship.
Homily on 1 Timothy 5
Innumerable are the examples we must omit, since we wish to be brief. But all of them make it sufficiently clear that the customary method of most heresies consists in rejoicing in “profane novelties,” in loathing traditional knowledge, which some rejecting have made shipwreck concerning the faith. Conversely, it is proper for Catholics to guard the “deposit,” handed down by the holy fathers, to condemn profane novelties, and, as the apostle said, “before and now I say again,” let him be anathema “if any one preach to you a gospel besides that which you have received.”
Commonitories 24
19–20holding faith and a good conscience, which some having rejected, have suffered shipwreck concerning the faith; among whom are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan that they may be taught not to blaspheme.
holding faith. For one must be a teacher of oneself before being a teacher to others. And faith, he says, is about doctrines, while conscience is about conduct.
which some having rejected. Of these, Paul says, conscience is about living rightly. For when someone lives without consideration it also shipwrecks their faith. In order not to be tormented by the fear of what is to come, they strive to persuade their own soul that all things concerning us, both about resurrection and judgment, are false.
whom I have handed over to Satan that they may be taught. Since Satan does not instruct himself, how can he bring good teaching to others? And we say, just as executioners, full of countless evils, train others to be prudent, so also does Satan. For when a person is handed over to Satan, it is by the exclusion from communion. Then the demon, having taken the person stripped of God's help, disciplines him. And this is done for his correction. But why do they hand over to Satan, and he himself does not discipline? So that it may be shown that even Satan is able to coerce, and so that, along with punishment, they are also insulted, with Satan being the avenger. For the apostles punished the unbelievers for their own sake, as Paul himself did to Bar-Jesus and Elymas (Acts 13), and Peter to Ananias (Acts 5); to show that they were able. But those who learned from these things, yet turned away, they handed over to Satan.
not to blaspheme. For these, by subjecting faith to human reasoning, have gone astray and blaspheme, as now the Nestorians suffer, and the other heresies.
On prayer, that it is above all, that it is everywhere, without wickedness, without disturbance, reverently.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Do not think, he says, to be content only with the fact that you have been appointed to the priesthood according to the prophecies, but you must have faith, so as to rightly proclaim the word of truth, and a good conscience, or a blameless life, from which comes a good conscience, so that you may also preside over others beneficially. For just as a general must first be a good soldier, so too a teacher himself must possess that which he requires of his students. Therefore, even though we are teachers, let us learn not to disregard the counsels and instructions of those who are greater than us.
By the word "which," he obviously means a good conscience. And rightly so. For if one's life is impure, then from this proceed also perverse doctrines. In order not to be tormented by fear of the future, those living impiously convince themselves that everything we hold is false. And he who has deviated from the faith and reasons about everything suffers shipwreck, despite the nearness of faith. For faith is a calm harbor; it keeps the mind at rest, while investigations are waves that here and there, as in a shipwreck, quickly seize the mind and dash it against the rocks, or even drown it.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Here is mentioned: first, the way to wage the war; second, the necessity of a good conscience, at which some rejecting.
He says, therefore: that you war in them a good warfare. As if to say: you can wage a good war: first of all, having faith: this is the victory which overcomes the world, our faith (1 John 5:4); second, through a good conscience, because men quickly flee from things that are bothering them; hence, remorse of conscience is like a goad pricking a man with a bad conscience. That is why he is quick to flee from sin by obtaining a good conscience and true faith: I have conversed with all good conscience before God until this present day (Acts 23:1); our glory is this, the testimony of our conscience (2 Cor 1:12).
Then he shows why there is need of a good conscience, when he says, which some rejecting, have made shipwreck concerning the faith: first, he mentions the sin; second, the punishment; third, the fruit of punishment. He mentions the sin when he says, which, namely, a good conscience, some rejecting, have made shipwreck concerning the faith; for one who errs against the faith loses all he has: without faith it is impossible to please God (Heb 11:6); and he dies, because the just man shall live in his faith (Hab 2:4).
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.
ὧν ἐστιν Ὑμέναιος καὶ Ἀλέξανδρος, οὓς παρέδωκα τῷ σατανᾷ, ἵνα παιδευθῶσι μὴ βλασφημεῖν.
ѿ ни́хже є҆́сть ѵ҆мене́й и҆ а҆леѯа́ндръ, и҆̀хже преда́хъ сатанѣ̀, да нака́жꙋтсѧ не хꙋ́лити.
Plainly Paul states that he delivered to Satan Hymenaeus and Alexander, “that they learn not to blaspheme,” as he writes to Timothy. Nevertheless Paul himself says that a “thorn was given him, an angel of Satan,” by which he was to be buffeted, lest he should exalt himself. Weren’t these brothers delivered to Satan not for perdition but for giving them an opportunity to change? If so, what is the difference between blasphemy and incest and a soul entirely free from these? The free soul would be elated from no other source than the highest sanctity and all innocence. The elation of such a soul would be in the apostle’s case restrained by this buffeting, by means, some say, of pain in the ear or head. Incest, however, and blasphemy would have deserved a different punishment. The person would have been delivered over to Satan himself for a possession, not to an “angel” of his.… If you take the assumption that the crime of Hymenaeus and Alexander—blasphemy—is irremissible in this and in the future age, the apostle would not, in opposition to the clear directive of the Lord, have given to Satan, under a hope of pardon, men already irremediably sunken from the faith into blasphemy. Thus, he pronounced them “shipwrecked with regard to faith,” having no longer the solace of the ship, the church.
On Modesty 13
It is a comparatively small thing, that certain men, like Phygellus, and Hermogenes, and Philetus, and Hymenµus, deserted His apostle: the betrayer of Christ was himself one of the apostles.
The Prescription Against Heretics
The famous Alexander, too, instigated by his love of disputation in the true fashion of heretical temper, has made himself conspicuous against us; he will have us say that Christ put on flesh of an earthly origin, in order that He might in His own person abolish sinful flesh.
On the Flesh of Christ
Plainly, the selfsame apostle delivered to Satan Hymenaeus and Alexander, "that they might be emended into not blaspheming," as he writes to his Timotheus.
On Modesty
For the apostle likewise delivered Phygellus and Hermogenes over to Satan that by chastening they might be taught not to blaspheme. You see, then, that the devil receives more suitably power even from the servants of God; so far is he from having it by any fight of his own.
On Flight in Persecution
When one knows properly these timely points, his understanding of the faith is right and healthy. But if he mistakes any such points, he quickly falls into heresy. Thus Hymenaeus and Alexander and their fellows were untimely when they said that the resurrection had already been. The Galatians were untimely in the other direction in making much of circumcision now.
Discourses Against the Arians 1.54.2
Those whom the usual penalties do not recall to their senses, and even exclusion from prayers does not lead to repentance, must be subjected to the canons given by the Lord. For it has been written, “If your brother sins, go and show him his fault, between you and him. But if he does not listen to you, take one or two others along with you. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.” Now, this truly has been done in the case of this man. Once he was accused; in the presence of one or two he was convicted; a third time, in the presence of the church. Since, therefore, we have solemnly protested to him and he has not acquiesced, let him for the future be excommunicated. And let it be announced to all the village that he is not to be admitted to any participation in the ordinary relations of life, so that, by our refusal to associate with him, he may become wholly the food for the devil.
Letters 288
They then who turn aside from the faith must suffer shipwreck; and this he shows by an example.
"Of whom are Hymenaeus and Alexander."
And from them he would instruct us. You see how even from those times there have been seducing Teachers, curious enquirers, and men holding off from the faith, and searching out by their own reasonings. As the shipwrecked man is naked and destitute of all things, so is he that fails away from the faith without resource, he knows not where to stand or where to stay himself, nor has he the advantage of a good life so as to gain anything from that quarter. For when the head is disordered, what avails the rest of the body? and if faith without a good life is unavailing, much more is the converse true. If God despises His own for our sakes, much more ought we to despise our own for His sake. For so it is, where any one fails away from the faith, he has no steadiness, he swims this way and that, till at last he is lost in the deep.
"Whom I delivered to Satan, that they might be taught not to blaspheme!" Thus it is blasphemy to search into divine things by our own reasonings. For what have human reasonings in common with them? But how does Satan instruct them not to blaspheme? can he instruct others, who has not yet taught himself, but is a blasphemer still? It is not that "he should instruct," but that they should be instructed. It is not he that does it, though such is the result. As elsewhere he says in the case of the fornicator: "To deliver such an one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh." Not that he may save the body, but "that the spirit may be saved." Therefore it is spoken impersonally. How then is this effected? As executioners, though themselves laden with numberless crimes, are made the correctors of others; so it is here with the evil spirit. But why didst thou not punish them thyself, as thou didst that Bar-Jesus, and as Peter did Ananias, instead of delivering them to Satan? It was not that they might be punished, but that they might be instructed. For that he had the power appears from other passages, "What will ye? Shall I come unto you with a rod?" And again, "Lest I should use sharpness, according to the power which the Lord hath given me to edification, and not to destruction." Why did he then call upon Satan to punish them? That the disgrace might be greater, as the severity and the punishment was more striking. Or rather, they themselves chastised those who did not yet believe, but those who turned aside, they delivered to Satan. Why then did Peter punish Ananias? Because whilst he was tempting the Holy Ghost, he was still an unbeliever. That the unbelieving therefore might learn that they could not escape, they themselves inflicted punishment upon them; but those who had learnt this, yet afterwards turned aside, they delivered to Satan; showing that they were sustained not by their own power, but by their care for them; and as many as were lifted up into arrogance were delivered to him. For as kings with their own hands slay their enemies, but deliver their subjects to executioners for punishment, so it is in this case. And these acts were done to show the authority committed to the Apostles. Nor was it a slight power, to be able thus to subject the devil to their commands. For this shows that he served and obeyed them even against his will, and this was no little proof of the power of grace. And listen how he delivered them: "When ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, to deliver such an one unto Satan." He was then immediately expelled from the common assembly, he was separated from the fold, he became deserted and destitute; he was delivered to the wolf. For as the cloud designated the camp of the Hebrews, so the Spirit distinguished the Church. If any one therefore was without, he was consumed, and it was by the judgment of the Apostles that he was cast out of the pale. So also the Lord delivered Judas to Satan. For immediately "after the sop Satan entered into him." Or this may be said; that those whom they wished to amend, they did not themselves punish, but reserved their punishments for those who were incorrigible. Or otherwise, that they were the more dreaded for delivering them up to others. Job also was delivered to Satan, but not for his sins, but for fuller proof of his worth.
Homily on 1 Timothy 5
The sinner is handed over to Satan, that is, is separated from the church, so that penitence may follow.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Let us learn, brethren, when actions are alike, to distinguish the intentions of the actors; otherwise, if we shut our eyes to this, we might judge falsely, and we might accuse well-wishers of doing us harm. Likewise, when the same apostle says that he delivered up certain men to Satan, “that they may learn not to blaspheme,” did he render evil for evil, or did he, rather, judge that it was a good work to correct evil men even by evil?
Letters 93.2.7
Out of love the apostle delivered a man up to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.
Reply to Faustus the Manichaean 22.79
Again they say, “Who made the devil?” He made himself; for the devil was made by sinning, not by nature. “Or,” they say, “God should not have made him if he knew that he would sin.” On the contrary, why should he not have made him? For through his own justice and providence God corrects many as a result of the malice of the devil. Or have you perhaps not heard the apostle Paul saying, “And I handed them over to Satan so that they might learn not to blaspheme”?
On Genesis, Against the Manichaeans 2.28.42
The sinner is separated from the body of the church, stripped of divine grace, and so will be cruelly beaten by the Adversary, will fall into illnesses and painful passions and into a host of scrapes and calamities. It is understood that the sentence will be revoked when the sinner has repented.
Interpretation of the First Letter to Timothy
Do you see that even in those times there were people who taught perversely, who departed from the faith, and gave themselves over to investigations and speculations? Therefore do not lose heart now when you see such people, but stand against them.
Teaching others, how is it that Satan does not teach himself? However, the apostle did not say: that he might teach them not to blaspheme, but: "that they might learn" (ῐνα παιδευθῶσιν). He does not accomplish this, but it happens as a consequence of his actions. For just as executioners, being themselves notorious criminals, bring others to their senses, so also does the devil. But why did Paul himself not punish them, as he punished Bar-Jesus and as Peter punished Ananias? So that together with the severity of the punishment he might combine greater dishonor, so that he might show that he commands even Satan and through this be more fearsome. Or rather, the apostles themselves punished unbelievers so that they might know that they could not hide. For Ananias too was an unbeliever and still testing. Meanwhile, those who already knew this and then fell away from the faith, they delivered over to Satan, showing them that they were guarded not by their own power but by the care of the apostles. Or furthermore, those whom they wished to correct they did not punish themselves, but the incorrigible they themselves subjected to punishment. How then was the guilty one delivered to Satan? He was cast out of the common assembly, separated from the flock, and handed over naked to the wolf. For just as in ancient times the cloud surrounded the tabernacle, so also the Holy Spirit surrounds the Church of Christ. Consequently, whoever is outside the Church is also outside the Spirit and is therefore pitiable and easily captured. Such is the punishment of excommunication. And God Himself, delivering sinners over to sicknesses and calamities, teaches through this. "But when we are judged," he says, "we are chastened by the Lord" (1 Cor. 11:32). Do you see that to investigate divine things by means of reasoning is to blaspheme? It is an insult to divine things when someone thinks that they are comprehensible by human reasoning.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
Of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander: Alexander, the coppersmith, has done me much evil (2 Tim 4:14).
Then he mentions the punishment, when he says, whom I have delivered up to Satan, because he excommunicated them, so that the faithful might avoid them and not be contaminated. The excommunication inflicted by the Apostle was of such force, that the excommunicated person was immediately snatched by the Devil and suffered bodily harassment: in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, you being gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, to deliver such a one to Satan, for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved (1 Cor 5:4).
But even now they are delivered over to be afflicted spiritually, because they lose the benefit of the Church's prayers, which are a great help against the Devil. And I have delivered them as God has delivered them up to a reprobate sense (Rom 1:28) by withdrawing his help and their affiliation with the Church and her prayers.
And he did this not from hatred, but from love and for their benefit: that the spirit may be saved (1 Cor 5:5); hence he says, that they may learn, through punishment, not to blaspheme. But there are three ways in which one learns to depart from sin: sometimes, from its punishment, when he is afflicted in body; sometimes, from the perplexity of being excommunicated; and sometimes, from the fact that the Church delivers him over to Satan, and he falls into public sins. As a result of this perplexity he is humbled and refrains even from hidden sins, which he formerly did not recognize he had.
Commentary on 1 Timothy
PAUL, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope;
Παῦλος, ἀπόστολος Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ κατ’ ἐπιταγὴν Θεοῦ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν καὶ Κυρίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ τῆς ἐλπίδος ἡμῶν,
[Заⷱ҇ 278] Па́ѵелъ, посла́нникъ і҆и҃съ хрⷭ҇то́въ по повелѣ́нїю бг҃а сп҃са на́шегѡ и҆ гдⷭ҇а і҆и҃са хрⷭ҇та̀ ᲂу҆пова́нїѧ на́шегѡ,