Friday of the 25th week after Pentecost

The Lord said of Herod, "Go and tell that fox." Because it [the fox] was troubled, what did it do? It slaughtered infants. What did it do? It slaughtered infants in place of the infant Word. They were made martyrs by the shedding of their blood, before they could confess the Lord with their mouths. And these are the first fruits that Christ sent to the Father. An infant came, and infants went. An infant came to us, infants went to God. From the mouths of infants and sucklings you have perfected praise.

(con. Julian. lib. 6. c. 19.) Or these things are understood to have been spoken mystically by Him, so as to refer to His body, which is the Church. For devils are cast out when the Gentiles having forsaken their superstition, believe in Him. And cures are perfected when according to His commands, after having renounced the devil and this world until the end of the resurrection, (by which as it were the third day will be completed,) the Church shall be perfected in angelical fulness by the immortality also of the body.

Behold, I cast out demons and accomplish healings today and tomorrow, and on the third day I am perfected. These words are understood mystically and figuratively as spoken by the Lord, for he did not suffer on the third day from this day, as he follows by saying:

Because of his wiles and stratagems He calls Herod a fox, which is an animal full of craft, concealing itself in a ditch because of snares, having a noisome smell, never walking in straight paths, all which things belong to heretics, of whom Herod is a type, who endeavours to destroy Christ (that is, the humility of the Christian faith) in the hearts of believers.

Secondly, the passion of Christ is intimated as voluntarily undertaken by him, when it is added: And he said to them: Go and tell that fox. He calls Herod a fox on account of his malice and deceitfulness, which nevertheless does not prevail against the wisdom of Christ; Wisdom 7: "Wisdom is not overcome by malice. She reaches therefore from end to end mightily."

And because the death of Christ was not to be consummated according to the machination of human malice, but according to the disposition of his own wisdom and will, therefore he adds: Behold, I cast out demons and perform healings today and tomorrow, through the working of miracles; Acts 10: "He went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil."

And the third day I am consummated, through the endurance of the passion, in which he said, John 19: "It is consummated"; and Hebrews 2: "For it was fitting that he, for whom are all things and through whom are all things, who had brought many sons into glory, should be consummated through suffering." Whence by these three days can be understood the three years in which the Lord preached and worked miracles, and thus that in the last year he suffered voluntarily and according to his own will; John 10: "I have the power to lay down my life, and I have the power to take it up again." Whence when he did not will it, no one was able to harm him, according to that word in John 7: "No one laid hands on him, because his hour had not yet come." Whence the fox-like malice was able to plot the death of Christ, but nevertheless was not able to accomplish it except as he himself willed; concerning which, Isaiah 53: "He was offered because he himself willed it."

And through this it is also spiritually understood that the mystical body of Christ does not suffer except according as God disposes, from impious heretics, whom Christ gives us to understand through Herod, attributing to him the name and the property of a fox.

Thus also, in reference to Herod: "Go, tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and perform cures to-day and to-morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected.". For not riches only, but also honour, and marriage, and poverty, have ten thousand cares for him who is unfit for them.

But what did he tell them to say? "Behold, I cast out demons and perform cures today and tomorrow, and the third day I finish my course." You see that he declares his intention of performing what he knew would grieve the troop of Pharisees. So they drive him from Jerusalem, fearing that by the display of miracles he will win many to faith in himself. But inasmuch as their purpose there did not escape him since he was God, he declares his intention of performing what they hated and says that he shall also rebuke unclean spirits and deliver the sick from their sufferings and be perfected. This means that of his own will he will endure the passion on the cross for the salvation of the world. He knew, therefore, as it appears, both how and when he would endure death in the flesh.

Or else the discourse seems to change here, and not to refer so much to the character of Herod as some think, as to the lies of the Pharisees. For He almost represents the Pharisees themselves to be standing near, when He said, Go tell this fox, as it is in the Greek. Therefore he commanded them to say that which might rouse the multitude of Pharisees. Behold, said He, I cast out devils, and I do cures to day and to morrow, and on the third day I shall be perfected. He promises to do what was displeasing to the Jews, namely, to command the evil spirits, and deliver the sick from disease, until in His own person He should undergo the suffering of the cross.

It was prophetic that Moses had given [the Israelites] the order to offer their sacrifices in one single place—there to offer the lamb in sacrifice and [there] to accomplish an image of the redemption. Herod did not kill [the Lord] with the infants of Bethlehem, nor did the Nazarenes when they hurled him down from the mountain, since it was not possible for him to die outside of Jerusalem. For it cannot be that a prophet should perish outside of Jerusalem. Take note that although it was Jerusalem that killed him, nevertheless Herod and Nazareth were united with regard to his death, and vengeance will be required of both for his death. Learn also from this that not only will vengeance for his blood be required of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, but also everyone who saw and denied him will be convicted for having killed him. In saying "between the sanctuary and the altar," he has indeed shown their perversity, in that they did not respect even the place of atonement. The words, "How often would I have gathered your children together," are similar to these, "See, these three years I have come, seeking fruit on this fig tree, and I find none."

And therefore did the Lord term those whom He knew to be the offspring of men "a generation of vipers;" because after the manner of these animals they go about in subtilty, and injure others. For He said, "Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees." Speaking of Herod, too, He says, "Go ye and tell that fox," aiming at his wicked cunning and deceit.

When the Pharisees said "Herod desireth to kill thee," He called Herod a fox because of his cunning, saying, "Go ye and say to this fox"—for because he hath no power to do what he desireth by authority, behold he contriveth artful schemes and plots in order that cunning may take the place of power, even as cunning taketh the place of strength in the fox—"by My own freewill will I go, but thy cunning which is outside My freewill, is not able to make Me go forth. To-day and to-morrow I work miracles, and the third day I am perfected."

He, knowing their hearts, according to His custom, answers them meekly, in a veiled manner, and says: "tell that fox." It appears that He is calling Herod a fox, but if one examines more carefully, it seems rather that He is calling the Pharisees this. For He did not say: "that" fox, but "this" fox, using a somewhat ambiguous expression with a particular intent. By saying "fox" in the singular, He gave them to understand Herod, but by saying the demonstrative "this," He hinted at their own craftiness. For the Pharisees truly displayed in their conduct the cunning and carelessness of a fox. Look, if you will, how He responds to their malice. Since they were trying to frighten Him with Herod out of envy at the healings He performed, He, knowing what brought them grief, says the following: behold, I "perform healings" and "cast out demons." For, as was said before, they persecuted Him so that He might not, by the display of miracles, draw many into faith in Himself. The words "today and tomorrow" signify a large number of days. Just as we in ordinary conversation usually say: today and tomorrow such-and-such will happen, yet we do not at all limit this matter to such a span, but only express that it will be soon, so also Christ by the words "today and tomorrow... I perform healings,... and on the third day I finish" did not at all mean that on the third day He would necessarily die, but rather expresses that His death would be soon.

As if He says, What think ye of My death? Behold, a little while, and it will come to pass. But by the words, To day and to morrow, are signified many days; as we also are wont to say in common conversation, "To day and to morrow such a thing takes place," not that it happens in that interval of time. And to explain more clearly the words of the Gospel, you must not understand them to be, I must walk to day and to morrow, but place a stop after to day and to morrow, then add, and walk on the day following, as frequently in reckoning we are accustomed to say, "The Lord's day and the day after, and on the third I will go out," as if by reckoning two, to denote the third. So also our Lord speaks as if calculating, I must do so to day, and so to morrow, and then afterward on the third day I must go to Jerusalem.

Nevertheless, I must walk today and tomorrow, and the next day, for it is not possible for a prophet to perish outside of Jerusalem. Therefore, what he says, I cast out demons, and accomplish healings today and tomorrow, and on the third day I am perfected (Luke XIII), is referred to his body which is the Church. For demons are cast out, when the Gentiles believe in him, forsaking ancestral superstitions: and healings are accomplished, when life is lived according to his precepts, after renouncing the devil and this world until the end of the resurrection. By which, as if on the third day, it will be perfected to fullness like the angels, that is, the Church will be perfected through the immortality of the body.

Thirdly, the passion of Christ is intimated as infallibly preordained from eternity; whence he adds: Nevertheless, I must walk today and tomorrow and the following day. This necessity was not from compulsion, but from a supernal disposition, according to that passage below in the last chapter: "O foolish and slow of heart to believe in all things which the Prophets have spoken," etc. For God had foreseen this, according to what is said in Acts 2: "Him, delivered up by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, you have slain, afflicting him by the hands of the wicked." The Prophets also foretold this, according to what is said in Acts 3: "But God, who announced through the mouth of the Prophets that his Christ should suffer, has thus fulfilled it." He himself intimated this necessity of the divine disposition in his passion, when he prayed, as is said in Matthew 26: "My Father, if this cup cannot pass unless I drink it, let your will be done."

And because the divine disposition preordained not only the time, but also the place, therefore he adds: Because it does not befit a Prophet to perish outside Jerusalem: it does not befit, "that is, it is not fitting," it does not befit prophetic Scripture, or it does not befit divine providence. This Prophet par excellence is Christ, who foreknows all future things; concerning whom Deuteronomy 18 says: "The Lord will raise up for you a Prophet from among your brethren like me"; and above in chapter 7: "A great Prophet has arisen among us." It was not fitting for him to die except in Jerusalem, according to the Scriptures, both because that was the royal, magisterial, and sacerdotal city, and because Christ was the supreme king, teacher, and priest. And therefore he ought not to have died except in that place; whence below in chapter 18: "Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the Prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished." For the Prophets universally foretold that the new law would come forth from Jerusalem; whence Isaiah 2: "Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord and to the house of the God of Jacob; for out of Sion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem"; and Zechariah 13: "In that day there shall be a fountain open to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, for the washing of the sinner and of the unclean woman."

And note that Christ was condemned in Jerusalem, but suffered outside the gate; whence Hebrews 13: "Jesus, that he might sanctify the people by his own blood, suffered outside the gate."

Mystically, however, it is to be noted here that this three-day period is expounded in three ways according to different expositors: allegorically, morally, and anagogically. Allegorically thus: the first day is the law of nature, the second is the law of Scripture, and the third is the law of grace; concerning which Mark 8 says: "I have compassion on the multitude, for behold, they have now been with me three days." Or, the first day is that of the passion, the second, of burial, but the third, of the resurrection; John 2: "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." Or, the first day is the course of the sixth age; the second, the rest of souls: but the third, the resurrection of bodies, which is in the eighth; Hosea 6: "He will revive us after two days, and on the third day he will raise us up."

Morally, thus, so that the first day is of compunction; the second, of confession; the third, of satisfaction: Exodus 5: "The Lord God of the Hebrews has called us: we shall go a journey of three days into the wilderness." — Or, the first day is good thought, the second is good speech, and the third is good action: Jonah 3 according to the Septuagint translation: "Yet three days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown." Or, the three days are the threefold vow of religion, namely of chastity, obedience, and poverty; Genesis 40: "Three days remain, after which Pharaoh will remember your service and will restore you to your former rank."

Anagogically, thus, so that the first day is purgation: the second, illumination, and the third, perfection: above, chapter 2: "It came to pass that after three days they found him in the temple." Or, so that the first day is the contemplation of God in his vestige, the second is of God in the image or in the mirror, the third, in himself: Numbers 10: "The ark of the Lord went before them for three days, providing a place for the camp." Or, the first day is the contemplation of the subcelestial hierarchy: the second, of the celestial, and the third, of the supercelestial. In the first is the casting out of demons; in the second is the perfection of health, but in the third, the consummation of all good: and concerning this three-day period, Joshua 2: "The scouts came to the mountains and remained there for three days." This ark is Christ, who in each of these hierarchies is the highest hierarch and our leader, so that we may come to the land of promise pledged to us. In figure of which he says that he walks for three days, because he makes us through this threefold hierarchy always ascend upward, unless perchance we descend to actions. In figure of which it is said in Genesis 28 that Jacob saw "the Angels of God ascending and descending on the ladder"; no one saw them standing still. By which is signified that one must always make progress in the good. For this is to draw near to the heavenly Jerusalem, to which we draw near not by steps of the body, but by the affections of the heart and mind.

But because the Pharisees thought that He who was the Lord of hosts, feared the hand of Herod. He refutes this, saying, Nevertheless I must walk to day and to morrow, and the day following. When He says must, He by no means implies a necessity imposed upon Him, but rather that He walked where He liked according to the inclination of His will, until He should come to the end of the dreadful cross, the time of which Christ shows to be now drawing near, when He says, To day and to morrow.

"Nevertheless, I must... today and tomorrow," that is, for some time, remain here and perform miracles, and "the following day" go to Jerusalem, for I have appointed for Myself to suffer there. Since they (the Pharisees) said to Him: "Get out..., for Herod wants to kill You," — and they said this in Galilee, which Herod governed, He declares to them that even with Herod's strong desire, he cannot kill Him, for He is appointed to suffer not in Galilee, but in Jerusalem. So that I may present the saying of the Gospel more clearly to you, I will say: do not understand it as meaning that today and tomorrow I must go, but pause at the words "today" and "tomorrow," and then read: "and the following day" go. When reckoning time, we often have the habit of saying: on Sunday, the next day, and on the third day I will go out — not because I intend to go out on Sunday and the next day, but in order, by counting off only those two days, to point to the third. Likewise the Lord here, as if counting off, says: I must today and tomorrow, then on the third day go to Jerusalem, for there My end is appointed. Since we said above that the Lord says this not because He confines His life to three days, but indicates a large number of days, if not a certain not very lengthy period of time, He says to those who envy Him something like this: why do you concern yourselves with My death? Behold, in a little while, it will come. When you hear that it is impossible for a prophet to perish outside of Jerusalem, do not conclude from these words that the Jews were somehow subjected to violence and compulsion to commit this, but rather it is said in accordance with their murderous intent. Just as if someone, seeing a murderer-robber lying in ambush by the road, were to say that it is impossible for this road to be free from blood, since the robber lies in wait for travelers along it, he would speak in complete accord with the robber's deeds — so too, when the robbers, the Pharisees and scribes, were seated in Jerusalem, it was impossible for the Master of the prophets to perish in any other place than in the place of these robbers. For they, having grown accustomed to shedding the blood of the servants, would kill the Lord as well.

As if He says, What think ye of My death? Behold, a little while, and it will come to pass. But by the words, To day and to morrow, are signified many days; as we also are wont to say in common conversation, "To day and to morrow such a thing takes place," not that it happens in that interval of time. And to explain more clearly the words of the Gospel, you must not understand them to be, I must walk to day and to morrow, but place a stop after to day and to morrow, then add, and walk on the day following, as frequently in reckoning we are accustomed to say, "The Lord's day and the day after, and on the third I will go out," as if by reckoning two, to denote the third. So also our Lord speaks as if calculating, I must do so to day, and so to morrow, and then afterward on the third day I must go to Jerusalem.

But because they said unto Him, Depart from hence, for Herod seeks to kill thee, speaking in Galilee where Herod reigned, He shows that not in Galilee, but in Jerusalem it had been fore-ordained that He should suffer. Hence it follows, For it can not be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem. When thou hearest, It can not be (or it is not fitting) that a prophet should perish out of Jerusalem, think not that any violent constraint was imposed upon the Jews, but He says this seasonably with reference to their eager desire after blood; just as if any one seeing a most savage robber, should say, the road on which this robber lurks can not be without bloodshed to travellers. So also no where else but in the abode of robbers must the Lord of the prophets perish. For accustomed to the blood of His prophets, they will also kill the Lord; as it follows, O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets.

(Severus.) But the repetition of the name also shows the rebuke to be severe. For she who knew God, how does she persecute God's ministers?

(Enchir. 97.) As many as I gathered together, it was done by my all prevailing will, yet thy unwillingness, for thou wert ever ungrateful.

(in Esaiam c. 16. §. 301.) He compared also the sons of Jerusalem to birds in the net, as if He said, Birds who are used to fly in the air are caught by the treacherous devices of the catchers, but thou shalt be as a chicken in want of another's protection; when thy mother then has fled away, thou art taken from thy nest as too weak to defend thyself, too feeble to fly; as it follows, Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I wanted to gather your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing. Jerusalem does not refer to the stones and buildings of the city, but to its inhabitants, whom he laments with a father's affection, as we also read in another place that upon seeing her, he wept. But in saying, "How often I wanted to gather your children," he testifies that all the prophets were sent by him. The similarity of the bird gathering its nest under its wings is also read in the song of Deuteronomy: "As an eagle protects its nest and desires over its chicks, spreading its wings, it took them and bore them on its feathers" (Deut. XXVIII). And fittingly, the one who had called Herod a fox pondering his own death, compares himself to a bird. For the deceitful fox never ceases to lay snares for birds.

In calling upon Jerusalem, He addresses not the stones and buildings of the city, but the dwellers therein, and He weeps over it with the affection of a father.

Now He who aptly had called Herod a fox, who was plotting His death, compares Himself to a bird, for foxes are ever lying in wait for birds.

Jerusalem, Jerusalem, etc. After he manifested the sublimity of the divine disposition in the redemption of the human race, here secondly he manifests it in the reprobation of the rebellious people. And first he indicates the rebellion, then the hardening, and thirdly the abandonment.

First, therefore, with regard to the rebellion of that people, he says: Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the Prophets and stones those who are sent to you. Here the container is taken for the contained: Acts 7: "Stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Spirit." "Which of the Prophets did your fathers not persecute?" Whence 4 Kings 21: "Manasseh shed very much innocent blood, until Jerusalem was filled to the brim." And they did this because they hated the truth, according to that passage of Amos 5: "They hated the one who reproves at the gate, and they abominated the one who speaks perfectly." And this was because they did not wish to be reproved; "for he who does evil hates the light and does not come to the light." On account of which it is said in Ezekiel 2: "Son of man, I send you to apostate nations, who have departed from me: the fathers have transgressed my covenant, and the sons are stiff-necked and of untamable heart, to whom I send you." And the stoning itself signifies this.

Second, with regard to the hardening of that people, he adds: How often I wished to gather your children, as a bird her brood under her wings, and you were unwilling! In which their excessive hardening appears, because it refused to be softened by so great a kindness.

But Christ compared himself to a bird insofar as a bird has a manifold property with regard to the superabundance of tender love. He is compared to a hen in his manner of life, because a hen by her tender care and vigilance is moved toward her chicks and gathers them and defends them with her wings against the rapacity of the kite. So also Christ did, as long as he was in the flesh; therefore Matthew 23: "How often I wished to gather your children, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were unwilling!" He is compared to the pelican in his passion, because the pelican is said to mourn her slain chicks for three days and afterward to pour forth her own blood with her beak, and thus to restore them to life. In this way Christ wept three times for the salvation of the human race: first over Lazarus, John 11; second over Jerusalem, below in chapter 19; third on the cross, Hebrews 5. And afterward he poured forth his own blood, by which he also gave us life: whence the Psalm: "I am become like a pelican of the wilderness."

Third, he is compared to an eagle in the resurrection and ascension, which rouses its young so that they may strive upward and gaze upon the sun and fly to the heights. And so that they may be able to do this, they lick its blood: whence Job 39: "Will the eagle be raised up at your command and make its nest in the heights," etc., up to that place: "Its young lick the blood." This bird, moreover, although it is harsh toward strangers, is nevertheless greatly attentive to the care of its offspring; on account of which Christ, our Redeemer, is rightly likened to it. Whence Deuteronomy 32: "He led him forth and taught him and guarded him as the pupil of his eye. As an eagle provoking its young to fly and hovering over them, he spread his wings and took him up and carried him on his shoulders." To refuse this kindness is the mark of the utmost hardness of heart and faithlessness; on account of which Isaiah 1: "Woe to the sinful nation, a people heavy with iniquity, a wicked seed, criminal children! They have forsaken the Lord, they have blasphemed the Holy One of Israel, they are alienated backward."

"Jerusalem, Jerusalem, how often would I have gathered thy children, as a hen her chickens!" And Jerusalem is, when interpreted, "a vision of peace." He therefore shows prophetically, that those who peacefully contemplate sacred things are in manifold ways trained to their calling. What then? He "would," and could not. How often, and where? Twice; by the prophets, and by the advent. The expression, then, "How often," shows wisdom to be manifold; every mode of quantity and quality, it by all means saves some, both in time and in eternity.

He shows that Jerusalem is guilty of the blood of many saints, declaring that it is not possible for a prophet to perish away from it. From this it follows that its people were about to fall from being members of God's spiritual family, that they were about to be rejected from the hope of the saints and entirely deprived of the inheritance of those blessings which are in store for those who have been saved by faith. He showed them that they were forgetful of God's gifts, and stubborn, and slothful to everything that might have profited them, saying, "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, killing the prophets and stoning those who are sent to you! How often would I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you would not! Behold, your house is forsaken." He taught them through the most wise Moses, and ordained for them the law to direct them in their conduct, and to be their ruler and guide in a life worthy of admiration. Though this law was but as yet in shadows, it nevertheless possessed the type of the true worship. He admonished them by the holy prophets. He would have had them under his wings, that is, under the protection of his power, but they lost the valuable blessings by being disposed to evil, ungrateful and scornful.

Now that they were unmindful of the Divine blessings He proves as follows, How often would I have gathered thy children together as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not. He led them by the hand of Moses full of all wisdom. He warns them by His prophets, He wished to have them under His wings, (i. e. under the shelter of His power,) but they deprived themselves of these choice blessings, through their ingratitude.

And, without using a parable, the Lord said to Jerusalem, `O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest those that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen gathereth her chickens trader her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house shall be left unto you desolate." For that which had been said in the parable, "Behold, for three years I come seeking fruit," and in clear terms, again, [where He says], "How often would I have gathered thy children together," shall be [found] a falsehood, if we do not understand His advent, which is [announced] by the prophets-if, in fact, He came to them but once, and then for the first time. But since He who chose the patriarchs and those [who lived under the first covenant], is the same Word of God who did both visit them through the prophetic Spirit, and us also who have been called together from all quarters by His advent; in addition to what has been already said, He truly declared, "Many shall come from the east and from the west, and shall recline with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. But the children of the kingdom shall go into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth." If, then, those who do believe in Him through the preaching of His apostles throughout the east and west shall recline with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven, partaking with them of the [heavenly] banquet, one and the same God is set forth as He who did indeed choose the patriarchs, visited also the people, and called the Gentiles.

(Hom. 75. in Matt.) For the twice repeated word betokens compassion or very great love. For the Lord speaks, if we may say it, as a lover would to his mistress who despised him, and was therefore about to be punished.

And yet He loved even those who hated Him, and wept over the unbelieving, and blessed those who slandered Him, and prayed for those who were in enmity against Him.

By the repetition of the name, the Lord shows what strong love He has for them. For He also calls out to the adulterous synagogue, as if He were some lover despised by his beloved. The Lord also declares His love for mankind, saying that He many times "wanted to gather" them; and He indicates their madness as well, having said: "and you were not willing."

But because they said unto Him, Depart from hence, for Herod seeks to kill thee, speaking in Galilee where Herod reigned, He shows that not in Galilee, but in Jerusalem it had been fore-ordained that He should suffer. Hence it follows, For it can not be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem. When thou hearest, It can not be (or it is not fitting) that a prophet should perish out of Jerusalem, think not that any violent constraint was imposed upon the Jews, but He says this seasonably with reference to their eager desire after blood; just as if any one seeing a most savage robber, should say, the road on which this robber lurks can not be without bloodshed to travellers. So also no where else but in the abode of robbers must the Lord of the prophets perish. For accustomed to the blood of His prophets, they will also kill the Lord; as it follows, O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets.

(de Cons. Ev. lib. 2. c. 72.) There seems nothing opposed to St. Luke's narrative, in what the multitudes said when our Lord came to Jerusalem, Blessed is he who cometh in the name of the Lord, (Mat. 21:9.) for He had not as yet come thither, nor had this yet been spoken.

(de Cons. Ev. ubi sup.) But as Luke does not say to what place our Lord went from thence, so that He should not come except at that time, (for when this was spoken He was journeying onward until He should come to Jerusalem,) He means therefore to refer to that coming of His, when He should appear in glory.

(ubi sup.) Luke must be understood then as wishing to anticipate here, before his narrative brought our Lord to Jerusalem, or to make Him when approaching the same city, give an answer to those who told Him to beware of Herod, like to that which Matthew says He gave when He had already reached Jerusalem.

Behold, your house is left to you desolate. The same city which he had called his nest, he now calls the house of the Jews. Which, not undeservedly, is left to its own dominion, stripped of the Lord's help, because it not only despised being protected by that almighty bird—which Matthew names a hen under its wings—but also handed over that same bird, who wished to protect it, to be devoured by foxes, that is, to be crucified by Herod and Pilate. Without delay, the realm of those same foxes, that is, the kingdom of the earth, is given to plunder. For after the Lord was killed, the Romans came, and like stripping an empty nest, took their place, people, and kingdom.

But I say unto you, you will not see me until the time comes when you say, "Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord." The crowd indeed said this to the Lord coming to Jerusalem, but since Luke does not state that the Lord departed from here to not come except at the time when that would be said (for he continues on his journey until he reaches Jerusalem), it must certainly be understood mystically, that is, about that coming of his in which he will come in glory, especially since Matthew testifies that the Lord said this after the crowd's praises were sung to him. Otherwise, what he says, this is: Unless you repent and confess that I am he of whom the prophets sang, the son of the almighty Father, you shall not see my face. The Jews have been given the time for repentance; let them confess the blessed one who comes in the name of the Lord, and they will see the face of Christ.

The city itself which He had called the nest, He now calls the house of the Jews; for when our Lord was slain, the Romans came, and plundering it as a deserted nest, took away both their place, nation, and kingdom.

Ye shall not see, that is, unless ye have worked repentance, and confessed Me to be the Son of the Father Almighty, ye shall not see My face at the second coming.

Third, as regards the abandonment of that nation, he adds: Behold, your house shall be left to you desolate: Isaiah 1: "Your land is desolate, your cities are burned with fire." "And the daughter of Zion shall be left as a shelter in a vineyard and as a hut in a cucumber garden and as a city that is laid waste."

And since, just as abandonment is joined to hardness of heart, so visitation is joined to devotion, therefore he adds: But I say to you: You shall not see me until it comes to pass that you say: Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord: Psalm: "Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord. We have blessed you from the house of the Lord; the Lord is God, and he has shone upon us." This, however, can be referred to the vision of faith, by which no one sees unless he believes him to be true man and true God: John 9: "The Lord said to the man born blind: Do you believe in the Son of God? He answered and said: Who is he, Lord, that I may believe in him? And Jesus said to him: You have both seen him, and it is he who speaks with you. And he said: I believe, Lord; and falling down he worshipped him."

It can also be referred to the vision of direct sight, to which no one attains unless he blesses with life and tongue: Isaiah 26: "Let the wicked be taken away, lest he see the glory of God," according to another translation; but according to ours it says: "In the land of the saints he has done wicked things and shall not see the glory of the Lord."

And note that, according to the exposition of the Gloss, he speaks here of the vision at the judgment, because after the vision of Christ in humility nothing is expected except the vision in majesty, and this will be twofold: of the Divinity and of the humanity: of the Divinity, and this will belong entirely to the good, because it will have the greatest joy conjoined to it: Job thirty-three: "He shall see his face in jubilation, and he shall restore to man his justice"; and Isaiah thirty-three: "They shall see the King in his beauty," etc. The other is the vision of the humanity, and this will be common to all. For all will see with certainty the power and dominion of Christ; Apocalypse one: "Behold, he shall come with clouds, and every eye shall see him, and they also who pierced him." The Lord therefore means to say that that Jewish people will not see Christ unto their salvation unless they are converted to the faith and to his praise; which is at last expected in the final time after the fullness of the Gentiles; whence Romans eleven: "Blindness in part has happened in Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles should enter in, and so all Israel should be saved"; and Romans nine: "Isaiah cries out for Israel: If the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved." And in this the depth of the divine dispensation manifestly appears, on account of which the Apostle exclaims in Romans eleven: "O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How incomprehensible are his judgments and how unsearchable his ways!"

"And I tell you," he says, "you will not see me until you say, 'Blessed is he that comes in the name of the Lord.' " What does this mean? The Lord withdrew from Jerusalem and left as unworthy of his presence those who said, "Get away from here." And after he had walked about Judea and saved many and performed miracles which no words can adequately describe, he returned again to Jerusalem. It was then that he sat upon a colt of a donkey, while vast multitudes and young children, holding up branches of palm trees, went before him, praising him and saying, "Hosanna to the Son of David. Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord." Having left them, therefore, as being unworthy, he says that when the time of his passion has arrived, he will then barely be seen by them. Then again he went up to Jerusalem and entered amidst praises, and at that very time endured his saving passion in our behalf, that by suffering he might save and renew to incorruption the inhabitants of the earth. God the Father has saved us by Christ.

For our Lord had departed from Jerusalem, as it were abandoning those who were unworthy of His presence, and afterwards returned to Jerusalem, having performed many miracles, when that crowd meets Him, saying, Osanna to the Son of David, blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

Finally, I am leaving you. For I have so hated your wickedness that I do not even call the temple My house, but your house. For as long as virtue dwelt among you, the temple was Mine. But when you defiled it as well, made it a place of trade and a den of robbers, engaging in manifold commerce in it and killing one another out of covetousness (for this is the work of robbery — to lie in wait for a brother and seize his property; this is what robbers do! they attack a traveler and then take what he has) — so then, when you made the temple a den of robbers through the various commercial transactions you conducted in it — the house of prayer — it is no longer My house, but yours. By "house" you can understand not only the temple, but also the entire Jewish race. For Scripture sometimes calls a race a house as well, for example: "O house of Levi, bless the Lord" (Ps. 134:20). Since here too it can be understood thus: "house," that is, your race, is being left by Me. Just as in another place He says through the prophet: I have forsaken My house, I have abandoned My heritage. Here the Israelites are called a house. The Lord shows that even before this it was He who preserved them and delivered them from enemies. The words point to the second coming. For then, even against their will, they will confess Him as Savior and Lord. Only it will be of no benefit to them. What then? Did they really not see Him from the time He said this? Exactly so. When He says "you will not see Me" from now on, He does not indicate immediately, but the time after the cross. He spoke as if to say: from the time you crucify Me, you will no longer see Me, until I come a second time.

Or your house, (that is, temple,) as if He says, As long as there was virtue in you, it was my temple, but after that you made it a den of thieves, it was no more my house but yours. Or by house He meant the whole Jewish nation, according to the Psalm, O house of Jacob, bless ye the Lord, (Psalm 135:20.) by which he shows that it was He Himself who governed them, and took them out of the hand of their enemies. It follows, And verily I say unto you, &c.

For then also will they unwillingly confess Him to be their Lord and Saviour, when there shall be no departure hence. But in saying, Ye shall not see me until he shall come, &c. does not signify that present hour, but the time of His cross; as if He says, When ye have crucified Me, ye shall no more see Me until I come again.