1 Timothy 5:11–21

But if you admit one younger into the order of widows, and she cannot bear her widowhood in her youth, and marries, she will procure indecent reflections on the glory of the order of the widows, and shall give an account to God; not because she married a second time, but because she has "waxed wanton against Christ," and not kept her promise, because she did not come and keep her promise with faith and the fear of God. Wherefore such a promise ought not to be rashly made, but with great caution: "for it is better for her not to vow, than to vow and not to pay."

When the apostle says elsewhere, "I desire that the younger widows marry, bear children, rule their households," he recommends the good of marriage with wisdom and apostolic authority. He does not impose the duty of bearing children. It is not to be treated as it were a law to be observed, at least in the case of those who have chosen the state of continence. Finally, he makes it clear why he has said this, by adding, "Give the adversary no occasion for abusing us. For already some have turned aside after Satan." By these words he wishes us to understand that for the young widows whom he thought it fitting to be married, continence would have been better than marriage, but that it was better for them to marry than to turn aside after Satan, that is, by looking back to former things after having chosen the excellent state of chastity in virginity or widowhood, to abandon it and to perish.

Against the vowing of widowed continence it is objected: 1 Timothy 5: Let a widow be chosen not less than sixty years of age; and in the same place: Avoid the younger widows: therefore it does not seem that widowed chastity should be undertaken except in elderly women, nor this for any other reason than on account of the danger: therefore it does not seem safe to make a vow of continence.

To that which is objected: Let a widow be chosen not less than sixty years old: it must be said that this is not understood with respect to the vow of continence, but with respect to the ministry that was to be rendered to the Saints, who also were to be sustained from ecclesiastical goods. Hence in the Gloss: "Let a widow be chosen not less than sixty years old, who is to be nourished by the sustenance of the Church." Hence what he adds: Avoid younger widows: is understood in the same sense. Hence the Gloss there: "Avoid younger widows, that is, do not so greatly concern yourself with their vows of chastity as to undertake to sustain them with the sustenance of the Church." But that he does not intend to prohibit continence or the vow of continence for them is apparent from what Ambrose says in the book On Virginity: "We ought not to regard the virtue of age, but the age of virtue; nor should you marvel at profession in young girls, when you read of passion in little children." Hence also blessed Agnes in her legend, which Ambrose composed: "Do not, she said to the prefect, so despise bodily youth in me as to think that I wish to have you favorable: for faith is found not in years but in understanding, and almighty God approves minds more than ages."

That all widows that are approved are to be held in honour. In the first Epistle of Paul to Timothy: "Honour widows which are truly widows. But the widow that is wanton, is dead while she liveth." And again: "But the younger widows pass by: for when they shall be wanton in Christ, they wish to marry; having judgment, because they have cast off their first faith."

Paul himself has condemned women who chose widowhood but then do not desire to abide by their decision.

Why then, you ask, did Paul forbid young women to remain as widows even if they were willing?… Do you not see that it is not those who wish to keep their widowhood but rather those who prefer to marry after being widowed whom he forbids to remain as widows and to be appointed to that holy company? And he does so very wisely. For if you should intend to engage in second marriages, he says, do not profess widowhood. For breaking a promise is much worse than not promising at all.

"The younger widows refuse, for when they have begun to wax wanton against Christ, they will marry"; that is, when they have become scornful and luxurious. For as in the case of a just man, we might say, "Let her depart, for she has become another's." He shows therefore that though they chose widowhood, it was not the choice of their judgment. So then a widow, by the state of widowhood, is espoused to Christ. For He has said, "I am the defender of the widows and the father of the orphans." He shows that they do not choose widowhood as they ought, but wax wanton: however he bears with them. Elsewhere indeed he says, "I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ."

But refuse younger widows; for when they have indulged themselves against Christ, they desire to marry, having condemnation because they have cast off their first faith.

But refuse younger widows. Therefore, when the struggle becomes greater among virgins, nowhere does it seem to express the observation of time? Because they have come to this point from a greater fervor of faith, indeed a certain necessity follows which solitude brings. Or because, also speaking about virgins, that it should be constant and careful for those who belong to the Lord (1 Cor. 7:32), great diligence was applied.

for when they have indulged themselves against Christ. Perhaps there were some who had acted this way. But see that truly widows are also joined to Christ: however, those who are joined to him are placed in the order of virgins. "For I betrothed you, he says, to one husband, pure virgin, to present you to Christ." (2 Cor. 11:2) And these things are fitting for every Church. But what does it mean, "when they have indulged themselves against"? it means, when they become foolish, when they become pampered, that is, when they become arrogant, when they become proud over Christ, not accepting Him as a bridegroom, then they fall away into marriage. For they did not choose widowhood with a judgment of reason.

Because they have abandoned the first faith. Paul speaks of the covenant with Christ. For they agreed to be joined to Christ: but they reject Him and turn to earthly marriages. After this, indeed, they fall into another sin, namely idleness. Therefore, he ordered not only men to work, but also women. For every evil arises from idleness.

Why does the apostle give no commandment regarding the age of virgins, even though this feat was far more important? Undoubtedly because such a feat is a feat of an exalted spiritual disposition and great zeal. On the contrary, when the apostle requires of virgins unceasing service to the Lord in quietness and care for the things of the Lord, here he sets forth and demands of them great diligence. From this, the very determination of the age of life also becomes evident. Moreover, the younger widows themselves gave occasion for such a regulation by the fact that they did not endure widowhood; meanwhile, among the virgins there was nothing of the sort.

That is, when they become insensible, grow lax, and become proud against Christ, not wishing to have Him as their Bridegroom, then at last they enter into marriage; for they had chosen widowhood frivolously. Note that a widow also has Christ as her Bridegroom, just as a virgin does.

Then when he says, but the younger widows avoid, he shows which ones are to be avoided:

first, he shows this;

second, he gives the reason, at when they have grown wanton.

He says, therefore: let older widows be chosen, but the younger widows avoid, i.e., do not accept all indiscriminately to be supported by the Church, especially those who are of ill repute and wanton. Or avoid them as far as living with them or being on intimate terms with them is concerned: better is the iniquity of man than a woman doing a good turn, and a woman bringing shame and reproach (Sir 42:14).

Then when he says, for when they have grown wanton in Christ, they will marry, he assigns two reasons drawn from the two dangers that threaten:

concerning the first he does two things;

first, he mentions the first danger;

second, he answers a question, at having damnation.

For if the younger ones are accepted for support by the Church, there are two results, namely, that they have a sufficiency and that they are not employed to work with their hands. From each result comes danger:

from the first, a danger to chastity; hence he says, when they have grown wanton in Christ. For wantonness is sometimes taken for excessive indulgence of the sexual act: then it is one of the seven capital sins; but sometimes it is taken for any excessive amount of temporal things: which is how it is taken here. As if to say: when they shall have obtained a superabundance in Christ, i.e., through Christ's help, then they will marry: the people sat down to eat and drink, and they rose up to play (Exod 32:6). Valerius says that from Ceres, i.e., food, and a generous father the journey to Venus is short: they shall eat and shall not be filled: they have committed fornication and have not ceased (Hos 4:10).

The apostle mentions evil, unmarried women who are gossipers and busybodies and says that this vice springs from idleness. "And further," he says, "being idle, they learn to go about from house to house, and are not only idle, but gossipers as well as busybodies, mentioning things they ought not." He had previously said of these, "But refuse younger widows, for when they have wantonly turned away from Christ, they wish to marry and are to be condemned because they have broken their first pledge," that is, they did not persevere in what they had first vowed. However, he does not say "They marry" but "They wish to marry," for it is not the love of their noble vow which prevents many of them from marrying but fear of outright indecency. This itself springs from pride by which human displeasure is more dreaded than the divine displeasure.

The apostle, in concluding his discussion of marriage and virginity, is careful to observe a right balance in discriminating between them. Turning neither to the right hand nor to the left, he keeps to the King's highway and thus fulfills the injunction, "Be not righteous overmuch." … Do we not clearly show by this language what is typified in the Holy Scriptures by the terms right and left, and also what we take to be the meaning of the words "Be not righteous overmuch"? We turn to the left if, following the lust of Jews and Gentiles, we burn for sexual intercourse. We turn to the right if, following the error of the Manichaeans, we under a pretense of chastity entangle ourselves in the meshes of unchastity. But we keep to the King's highway if we aspire to virginity yet refrain from condemning marriage. Can anyone, moreover, be so unfair in his criticism of my poor treatise as to allege that I condemn first marriages, when he reads my opinion of second ones as follows, "The apostle, it is true, allows second marriages, but only to such women as are bent upon them, to such as cannot contain, lest 'when they have begun to wax wanton against Christ they marry, having condemnation because they have rejected their first faith,' and he makes this concession because many 'are turned aside after Satan.' But they will be happier if they abide as widows."

"Having condemnation, because they have cast off their first faith." By faith he means, fidelity to their covenant. As if he had said, They have been false to Christ, they have dishonored Him, and transgressed His covenant.

By "faith" the apostle means a vow. They broke, he says, their covenant with Christ, and for that they are subject to condemnation.

Then when he says, having damnation, he answers a tacit question.

For someone might ask: wherein is the evil if they do marry? For you yourself say: a woman does not sin if she marry (1 Cor 7:36). Therefore, he says: having damnation, because they have made void their first faith, of chastity, which they vowed; for otherwise they would not have been accepted for support. Hence Augustine says here that a person incurs damnation from the mere proposal; and this is true, if it is directed to a definite person and accompanied by internal consent: if you have vowed anything to God, do not defer to pay it (Eccl 5:3); no man putting his hand to the plow and looking back is fit for the kingdom of God (Luke 9:62).

Marriage is a good in all the things which are proper to the married state. And these are three: it is the ordained means of procreation, it is the guarantee of chastity, it is the bond of union. In respect of its ordination for generation the Scripture says, "I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house." As regards its guaranteeing chastity, it is said of it, "The wife has not power over her own body, but the husband; and likewise also the husband has not power over his own body, but the wife. And considered as the bond of union, "What God has joined together, let no one put asunder."

Paul speaks of idle persons and busybodies, whether virgins or widows, such as go from house to house calling on married women. They display an unblushing effrontery greater than that of a stage parasite. Cast them from you as you would the plague. For "evil communications corrupt good manners," and women like these care for nothing but their lowest appetites. They will often urge you, saying, "My dear creature, make the best of your advantages, and live while life is yours," and, "Surely you are not laying up money for your children." Given to wine and wantonness, they instill all manner of mischief into people's minds and induce even the most austere to indulge in enervating pleasures.

It is true that in writing to Timothy the apostle from fear of fornication is forced to countenance second marriage.… He is offering not a crown to those who stand but a helping hand to those who are down. What must a second marriage be if it is looked on merely as an alternative to the brothel!

Thus he commands not only men, but women also, to work. For idleness is the teacher of every sin. And not only are they exposed to this condemnation, but to other sins. If therefore it is unbecoming for a married woman "to go from house to house," much more is it for a virgin. What then happens, when the care for the husband is withdrawn, and the care to please God does not constrain them? They naturally become idlers, tattlers, and busybodies. For he who does not attend to his own concerns will be meddling with those of others, even as he who minds his own business will take no account of and have no care about the affairs of another. And nothing is so unbecoming to a woman, as to busy herself in the concerns of others, and it is no less unbecoming to a man. This is a great sign of impudence and forwardness.

And also they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house; not only idle, but also gossips and chatterers, speaking things they ought not.

— [OECUMENIUS] And also they learn to be idle. How do the idle women learn? Having the men who are brought in to assist them provide what is necessary for their old age, they are negligent about their tasks, but they take care to appear pleasing to the men. [end of the excerpt by Oecumenius A f.172v; B f.208r; G f.296r] —

not only idle, but also gossips. For the mind has been created by the Creator for us to work. Therefore, when we do not provide it with good work, it itself takes on absurd tasks.

Pursue earnestly, therefore, the virtue of continence, which is modesty's agent; industry, which allows not women to be "wanderers; " frugality, which scorns the world.

Besides the already mentioned condemnation for sins, they are guilty of yet another thing, namely that they learn to be idle, going about from house to house. And idleness teaches every evil. Consequently, idleness is unbecoming not only for men, but also for women.

Rightly so. For, going from house to house, they do nothing else but carry gossip from one woman to another, from this one to that one, and, prying into everything, they inevitably fall into curiosity, and speaking to everyone about everything, they fall into idle talk.

From the second result, namely, that they do not labor, there flow three evils: the first evil is idleness: idleness has taught much evil (Sir 33:29); this was the sin of Sodom, your sister, fullness of bread, and abundance, and her idleness (Ezek 16:49); he who pursues idleness is very foolish (Prov 12:11).

From idleness flow three evils: a woman's heart is not as firm as a man's; hence it turns to many things. Therefore, if it is not channeled by work it flies off in all directions. Consequently, it is dangerous for women to be idle; that is why the ancients kept them busy.

Furthermore, they become restless in regard to place, because they go about from house to house: now abroad, now in the streets, now lying in wait near the corners (Prov 7:12); they have loved to move their feet and have not rested and have not pleased the Lord (Jer 14:10).

As to speech he says, but tattlers also: for if they are not kept busy they kill time with trifles: talkative and wandering; not bearing to be quiet (Prov 7:10).

As to the heart he says, busybodies, because since they are not occupied with themselves, they get involved in other people's affairs. As a consequence they speak things which they ought not, because they set themselves up as judges of all cases: her conversation burns as a fire (Sir 9:11).

Against the vowing of widowed continence it is objected: 1 Timothy 5: I wish the younger women to marry, to bear children: but the vow of continence is contrary to this: therefore the Apostle wished the contrary of the vow of continence: therefore continence is not to be vowed.

To that which is objected from the word of the Apostle: I will that the younger women marry, etc.: it must be said that neither is this a precept, but it is permissive, just as the preceding one; and therefore it does not follow that to vow continence is reprehensible. Whence Augustine, in the book On Widowhood: "What the Apostle says: I will that the younger women marry, bear children, commends the good of marriage with apostolic authority and sobriety; he does not impose the duty of procreation upon those who embrace the good of continence, as though it were an obligation of law." And later: "To devote oneself to the procreation of children in the honorable order of marriage is not a disposition to be condemned in a person; yet the Christian mind that thinks on heavenly things more laudably transcends and overcomes this. But since, as the Lord says, not all receive this word, let her who can receive it, receive it; and let her who does not contain herself marry; let her who has not begun deliberate, and let her who has undertaken it persevere; let no occasion be given to the adversary, let no offering be withdrawn from Christ."

But if anyone dares to call marriage fornication, he again falls into blasphemy against the law and the Lord. For as covetousness is called fornication because it is opposed to contentment with what one possesses, and as idolatry is an abandonment of the one God to embrace many gods, so fornication is apostasy from single marriage to several. For, as we have remarked, the apostle uses the words fornication and adultery in three senses. On this matter the prophet says: "You were sold to your sins." And again: "You were defiled in a foreign land." Here he regards as defilement an association which is bound up with a strange body and not with that which in marriage is bestowed for the purpose of procreation. That is why the apostle also says: "I wish then that the younger women marry, bear children, look after their houses, and give the adversary no occasion for abuse; for some have already turned aside after Satan."

And indeed he entirely approves of the man who is husband of one wife, whether he be presbyter, deacon, or layman, if he conducts his marriage unblameably. "For he shall be saved by child-bearing."

It is likely that many widows at that time had lived more recklessly and arrogantly after the death of their husbands, as if freed from some constraining tyranny of their husbands over them; and so some earn a bad reputation for themselves because of their audacity. Drawing them away from this ruinous freedom, Paul leads them back to their former yoke. He says that if a widow intends to secretly cheapen and dishonor herself, it is much better to marry and "give our enemies no occasion to speak ill of us." Thus, because he did not want to furnish opportunities for rebuke or want the widow to live the wanton life of a harlot, he permitted second marriages.

"I will therefore," he says, (since they themselves wish it,) "that the younger widows marry, bear children, guide the house." This course is at least preferable to the other. They ought indeed to be concerned for the things of God, they ought to preserve their faith. But since they do not this, it is better to avoid a worse course. God is not dishonored by their marrying again, and they do not fall into those practices, which have been censured. From such a widowhood, no good could arise, but good may come out of this marriage. Hence the women will be able to correct that indolence and vanity of mind.

But why, since some have fallen away, does he not say that much care is to be taken of them, that they may not fall into the error he has mentioned? Why has he commanded them to marry? Because marriage is not forbidden, and it is a safeguard to them. Wherefore he adds, that they "give none occasion," or handle, "to the adversary to speak reproachfully."

Therefore, I wish the younger women to marry, bear children, manage the household, and give no opportunity to the adversary to have a cause for slander. For already some have turned aside after Satan.

The good aspect was that, once the widows were instructed, they should not abandon Christ nor reject their initial faith. But since they do this, let them marry, and let them not pledge themselves to Christ, and so let them marry. The former is blameless, the latter is unholy. For their arrogance and looseness of conduct are thus restrained, at least by greater affliction and concern.

and give no opportunity to the adversary. For if they marry correctly, not engaged to Christ beforehand, they will not expose themselves to the occasion of being slandered. Paul did not command them to live without fear in marrying, but that, pressed by cares, they should look to live modestly.

For already some have turned aside after Satan. But why then did you pay such great attention to these things, and even more to those concerning the virgins? Because they, Paul says, gave occasion, turning away after Satan. For he says this not that there are no younger widows, but because he feared lest he might reject Christ.

"But again, writing to Timotheus, he 'wills the very young (women) to marry, bear children, act the housewife.'" He is (here) directing (his speech) to such as he denotes above-"very young widows," who, after being, "apprehended" in widowhood, and (subsequently) wooed for some length of time, after they have had Christ in their affections, "wish to marry, having judgment, because they have rescinded the first faith,"-that (faith), to wit, by which they were "found" in widowhood, and, after professing it, do not persevere.

Especially, he says, I desired that they not break their vows. Since they themselves desire marriage, I too, condescending to them, want this. For it is better for them to "manage the house," that is, to have care for their own household and bear the labors and concerns of it, than to go about from house to house, chattering and spending time in idleness. Having said "bear children," the apostle showed that one should enter into marriage for the sake of childbearing, so as to bring many to God.

Since he said: "that they manage the house," lest it seem that he gives them freedom to indulge in worldly pleasures, he added: "give no occasion to the adversary for slander." Take care of the house in such a way, he says, that you do not harm the soul. Moreover, here the apostle very clearly indicates the purpose for which he makes such a concession to young widows. It is so that, he says, the devil may not be given occasion to mock them if, having become brides of Christ, they then, due to the inconstancy natural to youth, fall into impure deeds. For this reason I lead them under the yoke of marriage, so that, having neither time nor leisure, they may have no opportunity to commit a heap of the aforementioned wicked deeds.

Then when he says, I will, therefore, that the younger should marry, he shows what they should apply themselves to, namely, that they marry:

first, he gives his teaching;

second, the reason, at for some.

He says, therefore: I will, therefore, that the younger, namely, widows, should marry. But this seems to be contrary to what he says in 1 Corinthians: but I say to the widows: it is good for them, if they so continue (1 Cor 7:8). Therefore, he should have said, I will that they continue in their state.

I answer with Jerome that in that passage from 1 Corinthians the Apostle was describing what should be one's principle intention; but each one has his own gift from God. That is why he continues: it is better to marry than to burn. Therefore, one must be careful to learn what case he has in mind, because in this case his aim is that they not make their first faith void; consequently, in saying, I will, he does not have in mind the primary aim.

Bear children, and not kill them secretly by abortion: yet she shall be saved through childbearing, if she continue in the faith (1 Tim 2:15); be mistresses of families, namely, be kept busy and not be gadabouts from house to house. And I will also that they give no occasion to the adversary, i.e., to the Devil or the gentile, to speak evil, i.e., enable them to malign the Church of God. On this note he ends his description of the life that widows should lead, namely, that they should so live that they not provoke others to lewdness: for so is the will of God, that by doing well you may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men (1 Pet 2:15).

"For some are already turned aside after Satan." Such widows as these then he would have refused, not meaning that there should be no younger widows, but that there should be no adulteresses, that none should be idle, busy-bodies, speaking things that they ought not, that no occasion should be given to the adversary. Had nothing of this kind taken place, he would not have forbidden them.

His reason is this: for some are already turned aside after Satan, i.e., some who have vowed chastity have looked back, avoiding their vow, and they walk after Satan by imitating him who apostatized from the angel's ranks.

But if it is praiseworthy to have one's soul free from this failing of greed, how much more glorious is it to gain the love of the people by liberality. This should be neither too freely shown to those who are unsuitable, nor too sparingly bestowed upon the needy.… There is also another kind of liberality which the apostle teaches, "If any believing woman has relatives who are widows, let her assist them. Let the church not be burdened so that it may assist those who are real widows." Useful, then, is liberality of this sort.

"But none of those reclining at table understood why he said this to him. For some thought that, because Judas held the purse, Jesus says to him, 'Buy the things that we need for the feast,' or that he should give something to the poor." Therefore, the Lord, too, had a purse. Keeping safe the offerings from the faithful, he distributed both to the needs of his people and to others in need. The paradigm for handling church money was thereby established: We should understand that his teaching that one must not take thought of tomorrow was taught for this purpose, that no money should be kept by the saints, but that God should not be served for money and that justice should not be abandoned because of a fear of need. For the apostle too, looking ahead to the future, said, "If any believing woman has widowed relatives, let her provide sufficiently for them so that the church not be burdened, in order that it can have enough for true widows."

Observe how again he speaks of those as "widows indeed," who are left destitute, and have no resource from any other quarter. It was better to have it so. For thus two great objects were attained. Those had an opportunity of doing good, whilst these were honorably maintained, and the Church not burdened. And he has well said, "If any believer." For it is not fit that believing women should be maintained by unbelievers, lest they should seem to stand in need of them. And observe how persuasively he speaks; he has not said, "let them maintain them expensively," but "let them relieve them." "That the Church," he says, "may relieve them that are widows indeed." She therefore has the reward of this help also, for she that helps the Church, helps not her only, but those widows too whom the Church is thus enabled to maintain more bountifully.

If a faithful man or woman has widows, let them be supported, and let the Church not be burdened, so that it may provide adequately for the truly widows.

If a faithful man. He repeated: If a faithful man or woman has widows. For if they were unfaithful, it would not be necessary for them to be supported by them, lest the faithful appear to be in need of the unfaithful. Moreover, the laws also concern those who obey them, not those who are not subject to them.

let him provide for them. Let the matter be done lightly. For through this, let them support, Paul meant the necessary nourishment.

so that the Church is not burdened. So the faithful, supporting their own widows, also contribute to the widows of the Church. Just as the Church, not being burdened, and for this reason nourishing more abundantly those it nourishes, namely truly the widows, that is, those unprotected and isolated.

and that those who are truly widows. Truly widows are those who are abandoned on all sides. For he who does this, Paul says, not only supports them if he provides for them, but also greatly helps the rest, granting them relief.

For the widows of the faithful ought not to receive sustenance from the unfaithful, lest it seem that they have need of them. By the expression "must provide for them," the apostle indicated a sufficient satisfaction of need, and not luxury.

Thus, the faithful who support their own widows also help the church's widows at the same time, precisely in that the Church is not burdened and as a result can better provide for those whom it supports, namely the true widows, that is, those who are completely defenseless and alone.

Then when he says, if any of the faithful, he shows that the widows should be supported by private persons: first, he sets forth the doctrine;

second, the reason, at do not let the Church be charged. He says, therefore, that one who is truly a widow should put her trust in God; but if she has brothers or sisters or parents, let her be supported by them.

That is why he says, if any of the faithful have widows, let him minister to them, because this is a work of mercy; and this should be done lest the Church be charged. And this was necessary, because in those days the Church was without possessions; but today the Church has possessions that can be devoted to the support of widows: we worked night and day, lest we should be chargeable to any of you (1 Thess 3:8).

Effective presbyters should be rewarded not only with sublime honor but with earthly as well, that they not be burdened with poverty.

Preaching really entails hard work. This fact Paul made plain when he said, "Let the presbyters who rule well be held worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in the word and in teaching." But you are responsible for making this toil light or heavy. If you despise my words or, though you do not despise them, do not embody them in your deeds, my toil will be heavy, because I am laboring fruitlessly and in vain. But if you pay attention and make my words manifest in your deeds, I shall not even be aware of the perspiration, for the fruit produced by my work will not permit me to feel the laboriousness of the toil.

For this is the ultimate aim of their teaching: to lead their disciples, both by what they do and what they say, into the way of that blessed life which Christ commanded. Example alone is not sufficient instruction. And this statement is not mine but the Savior's. For he says, "Whoever shall do and teach, he shall be called great." Now if to do were the same as to teach, the second word would be superfluous. It would have been enough to say, "Whosoever shall do." But in fact by distinguishing these two he shows that example is one thing and instruction another. Each requires the other for perfect edification.

The "honor" of which he here speaks is attention to them, and the supply of their necessities, as is shown by his adding, "Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn"; and, "The laborer is worthy of his reward." So when he says, "Honor widows," he means, "support" them in all that is necessary. Thus he says, "That it may relieve those that are widows indeed"; and again, "Honor widows that are widows indeed," that is, who are in poverty, for the greater their poverty, the more truly are they widows. He alleges the Law, he alleges the words of Christ, both agreeing herein. For the Law says, "Thou shall not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn." See how he would have the teacher labor! For there is not, indeed there is not, any other labor such as his. But this is from the Law. But how does he quote from Christ? "The laborer is worthy of his reward." Let us not then look only to the reward, but to the terms of the commandment. "The laborer," he says, "is worthy of his reward." So that if any one lives in sloth and luxury, he is unworthy of it. Unless he is as the ox treading out the corn, and bearing the yoke, in spite of heat and thorns, and ceases not till he has carried the corn into the granary, he is not worthy. Therefore to teachers should be granted a supply of their necessities without grudging, that they may not faint nor be discouraged, nor by attention to inferior things deprive themselves of greater; that they may labor for spiritual things, paying no regard to worldly things.

And what is double support? Double that of the widows, or of the deacons, or simply, liberal support. Let us not then think only of the double maintenance granted them, but of what is added, "Those who rule well." And what is it to rule well? Let us hear Christ, Who says, "The good shepherd giveth his life for his sheep." Thus to rule well is, from our concern for them, never to spare ourselves.

"Especially those who labor in the word and doctrine." Where then are those who say that there is no occasion for the word and doctrine? Whereas he says to Timothy, "Meditate upon these things; give thyself wholly to them"; and, "Give attendance to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine; for in doing this thou shalt save both thyself, and them that hear thee." These are the men whom he wishes to be honored most of all, and he adds the reason, for they sustain great labor.

The elders who rule well are to be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in preaching and teaching. For the Scripture says, "Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain," and, "The worker deserves his wages."

Who then are the ones who lead well, Christ declared. "The good Shepherd," he says, "lays down his life for the sheep." (Jn. 10:11)

are to be considered worthy of double honor. Paul calls the necessary provision an honor, or rather a contribution. "Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain," and, "The worker deserves his wages."

double. But truly, with a double comparison made to widows, not to elders who do not rule well. For they do not even deserve simple honor, but rather must be expelled. Or he says double means much.

those who labor in preaching. Preach, not the boastful kind, but that which has the power to nourish spiritually. But where now are those who say that the leader does not need words or teaching, but life? Let them now hear how Paul honors the word [λόγον], especially preaching. For even this, if from some other. For when the word is about doctrines, where then does life have power? And see the contrast to, "Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain." For indeed, one who is threshing must be muzzled.

The worker deserves his wages. Even Christ speaks in accordance with the law. By wages, he means food, and by worker, he means the one who labors, namely that one who does not labor is unworthy of food. This, however, Paul says to teachers who do not labor in teaching.

The apostle has given them "double honor" as being both brothers and officers.

To the indictment of your appetite pertains (the charge) that "double honour" is with you assigned to your presiding (elders) by double shares (of meat and drink); whereas the apostle has given them "double honour" as being both brethren and officers. Who, among you, is superior in holiness, except him who is more frequent in banqueting, more sumptuous in catering, more learned in cups? Men of soul and flesh alone as you are, justly do you reject things spiritual.

The one who rules worthily — this the Lord teaches, saying: "the good shepherd lays down his life" (John 10:11), sparing nothing for the sake of caring for the sheep. By "honor" the apostle means the provision of all necessities, as is evident from what follows. For teachers must have necessities in abundance, so that, undistracted by anything, they may devote themselves to teaching. So too lived the Levites in the Old Testament. "Double" honor — either in relation to the widows, or in relation to the deacons, or simply double honor, that is, great honor. Where now are those who say that words are not needed, but only life? Let them listen now to Paul, how he values the word above all else, saying: this is necessary for us, just as the other is too. For when it comes to dogmas, what power does life have there? The apostle requires a word that is not boastful, but filled with the power of Scripture and understanding, even if it be spoken simply.

Above, he dealt with honorable widows who are supported by subsidies from the Church; here he deals with the honoring of bishops and priests:

first, he instructs Timothy how he should act toward them;

second, he shows how some of the things he said are to be understood, at some men's sins are manifest.

In regard to the first he does two things:

first, he shows that priests should be honored;

second, he supports himself with an authority, at for the Scripture says. In regard to the first he does two things: first, he shows that they are to be honored;

second, he shows why they deserve honor, at especially those who labor.

He says, therefore, let the priests who rule well. For the presbyters is the same as the elder; and just as the old are wont to have prudence: in the ancient is wisdom (Job 12:12), so those who are appointed to rule in the Church should have prudence: who is the faithful and wise steward, whom his lord sets over his family? (Luke 12:42). That is why the Church's prelates, i.e., bishops and priests, are called presbyters; hence he says, priests who rule. But this is not all, for they should rule well, namely, to the honor of God and not their own advantage: woe to the shepherds of Israel who fed themselves (Ezek 34:2); and should be prudent, so that he might give to each in due season: here now it is required of dispensers that a man be found faithful (1 Cor 4:2).

Esteemed worthy of double honor: one of which is that they be provided with the necessities of life: he had ten talents of silver so that with it he had been honored by the king (Tob 1:16); honor the Lord with your substance (Prov 3:9); and the other of which is that they be shown respect: humble your soul to the ancient (Sir 4:7); obey your prelates (Heb 13:17); all her domestics are clothed with double garments (Prov 31:21); they shall receive double in their land (Isa 61:7).

But especially is this honor to be shown to those who merit it by their labors, namely, those who labor in the word of preaching: among whom you shine as lights in the world (Phil 2:15); Let the word of Christ dwell in you abundantly in all wisdom teaching (Col 3:16); and doctrine, i.e., in erudition: I will give you pastors according to my own heart, and they shall feed you with knowledge and doctrine (Jer 3:15); and in Ephesians he links pastors with teachers, because this is the bishop's function (Eph 4:11).

And the same law commands "not to muzzle the ox which treadeth out the corn: for the labourer must be reckoned worthy of his food."

And it should be noted what is added: "The laborer is worthy of his hire," because the very food for sustenance is already part of the wages of the work, so that here the reward from the labor of preaching may begin, which is perfected there in the vision of truth. In this matter it should be considered that two rewards are owed to our one work: one on the way, the other in the homeland; one which sustains us in labor, another which recompenses us in the resurrection. Therefore the reward which is received in the present ought to accomplish this in us: that we may strive more vigorously toward the subsequent reward. Therefore every preacher should not preach in order to receive a reward in this time, but should receive a reward in order to continue preaching. For whoever preaches in order to receive here a reward of either praise or gift, without doubt deprives himself of the eternal reward.

He alleges the Law, he alleges the words of Christ, both agreeing herein. For the Law says, "Thou shall not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn." See how he would have the teacher labor! For there is not, indeed there is not, any other labor such as his. But this is from the Law. But how does he quote from Christ? "The laborer is worthy of his reward." Let us not then look only to the reward, but to the terms of the commandment. "The laborer," he says, "is worthy of his reward." So that if any one lives in sloth and luxury, he is unworthy of it. Unless he is as the ox treading out the corn, and bearing the yoke, in spite of heat and thorns, and ceases not till he has carried the corn into the granary, he is not worthy.

The apostle brings forward testimonies—one from the law, and another testimony of Christ. In both, observe what labor is required of the teacher. Threshing is the most arduous labor: and the teacher likewise must be prepared for every kind of toil, hardship, and grief. By the expression "the laborer," the apostle shows that one must not seek comfort and rest. "The laborer is worthy of his reward," or food. By these words the apostle points to prosperity: for if the laborer is worthy of his reward, then how much more of food. But the one who does not labor is unworthy.

Then when he says, for the Scripture says, he proves his statement with two authorities: one is used in the mystical sense and the other in the literal sense, at the laborer is worthy of his reward.

He says, therefore, for the Scripture says, namely, Deuteronomy: you shall not muzzle the ox that treads out the corn (Deut 25:4). In 1 Corinthians the Apostle shows that this passage is to be understood for teachers, for does God take care for oxen? (1 Cor 9:8). Not that they are not included under divine providence, but that he is not concerned how men treat them, since they can use them as they will. Consequently, that law is not concerned with oxen, but is a law presented under a figure. As if to say: do not prevent a man who labors in the office of preaching and ruling from living off his office. By oxen are understood teachers: where there are no oxen, the crib is empty; but where is much corn, there the strength of the ox is manifest (Prov 14:4); by corn is understood the faithful: the harvest indeed is great (Matt 9:37). Therefore, teachers and preachers are not to be prevented from having their honorarium.

The other authority is in Matthew: the laborer is worthy of his food (Matt 10:10); but it is better to say that it is from the Old Testament, although it is not stated in those words: for the Apostle never quotes the Gospel without explicitly saying so. But this authority is taken from Leviticus: the wages of him who has been hired by you shall not abide with you until the morning (Lev 19:13).

But are those honoraria considered to be wages? Augustine in a Gloss says that they are not. For the Gospel is not something that can be bought and sold in the sense that one preaches for a price. For sometimes that which is given to a person as a final reward is called a wage; but God forbid that a preacher's wages be that sort of honorarium: but sometimes a wage refers to that which a person deserves for his labor; and this is taking wage in a broad sense. Accordingly, Augustine says: let them accept.

That an elder must not be rashly accused. In the first to Timothy: "Against an eider receive not all accusation."

When a man is advanced in years, you must not be too ready to believe evil of him. His past life is itself a defense, and so also is his rank as an elder. Still, since we are human and sometimes in spite of the ripeness of our years fall into the sins of youth, if I do wrong and you wish to correct me, accuse me openly of my fault. Do not backbite me secretly.

May we then receive an accusation against a younger man, or against any one at all without witnesses? Ought we not in all cases to come to our judgments with the greatest exactness? What then does he mean? Do not so, he means, with any, but especially in the case of an elder. For he speaks of an elder not with respect to office, but to age, since the young more easily fall into sin than their elders. And it is manifest from hence that the Church, and even the whole people of Asia, had been now intrusted to Timothy, which is the reason why he discourses with him concerning elders.

And because many judgments are formed upon suspicion, there ought, he says, to be witnesses, and men to convict the offender according to the ancient law. "At the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every matter be established. Against an elder receive not an accusation." He does not say, "do not condemn," but "receive not an accusation," bring him not to judgment at all. But what if the two witnesses are false? This rarely happens, and it may be discovered upon examination on the trial. For since offenses are committed in secret, we ought to be satisfied with two witnesses, and this is sufficient proof of investigation.

But what if the offenses be notorious, and yet there are no witnesses, only a strong suspicion? It has been said above that he ought "to have a good report of them which are without."

Do not receive an accusation against an elder except on the evidence of two or three witnesses. Rebuke those who sin in the presence of all, so that the rest also may be fearful.

Do not receive an accusation against an elder. What then? Should such an accusation be admitted against the younger? By no means! But as if he were saying: Against no one, and especially not against the elder; for they have, even from their very age, a certain restraint; therefore he calls him an elder [πρεσβύτερον] who is old in age.

Rebuke those who sin in the presence of all. For he seeks carefully, Paul says, and when he finds, he reproaches with severity. For this is the rebuke. Before all, so that the rest may also be admonished. This, God did, both upon Pharaoh (Ex. 19) and upon Nebuchadnezzar (Dan. 4).

It is the duty of the presbyter to function as the common father of both the men and women of the congregation; because the care of both sexes involves seeing and speaking discreetly with the women, pastoral work must be done with great reverence. Furthermore, the duty of presbyters involves the administration of penitential discipline on admitted sinners and the exercise of oversight where such discipline is substandard. For both reasons the presbyters are vulnerable to charges.

Do we really accept an accusation against a young person but not against someone else? On the contrary, the apostle speaks as if to say: against no one, and especially not against an elder. He did not say: do not accuse, but: do not even "receive an accusation" at all. For by their very age they sin less than the young. By "elder" the apostle here means a person who has reached old age. Since many are accused on suspicion, according to the ancient law, he says, there must be witnesses who convict the guilty party. But what if they lie? This rarely happens, and at trial this can be uncovered. It would be good to have at least two witnesses, because sins are committed in secret. But what if the sins are manifest, yet there are no witnesses, but only a bad reputation? About this the apostle said above: "he must also have a good testimony from those who are outside" (1 Tim. 3:7).

Then when he says, do not receive an accusation, he treats of the correction of prelates, saying that priests who have ruled well are worthy of a double honor; but those who are wicked must be corrected.

In regard to this he does three things:

first, he says that accusations against them must not be readily admitted;

second, that guilty ones must be publicly corrected, at reprove those who sin;

third, that they should not be condemned rashly, at without prejudice.

He says, therefore: as major prelate, do not receive an accusation against a priest, but under two or three witnesses. Two suffice, if they are good. The reason for this statement is found in a Gloss, that a person in such a lofty position should not be readily accused, for he is Christ's representative.

But this does not seem to suffice, because even in regard to the laity no accusation is admitted except under two or three witnesses: by the mouth of two or three witnesses shall he die, who is to be slain (Deut 17:6).

Hence it should be noted that it is one thing to receive an accusation, and another to condemn the accused. A judge should not do the second, unless the accused has been convicted and condemned by witnesses; and this is the procedure in the state. But against a priest no accusation should be received, unless it is evident.

And here is a dilemma which often occurs: If you punish a man, you may ruin him. If you leave him unpunished, you may ruin another. I admit that I make mistakes in this matter every day.

Who is the hired hand? One who sees the wolf coming and flees. One who seeks his own things, not those of Jesus Christ. He does not dare openly to accuse the sinner. Suppose someone has sinned, and sinned grievously. He ought to be reproached and perhaps excommunicated. But if he is excommunicated, you imagine, he will be an enemy, he will make plots, he will do harm when he can. Now consider one who seeks his own things, not those of Jesus Christ. He does not lose what he is pursuing, the advantage of a human friendship. He does not incur the distress of human enmities—he is quiet; he does not correct. Look, the wolf seizes the sheep's throat. The devil has persuaded a believer to commit adultery. You are silent; you do not scold. O hired hand, you saw the wolf coming and you fled.

A feigned kindness to the wicked is a betrayal of the truth, an act of treachery to the community and a means of habituating oneself to indifference to evil.… "Them that sin, reprove before all," says the apostle, and he immediately adds the reason, saying, "that the rest also may have fear."

That the sinner must be publicly reproved. In the first Epistle of Paul to Timothy: "Rebuke them that sin in the presence of all, that others also may be afraid."

Do not, he says, hastily cut them off, but carefully enquire into all the circumstances, and when thou hast thoroughly informed thyself, then proceed against the offender with rigor, that others may take warning. For as it is wrong to condemn hastily and rashly, so not to punish manifest offenses is to open the way to others, and embolden them to offend.

"Rebuke," he says, to show that it is not to be done lightly, but with severity. For thus others will be deterred. How is it then that Christ says, "Go and tell him his fault between him and thee alone, if one sin against thee." But Christ Himself permits him to be censured in the Church. What then? is it not a greater scandal, that one should be rebuked before all? How so? For it is a much greater scandal, that the offense should be known, and not the punishment. For as when sinners go unpunished, many commit crimes; so when they are punished, many are made better. God Himself acted in this manner. He brought forth Pharaoh, and punished him openly. And Nebuchadnezzar too, and many others, both cities and individuals, we see visited with punishment. Paul therefore would have all stand in awe of their Bishop, and sets him over all.

That is, those who persist in sin and whom you find after thorough investigation, rebuke strongly and strictly, not to satisfy your own anger, but so that the rest may be instructed through fear. For a bishop must also be fearsome. For just as it is harmful to condemn thoughtlessly, so it is destructive not to rebuke the guilty, because through this the disease of sin spreads to many. But how then did the Lord say in the Gospel: "If your brother sins against you, go and rebuke him between you and him alone" (Matt. 18:15)? Yet the Lord also commands to rebuke before the community one who persists in sin. So then what? Will not rebuke before the community cause scandal? On the contrary, there is greater scandal when a well-known sinner is not rebuked. Therefore God also, setting them up as an example, so to speak, punished Pharaoh (Exod. 14:4), Nebuchadnezzar (Dan. 4), and many others, with the purpose of instructing the people living on earth.

Then when he says, reprove those who sin, he shows how they are to be punished, if proved guilty:

first, he shows that they must be punished publicly;

second, he adjures him to observe this, at I charge you, before God.

He says, therefore: reprove those who sin, whether they be priests or not, before all. Why? So that the rest also may have fear.

Yet the procedure in such cases is not the same as that in fraternal correction; because the judge is a public person. Consequently, he must aim at the common good, which is harmed by a public crime, because many are scandalized. Therefore, an ecclesiastical judge must inflict public punishments in such a way that others are edified: for because sentence is not speedily pronounced against the evil, the children of men commit evils without any fear (Eccl 8:11); the wicked man being scourged, the fool shall be wiser (Prov 19:25).

Note that he says, before all; which seems to be contrary to what is stated in Matthew: if your brother shall offend you, go, and rebuke him between you and him alone (Matt 18:15).

Augustine answers in a Gloss: distinguish the times and the sin, because the one is secret and the other public. The first needs a secret remedy, i.e., should be corrected in private; and this is the one the Lord has in mind; hence he says, offend you alone, as though in private. But the Apostle is speaking of a public sin, which calls for a public penalty. And this is signified by the dead whom the Lord revived. He revived the girl in her own home (Matt 9); and this signifies a secret sin. On that occasion he even cleared the room of people. But he revived the widow's son outside the gate in public (Luke 7); by which he showed that a public sin must be publicly punished.

Let us reverence the Lord Jesus Christ, whose blood was given for us; let us esteem those who have the rule over us; let us honour the aged among us; let us train up the young men in the fear of God; let us direct our wives to that which is good. Let them exhibit the lovely habit of purity [in all their conduct]; let them show forth the sincere disposition of meekness; let them make manifest the command which they have of their tongue, by their manner of speaking; let them display their love, not by preferring one to another, but by showing equal affection to all that piously fear God.

Having spoken of Bishops and Deacons, of men, and women, of widows and elders, and of all others, and having shown how great was the authority of a Bishop, now he was speaking of judgment, he has added, "I charge thee before God and the Lord Jesus Christ and the elect angels, that thou observe these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality." Thus fearfully he charges him. For though Timothy was his beloved son, he did not therefore stand in awe of him. For as he was not ashamed to say of himself, "Lest by any means when I have preached to others, I myself should be a cast-away" (1 Cor. ix. 27); much less would he be afraid or ashamed in the case of Timothy. He called the Father and the Son to witness. But wherefore the elect Angels? From great moderation, as Moses said, "I call heaven and earth to witness" (Deut. iv. 26); and again, "Hear ye, O mountains, and strong foundations of the earth." (Mic. vi. 2.) He calls the Father and the Son to witness what he has said, making his appeal to Them against that future Day, that if anything should be done that ought not to be done, he was clear from the guilt of it.

"That thou observe these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality." That is, that thou deal impartially and equally between those who are upon trial and are to be judged by thee, that no one may pre-occupy thy mind, or gain thee over to his side beforehand.

But who are the elect Angels? It is because there are some not elect. As Jacob calls to witness God and the heap (Gen. xxxi. 45), so we often take at once superior and inferior persons to witness; so great a thing is testimony. As if he had said, I call to witness God and His Son and His servants, that I have charged thee: so before them I charge thee. He impresses Timothy with fear.

I seriously charge you before God and the Lord Jesus Christ and the elect angels to keep these instructions without bias, and to do nothing out of favoritism.

I seriously charge you before God. Paul warns of severity. For Timothy did not simply resign, but protested, securing himself in case anything improper should happen. But why did Paul call the Father and the Son as witnesses, and also angels together? Because they, along with their Lord who is to come in judgment, are present and will bear witness to the discourse. It is also our custom to call both superiors and inferiors as witnesses. And Jacob also took God and the mountain as witnesses. (Gen. 31:46)

and the elect angels. He said "elect angels," because angels and demons alike are cast away.

— [OECUMENIUS] Either he spoke what was truly the case, or he brought them to the brink of ruin. [end of the excerpt by Oecumenius A f. 173v; B f. 209τ; G f. 297r] —

to keep these instructions without bias. This, for example, is what he said: Without haste in judgment, that is, so that you do nothing rashly or recklessly from what has been said, and not without preceding judgment or counsel.

and to do nothing out of favoritism. Indeed, presumptions are often devoid of truth. For favoritism [πρόσκλησις] is an affectation that incites someone to do something without judgment.

without bias. That is, without falling into the judgment and punishment of disobedience for someone who has erred in something. Thus Clement in the seventh book of Hypotyposes. And Basil, in his interpretation of the Proverbs, says, According to inclination, that is, not leaning towards what is wrong, but bringing forth straight judgment. For he says thus: Doing nothing according to inclination, but bringing forth judgments straight and unaltered.

Just as they carefully prepared their will and testament, and committed it to a trust, and adjured (the trustees to be faithful to their charge), even so do I hold it.

Having said much in the words cited above, he now begins to speak as in a court and in doing so adjures Timothy most solemnly. He was not ashamed to safeguard even Timothy with such an exhortation. For if he said of himself, "lest, having preached to others, I myself should be disqualified" (1 Cor. 9:27), then all the more was he not ashamed to say this concerning Timothy. He calls the Father and the Son as witnesses so that on the coming day of judgment, if anything were done contrary to duty, he might remain blameless, since he had strictly exhorted him. Why does he add the angels as well? Because on the day of judgment the angels will solemnly accompany the Lord. And we too have a custom of taking as witnesses both important and insignificant persons. Jacob also takes as witnesses God and the hill. And Moses says, "I call heaven and earth to witness" (Deut. 4:26). For God is so gracious toward us that He accepts even servants brought together with Him as witnesses. He called the angels "elect" because the demons are also angels, but rejected ones.

That is, be impartial toward those who are being judged, so that there be no preliminary decision, that is, so that no one prejudices you and, drawing you to their side in advance, disposes you to pronounce judgment and render a decision. Do nothing "by partiality," inclining to one side. It is as if he were saying: one side invites you to help it; so do not act according to this invitation.

Then he says, I charge you, before God. Because the ecclesiastical judge acts in God's person in a special way when he judges; therefore, he charges him before God to judge justly.

For he must argue his case in public in such a way that he does not scorn God's judgment. On this point he reminds him of three things: first, God's authority, because God the Father will judge him with authority; hence he says, before God: you shall judge the whole earth (Gen 18:25). Second, Christ as man will be sitting as judge: he has given him power to do judgment, because he is the Son of man (John 5:27). Hence he says, and Christ Jesus. Third, the angels will be ministers: when the Son of man shall come in his majesty and all the angels with him, then he shall sit upon the throne of his majesty (Matt 25:31); that is why he adds, and the elect angels: you renew your witnesses against me (Job 10:17).

Then when he says, observe these things without prejudice, he warns him against rash judgment, saying, without prejudice, i.e., that he should not proceed rashly but with deliberation, doing nothing by declining to either side.

Or without prejudice, i.e., without previous discussion: do no important thing without judgment (Sir 33:30); the cause which I knew not, I searched out most diligently (Job 29:16); otherwise, you will not be acting as mediator between two parties: you shall not go aside in the poor man's judgment (Exod 23:6).