1 Timothy 3:14–4:5

"These things write I unto thee, hoping to come unto thee shortly. But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the Church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth."

That he may not plunge Timothy into dejection by giving him orders about such matters, he says, I write thus not as though I were not coming, but I will indeed come, still in case I should be delayed, that thou mayest not be distressed. And this he writes to him to prevent his being dejected, but to others in order to rouse them to greater earnestness. For his presence, though only promised, would have great effect. Nor let it seem strange that, though foreseeing everything through the Spirit, he was yet ignorant of this, and only says, I hope to come, but if I tarry, which implies uncertainty. For since he was led by the Spirit, and did not act from his own inclination, he was naturally uncertain about this matter.

These things I write to you, hoping to come to you soon; but if I am delayed, I write so that you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth.

These things I write to you. In order that the arrangement concerning these matters may not throw Timothy into gloom because Paul is no longer present, see what Paul says: "But if I am delayed." Since he was led by the Spirit, and did not know where the Spirit was ordering him to go, therefore he always hesitates.

which is the Church of the living God. Whoever is a house, is the Church of the living God; not like the Jewish temple, but a pillar and foundation, that is, a confirmation of the truth. For the temple, he says, was a foundation of the types of truth. And rightly so, "of the living God." For do you not notice, he said, that it is filled with men: for it excels through God, and is built by Him, and has Him as its inhabitant.

Lest by giving him instruction concerning such matters he cast the disciple into grief, as though Paul would no longer see him, he says: I do not write this because I will no longer come; on the contrary, I will come. However, if it happens that I am delayed, you must have a model of how it is fitting for you to live. The apostle said beautifully: "hoping." Since, being led by the Spirit, he did not know where he must go, he rightly has doubts also concerning his coming to Timothy.

Then when he says, these things I write to you, he presents the reason for all the above mentioned admonitions:

first, he excludes a supposed reason;

second, he states the true one, at but if I tarry;

third, he assigns the reason, at which is the Church.

In regard to the first it should be noted that from what Paul had written Timothy could suppose that he was never to see Paul again; otherwise, it would seem superfluous to write him letters. Hence he says, these things I write to you, hoping that I shall come to you shortly. He called him son, because he was very dear to him: for this cause have I sent to you Timothy, who is my dearest son (1 Cor 4:17). And he says, hoping, as though not certain: having more things to write unto you, I would not by paper and ink; for I hope that I shall be with you and speak face to face (2 John 1:12). I write, therefore, even though I have hope, because hope should not be prolonged too much: it is the part of man to prepare the soul; and of the Lord to govern the tongue (Prov 16:1).

Accordingly, as Scripture says, Jacob became rich by such means and reared a very good flock for Christ. He improved it with the title of faith and a diversity of virtues, the marks of a glorious name. And so he did not consider himself poor, for he was rich with the wealth of faith.… And it is no wonder that Jacob possessed peace, for he had set up a pillar and anointed it to God, and that pillar is the church. Paul calls that pillar "the bulwark of the truth." That man anoints it who pours the ointment of faith upon Christ and of compassion upon the poor.

For there is no necessity that the women should be seen by the men; but only in the laying on of hands the bishop shall anoint her head, as the priests and kings were formerly anointed, not because those which are now baptized are ordained priests, but as being Christians, or anointed, from Christ the Anointed, "a royal priesthood, and an holy nation, the Church of God, the pillar and ground of the marriage-chamber," who formerly were not a people, but now are beloved and chosen, upon whom is called His new name as Isaiah the prophet witnesses, saying: "And they shall call the people by His new name, which the Lord shall name for them."

Therefore, beloved, with assured mind and steadfast heart, let us continue to live under so lofty a Head in so glorious a body, in which we are mutually members. Thus, even if my absence were as far as the most distant lands, we should be together in him, and we should never withdraw from the unity of his body. If we lived in one house, we should certainly be said to be together; how much more are we together when we are together in one body!

Honor the holy church as your mother. Love her, proclaim her the Jerusalem which is above, the holy city of God. She it is who, in this faith which you have heard, bears fruit and grows in the whole world, the church of the living God, the pillar and buttress of the truth. She tolerates the wicked in the communion of the sacraments, knowing that they are due to be separated from her at the end and withdrawing from them meanwhile in the dissimilarity of their morals.

Every one of us, indeed, who is instructed in the Holy Scripture is the administrator of some one of those gifts which, according to the gospel, have been apportioned to us. In this great household of the church not only are there vessels of every kind—gold, silver, wooden and earthen—but also a great variety of vocational pursuits. The house of God, which is the church of the living God, has hunters, travelers, architects, builders, farmers, shepherds, athletes, soldiers.

The earth which the Spirit has filled is the ecclesiastical hierarchy; he "who weighs the mass of the earth with three fingers," because he founded the holy Church upon the divine utterances. The sacred utterances are for its stability. The Apostle says to Timothy: "I write to you, Timothy, that you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the Church of the living God, the pillar and ground of truth."

Concerning observance of divine Law, St. Paul writes: "I write these things to thee, my son Timothy, in order that thou mayest know how to conduct thyself in the house of God, which is the Church of the living God, the pillar and mainstay of the truth." The Church is called pillar and mainstay because it both enlightens the mind and strengthens virtue. Those who come to it are enlightened by faith and strengthened by the constancy of virtue. And divine Law brings about these two effects. Hence it is the column of the sons of Israel, whose motion indicated clearly how they were to act and how to rest. For on this point all Churches are in agreement, on how to observe God's Law, as in olden days the whole people kept their eyes on the moving column. He who does not look upon it does not belong to the unity of the Church, for instance if he does not understand this Law, or understanding it, refuses to obey it.

"For from the rising of the sun, even to its setting, my name is great among the nations." It is of this holy Catholic church that Paul writes to Timothy.… He calls the church "the pillar and mainstay of the truth."

We know through the grace of God that the holy church is called a virgin, as the apostle says, "I betrothed you to one husband to present you as a chaste virgin to Christ," but in that one virgin herself, virgins in the plural are also named. For we read, "Virgins will be brought to the king after her." Nor is there any doubt that there is one church which is spread throughout the whole world which is called by the apostle "the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of truth." Still this is one church in such a way that in it many are called churches.

WE have learned from none others the plan of our salvation, than from those through whom the Gospel has come down to us, which they did at one time proclaim in public, and, at a later period, by the will of God, handed down to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith. For it is unlawful to assert that they preached before they possessed "perfect knowledge," as some do even venture to say, boasting themselves as improvers of the apostles. For, after our Lord rose from the dead, [the apostles] were invested with power from on high when the Holy Spirit came down [upon them], were filled from all [His gifts], and had perfect knowledge: they departed to the ends of the earth, preaching the glad tidings of the good things [sent] from God to us, and proclaiming the peace of heaven to men, who indeed do all equally and individually possess the Gospel of God.

Such, then, are the first principles of the Gospel: that there is one God, the Maker of this universe; He who was also announced by the prophets, and who by Moses set forth the dispensation of the law,-[principles] which proclaim the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and ignore any other God or Father except Him. So firm is the ground upon which these Gospels rest, that the very heretics themselves bear witness to them, and, starting from these [documents], each one of them endeavours to establish his own peculiar doctrine. ... It is not possible that the Gospels can be either more or fewer in number than they are. For, since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds, while the Church is scattered throughout all the world, and the "pillar and ground" of the Church is the Gospel and the spirit of life; it is fitting that she should have four pillars, breathing out immortality on every side, and vivifying men afresh.

"That thou mayest know," he says, "how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the Church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth." Not like that Jewish house. For it is this that maintains the faith and the preaching of the Word. For the truth is the pillar and the ground of the Church.

For the soul, the bride of the Word, which abides in the royal house — that is, in the Church — is taught by the Word of God, who is her Bridegroom, whatever things have been laid up and stored away within the royal hall and the king's chamber. In this house, which is the Church of the living God, she learns also the cellars of that wine which has been gathered from the holy winepresses — cellars of wine not only new but also old and sweet, which is the teaching of the law and the prophets.

Do not say that people assembled the Church. She is the work of God — the living and fearsome God, not a dead and powerless one, such as are the gods of the Greeks.

The Apostle here compares the Church with the Jewish temple and says that the latter was truly a type and shadow, such as, for example, the bells, the costly ornaments, and the high priest with the sacrifices. But the Church is the pillar of truth. For everything performed in her is true and not figurative, as were the things in the church under the Law: instead of bells, she has resplendent preaching; instead of costly ornaments and sacred vestments, a most glorious life, rich in inward fruits; her High Priest is the Son of God; her great sacrifice is His Divine Body.

Hence he says, but if I tarry long; for we would have come unto you, I Paul indeed, once and again: but Satan has hindered us (1 Thess 2:18); I write that you may know how you ought to behave yourself in the house of God: God makes men of one mind to dwell in a house (Ps 67:7).

Then when he says, which is the Church of the living God, he gives the cause why he should behave himself in it; second, he gives the reason for this cause, which is twofold:

first, by commending the Church;

second, the unity of the Church, at and evidently great.

In regard to the first he does two things:

first, he commends the Church on the part of the one whose Church it is;

second, from the truth of the Church itself, at the pillar.

On the part of the one whose Church it is, it is the Church of the living God. For a church is, as it were, an assembly, because in the Church is found the assembly of believers: whom he called, them he also justified (Rom 8:30). And they are assembled for God: that they also may be one in us (John 17:21). Hence he says, which is the Church of God, and adds, living, to distinguish from other gods unto whom the gentiles are assembled; for these gods are dead, but the God of the Church is living: as the Father has life in himself, so he has given to the Son also to have life in himself (John 5:26). Consequently, we must behave in it, so as to be spiritually alive: holiness becomes your house, O Lord (Ps 92:5).

The second reason is from the truth of the Church. For it is natural for man to desire knowledge of the truth, since truth is the perfection of the intellect. Hence Augustine says that man's end is happiness, which is nothing less than joy in the truth. This was discovered by philosophers from creatures (Rom 1:19); but they wavered, because they were not certain of the truth, both because they had been corrupted by errors, and because there is scarcely one truth in which all agree. But in the Church there is firm knowledge and truth; hence he says, the pillar: my throne is in a pillar of a cloud (Sir 24:7); their heads shall be of gold and the sockets of brass (Lev 26:37); they are called golden, because of themselves they are holy. And ground, namely, in relation to others, because they cannot be strengthened in the truth except by the sacraments of the Church: and you being once converted, confirm your brethren (Luke 22:32); I have established the pillars thereof (Ps 74:4). Therefore, because the Church is the assembly of God and gives knowledge of the truth, we ought to be in it.

"And He had in His right hand seven stars." He said that in His right hand He had seven stars, because the Holy Spirit of sevenfold agency was given into His power by the Father. As Peter exclaimed to the Jews: "Being at the right hand of God exalted, He hath shed forth this Spirit received from the Father, which ye both see and hear." Moreover, John the Baptist had also anticipated this, by saying to his disciples: "For God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto Him. The Father," says he, "loveth the Son, and hath given all things into His hands." Those seven stars are the seven churches, which he names in his addresses by name, old calls them to whom he wrote epistles. Not that they are themselves the only, or even the principal churches; but what he says to one, he says to all. For they are in no respect different, that on that ground any one should prefer them to the larger number of similar small ones. In the whole world Paul taught that all the churches are arranged by sevens, that they are called seven, and that the Catholic Church is one. And first of all, indeed, that he himself also might maintain the type of seven churches, he did not exceed that number. But he wrote to the Romans, to the Corinthians, to the Galatians, to the Ephesians, to the Thessalonians, to the Philippians, to the Colossians; afterwards he wrote to individual persons, so as not to exceed the number of seven churches. And abridging in a short space his announcement, he thus says to Timothy: "That thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the Church of the living God." We read also that this typical number is announced by the Holy Spirit by the month of Isaiah: "Of seven women which took hold of one man." The one man is Christ, not born of seed; but the seven women are seven churches, receiving His bread, and clothed with his apparel, who ask that their reproach should be taken away, only that His name should be called upon them. The bread is the Holy Spirit, which nourishes to eternal life, promised to them, that is, by faith. And His garments wherewith they desire to be clothed are the glory of immortality, of which Paul the apostle says: "For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on mortality." Moreover, they ask that their reproach may be taken away-that is, that they may be cleansed from their sins: for the reproach is the original sin which is taken away in baptism, and they begin to be called Christian men, which is, "Let thy name be called upon us." Therefore in these seven churches, of one Catholic Church are believers, because it is one in seven by the quality of faith and election. Whether writing to them who labour in the world, and live of the frugality of their labours, and are patient, and when they see certain men in the Church wasters, and pernicious, they hear them, lest there should become dissension, he yet admonishes them by love, that in what respects their faith is deficient they should repent; or to those who dwell in cruel places among persecutors, that they should continue faithful; or to those who, under the pretext of mercy, do unlawful sins in the Church, and make them manifest to be done by others; or to those that are at ease in the Church; or to those who are negligent, and Christians only in name; or to those who are meekly instructed, that they may bravely persevere in faith; or to those who study the Scriptures, and labour to know the mysteries of their announcement, and are unwilling to do God's work that is mercy and love: to all he urges penitence, to all he declares judgment.

But when the fullness of time was come, she [Wisdom] was sent, not to fill angels, nor to be an angel, except in so far as she announced the counsel of the Father, which was her own also; nor, again, to be with men or in men, for this too took place before, both in the fathers and in the prophets; but that the Word itself should be made flesh, that is, should be made man. In which future mystery, when revealed, was to be the salvation of those wise and holy men also, who, before He was born of the Virgin, were born of women; and in which, when done and made known, is the salvation of all who believe, and hope, and love. For this is "the great mystery of godliness, which was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory."

The second original influence of piety itself is from incarnate Wisdom. Whence the Apostle to Timothy: "Manifestly great is the sacrament of piety, which was manifested in the flesh, justified in the spirit, appeared to Angels, was preached to the nations, was believed in the world, was taken up in glory." The mystery of human redemption accomplished through the incarnate and crucified Word is the great sacrament of piety.

He says that it was manifested in the flesh, through the incarnation; was justified in the spirit, on the gibbet of the cross; appeared to Angels, in the glorification; was preached to the nations, in the mission of the Holy Spirit; was believed in the world, through the spread of the faith; was taken up in glory, through the examination of the final judgment. I say that the incarnate Son of God assumed our poverty. What brought this about? Certainly piety. "Whence he ought in all things to be made like unto his brethren, that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest before God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people." Through piety he assumed flesh, ascended the cross, was raised from the dead, sent the Holy Spirit upon the earth, called the Church to himself, and freed all the worthy from misery through piety. The Apostle to the Romans says: "Do you despise the riches of his goodness and patience and longsuffering? Do you not know that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? But according to your hardness and impenitent heart, you treasure up for yourself wrath in the day of wrath and of the revelation of the just judgment of God." The Son of God offered a holocaust, namely himself for us: this is the great sacrament of piety.

This sacrament is repeated daily upon the altar. For these reasons he gave us the Sacrament of the altar, so that, mindful of the sacrament of piety, we might put on the bowels of piety. Cruel is the heart that is not softened by these things.

We hold it necessary to honour, even as the Father is honoured, the God Who was manifested by the Cross, and they [the Eunomians] find the Passion a hindrance to glorifying the Only-begotten God equally with the Father that begat Him.… Eunomius makes the suffering of the Cross to be a sign of divergence in essence, in the sense of inferiority, considering, I know not how, the surpassing act of power, by which He was able to perform this, to be an evidence of weakness; failing to perceive the fact that, while nothing which moves according to its own nature is looked upon as surprisingly wonderful, all things that overpass the limitations of their own nature become especially the objects of admiration, and to them every ear is turned, every mind is attentive, in wonder at the marvel. And hence it is that all who preach the word point out the wonderful character of the mystery in this respect,—that "God was manifested in the flesh," that "the Word was made flesh," that "the Light shined in darkness," "the Life tasted death," and all such declarations which the heralds of the faith are wont to make, whereby is increased the marvellous character of Him Who manifested the superabundance of His power by means external to His own nature.

"Had ye known My Essence and My Dignity, ye would have known that of the Father also; and henceforth ye shall know Him, and have seen Him," (the one belonging to the future, the other to the present,) that is, "by Me." By "sight," He meaneth knowledge by intellectual perception. For those who are seen we may see and not know; but those who are known we cannot know and not know. Wherefore He saith, "and ye have seen Him"; just as it saith, "was seen also of Angels." (1 Tim. iii. 16.) Yet the very Essence was not seen; yet it saith that He "was seen," that is, as far as it was possible for them to see. These words are used, that thou mayest learn that the man who hath seen Him knoweth Him who begat Him. But they beheld Him not in His unveiled Essence, but clothed with flesh.

"And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; God [He who] was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit."

Here he speaks of the Dispensation in our behalf. Tell me not of the bells, nor of the holy of holies, nor of the high priest. The Church is the pillar of the world. Consider this mystery, and thou mayest be struck with awe: for it is indeed "a great mystery," and "a mystery of godliness," and that "without controversy" or question, for it is beyond all doubt. Since in his directions to the Priests he had required nothing like what is found in Leviticus he refers the whole matter to Another, saying, "God was manifest in the flesh." The Creator was seen incarnate. "He was justified in the Spirit." As it is said, "Wisdom is justified of her children," or because He practiced no guile, as the Prophet says, "Because he had done no violence, neither was guile found in his mouth." (Isa. liii. 9; 1 Pet. ii. 22) "Seen of Angels." So that Angels together with us saw the Son of God, not having before seen Him. Great, truly great, was this mystery! "Preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world." He was heard of and believed in through all parts of the world, as the Prophet foreshowed, saying, "Their sound is gone out into all the world." (Ps. xix. 4) Think not that these things are mere words, for they are not, but full of hidden realities. "Received up into glory." He ascended upon clouds. "This Jesus," it is said, "Who is taken up from you, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen Him go into heaven." (Acts i. 11)

The dispensation in our behalf he calls a "mystery," and well may it be so called, since it is not manifest to all, nay, it was not manifest to the Angels, for how could it, when it was "made known by the Church"? (Eph. iii. 10) Therefore he says, "without controversy great is the mystery." Great indeed was it. For God became Man, and Man became God. A Man was seen without sin! A Man was received up, was preached in the world! Together with us the Angels saw Him. This is indeed a mystery! Let us not then expose this mystery. Let us not lay it forth everywhere, but let us live in a manner worthy of the mystery. They to whom a mystery is intrusted are great persons. We account it a mark of favor, if a king intrusts a secret to us. But God has committed His mystery to us, yet are we ungrateful to our Benefactor, as if we had not received the greatest benefits. Our insensibility to such a kindness should strike us with horror. And how is that a mystery which all know? In the first place all do not know it, and before then too they knew it not, but now it is made manifest.

And so it was no new counsel, no tardy pity whereby God took thought for men: but from the constitution of the world He ordained one and the same Cause of Salvation for all. For the grace of God, by which the whole body of the saints is ever justified, was augmented, not begun, when Christ was born: and this mystery of God's great love, wherewith the whole world is now filled, was so effectively presignified that those who believed that promise obtained no less than they, who were the actual recipients.

And confessedly, great is the mystery of godliness: God was revealed in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, received up in glory.

confessedly. For no one doubts this. And faith which is in us is both great and a mystery, and a mystery of devotion, and it has no hesitation. Do you see the steps?

God was revealed in the flesh, etc. Then Paul speaks of the mystery. For He who was revealed to men in the flesh was not judged righteous by human eyes, but by the eyes of the Spirit, who also searches the depths of God. (1 Cor. 2:10)

But he says: He was justified because of the flesh. For since God is God, he is not justified but justifies. This is also what the prophet said: "He who has not committed sin, nor deceit found in his mouth." (1 Peter 2:22) Saint Cyril in the twelfth chapter of the Scholia says: "'He who was revealed in the flesh was justified in the Spirit.' For in no way was he subjected to our weaknesses."

seen by angels. For they did not disregard His birth according to the flesh.

— [OECUMENIUS] He was justified in spirit. And by what justification is he justified who is righteousness itself and redemption, the Sun of righteousness according to Malachi? Which indicates the most pure and perfect righteousness, the fulfillment evidently of the legal rights; concerning which John said: "Let it be so now; for thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness." (Matt. 3:15) For since the law also commanded concerning baptisms, He came to the Jordan to fulfill this as well, just as He fulfilled circumcision and the offerings for the firstborn. But what does He mean by "In spirit"? Israel was bound in the spirit of slavery through the punishing law. For it did not have the spirit of adoption; this has been granted to Christians, as Paul also says: "What is above is Jerusalem the free, which is the mother of us all." (Gal. 4:26) He says therefore, Even if he fulfilled the legal righteous requirements, but not with the spirit of slavery (for how, he who also frees others?), but with the Holy Spirit of adoption, which the genuine Son received according to the human nature, bestowing the gift upon us, and consubstantial with the Spirit, and not for Himself. Just as He cared for and prayed, making our prayers acceptable, and called His own body a temple, causing us to become temples of God. [end of the excerpt by Oecumenius] —

For indeed, the righteous according to the Gospel, truly spiritual, have long surpassed many of those who are justified by the law.

— [PHOTIUS] Instead of being justified legally, he was justified spiritually. For he fulfilled the legal commandments not legally, but spiritually. The fact that he was not considered justified by the fleshly and hard-hearted (for they said, "Glutton and drunkard") but was justified by those who are established in the Spirit of God. "For we have seen his glory, glory as of the only begotten," and so on. (Jn. 1:14) [end of the excerpt by Photius] —

seen by angels. (O the mystery! The angels saw Christ with us, when before they had not seen.) Not as by men. Thus Clement in book seven of the Hypotyposes. "He was believed in the world." Truly great is the mystery. For everywhere in the inhabited world he was believed.

received up in glory. For the angels ministered to him as he was taken up on the clouds. Therefore he says, "in glory," because even the ascension itself is glorious.

See, then, the greatness of the Savior, how it has been poured out over the whole world — and certainly I have not yet set forth his true greatness. Ascend into the heavens and see him, how he has filled the heavenly places: for indeed "he appeared to the angels". Descend in thought into the depths, and you will see that he descended there also. For "he who descended is the same also who ascended, that he might fill all things", "that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and things on earth and things under the earth". Consider the power of the Lord, how he has filled the world — that is, the heavenly and the earthly and the infernal things — how he has penetrated heaven itself and ascended to the things above.

Well, I on my side will first explain the reason of his offence, that I may the more easily explode the scandal of our heretic. Now, that the very Lord Himself of all might, the Word and Spirit of the Father, was operating and preaching on earth, it was necessary that the portion of the Holy Spirit which, in the form of the prophetic gift, had been through John preparing the ways of the Lord, should now depart from John, and return back again of course to the Lord, as to its all-embracing original.

The "mystery" is the scriptural teaching concerning Christ.

The "mystery" is the sacred object of reverence, namely, that what was foreordained from the beginning and afterward became manifest.

The economy of our salvation is a mystery. This mystery is "great," a mystery "of godliness," for it is beyond all doubt. But what kind of mystery is it that everyone knows? Very many know it, but not all. And even if all know it now, not all knew it before. Moreover, all know that God became incarnate, but how He became incarnate—this is hidden, and therefore it is a mystery. Consider, then, how great is God's love toward us, if He has fully revealed His mystery to us.

Since Paul, in giving instruction about priests, said nothing of the sort that is found in the book of Leviticus — therefore, he says, let no one be surprised if I do not discuss such unimportant matters. What is great is ours, and there is nothing of that sort there. Here God was manifested. In what way? In the flesh; for in His Divinity He is invisible.

Either He means that, having done everything for the salvation of men, although He did not persuade some of the obstinate, He nevertheless justified Himself as one who had fulfilled His task; or that He committed no sin, "and no deceit was found in His mouth" (Isa. 53:9). And the righteous under the law were in bondage in spirit. For the law contained threats and punishments but did not possess the spirit of adoption. But the Lord fulfilled all righteousness in the Holy Spirit, being consubstantial with Him and having Him in Himself by nature, and through Himself granting to us also the ability to be justified through Him. For the righteous according to the Gospel, being spiritual, far surpass those who were once justified under the law.

O mystery! Together with us, the angels too saw the Son of God, not having seen Him before. For the Gospel says: "and... angels came and ministered unto Him" (Matt. 4:11). And not here only, but from His very birth until His ascension they ministered to Him. At the time of His birth, angels sing a hymn to Him and bring glad tidings of Him to the shepherds; and at the time of His ascension they minister to Him.

"Preached among the nations" who were in despair and delusion, and not only "preached," but also "believed on in the world," which serves as a great sign of the power of the One preached and of the truth of the preaching.

That is, on clouds, when angels also ministered to Him. Of course, He ascended into heaven not like Elijah, as though into heaven, lest one say that the ascension itself is also glory.

Then when he says, and evidently great, he commends the truth of the Church:

first, Christ, for whose manifestation it appeared;

second, its exaltation, at is taken up into glory.

But he commends Christ in two ways:

first, in regard to his divine nature;

second, in regard to the human, at which was manifested in the flesh.

He says, therefore, and evidently great is the mystery of godliness, because a mystery, or sacrament, is the same as a secret sign. But nothing is as secret as what we keep in our hearts. Much more, then, what is kept in God's heart is both secret and holy: the things that are of God, no man knows but the Spirit of God (1 Cor 2:11); my secret to myself (Isa 24:16); verily you art a hidden God (Isa 45:15). And this is the word of God in the Father's heart: my heart has uttered a good word (Ps 44:2). Of course, this secret is the mystery of godliness. But a man's secret is sometimes vain: the Lord knows the thoughts of men, that they are vain (Ps 93:11). Inasmuch as this mystery restores the world, it is called a mystery of godliness. Also great, because it is the true God who is immense.

Therefore, this secret which was locked in God's heart was made man; hence he describes him second in regard to his human nature: first, in regard to the flesh; second, in regard to the soul.

In regard to the first he says, which was manifested in the flesh. As a word concealed in the heart is manifested by an audible word, so the Word of God, lying in God's heart, was manifested in the flesh: the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14).

In regard to the soul he says, was justified in the Spirit. This is explained in two ways: first, lest it be believed that the flesh was conceived beforehand, he says that it was not, because in the Spirit, i.e., it was conceived by the Holy Spirit: that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit (Matt 1:20); therefore the Holy which shall be born of you shall be called the Son of God (Luke 1:35); and this is because the Holy Spirit shall come upon you (Luke 1:35). Or in the human Holy Spirit: and Jesus, crying again with a loud voice, yielded up the Spirit (Matt 27:50). And thus he manifested himself in the flesh, while yet with the Spirit. And I say with a justified Spirit, because he is just without any blemish.

Then when he says, appeared, he declares his manifestation:

first, the one made to the angels;

second, to men, at has been preached.

He says, therefore, that the sacrament which appeared to angels exceeded even their knowledge. But that is said to appear which has it in its power to be seen and not be seen, and is not subject to the power of the one seeing. Hence we do not say that a stone appeared to me, but I saw a stone. Therefore, if an angel had it in its own nature and power to see the Word, the Word would not be said to appear to the angel; but that it sees him when it wills. And, therefore, the Apostle says, appeared unto angels, because they did not see him in their own nature. But it is true that he appeared to angels from the very beginning, when after turning from themselves he deified them. But when he was incarnated, many mysteries were made known to the angels which were not known before. Accordingly, Bede says that at the nativity there appeared to the angels his brightness, which had never before been seen in its reality by men.

And this in two ways: first, by the ministry of the apostles; second, in the knowledge of the faithful, to whom he was manifested.

In olden times it is true that he was known only to the Jews, but now also to the gentiles; hence he says, has been preached unto the gentiles: going, therefore, teach all nations (Matt 28:19); declare his glory among the gentiles (Ps 95:3). And this succeeded, because he is believed in the world, which is what the Lord prayed for (John 17:26). And it is remarkable that the whole world was converted by men who were simple, poor, powerless, and ignoble: there are not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble (1 Cor 1:26). And this that no flesh should glory in his sight (1 Cor 1:29).

Second, he manifests that God's truth alone does this, because he was taken up in glory, i.e., Christ, because after he was manifested, he was taken up into heaven: and the Lord Jesus, after he had spoken to them, was taken up into heaven (Mark 16:19); every tongue should confess that the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of the Father (Phil 2:11).

Wherefore they have been excommunicated and anathematized by the Church. And indeed, although we grieve at the destruction of these men, especially that after having once learned the doctrine of the Church, they have now gone back; yet we do not wonder at it; for this very thing Hymenaeus and Philetus suffered, and before them Judas, who, though he followed the Saviour, afterwards became a traitor and an apostate. Moreover, concerning these very men, warnings are not wanting to us, for the Lord foretold: "Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in My name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them." Paul, too, having learnt these things from the Saviour, wrote, "In the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils which turn away from the truth."

Now concerning their blasphemous assertion who say that the Son does not perfectly know the Father, we need not wonder: for having once purposed in their mind to wage war against Christ, they impugn also these words of His, "As the Father knoweth Me, even so know I the Father." … Moreover, concerning these very men, warnings are not wanting to us, for the Lord foretold: "Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in My name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them." Paul, too, having learnt these things from the Saviour, wrote, "In the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils which turn away from the truth."

As for me, indeed, would that they might have a will to hear, that they might believe—to hear with true love and meekness, as men seeking what is true and not assailing all truth. For it is written that we pay no heed to "endless fables and genealogies, which do rather raise disputes than set forward the godly edification, which is in faith. But the aim of the charge is love from a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith unfeigned, whence some have erred and betaken themselves to empty babbling. For they are desirous of being teachers of the law, without understanding the words they say, nor the things whereof they speak with assurance." In another place also the same apostle says, "Avoid foolish and ignorant questionings." Such men, who sow disputes—that is to say, heretics—the apostle bids us leave alone. Of them he says in yet another place that "certain shall depart from the faith, giving heed to deceitful spirits and the doctrines of devils."

Wherefore it becomes us to watch, lest some deception be conveyed under the clothing of their phrases, and they lead away certain from the true faith. And if they venture to advance the opinions of Arius, when they see themselves proceeding in a prosperous course, nothing remains for us but to use great boldness of speech, remembering the predictions of the Apostle, which he wrote to forewarn us of such like heresies, and which it becomes us to repeat. For we know that, as it is written, "in the latter times some shall depart from the sound faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils, that turn from the truth."

Considering the signs mentioned by Gospel and prophecy which we see happening, would anyone deny that we ought to hope for the coming of the Lord? Manifestly, it is nearer and nearer every day. But the exact span of the nearness, that, as we said, "is not for you to know." Notice when the apostle said this, "For our salvation is nearer than when we believed. The night is past and the day is at hand," and look how many years have passed! Yet, what he said was not untrue. How much more probable is it to say now that the coming of the Lord is near when there has been such an increase of time toward the end! Certainly the apostle said, "The Spirit manifestly says that in the last times some shall depart from the faith." Obviously, those were not yet the times of heretics such as he describes them in the same sentence, but they have now come. According to this, we seem to be in the last times, and the heretics seem to be a warning of the end of the world.

Assuredly there are predictions of the Manichaeans, less clear in the prophets, and most explicit in the apostle. For example: "The Spirit," he says, "speaketh expressly, that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and to doctrines of devils, speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their conscience seared, forbidding to marry, abstaining from meats, which God has created to be received with thanksgiving by believers, and those who know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving." The fulfillment of this in the Manichaeans is as clear as day to all that know them, and has already been proved as fully as time permits.

And no doubt of such people it is reasonable when, "the Spirit says expressly that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error and the teaching inspired by daemons, through hypocritical sophists who are seated in conscience and forbid marriage, and demand abstinence from foods which God created to be eaten with thanksgiving by believers who know the truth. Everything created by God is good, and none is to be rejected but accepted with thanksgiving. For it is sanctified by the Word of God and by prayer." It necessarily follows, then, that it is wrong to forbid marriage and indeed eating meat or drinking wine. For it is written: "It is good to eat no meat and to drink no wine" if it causes offence to do so, and that it is "good to remain as I am." But both he who eats with thanksgiving and he who does not eat, who also offers thanksgiving and has a continent enjoyment, should live in accordance with reason.

And no doubt of such people it is reasonable when, "the Spirit says expressly that in the last times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error and the teaching inspired by daemons, through hypocritical sophists who are seated in conscience and forbid marriage, and demand abstinence from foods which God created to be eaten with thanksgiving by believers who know the truth. Everything created by God is good, and none is to be rejected but accepted with thanksgiving. For it is sanctified by the Word of God and by prayer." It necessarily follows, then, that it is wrong to forbid marriage and indeed eating meat or drinking wine.

That the Holy Spirit subsists, lives, speaks and foretells I have told you repeatedly on former occasions. Paul writes clearly to Timothy, "Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith." This we see in the factions of former times and in our own day. How diverse and multiform are the errors of the heretics.

Others, however, styling themselves Encratites, acknowledge some things concerning God and Christ in like manner with the Church. In respect, however, of their mode of life, they pass their days inflated with pride. They suppose, that by meats they magnify themselves, while abstaining from animal food, (and) being water-drinkers, and forbidding to marry, and devoting themselves during the remainder of life to habits of asceticism. But persons of this description are estimated Cynics rather than Christians, inasmuch as they do not attend unto the words spoken against them through the Apostle Paul. Now he, predicting the novelties that were to be hereafter introduced ineffectually by certain (heretics), made a statement thus: "The Spirit speaketh expressly, In the latter times certain will depart from sound doctrine, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils, uttering falsehoods in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron, forbidding to marry, to abstain from meats, which God has created to be partaken of with thanksgiving by the faithful, and those who know the truth; because every creature of God is good, and nothing to be rejected which is received with thanksgiving; for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer." This voice, then, of the blessed Paul, is sufficient for the refutation of those who live in this manner, and plume themselves on being just; (and) for the purpose of proving that also, this (tenet of the Encratites) constitutes a heresy. But even though there have been denominated certain other heresies-I mean those of the Cainites, Ophites, or Noachites, and of others of this description-I have not deemed it requisite to explain the things said or done by these, test on this account they may consider themselves somebody, or deserving of consideration. Since, however, the statements concerning these appear to be sufficient, let us pass on to the cause of evils to all, (viz.,) the heresy of the Noetians. Now, after we have laid bare the root of this (heresy), and stigmatized openly the venom, as it were, lurking within it, let us seek to deter from an error of this description those who have been impelled into it by a violent spirit, as it were by a swollen torrent.

As those who adhere to the faith are fixed on a safe anchor, so those who fall from the faith can nowhere rest; but after many wanderings to and fro, they are borne at last into the very gulf of perdition. And this he had shown before, saying, that some had "already made shipwreck concerning the faith," and now he says, "Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits." This is said of the Manichaeans, the Encratites, and the Marcionites, and the whole of their tribe, that they should hereafter depart from the faith. Seest thou that this departure from the faith is the cause of all the evils that follow!

But what is "expressly"? Plainly, clearly, and beyond doubt. Marvel not, he says, if some having departed from the faith still adhere to Judaism. There will be a time, when even those who have partaken of the faith will fall into a worse error, not only with respect to meats, but to marriages, and other such things, introducing the most pernicious notions. This refers not to the Jews, (for "the latter times," and a "departure from the faith," is not applicable to them;) but to the Manichees, and the founders of these sects. And he calls them very justly, "seducing spirits," since it was by these they were actuated in speaking such things.

There existed, long before this time, certain men more ancient than all those who are esteemed philosophers, both righteous and beloved by God, who spoke by the Divine Spirit, and foretold events which would take place, and which are now taking place. They are called prophets. These alone both saw and announced the truth to men, neither reverencing nor fearing any man, not influenced by a desire for glory, but speaking those things alone which they saw and which they heard, being filled with the Holy Spirit. Their writings are still extant, and he who has read them is very much helped in his knowledge of the beginning and end of things, and of those matters which the philosopher ought to know, provided he has believed them. For they did not use demonstration in their treatises, seeing that they were witnesses to the truth above all demonstration, and worthy of belief; and those events which have happened, and those which are happening, compel you to assent to the utterances made by them, although, indeed, they were entitled to credit on account of the miracles which they performed, since they both glorified the Creator, the God and Father of all things, and proclaimed His Son, the Christ [sent] by Him: which, indeed, the false prophets, who are filled with the lying unclean spirit, neither have done nor do, but venture to work certain wonderful deeds for the purpose of astonishing men, and glorify the spirits and demons of error.

How could anyone be silent in regard to the divine authority of the Holy Spirit? The ancient prophets cried out, "These things say the Lord." When Christ came, he also used this word "say" in his own person, "But I say unto you." Listen now to what the prophets of the New Testament proclaim. Take the prophet Agabus in the Acts of the Apostles, "Thus says the Holy Spirit." So, too, Paul to Timothy, "Now the Spirit expressly says …"

But the Spirit openly says that in later times some will abandon the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the hypocrisy of liars whose consciences are seared.

But the Spirit openly says. That is, clearly and obviously. Do not be amazed, Paul says, if some now, having fallen away from the faith, Judaize. For a time will come, he says, when the faith will be more broadly extended, in which they will do even worse things, not only in the observance of foods, but also in marriages and other matters.

paying attention to deceitful spirits. For if anyone departs from faith, everything else becomes dangerous. For it is necessary from then on that the mind be attentive to impure spirits, and to demons leading man away from the right path.

and teachings of demons. Through these he revealed every wickedness, especially the Manichaeans, the Encratites, the Marcionites.

through the hypocrisy. That is, deceitful work. However, it stands that since they know the falseness of their dogmas, they strive to speak falsely. And Paul says that liars are those whose conscience has been seared by an evil life, that is, a depraved life: and because they are aware of much filth within themselves, therefore their conscience bears stubborn marks of a sleazy life. Truly, those who are such, through fear of retribution, pervert true dogmas, persuading themselves of anything rather than that only God is the just judge, the resurrection, and the retribution of good and evil.

These are "the doctrines" of men and "of demons" that produce for itching ears of the spirit this world's wisdom. This is what the Lord called "foolishness." God "chose the foolish things of the world" to confound even philosophy itself. For philosophy is the material of the world's wisdom, the rash interpreter of the nature and the providence (dispensations) of God.

The character of the times in which we live is such as to call forth from us even this admonition, that we ought not to be astonished at the heresies (which abound) neither ought their existence to surprise us, for it was foretold that they should come to pass; nor the fact that they subvert the faith of some, for their final cause is, by affording a trial to faith, to give it also the opportunity of being "approved.

What harshness, therefore, is here on our part, if we renounce (communion with) such as do not the will of God? What heresy, if we judge second marriage, as being unlawful, akin to adultery? For what is adultery but unlawful marriage? The apostle sets a brand upon those who were wont entirely to forbid marriage, who were wont at the same time to lay an interdict on meats which God has created. We, however, no more do away with marriage if we abjure its repetition, than we reprobate meats if we fast oftener (than others).

And accordingly (they think) us to have been even then prenoted as "in the latest times departing from the faith, giving heed to spirits which seduce the world, having a conscience inburnt with doctrines of liars." (Inburnt?) With what fires, prithee? The fires, I ween, which lead us to repeated contracting of nuptials and daily cooking of dinners! Thus, too, they affirm that we share with the Galatians the piercing rebuke (of the apostle), as "observers of days, and of months, and of years.

That is, obviously, clearly, and not covertly, as the law and the prophets.

Since the apostle said above that some had suffered shipwreck in the faith, do not be surprised, he says, that now some hold to Jewish errors. A time will come when those who consider themselves Christians will do works even worse. The apostle says this not about the Jews, for they existed in ancient times, as also in that time, but about the Marcionites, Encratites, Manichaeans, and all their assemblies of that sort.

For, attending to these things, they condemned certain foods and marriage. However, the apostle has in mind here all other heresies as well, for they are all from the seduction of lying spirits and the teaching of demons. Yet he does not clearly mention all heresies here, so as not to sow them in the souls of people: he points to the heresy that had already begun, namely concerning foods and marriage.

Above, he instructed Timothy on matters pertaining to the attitude of the Church in spiritual things; second, in regard to the teachings of faith, the worship of God and the qualities required of its ministers. Here he instructs him on the attitude of the Church in regard to external things:

first, in regard to food;

second, in regard to riches and the different states of men, at whoever are servants under the yoke.

In regard to food he does two things: first, in regard to the use of foods;

second, its distribution, in chapter five, at honor widows (1 Tim 5:1).

In regard to the first he does two things: first, he rejects superstitious abstinence;

second, he prefers godliness to lawful abstinence, at exercise yourself unto godliness.

In regard to the first he does two things: first, he states the false doctrine regarding unlawful abstinence;

second, he instructs him to propose these things to the brethren, at proposing these things.

In regard to the first he does two things: first, he exposes the error;

second, he excludes it, at which God has created.

In regard to the first he does two things: first, he foretells a future error on the part of the deceived;

second, on the part of the deceivers, at speaking lies in hypocrisy.

In regard to the first he does three things: first, he discloses the author of the announcement;

second, defection from the faith, at that in the last times;

third, the cause of the defection, at giving heed.

He says, therefore: great is the mystery of godliness, which was manifested in the flesh, was justified in the Spirit (1 Tim 3:16). But in regard to this mystery the Holy Spirit foretells something of the future, for it pertains to him to reveal mysteries: the things that are to come he shall show you (John 16:13). The Spirit, therefore, foretells the secrets that lie in the Father's heart. But formerly he spoke in figures: if there be among you a prophet of the Lord, I will appear to him in a vision or I will speak to him in a dream (Num 12:6); I have multiplied visions and I have used similitudes by the ministry of the prophets (Hos 12:10). But in the New Testament the Spirit manifestly says: he will show you plainly of the Father (John 16:25).

And he foretells a coming defection from the faith: hence he says, in the last times some shall depart from the faith. The last times refers to the final era, because we are the ones upon whom the final ages have descended. Yet in this world the later it is, the closer we are to the last day. And just as in the early Church, on account of its nearness to Christ and the recently instituted sacraments, faith was very fervent, so in the last days as compared to the days of the apostles, some shall depart from the faith, because they are carnal, and error will abound: gather yourselves together that I may tell you the things that shall befall you in the last days (Gen 49:1).

The causes of the defection is twofold: one on the part of the Devil, who seduces: but I fear lest as the serpent seduced Eve by his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted (2 Cor 11:3). Therefore, he says, giving heed to spirits of error, namely, to demons whose work is to lead men into error: he is a liar and the father thereof (John 8:44); I will go forth and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets (3 Kgs 22:22). And he says, to spirits, because the head Devil has many underlings.

But how will they give heed? Will they see him? No, but they will speak in them. Therefore, he mentions the second cause, namely, false doctrines. According to a Gloss he calls false teachers devils; and deservedly. For just as good men are sometimes called angels, so evil men because of the degree of their wickedness are called demons: have not I chosen you twelve: and one of you is the Devil (John 6:71).

The seared conscience is a branded conscience, with the implication that they have been corrupted by falsehood which makes a mark on their consciences like a brand on skin.

If any bishop, or presbyter, or deacon does not on festival days partake of flesh or wine, let him be deprived, as "having a seared conscience," and becoming a cause of scandal to many.

I heard the Diabolist say, "I tell you I have done everything else. If I do that I shan't know the difference between right and wrong." I rushed out without daring to pause; and as I passed the fire I did not know whether it was hell or the furious love of God.

Such are the words and deeds by which, in our own district of the Rhone, they have deluded many women, who have their consciences seared as with a hot iron. Some of them, indeed, make a public confession of their sins; but others of them are ashamed to do this, and in a tacit kind of way, despairing of [attaining to] the life of God, have, some of them, apostatized altogether; while others hesitate between the two courses, and incur that which is implied in the proverb, "neither without nor within;" possessing this as the fruit from the seed of the children of knowledge.

In what way then is she a virgin who has fallen away from the faith, who has devoted herself to the deceivers, who obeys the demons and honors falsehood? In what way is she a virgin who has a seared conscience? For the virgin must be pure not only in body but also in soul if she is going to receive the holy bridegroom.… Virginity is defined by holiness of body and soul. But if a woman is unholy and impure in each respect, how could she be a virgin?… But she shows me a pale face, wasted limbs, a shabby garment and gentle glance.… What is the good of all that when the eye of the soul is bold, for what could be more audacious than that eye encouraging her real eyes to consider the objects of God's creation as bad?

"Speaking lies in hypocrisy." This implies that they utter not these falsehoods through ignorance and unknowingly, but as acting a part, knowing the truth, but "having their conscience seared," that is, being men of evil lives.

But why does he speak only of these heretics? Christ had before said, "Offenses must need come" (Matt. xviii. 7), and he had predicted the same in his parable of the sower, and of the springing up of the tares. But here admire with me the prophetic gift of Paul, who, before the times in which they were to appear, specifies the time itself. As if he had said, Do not wonder, if, at the commencement of the faith, some endeavor to bring in these pernicious doctrines; since, after it has been established for a length of time, many shall depart from the faith.

"Having their consciences seared" means not having a whole conscience, for they live the opposite of what they teach.

"Consciences seared" refers to their final numbing, the deadening of their consciences.

That is, what they speak falsely about, they do not speak falsely out of ignorance, but knowing that it is false, they hypocritically teach it as though it were true.

On the part of those deceived, the cause is also twofold: one is their falsity; the other is the perversity of their conscience.

In regard to the first he says, of devils, i.e., of men possessed by a Devil; of devils I say, speaking lies: how long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophecy lies, and that prophesy the delusions of their own heart (Jer 23:36).

And note that no one could deceive another with a simple lie, unless it was covered with the appearance of truth. And so, they never could succeed in deceiving unless they pretended to have a good intention, or put a cloak over their pretense or false authority: let no man deceive you with vain words (Eph 5:6); having an appearance indeed of godliness, but denying the power thereof. Now these avoid (2 Tim 3:5).

And of devils, I say, having their conscience seared. Flesh is said to be seared, when it is corrupted by fire and is in such a condition that rot flows from it continuously. Thus, by means of the fire of a perverse will, of anger, of hatred, of concupiscence, the conscience is ulcerated and the false doctrine of devils continually issues from it: both their mind and their conscience are defiled (Titus 1:15).

The Lord, in that He came to the marriage to which He was invited, wished, apart from the mystical signification, to assure us that marriage was His own institution. For there were to be those of whom the apostle spoke, "forbidding to marry," and asserting that marriage was an evil, and of the devil's institution: notwithstanding the same Lord declares in the Gospel, on being asked whether it be lawful for a man to put away his wife for any cause, that it is not lawful save for the cause of fornication. In His answer, if you remember, He said, "What God hath joined together let not man put asunder." And they that are well instructed in the catholic faith know that God instituted marriage; and as the union of man and wife is from God, so divorce is from the devil.

The Church of God, however, being meanwhile so constituted as to enclose much chaff and many tares, bears with many things; yet if anything be contrary to faith or to holy life, she does not approve of it either by silence or by practice. Accordingly, that which you wrote as to certain brethren abstaining from the use of animal food, on the ground of its being ceremonially unclean, is most clearly contrary to the faith and to sound doctrine. If I were to enter on anything like a full discussion of this matter, it might be thought by some that there was some obscurity in the precepts of the apostle in this matter whereas he, among many other things which he said on this subject, expressed his abhorrence of this opinion of the heretics in these words: "Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils; speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer."

It should also be laid down as essential that continency is inexorably demanded of combatants for godliness, so that they may bring the body into subjection, "for every athlete exercises self-control in all things." However, to avoid being classed with the enemies of God who are seared in their conscience and, therefore, abstain from food which God has made for the faithful to partake of with thanksgiving, we should taste each dish when occasion offers so as to indicate to those looking on that "all things are clean to the clean" and that "every creature of God is good and nothing to be rejected that is received with thanksgiving; for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer." The aim of continency must nevertheless be kept in mind also, to the extent that we satisfy our need with the plainer foods and those necessary to sustain life, avoiding the evil of taking our fill of them and abstaining absolutely from those foods whose sole purpose is to give delight.

It follows that celibacy is not particularly praiseworthy unless it arises through love of God. The blessed Paul says of those who show a distaste for marriage, "In the last days people will abandon the faith, attaching themselves to deceitful spirits and the teachings of demonic powers that they should abstain from food, at the same time forbidding marriage." Again he says, "Do not let anyone disqualify you in forced piety of self-mortification and severity to the body." Well? Did not the righteous of past days share gratefully in God's creation? Some of them married and produced children without loss of self-control.

Do not abhor meats as if they were taboo. The apostle evidently knew people like that, since he says that there are those "who forbid to marry and command to abstain from meats which God has created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe." If therefore you are abstaining from these things, let it not be as from things abominated, or your reward is lost, but as good things let them be transcended, in the quest of the fairer spiritual rewards that are set before you.

Meanwhile, it remains true that I shall eat a great deal of turkey this Christmas; and it is not in the least true (as the vegetarians say) that I shall do it because I do not realise what I am doing, or because I do what I know is wrong, or that I do it with shame or doubt or a fundamental unrest of conscience. In one sense I know quite well what I am doing; in another sense I know quite well that I know not what I do.

He wore a high shiny hat and a long frock coat, but he wore them as such solemn things were meant to be worn; he wore the silk hat as if it were a mitre, and the frock coat as if it were the ephod of a high priest. He not only hung his hat up on the peg, but he seemed (such was his stateliness) almost to ask permission of the hat for doing so, and to apologise to the peg for making use of it. When he had sat down on a wooden chair with the air of one considering its feelings and given a sort of slight stoop or bow to the wooden table itself, as if it were an altar, I could not help some comment springing to my lips.

That the early Church was itself full of an ecstatic enthusiasm for renunciation and virginity makes this distinction much more striking and not less so. It makes all the more important the place where the dogma drew the line. A man might crawl about on all fours like a beast because he was an ascetic. He might stand night and day on the top of a pillar and be adored for being an ascetic. But he could not say that the world was a mistake or the marriage state a sin without being a heretic. What was it that thus deliberately disengaged itself from eastern asceticism by sharp definition and fierce refusal, if it was not something with an individuality of its own; and one that was quite different? If the Catholics are to be confused with the Gnostics, we can only say it was not their fault if they are. And it is rather hard that the Catholics should be blamed by the same critics for persecuting the heretics and also for sympathising with the heresy.

Let no one think however that herein we depreciate marriage as an institution. We are well aware that it is not a stranger to God's blessing. But since the common instincts of mankind can plead sufficiently on its behalf, instincts which prompt by a spontaneous bias to take the high road of marriage for the procreation of children, whereas Virginity in a way thwarts this natural impulse, it is a superfluous task to compose formally an Exhortation to marriage. We put forward the pleasure of it instead, as a most doughty champion on its behalf. It may be however, notwithstanding this, that there is some need of such a treatise, occasioned by those who travesty the teaching of the Church. Such persons "have their conscience seared with a hot iron," as the Apostle expresses it; and very truly too, considering that, deserting the guidance of the Holy Spirit for the "doctrines of devils," they have some ulcers and blisters stamped upon their hearts, abominating God's creatures, and calling them "foul," "seducing," "mischievous," and so on.

For bear with me, O Marcion: as you have instituted a comparison of what is good and evil, I also to-day will institute a comparison following up your own tenets, as you suppose them to be. You affirm that the Demiurge of the world is evil — why not hide your countenance in shame, (as thus) teaching to the Church the doctrines of Empedocles? You say that there is a good Deity who destroys the works of the Demiurge: then do not you plainly preach to your pupils, as the good Deity, the Friendship of Empedocles. You forbid marriage, the procreation of children, (and) the abstaining from meats which God has created for participation by the faithful, and those that know the truth. (Thinkest thou, then,) that thou canst escape detection, (while thus) enjoining the purificatory rites of Empedocles? For in point of fact you follow in every respect this (philosopher of paganism), while you instruct your own disciples to refuse meats, in order not to eat any body (that might be) a remnant of a soul which has been punished by the Demiurge. You dissolve marriages that have been cemented by the Deity. And here again you conform to the tenets of Empedocles, in order that for you the work of Friendship may be perpetuated as one (and) indivisible. For, according to Empedocles, matrimony separates unity, and makes (out of it) plurality, as we have proved.

Others, however, styling themselves Encratites, acknowledge some things concerning God and Christ in like manner with the Church. In respect, however, of their mode of life, they pass their days inflated with pride. They suppose, that by meats they magnify themselves, while abstaining from animal food, (and) being water-drinkers, and forbidding to marry, and devoting themselves during the remainder of life to habits of asceticism. But persons of this description are estimated Cynics rather than Christians, inasmuch as they do not attend unto the words spoken against them through the Apostle Paul. Now he, predicting the novelties that were to be hereafter introduced ineffectually by certain (heretics), made a statement thus: "The Spirit speaketh expressly, In the latter times certain will depart from sound doctrine, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils, uttering falsehoods in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron, forbidding to marry, to abstain from meats, which God has created to be partaken of with thanksgiving by the faithful, and those who know the truth; because every creature of God is good, and nothing to be rejected which is received with thanksgiving; for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer." This voice, then, of the blessed Paul, is sufficient for the refutation of those who live in this manner, and plume themselves on being just; (and) for the purpose of proving that also, this (tenet of the Encratites) constitutes a heresy.

And since the demons assist the most wicked, the Saviour came for the destruction of evil men and of the demons, but for the salvation of the good. They declare also, that marriage and generation are from Satan. Many of those, too, who belong to his school, abstain from animal food, and draw away multitudes by a reigned temperance of this kind.

Have I not, I would ask, in the very forefront of my work set the following preface: "We are no disciples of Marcion or of Manichaeus, to detract from marriage. Nor are we deceived by the error of Tatian, the chief of the Encratites, into supposing all cohabitation unclean. For he condemns and reprobates not marriage only but foods also which God has created for us to enjoy. We know that in a large house there are vessels not only of silver and of gold but of wood also and of earth. We know, too, that on the foundation of Christ which Paul the master builder has laid, some build up gold, silver and precious stones; others, on the contrary, hay, wood and stubble."

"Well," saith one, "and what dost thou require us to do? to occupy the mountains, and become monks?" Why it is this which makes me sigh, that ye think them alone to be properly concerned with decency and chastity; and yet assuredly Christ made His laws common to all. Thus, when He saith, "if any one look on a woman to lust after her," He speaks not to the solitary, but to him also that hath a wife; since in fact that mount was at that time filled with all kinds of persons of that description. Form then in thy mind an image of that amphitheatre, and hate thou this, which is the devil's. Neither do thou condemn the severity of my speech. For I nether "forbid to marry," nor hinder thy taking pleasure; but I would have this be done in chastity, not with shame, and reproach, and imputations without end. I do not make it a law that you are to occupy the mountains and the deserts, but to be good and considerate and chaste, dwelling in the midst of the city. For in fact all our laws are common to the monks also, except marriage; yea rather, even with respect to this, Paul commands us to put ourselves altogether on a level with them; saying, "For the fashion of this world passeth away:" that "they that have wives be as though they had none."

"Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats." Why then has he mentioned no other heresies? Though not particularized, they are implied by the expressions of "seducing spirits and doctrines of demons." But he did not wish to instill these things into the minds of men before the time; but that which had already commenced, the case of meats, he specifies. "Which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth." Why did he not say, by the unbelievers too? How by the unbelievers, when they exclude themselves from them by their own rules? But is not luxury forbidden? Certainly it is. But why? if good things are created to be received. Because He created bread, and yet too much is forbidden; and wine also, and yet excess is forbidden; and we are not commanded to avoid dainties as if they were unclean in themselves, but as they corrupt the soul by excess.

It is then the last time. For "in the latter times," he says, "some shall depart from the faith." "Forbidding to marry." And do not we forbid to marry? God forbid. We do not forbid those who wish to marry, but those who do not wish to marry, we exhort to virginity. It is one thing to forbid, and another to leave one to his own free choice. He that forbids, does it once for all, but he who recommends virginity as a higher state, does not forbid marriage, because he prefers virginity.

"Forbidding to marry," he says, "and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth." It is well said, "who know the truth." The former things then were a type. For nothing is unclean by nature, but it becomes so through the conscience of him that partakes of it. And what was the object of the prohibition of so many meats? To restrain excessive luxury. But had it been said, "eat not for the sake of luxury," it would not have been borne. They were therefore shut up under the necessity of the law, that they might abstain from the stronger principle of fear. The fish was not forbidden, though it was manifestly more unclean than the swine. But they might have learned how pernicious luxury was from that saying of Moses, "Jeshurun waxed fat, and kicked." (Deut. xxxii. 15) Another cause of these prohibitions might be, that being straitened for other food, they might be reduced to slaughter sheep and oxen; he therefore restrained them from other things, on account of Apis and the calf, which was an abomination, ungrateful, polluted, and profane.

who forbid marriage, abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful who know the truth.

who forbid marriage. What then? Do Christians not hinder from marrying? By no means. "Marriage is honorable in all things, and the bed undefiled." (Heb. 13:4) But those who do not wish to marry are urged to abstinence. And those who hinder marriage are said to hinder on account of impurity.

abstain from foods. It is not a mistake or a lapse in elegance of speech when it says, "to abstain from foods", which seemed to some not even a matter of apostolic vision, but rightly expressed according to the Attic custom (dialect). Just as the phrase, "He prevented him from doing improper things," does not mean that he encouraged him to do improper things; and likewise, "He deterred him from offending friends," does not mean offending friends, but rather the opposite. And again, "He prevented him from stealing," does not mean that he permitted theft. And, "He prevented ceasing from speaking," instead of, "He kept away from such an action." Thus also, "They prevented abstaining from foods," instead of, "They prevented from eating." And this usage is also frequent among outsiders.

created to be received [μετάληψιν] with thanksgiving. See how Paul expelled luxury in the name of participation [μεταλήψεως]. For to be received [μετάληψιν] signifies a measured reception [μεμετρημένην]. And he did not expel luxury as something unclean, but as something obstructive due to excess and, as it were, a rupture of the soul.

To the faithful, God has created foods to be received [μετάληψιν] thankfully. But not to the unbelievers anymore. For by their own laws they shut themselves off from them.

who know the truth. The Jewish rites were indeed a shadow; now the truth has come. Many things were forbidden to them, not because they were impure, but to restrain indulgences. But the truth speaks of the faith which is in Christ.

The Savior then commanded, "What God has joined together, let not man put asunder." But man wishes to put asunder what God has joined together. He does this when, "falling away from the sound faith, he gives heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons, through the hypocrisy of men who speak lies, branded in their own conscience as with a hot iron, and by forbidding" them not only to commit fornication but even "to marry." In this way he dissolves even those who before had been joined together by the providence of God.

Do you wish me to show you still further what kind of fast you ought to fast? Fast from every sin, take no food of malice, partake of no feasts of pleasure, grow warm with no wine of luxury. Fast from evil deeds, abstain from evil words, hold yourself back from the worst thoughts. Do not touch the stolen loaves of perverse doctrine. Do not covet the deceitful foods of philosophy, which would seduce you from the truth. Such a fast is pleasing to God. But "to abstain from foods which God has created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful," and to do this together with those who crucified Christ, cannot be acceptable to God.

The apostle set a brand upon those who were inclined entirely to forbid marriage and who were determined to lay an interdict on meats which God has created. We, however, do not do away with marriage if we disavow its repetition, nor do we condemn meats if we fast oftener than others. It is one thing to regulate but another thing to do away with altogether.

Thus runs Hebion's heresy. Such also as "forbid to marry" he reproaches in his instructions to Timothy. Now, this is the teaching of Marcion and his follower Apelles.

Now, whence comes this halving of salvation, if not from a failure of goodness? What could have been a better proof of a perfect goodness, than the recovery of the whole man to salvation? Totally damned by the Creator, he should have been totally restored by the most merciful god. I rather think that by Marcion's rule the body is baptized, is deprived of marriage, is cruelly tortured in confession.

Xerophagies, however, (they consider) the novel name of a studied duty, and very much akin to heathenish superstition, like the abstemious rigours which purify an Apis, an Isis, and a Magna Mater, by a restriction laid upon certain kinds of food; whereas faith, free in Christ, owes no abstinence from particular meats to the Jewish Law even, admitted as it has been by the apostle once for all to the whole range of the meat-market -(the apostle, I say), that detester of such as, in like manner as they prohibit marrying, so bid us abstain from meats created by God. And accordingly (they think) us to have been even then prenoted as "in the latest times departing from the faith, giving heed to spirits which seduce the world, having a conscience inburnt with doctrines of liars.

That is, since they knew much that was impure about themselves, their conscience bore the branded marks of their impure life, and therefore condemned marriage. For if their life had truly been pure, their conscience too would have been pure and would not have condemned what God had blessed. Just as an ailing stomach condemns food, while it itself has bad digestive juices within. So then what? Do we forbid entering into marriage? By no means. But those who do not wish to enter into marriage we direct toward the keeping of virginity, teaching that it is more honorable; but from this it does not follow that marriage is already dishonorable, just as from the fact that gold is more honorable, it does not follow that it is more honorable than something honorable, and the better is better than the good, not the bad. Therefore, let the one who is able take up the gold of virginity; and the one who cannot, let him accept the silver of marriage.

What then? Did not God create foods even for unbelievers? Yes, but they abstain from them. So what then? Is indulgence not forbidden? Very much so, but not the eating of food. For eating observes moderation, while indulgence knows no measure. However, even the indulgence in food is not unclean in itself, but because it weakens the soul of those who give themselves over to it. "And those who have known the truth." Everything pertaining to the Jews was a type, but now truth reigns. Many things were forbidden to the Jews (Lev. 11 ff.), not as unclean, but in order to root out indulgence—so that they, being placed in a constrained position by the many prohibitions, would slaughter bulls and sheep and in this way come to know what kind of gods the Egyptians had invented for themselves. So by "truth" understand either faith in Christ, or simply that truth of which he will presently speak.

Then he identifies the false doctrine and touches on the Manichean heresy, which condemns marriage in opposition to Matthew: what God has joined together, let no man put asunder (Matt 19:6); a woman sins not, if she marry (1 Cor 7:36). Likewise, the Manicheans forbid the use of foods, i.e., they command abstinence from foods.

Now abstaining from foods can be lawful, when it is for the purpose of taming the flesh, as Timothy abstained from wine; or to avoid scandal, as the Apostle says in 1 Corinthians: if meat scandalize my brother, I will never eat flesh, lest I should scandalize my brother (1 Cor 8:13). And it can be unlawful: first of all, when it involves obeying false laws, as though the observances of the old law were still in vogue contrary to the Apostle in Galatians (Gal 2:15); second, when it accords with the heresy of the Manicheans, not because it is commanded by the law (which they reject), but because they say that in flesh, eggs, wine, and so on, i.e., in certain particles of these foods the divine nature is an ingredient. But the Apostle does not seem to be referring here to the foods interdicted the by the old law, but to those forbidden by the Manicheans, because he says: in the last times.

And he calls those Manicheans devils, because they give more honor to the Devil than other heresies do, inasmuch as they regard him as a principle equal to the good God, since they regard him as the principle of visible things.

But the Apostle disproves this error in two ways:

first, by reason of God's intention in creating food;

and second, from the condition of the creature, at every creature.

He says, therefore, that they command abstinence even against God's intention, who created these things to be received with thanksgiving: and every thing that moves and lives shall be meat for you: even as the green herbs have I delivered them all to you (Gen 9:3).

But you say: do plants exist for animals and animals for men? The answer is yes; even according to the Philosopher in the Politics I, which states that the imperfect is for the sake of the more perfect. Hence, just as there are degrees of perfection in the production of things: first, the production of plants; then of animals, and finally of men; so also in the use of things:

And thus, they are to be received, but with thanksgiving: in all things give thanks (2 Thess 5:18), because all have been granted to you by God: the poor shall eat and be filled (Ps 21:27).

And he says, with thanksgiving by the faithful, because they who receive with thanksgiving are faithful. For no one can thank God for that which is unlawful. For he is a fool who thanks God for fornication, because God is not the source of evil. Therefore, he thanks God who recognizes that the use of foods is lawful. And this is made known by faith alone; that is why he says, by the faithful.

Then when he says, and by those who have known the truth, for every creature of God is good, he disproves this error by arguing from the condition of the creature:

first, he describes the condition of the creature, namely, that every creature is good in itself;

second, the use of the creature.

Because sin or iniquity is not a seeking of things evil by nature but an abandonment of the better things, this is found written in Scripture. "Every creature is good." Every tree that God planted in paradise was good. Man, therefore, did not desire anything evil by nature when he touched the forbidden tree. But by departing from what was better he himself committed an act that was evil.

It is not the uncleanness of meat that I fear, but the uncleanness of an incontinent appetite.

As there is an unconscious worship of idols and devils in the fanciful legends of the Manichaeans, so they knowingly serve the creature in their worship of the sun and moon. And in what they call their service of the Creator they really serve their own fancy, and not the Creator at all. For they deny that God created those things which the apostle plainly declares to be the creatures of God, when he says of food, "Every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it is received with thanksgiving." This is sound doctrine, which you cannot bear, and so turn to fables. The apostle praises the creature of God, but forbids the worship of it; and in the same way Moses gives due praise to the sun and moon, while at the same time he states the fact of their having been made by God, and placed by Him in their courses,—the sun to rule the day, and the moon to rule the night. And if earthly bodies are good, of which the apostle spoke when he said that no food is unclean, because every creature of God is good, much more the heavenly bodies, of which the sun and moon are the chief.

It has seemed to me ridiculous that any one should make a vow to abstain from swine's flesh. Be so good as to teach men to abstain from foolish vows and promises. Represent the use to be quite indifferent. No creature of God, received with thanksgiving, is to be rejected. The vow is ridiculous; the abstinence unnecessary.

Temperance referred not specially to drink, but to all pleasures; and it meant not abstaining, but going the right length and no further. It is a mistake to think that Christians ought all to be teetotallers; Mohammedanism, not Christianity, is the teetotal religion. Of course it may be the duty of a particular Christian, or of any Christian, at a particular time, to abstain from strong drink, either because he is the sort of man who cannot drink at all without drinking too much, or because he is with people who are inclined to drunkenness and must not encourage them by drinking himself. But the whole point is that he is abstaining, for a good reason, from something which he does not condemn and which he likes to see other people enjoying. One of the marks of a certain type of bad man is that he cannot give up a thing himself without wanting every one else to give it up. That is not the Christian way. An individual Christian may see fit to give up all sorts of things for special reasons — marriage, or meat, or beer, or the cinema; but the moment he starts saying the things are bad in themselves, or looking down his nose at other people who do use them, he has taken the wrong turning.

But as in the sensible world itself, though there is a considerable mutual opposition of its various elements, yet a certain harmony maintained in those opposites has been devised by the wisdom that rules the Universe, and thus there is produced a concord of the whole creation with itself, and the natural contrariety does not break the chain of agreement; in like manner, owing to the Divine wisdom, there is an admixture and interpenetration of the sensible with the intellectual department, in order that all things may equally have a share in the beautiful, and no single one of existing things be without its share in that superior world. For this reason the corresponding locality of the intellectual world is a subtle and mobile essence, which, in accordance with its supramundane habitation, has in its peculiar nature large affinity with the intellectual part. Now, by a provision of the supreme Mind there is an intermixture of the intellectual with the sensible world, in order that nothing in creation may be thrown aside as worthless, as says the Apostle, or be left without its portion of the Divine fellowship. On this account it is that the commixture of the intellectual and sensible in man is effected by the Divine Being, as the description of the cosmogony instructs us.

For, be it observed, there is no such thing in the world as evil irrespective of a will, and discoverable in a substance apart from that. Every creature of God is good, and nothing of His "to be rejected"; all that God made was "very good." But the habit of sinning entered as we have described, and with fatal quickness, into the life of man; and from that small beginning spread into this infinitude of evil. Then that godly beauty of the soul which was an imitation of the Archetypal Beauty, like fine steel blackened with the vicious rust, preserved no longer the glory of its familiar essence, but was disfigured with the ugliness of sin. This thing so great and precious, as the Scripture calls him, this being man, has fallen from his proud birthright.

"For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving."

If it be the creature of God, it is good. For "all things," it is said, "were very good." (Gen. i. 31) By speaking thus of things eatable, he by anticipation impugns the heresy of those who introduce an uncreated matter, and assert that these things proceed from it. But if it is good, why is it "sanctified by the word of God and prayers"? For it must be unclean, if it is to be sanctified? Not so, here he is speaking to those who thought that some of these things were common; therefore he lays down two positions: first, that no creature of God is unclean: secondly, that if it were become so, you have a remedy, seal it, give thanks, and glorify God, and all the uncleanness passes away. Can we then so cleanse that which is offered to an idol? If you know not that it was so offered. But if, knowing this, you partake of it, you will be unclean; not because it was offered to an idol, but because contrary to an express command, you thereby communicate with devils. So that it is not unclean by nature, but becomes so through your wilful disobedience. What then, is not swine's flesh unclean? By no means, when it is received with thanksgiving, and with the seal; nor is anything else. It is your unthankful disposition to God that is unclean.

The first cause of sin crept in from the enjoyment of food. What more salutary gift of God does our redeemed liberty use than that the will, which once did not know how to restrain itself from forbidden things, now knows how to restrain itself from lawful things? "Every creature of God is good, and nothing ought to be rejected, which is received with the giving of thanks." We were not created to seek out all the riches of the world with a foul and shameless greed. We can restrain voluntarily from what is lawful.

that every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving. For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.

that every creature of God is good. Paul speaks concerning things that are edible. He already anticipates the heresy of those introducing uncreated matter and said that those were foods.

and nothing is to be rejected. Therefore, neither should the idol's food be rejected, provided it is taken with prayer, if you are unaware: since by law you become guilty who are commanded not to be defiled by the food of idols; therefore, by transgressing the law, one is defiled: just as even what is entirely pure, and taken without thanksgiving, becomes defiled because of your voluntary ingratitude.

For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer. If it is sanctified, then is it unclean? Far from it! For everything is clean; but here two points are made against those who say that some foods are unclean. First, that every creature of God is good, and nothing is unclean. But if anyone considers something to be unclean, there is also such a thing as medicine [φάρμακον], he says. For it is sanctified by the word of God, that is, by prayer. Moreover, it is stated earlier: For it is by the word and prayer made to God that it is sanctified.

And again, when the Apostle Paul is read, and he heareth from him, "Everything which was created by God is holy, and nothing is to be rejected if it be received with thanksgiving; for it is sanctified through the word of God and prayer;" or another verse, "The belly for meats, and meats for the belly;" or that also which he spake, "Let not him that eateth not judge him that eateth." And in the other things like unto these which are written in the doctrine of Paul, the fool rejoiceth, and receiveth them gladly, without understanding the reason of the words.

And the glutton is not pleased to hear the other things which have been written by Paul upon fortitude and asceticism, either when he recounteth his numerous fastings, or when he crieth out to his disciples, saying, "Ye are dead unto the world," or when he writeth, "It is good for a man not to eat flesh, and not to drink wine," or his exhortation, "Through many tribulations it is meet for a man to enter into the kingdom of God," or his saying, "God shall bring both the belly and the food to nought;" and the reading of these and such like passages the glutton considereth unnecessary, and he is not pleased even to hear them.

Hast thou forgotten that which Paul crieth, saying, "Everything which hath been created by God is holy, and nothing is to be rejected if it be received with thanksgiving?" But take good heed unto me, in this case also, that thou receive not this word as free permission to eat flesh, and that thou make not use thereof, for the sake of ministering unto thy lusts, for unto the free it is written. If thou hast been tempted in thy soul which standeth upon the height of the freedom of Christ, and hast subdued by the power of thy patient endurance the bondage which is in thee, thou mayest make use of these words, if when thou eatest thou dost not eat with thy senses, and when thou drinkest thou dost not drink longingly that which thou drinkest. If thou canst eat like a dead man, eat, but if thou eatest like a living man, take heed that thou dost not taste thy food with pleasure; for the perception of the taste of that which thou eatest testifieth against thee that thou art still alive unto lust, and that thou eatest in order that thou mayest eat, and not that thou mayest live.

If, then he shows plainly that even wives themselves are so to be had as if they be not had, on account of the straits of the times, what would be his sentiments about these vain appliances of theirs? Why, are there not many, withal, who so do, and seal themselves up to eunuchhood for the sake of the kingdom of God, spontaneously relinquishing a pleasure so honourable, and (as we know) permitted? Are there not some who prohibit to themselves (the use of) the very "creature of God," abstaining from wine and animal food, the enjoyments of which border upon no peril or solicitude; but they sacrifice to God the humility of their soul even in the chastened use of food? Sufficiently, therefore, have you, too, used your riches and your delicacies; sufficiently have you cut down the fruits of your dowries, before (receiving) the knowledge of saving disciplines.

For "all things," it says, "were very good" (Gen. 1:31). By saying "creature of God," the apostle designated everything that can be used for food, and in this way already overthrew the error of those who introduce uncreated matter and say that everything came from it.

If something is sanctified, does this not mean that it is unclean? No, the apostle makes a qualification. First he essentially says that nothing is unclean, then with a qualification: suppose, he says, that there is something unclean, but you have a remedy: make the sign of the cross over it, give thanks, render glory to God — and the uncleanness disappears. For thanksgiving purifies all things; but the ungrateful person is himself unclean and defiled. Can we then in this way also purify food offered to idols? Yes, if we do not know that it is food offered to idols. But if we know and partake of it, then we are unclean, because we have violated the law commanding us not to partake in the table of demons. Consequently, it is your free will that is defiled by disobedience, while food by its nature is never unclean.

He says, therefore, every creature of God is good, i.e., in its nature: God saw all the things that he had made, and they were very good (Gen 1:31). For from a good source good alone proceeds.

But because many things are good in themselves, but their use is not good, he proves that every creature is good not only in itself, but also in its use:

first, he states his intent;

second, he proves it, at for it is sanctified.

He says, therefore: nothing is to be rejected, i.e., as though forbidden by divine law; although it might be rejected for some other reason. For example, to take poison is not a sin, but it must be avoided, because it is deadly. The same is true of other foods: they are not to be rejected as things, but only as stimuli to wantonness. Therefore, they are to be rejected only in view of reason's discretion and charity's demands: not that which goes into the mouth defiles a man (Matt 15:11).

But why were certain foods forbidden under the old law? Augustine states the reason in the book Against Faustus, when he says that, in that state not only words, but deeds also, prefigured Christ. Hence foods, vesture and sacrifice were figures of a coming state. Therefore, they were not forbidden in themselves, but because they were figures of unclean things. Thus a pig was a symbol of an impure life; consequently, its flesh was prohibited, because it was a sign that in Christ's law all uncleanness would be forbidden. This is Augustine's example. This name, 'tasteless,' can be considered insofar as it is a word composed of letters, and in this sense it is good; or it can be considered as a sign of such and such a thing, and then it is evil and forbidden. The use of every creature, therefore, is good in itself.

But if it is good, why is it "sanctified by the word of God and prayers"? For it must be unclean, if it is to be sanctified? Not so, here he is speaking to those who thought that some of these things were common; therefore he lays down two positions: first, that no creature of God is unclean: secondly, that if it were become so, you have a remedy, seal it, give thanks, and glorify God, and all the uncleanness passes away.

Now with thee He hath not done thus, but He hath purified and sanctified everything, as it is written, "Everything is sanctified by the word of God and by prayer," that henceforth the patient endurance of thy discretion might appear, and that thou mightest not eat, not because they were impure, but because it hath been said that it is good that thou shouldst not eat flesh nor drink wine, nor anything by which our brother may stumble, and also that thou mightest overcome lust by thine own will, and not by the restriction of the uncleanness of meats.

The reason for this is that if it were evil it would only be so, because the Devil had acquired power over it after man's sin: for as a result of man's sin the Devil obtained power over man and over the things that man owns. But Christ took away this power: and this is called sanctification. Consequently, everything we bless is thereby exorcised, because the blessing includes a prayer expelling the Devil. That is why the Apostle says, it is sanctified by the Word of God, i.e., by Christ, who sanctifies all things, and by the prayer of the faithful: for the continual prayer of a just man avails much (Jas 5:16).